Guest guest Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation, Too Much of a Good Thing? Researchers have investigated the effect of oral vitamin D on falls and fractures in older women. They found that how you take it might make a difference. Also, frailty is a huge health problem for older people. However, what actually is frailty, is it inevitable and can it be reversed? Transcript (This transcript was typed from a recording of the program. The ABC cannot guarantee its complete accuracy because of the possibility of mishearing and occasional difficulty in identifying speakers.) Norman Swan: Today on the Health Report: delving into the used and abused concept of frailty -- what exactly does it mean and why does it occur, and an extraordinary program that looks like preventing it. And the vitamin of the moment, vitamin D. The Health Report was probably the first place in Australia to cover research showing the widespread benefits of vitamin D, from cancer prevention to reduced falls and fractures set against the widespread extent of vitamin D deficiency even in a sunny country like Australia. But Australian research recently published internationally has sounded a note of warning. It relates to the way vitamin D may be increasingly given by doctors. Professor Geoff Nicholson is head of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences at the University of Melbourne and director of Endocrinology at Barwon Health in Geelong. He and his team have had a long interest in bone health in the community. Geoff Nicholson: We've done a survey in Geelong amongst women, and up to half of the women of all ages have some degree of vitamin D insufficiency. In the case of elderly women in the middle of winter it can be quite significant. Norman Swan: And people have related this to falls? Geoff Nicholson: Yes, vitamin D deficiency is associated with instability of gait and weakness of the proximal muscles and increased falls. Norman Swan: And the proximal muscles are the ones that are at the top of the leg? Geoff Nicholson: Yes, and perhaps also the speed of muscles because people recover from a little trip by quickly moving their legs to replace them and get back their balance but if they can't move them quickly then they fall over. Norman Swan: So you decided to test supplementation which has been tested in other situations. Geoff Nicholson: Yes, one of the problems with many of the studies has been compliance, people are asked to take vitamin D every day usually with calcium and in a number of large studies the proportion of people actually taking the therapy at the end of the study has been down to 50%. There was a very famous study done in French nursing homes where compliance is high because medication was administered by the staff and that showed a reduction in fractures and that was really the landmark study. Subsequent studies have had quite mixed results. So what we decided to do was to address the problems of compliance, we decided to give the vitamin D once a year. Now vitamin D is stored in the body and it was previously thought to be quite safe to give a loading dose. We focused on the people most at risk, so these were older women over 70 who were actually living in the community. We recruited 2,256 women who participated for between three and five years, so it's a very large study over a long time. Norman Swan: And a very large dose, 500,000 units of vitamin D. Geoff Nicholson: That's right but in a daily dose it's a little bit less than 1,500 units a day which is not really an extraordinary daily dose. Norman Swan: And they got this at the beginning of winter? Geoff Nicholson: Yes. We had some other data where we measured vitamin D levels throughout the year and we found the vitamin D levels dropped during winter. We also observed that as the vitamin D levels dropped the number of fractures went up so we had more fractures during the winter months than we had during the summer months. So we estimated that if we could stop that drop in the vitamin D levels during winter we would have up to a 22% reduction in fractures. Norman Swan: So what did you find? Geoff Nicholson: Well we found exactly the opposite. We got a 26% increase in fractures. Norman Swan: No particular women were more likely than others? Geoff Nicholson: No, there were no characteristics that selected whether people were more likely to have a fracture or not including their calcium intake. Norman Swan: This must have shocked the living daylights out of you? Geoff Nicholson: It did indeed so we went back and made sure that there hadn't been any errors, we actually tested the study drug to make sure that it was correct. There was some confirmation in that about 130 of the ladies were involved in an intensive study and we measured a whole bunch of functions and were able to track the vitamin D levels and that confirmed that the people who were on the active study medication actually got a significant rise in vitamin D. Norman Swan: So what could be going on? I mean people have given various explanations for this including that you actually might have made them so well with their vitamin D that they go out more and put themselves more at risk. Geoff Nicholson: Well we did an analysis of that and there were not increased fractures in people who were active. Norman Swan: You didn't have an epidemic of well being and people squash playing? Geoff Nicholson: No. What we also found is an increase in falls, a 15% increase in falls amongst the group taking the vitamin D. Norman Swan: So what's happening? Geoff Nicholson: That was a great puzzle. We did a post hoc analysis looking at when the falls and fractures were occurring and we found that the increased rate of falls and fractures was much higher in the first three months. So that tells us that it's got something to do with the sudden rise in vitamin D levels. Norman Swan: And what could that be doing? Geoff Nicholson: It could be interfering with vitamin D signalling, there are vitamin D receptors basically in every cell in the body. Norman Swan: And we should say here that vitamin D is not really a vitamin it's a hormone, it's a chemical messenger. Geoff Nicholson: Yes, that's right, it interacts with the receptor in the cells and whether that interaction is interfered with by the presence of high levels of other vitamin D metabolites is unknown. Norman Swan: So what do you think the message is at this state of knowledge here, it is only just one study, that if doctors attempted to give a whopping great dose of vitamin D because they don't think people are going to take it on a daily basis, just be a bit careful? Geoff Nicholson: Oh I think they should severely rethink that strategy. It's not the only study, there's another study, they gave a large group of elderly men and women once a year vitamin D as an intramuscular dose. There was a clear effect on increasing fractures in the older women. Norman Swan: And why should it be different for men and women? Geoff Nicholson: Excellent question. No idea. Norman Swan: Are you starting to question whether daily doses of vitamin D may be toxic as well? Geoff Nicholson: No, I don't think so, I think there are a couple of studies with daily doses of 400 to 800 units per day and a couple of those have shown a clear benefit and reduction in fractures. Norman Swan: But some people are giving 4,000 units a day. Geoff Nicholson: Yes, well I think that one needs to question that. The situation gets even more confusing because there was one study where the subjects were given 100,000 units every four months and that showed a reduction in fractures. Norman Swan: So the bottom line here is that the vitamin D story and falls may still be right but only for moderate daily doses of vitamin D. The king hit to save you taking daily vitamin D is to be avoided, at least at this state of knowledge. Geoff Nicholson: Yes, I'd agree. Norman Swan: Is there any evidence that this practice of giving the one big dose a year is prevalent in Australia? Geoff Nicholson: I don't know the statistics of that but certainly I'm aware and I do see patients who are given doses for example of 50,000 a week or more. These high doses are available and are becoming increasingly available. Now there are people who have more severe issues, for example fat mal-absorption or have had bowel surgery where one needs higher doses because this is a fat soluble vitamin, it is absorbed through the gut and if the patients have mal-absorption and you have to give higher doses - that's a different matter. Norman Swan: Because they are losing a lot of it in their poo. Geoff Nicholson: Exactly yes. Norman Swan: Professor Geoff Nicholson is Head of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences at the University of Melbourne. You're with the Health Report here on ABC Radio National, I'm Norman Swan. References: KM et al. Annual High-Dose Oral Vitamin D and Falls and Fractures in Older Women. JAMA 2010;303(18):1815-1822 Bess Dawson- and S. High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation, Too Much of a Good Thing? (Editorial) JAMA 2010;303(18):1861-1862 http://www.abc.net.au/rn/healthreport/stories/2010/2942983.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.