Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 & : I have heard a LOT about this, and here is a rather interesting series of posts about this topic. I personally would not be at ALL surprised if Lyme diseases originated as a Bioweapon. (You will see below some of the reasons it is ideal for that use) - - GLEN At 08:32 AM 1/7/2006 -0800, you wrote: > http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/11/328067.html?c=on#c135836 > UK Indymedia > > Skip to content | Home | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | > About | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us > > A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists > and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial > coverage of important social and political issues. > US Govt Admits Lyme Disease a Bioweapon Lymerayja | 18.11.2005 > 13:47 | Anti-militarism | Bio-technology | Health | World > The existence of the Lyme disease epidemic is officially covered up > in the UK, its myriad presentations routinely misdiagnosed as everything > from " M.E. " to MS to hypochondria. This is the first admission by a US > government body that the cause is an incapacitating biowar agent. > > " SAN ANTONIO (AP) - >The $10.6 million Margaret Batts Tobin Laboratory Building will provide a >22,000-square-foot facility to study such diseases as anthrax, tularemia, >cholera, lyme disease, desert valley fever and other parasitic and fungal >diseases. >The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identified these diseases >as potential bioterrorism agents. " . > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10039154/ > > >This is the first admission by a US government body that Lyme disease is a >biological warfare agent. This is the reason that hundreds of thousands of >men, women and children around the world have been left to rot with wrong >diagnoses, or have had their Lyme disease acknowledged but been told that >it is an " easily-treated " disease, given 3 weeks' antibiotics, then told >to shove off when their symptoms carried on after that. > >In Britain the existence of the epidemic is denied completely, and >virtually no effort made to warn or educate the public about the dangers >of ticks, which carry the bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi. > >The Borrelia genus has been a subject of biowar experimentation at least >as far back as WW2, when the infamous Japanese Unit 731, which tortured >and experimented on live prisoners, studied it. > >The reality is, Lyme disease is for many a chronic, horrendous, >incapacitating disease producing crippling fatigue, constant pain, loss of >memory, possible paralysis, psychosis, blindness and even death. > >It was an ideal biowar agent because it evades detection on routine tests, >has an enormous range of different presentations, and can mimic everything >from ADHD to multiple sclerosis to carpal tunnel syndrome to rheumatoid >arthritis to chronic fatigue syndrome (M.E.) to lupus to schizophrenia. >Enemy medical staff would never know what had hit them, nor even that ONE >illness had hit their population, rather than an unexplained rise in >dozens of known conditions. > >Honest doctors and scientists who tried to treat or research Lyme disease >according to ethical principles have been viciously persecuted by >government-backed organisations in the US, Europe and elsewhere. Many >specialists in the US were threatened with loss of their license or had >anonymous, false allegations sent to the medical board, which tied them up >in mountains of paperwork and legal fees...some were forced out of >medicine or even driven to suicide. > > >Instead, medical disinfo agents, most of whom have a background in >military/biowarfare units, such as Dr Steere, Mark Klempner, Philip >Baker, McSweegan, Dennis, Alan Barbour etc were enabled to >assume top positions in Lyme research , CDC, NIH etc from where they >issued false information , covering up the true seriousness and chronic >nature of the disease, and comdemned untold numbers to a living hell. > >Please help Lyme patients publicise this scandal, which has caused >suffering on a massive scale. Contact me by email if you are interested in >helping. Thank you. > > > > > Lymerayja > e-mail: lymerayja@... > Homepage: http://www.lyme-rage.info > > Download this article in pdf format > Email this article to someone; > Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article > > Comments Hide the following 5 comments > > Bizarre! 18.11.2005 22:05 > Uh ---- I live only just over a hundred miles from the epicenter (where > Lyme disease was discovered). > >Kind of hard to think of an example of a moderately serious aliment LESS >suitable for military purposes. Yes indeed, if Lyme disease isn't treated >promptly it becomes much more difficult to treat and if neglected for a >year or so, just about impossible. BUT (a very big but) the dibilitating >symptoms don't appear faster than that either. > >I guess if you figured that the war was going to last several years might >be of some use. But guess what -- the generals NEVER plan on long wars > > Mike > e-mail: tdata.com " >stepbystpefarm <a> tdata.com > > >--------------------------------- > > Quickness of Lyme symptoms 22.11.2005 08:28 > Actually Mike, the symptoms of Lyme can appear a lot faster than you > think. I live in Pennsylvania, the most Lyme-infested state in the US, > and it is ramped here. I know that most people get flu-like symptoms not > long after the bite of an infected insect. As little as 2 hours after the > bite. And flu-like symptoms, as well as other phsychological symptoms, > can have anyone knocked out within a day. Some pretty scary stuff. > Marie > > >--------------------------------- > > NIH also admits they study Lyme as a Bioweapon 23.11.2005 23:29 > > From the website of the National Institutes of Health, the leading public > health agency in the US:# > >www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/detrick_qa.htm > > " Has there ever been an accident at a BSL-3 or BSL-4 facility? >No. A number of BSL-3 and BSL-4 facilities have operated safely in the >United States for 30 years. Rare accidents such as needlesticks may cause >exposure of laboratory staff; immediate treatment of any person so exposed >avoids any danger to other workers or to the community. " > >This is a lie. Carroll's book " Lab 257 " documents a number of >accidents at the Plum Island research centre (opposite Lyme, >Connecticut)involving extremely serious microbes even before they > " officially " were granted maximum-containment status. > >Also see the Boston Globe for reports of the escape of tularemia from the >BU biowarfare lab, covered up by Dr Mark Klempner, director of the lab and >leading Steere camp Lyme researcher. > > " Will the new facility pose any threat to the local community? > >A properly constructed and properly operated BSL-3 and BSL-4 facility >poses no threat to the local community... " > >Yeah, and clear the runway for oncoming flying pig . > > " Are NIAID scientists already studying potential agents of bioterrorism? > > > " Even before the current emphasis on biodefense, NIAID scientists had been >studying organisms that cause a variety of infectious diseases. >Potentially, some of these microbes also could be used as agents of >bioterrorism. Examples of diseases caused by these agents include plague, >Lyme disease, rabies, tick-borne encephalitis, West Nile virus disease, >influenza, anthrax infection, Ebola virus hemorrhagic fever, HIV, >tuberculosis, transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, and Q fever. All >of this work has been carried out in either the land or Montana >laboratories with required safety measures in place. " > >At last, some truth. NIAID (infectious diseases division of the National >Institutes of Health) admits it has been studying Lyme disease along with >anthrax, Ebola, plague etc as a potential " agent of bioterrorism " . > >Yet people who contract the disease are either told they don't have it, or >are told it's " easily cured in 3 weeks of doxycycline " and left to rot. > >To the person who said it takes a year before serious symptoms appear - >visit one of the major Lyme discussion sites, such as LymeNet, and you >will meet hundreds of people who rapidly developed serious symptoms after >a tick bite. > >Even the Steere camp (govt-backed medical disinfo) admit that serious >neurological and cardiac symptoms can develop within weeks of a tick bite. >The difference is, they pretend that these simply vanish, never to return, >and in general they massively and deliberately downplay the extent of the >pandemic and the chronicity and seriousness of the disease. > >LymeRayja > Lymerayja > e-mail: lymerayja@... > Homepage: http://www.lyme-rage.info > >--------------------------------- > > Need Additional Information on Lyme Disease 03.01.2006 05:37 > My granddaughter has contracted Lyme disease. I need more information > before I send this article to my daughter. > Sharon son > e-mail: grammieof13@... > > >--------------------------------- > > Military Lyme Support 05.01.2006 18:50 > This article confirms what I've suspected for a long time......and > hence why military folks need a lot of support for Lyme.....they're the > guinea pigs for this type of stuff! > Colleen Nicholson > e-mail: jcn4jc@... > Homepage: http://www.lymediseaseassociation.org > >--------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 The US gov't has NOT identified Lyme as a bioweapon. See their list at this URL: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol8no2/01-0164.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 We oughta ask them why they haven't mentioned it and then share the reasons that it makes an excellent bioagent. Agents that kill fairly quickly are not as effective as ones which pass slowly through a population undetected as a contagious disease. The former is soon recognized and then steps are taken to quarantine...thus keeping it under control. As we well know....Lyme and it's coinfections that are downplayed, are not under control. People may not die immediately but they become disabled. If " whoever " wants to bring down a nation, it is more effective to disable it. That's what McArthur says in a govt. document...that disabling agents are the most effective. Our govt seems to be using scare tactics intentionally to get us to dwell on the diseases which are fairly lethal but that haven't affected many, if any yet. I tend to focus more on what the govt isn't telling us...that always seems to be more accurate. Margie T overman74 <overman74@...> wrote: The US gov't has NOT identified Lyme as a bioweapon. See their list at this URL: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol8no2/01-0164.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 > The US gov't has NOT identified Lyme as a bioweapon. See their list > at this URL: > > http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol8no2/01-0164.htm Maybe not a bioweapon per se, but surely a biohazard. Lyme was one of the diseases that we gave to Saddam for his researchers, some 15 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 It appears to me that whoever was interviewed by MSNBC let the cat out of the bag by mistake. Of course, the CDC and the NIH will not reveal the fact that they have been studying Borrelia infections/infected ticks for decades, and they will not elaborate on the fact that they are beefing up their studies currently. If they openly post that they are studying LD as a bioweapon, then they have a bioweapon, terrorist situation on their hands right now with all the people in this country who are infected. They would have to address that issue. However, if they retract the information provided to MSNBC and say it was a journalistic error, then they can keep up the guise that they're so good at displaying. Reflect back on all the years that the CDC has been gathering information and statistics on Lyme disease case reports. Why? Why would they be so keen on gathering ifnormation on a disease that is " rare and easily cured " ? It is my opinion that they have been studying Lyme disease as a biological weapon this entire time, and all of us who are infected just happen to be the human test subjects. Go to the CDC website and find their own timeline for the Tuskegee Study, and you will get an accurate idea of what our public health agency is really all about and how they so easily conduct human research studies without providing informed consent. /Rodney, would you please be so kind as to direct me to any information you know of that can verify that the U.S. gave Saddam Hussein Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria? Thank you very much. One more thought: If the U.S. has been and is studying all these various illnesses as biological weapons, they are studying them from two angles. 1. To create vaccines to guard against infection from a terrorist attack. 2. To create more volatile biological weapons to use as weapons of war. They have the capability to create mutant strains that can be completely resistant to treatment. Ponder that thought; does it sound familiar? NOTE: These comments are my own personal opinion and do not reflect the mission and vision of our organization, L.E.A.P. Arizona, Inc. Tina J. President L.E.A.P. Arizona, Inc. Lyme Education Awareness Program www.leaparizona.com > > > The US gov't has NOT identified Lyme as a bioweapon. See their list > > at this URL: > > > > http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol8no2/01-0164.htm > > > > Maybe not a bioweapon per se, but surely a biohazard. Lyme was one of > the diseases that we gave to Saddam for his researchers, some 15 years ago. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 This is just Bartonella No country is going to turn away from something so developed all tehse years ago. The Trenches are still being sampled. The article is headed Bacterial weapon acting on humans. http://www.cbwinfo.com/Biological/Pathogens/BQ.HTML > > The US gov't has NOT identified Lyme as a bioweapon. See their list > at this URL: > > http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol8no2/01-0164.htm > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 Do you have a reliable source for this information? I would be very interested in seeing it. > > Maybe not a bioweapon per se, but surely a biohazard. Lyme was one of > the diseases that we gave to Saddam for his researchers, some 15 years ago. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 > /Rodney, would you please be so kind as to direct me to any > information you know of that can verify that the U.S. gave Saddam > Hussein Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria? Thank you very much. It was on the list of diseases that was sent to him. I cannot for the life of me recall exactly where I saw it. BUT, I am pretty darn sure that it was on the news when we were have that Anthrax problem in '02 AND that it was talked about by, cant recall his name ughhhh, when Bush was making his case for war against Hussein stating all the infectious diseases that Saddam had access too. > > One more thought: If the U.S. has been and is studying all these > various illnesses as biological weapons, they are studying them from > two angles. 1. To create vaccines to guard against infection from > a terrorist attack. 2. To create more volatile biological weapons > to use as weapons of war. They have the capability to create mutant > strains that can be completely resistant to treatment. Ponder that > thought; does it sound familiar? > > NOTE: These comments are my own personal opinion and do not reflect > the mission and vision of our organization, L.E.A.P. Arizona, Inc. > > Tina J. > President > L.E.A.P. Arizona, Inc. > Lyme Education Awareness Program > www.leaparizona.com > > > > > > > > > > > The US gov't has NOT identified Lyme as a bioweapon. See > their list > > > at this URL: > > > > > > http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol8no2/01-0164.htm > > > > > > > > Maybe not a bioweapon per se, but surely a biohazard. Lyme was > one of > > the diseases that we gave to Saddam for his researchers, some 15 > years ago. > > > > > > > > > > > > Support group for Oregon residents: > Oregon_Lyme/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 I would also like to be able to verify this information. Very important. Thanks. overman74 <overman74@...> wrote: Do you have a reliable source for this information? I would be very interested in seeing it. > > Maybe not a bioweapon per se, but surely a biohazard. Lyme was one of > the diseases that we gave to Saddam for his researchers, some 15 years ago. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 I know it would be important. BUT, bet it cant be found. Seems a lot of things, such as the Wolfowitz Doctrine, have been removed from the web. Doing a search, but bet it wont be found. Pretty sure it was on a news cast anyhow, not the web. Re: [ ] US Govt Admits Lyme Disease a Bioweapon > I would also like to be able to verify this information. Very important. Thanks. > > overman74 <overman74@...> wrote: Do you have a reliable source for this information? I would be very > interested in seeing it. > > > > > > Maybe not a bioweapon per se, but surely a biohazard. Lyme was > one of > > the diseases that we gave to Saddam for his researchers, some 15 > years ago. > > > > > > > > > Support group for Oregon residents: > Oregon_Lyme/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 Thanks very much for checking. Perhaps we'll run across it in our search for other related topics. /Rodney <rod@...> wrote: I know it would be important. BUT, bet it cant be found. Seems a lot of things, such as the Wolfowitz Doctrine, have been removed from the web. Doing a search, but bet it wont be found. Pretty sure it was on a news cast anyhow, not the web. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.