Guest guest Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 wroteI think though, one of your most telling and nonsensical statements has to be the following: Thursday, May 20, 2010, 8:59:47 PM, you wrote: >I have more trust for doctors' observations in practice than I do drug >"studies" which are notoriously biased in a multitude of ways, from out and >out lying about results to skewed questions about what to study in the >first place (and there is plenty of information to Google on this). wrote"This IN NO WAY means that all scientific studies are flawed.!!!"Where in 's quote is the word "scientific"?Studies and Science are different, yes, some studies are done scientifically, meaning that they adhere to certain agreed to principles, but NOT all. The studies that alluded to are those that are frequently done by people who have a bias toward a given conclusion. wrote"You are using a similarly bad logical approach in the next thing you say too: It was" >doctors' observations that noticed thalidomide was bad for pregnant women, >and it was doctors' observations that noticed that children born to women >taking LDN are exceptionally vigorous. I trust this kind of "folk" >knowledge more than the medical-industrial sort of knowledge. just says that she trusts the observations of people on the ground rather than those not in touch with patients. wrote"The amount of cash that is 'extracted' from scammers selling things like the things you recommend, is abhorrent and I think we should be trying to STROP such practises, not encourage them."Yeah, right, is selling and making lots of money with naltrexone especially the low dose nalrexone which I buy for about 28 cents per day. Say, , how much of that 28 cents do you get?Sterling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.