Guest guest Posted June 15, 2010 Report Share Posted June 15, 2010 Further to my earlier email from Dr Zagon, I questioned LDN being an immuno suppressant - please see his response below and articles attached. Jayne Crocker Dear Jayne: We have a paper in press - Immunobiology - that B lymphocytes are suppressed in cell proliferation by the OGF-OGFr axis - this is how LDN does its job. When the paper comes out I will send it to you. We have another paper submitted showing that T lymphocytes are also suppressed in cell proliferation by OGF. Our studies under in vivo conditions are underway and stand in agreement with our other results. I have spent considerable time in these studies reviewing much of the flawed investigations from past researchers giving the false impression that LDN is an immunostimulant. There are papers suggesting otherwise - we have nailed it down to the molecular level. Knockdown OGFr and OGF does not work!!! Now, use your head - would you want more immune response if you have MS or arthritis or lupus. No. This would make autoimmune diseases worse. If I did not do so earlier, I will attach 2 papers on MS. Dr. Zagon 2 of 2 File(s) LDNMS.pdf v1310_154_161_2010OGFMS.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 How can LDN suppress the immune system when it can affect the effects of steroids, render them incapable of working and steroids can do just the opposite to LDN? > > Further to my earlier email from Dr Zagon, I questioned LDN being an immuno > suppressant - please see his response below and articles attached. > > Jayne Crocker > > Dear Jayne: > We have a paper in press - Immunobiology - that B lymphocytes are > suppressed in cell proliferation by the OGF-OGFr axis > - this is how LDN does its job. When the paper comes out I will send it to > you. We have another paper submitted showing that T lymphocytes are also > suppressed in cell proliferation by OGF. Our studies under in vivo > conditions are underway and stand in agreement with our other results. > I have spent considerable time in these studies reviewing much of > the flawed investigations from past researchers giving the false impression > that LDN is an immunostimulant. There are papers suggesting otherwise - we > have nailed it down to the molecular level. Knockdown OGFr and OGF does not > work!!! Now, use your head - would you want more immune response if you > have MS or arthritis or lupus. No. This would make autoimmune diseases > worse. If I did not do so earlier, I will attach 2 papers on MS. > Dr. Zagon > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 > Now, use your head - would you want more immune response if you > > have MS or arthritis or lupus. No. This would make autoimmune diseases > > worse. If I did not do so earlier, I will attach 2 papers on MS. > > Dr. Zagon I'm sorry, but this viewpoint on autoimmune diseases is outmoded. It is now well known among cutting edge researchers, nutritional therapists, naturopaths, and integrative physicians that autoimmune diseases are the result of too little immune activity, not too much. Probably the old view of such diseases is why there has been so little progress in treating them. But stimulation of the immune system, strengthening of the immune system, increases health and decreases debility from such diseases. I also agree with Art's and Cris's comments. -- ~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ --A.J. Muste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 The science Zagon is doing is really not disputable - looking at these cells at the molecular level is as deep as we humans can look into our biology at present. Immuno-deficiency diseases are not in the same class as auto-immune diseases - two different dysfunctions.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immune_system#HypersensitivityDisorders in the immune system can result in disease. Immunodeficiency occurs when the immune system is less active than normal, resulting in recurring and life-threatening infections. Immunodeficiency can either be the result of a genetic disease, such as severe combined immunodeficiency, or be produced by pharmaceuticals or an infection, such as the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) that is caused by the retrovirus HIV. In contrast, autoimmune diseases result from a hyperactive immune system attacking normal tissues as if they were foreign organisms. Common autoimmune diseases include Hashimoto's thyroiditis, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus type 1, and lupus erythematosus. Immunology covers the study of all aspects of the immune system, having significant relevance to health and diseases. Further investigation in this field is expected to play a serious role in promotion of health and treatment of diseases.From: Baker <vbaker@...>Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: FW: Dosing of LDN twice a day at 4.5mgTo: low dose naltrexone Date: Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 10:12 PM> Now, use your head - would you want more immune response if you> > have MS or arthritis or lupus. No. This would make autoimmune diseases> > worse. If I did not do so earlier, I will attach 2 papers on MS.> > Dr. ZagonI'm sorry, but this viewpoint on autoimmune diseases is outmoded. It is now well known among cutting edge researchers, nutritional therapists, naturopaths, and integrative physicians that autoimmune diseases are the result of too little immune activity, not too much.Probably the old view of such diseases is why there has been so little progress in treating them. But stimulation of the immune system, strengthening of the immune system, increases health and decreases debility from such diseases.I also agree with Art's and Cris's comments.--~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ --A.J. Muste------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 Thanks you , Cris, and others, for making these points and so clearly. I have to say what you write describes what I've always understood and more, and it makes sense, both theoretically and in my own experience. Personally I find Dr Zagon's comments and the tone he uses more confusing than enlightening and can't relate my experience to them at all.When I started LDN in April last year I was as nervous about it as the next person. I relied on the advice given on this group and 's board from people who've been using LDN for years. Like most people I was lucky and have no problems with it - on the contrary I've not regretted taking it for one moment. At the very least it's saved me from having to have surgery and I've enjoying many more benefits. I feel badly for people who aren't so lucky and don't respond to LDN so well. I often think that it would be really beneficial if researchers could spend more time trying to understand why.Margaret From: Baker <vbaker@...>low dose naltrexone Sent: Thu, June 17, 2010 5:12:47 AMSubject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: FW: Dosing of LDN twice a day at 4.5mg > Now, use your head - would you want more immune response if you > > have MS or arthritis or lupus. No. This would make autoimmune diseases > > worse. If I did not do so earlier, I will attach 2 papers on MS. > > Dr. Zagon I'm sorry, but this viewpoint on autoimmune diseases is outmoded. It is now well known among cutting edge researchers, nutritional therapists, naturopaths, and integrative physicians that autoimmune diseases are the result of too little immune activity, not too much. Probably the old view of such diseases is why there has been so little progress in treating them. But stimulation of the immune system, strengthening of the immune system, increases health and decreases debility from such diseases. I also agree with Art's and Cris's comments. -- ~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ --A.J. Muste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 MMmmm I have to disagree .. I have MS complicated by Hashimotos. This seems to be common for others on this forum. My immune system was in overdrive attacking my body. This was confirmed by testing and being put on prednisone to knock out my immune system. I am a currently in remission for my MS, per my doc. However I am still fighting the battle with Hashimotos. Every person with immune problems has different levels of medical issues. Mari Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: FW: Dosing of LDN twice a day at 4.5mg > Now, use your head - would you want more immune response if you > > have MS or arthritis or lupus. No. This would make autoimmune diseases > > worse. If I did not do so earlier, I will attach 2 papers on MS. > > Dr. Zagon I'm sorry, but this viewpoint on autoimmune diseases is outmoded. It is now well known among cutting edge researchers, nutritional therapists, naturopaths, and integrative physicians that autoimmune diseases are the result of too little immune activity, not too much. Probably the old view of such diseases is why there has been so little progress in treating them. But stimulation of the immune system, strengthening of the immune system, increases health and decreases debility from such diseases. I also agree with Art's and Cris's comments. -- ~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ --A.J. Muste ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 All this Wikipedia article is doing is regurgitating the old viewpoint that is being debunked by integrative medicine. I have autoimmune diseases (Hashimoto's, fibromyalgia, vitilago), and I've also been studying alternatives to Western medicine, and intergrative medicine, since the late 1970s. Just like everyone else, I bought the old theory, and when I found that I had autoimmune disease in the early 2000s I thought that it meant my immune system was overactive. I since learned differently. Scientists always say that they can dissect the truth out of the body, but the body holds mysteries still. For instance, only recently has science " discovered " that phytonutrients, such as natural blue and red colors in food, are extremely important to our health, whereas in the past it was assumed " everything " was known about the molecules of food. I've been having the argument, with scientistic types, about the difference between whole nutrition and dissected nutrition since the 1970s. Now science catches up to what many traditions have long known. I believe that similar limitations apply to these questions about LDN. Scientistic thinking is the belief that science can tell us everything about our world, coupled with the belief that anyone who disagrees is mentally deficient. I uncouple myself from scientistic thinking, because I know that our bodies contain mysteries that are not yet, and may never be, unravelled. -- At 11:43 PM 6/16/2010, you wrote: >The science Zagon is doing is really not disputable - looking at these >cells at the molecular level is as deep as we humans can look into our >biology at present. Immuno-deficiency diseases are not in the same class >as auto-immune diseases - two different dysfunctions. > ><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immune_system#Hypersensitivity>http://en.wikipedi\ a.org/wiki/Immune_system#Hypersensitivity > >Disorders in the immune system can result in disease. ><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immunodeficiency>Immunodeficiency occurs >when the immune system is less active than normal, resulting in recurring >and life-threatening infections. Immunodeficiency can either be the result >of a <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_disease>genetic disease, such >as <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_combined_immunodeficiency>severe >combined immunodeficiency, or be produced by pharmaceuticals or an >infection, such as the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS>acquired immune >deficiency syndrome (AIDS) that is caused by the ><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrovirus>retrovirus ><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV>HIV. In contrast, ><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoimmunity>autoimmune diseases result from >a hyperactive immune system attacking normal tissues as if they were >foreign organisms. Common autoimmune diseases include ><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashimoto%27s_thyroiditis>Hashimoto's >thyroiditis, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheumatoid_arthritis>rheumatoid >arthritis, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diabetes_mellitus_type_1>diabetes >mellitus type 1, and ><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lupus_erythematosus>lupus erythematosus. ><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immunology>Immunology covers the study of >all aspects of the immune system, having significant relevance to ><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health>health and diseases. Further >investigation in this field is expected to play a serious role in >promotion of health and treatment of diseases. > > > >From: Baker <vbaker@...> >Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: FW: Dosing of LDN twice a day at 4.5mg >low dose naltrexone >Date: Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 10:12 PM > > > > Now, use your head - would you want more immune response if you > > > have MS or arthritis or lupus. No. This would make autoimmune diseases > > > worse. If I did not do so earlier, I will attach 2 papers on MS. > > > Dr. Zagon > >I'm sorry, but this viewpoint on autoimmune diseases is outmoded. It is now >well known among cutting edge researchers, nutritional therapists, >naturopaths, and integrative physicians that autoimmune diseases are the >result of too little immune activity, not too much. > >Probably the old view of such diseases is why there has been so little >progress in treating them. But stimulation of the immune system, >strengthening of the immune system, increases health and decreases debility >from such diseases. > >I also agree with Art's and Cris's comments. > >-- ~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ --A.J. Muste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 Yes, that's what it looks like to conventional Western medicine. But the answer for ultimate healing lies in strengthening the immune system. It's attacking the body because of weakness, not strength. -- At 11:10 AM 6/17/2010, you wrote: >MMmmm I have to disagree .. I have MS complicated by Hashimotos. This >seems to be common for others on this forum. My immune system was in >overdrive attacking my body. This was confirmed by testing and being put >on prednisone to knock out my immune system. I am a currently in >remission for my MS, per my doc. However I am still fighting the battle >with Hashimotos. Every person with immune problems has different levels >of medical issues. Mari >Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: FW: Dosing of LDN twice a day at > 4.5mg > > > > Now, use your head - would you want more immune response if you > > > have MS or arthritis or lupus. No. This would make autoimmune diseases > > > worse. If I did not do so earlier, I will attach 2 papers on MS. > > > Dr. Zagon > >I'm sorry, but this viewpoint on autoimmune diseases is outmoded. It is now >well known among cutting edge researchers, nutritional therapists, >naturopaths, and integrative physicians that autoimmune diseases are the >result of too little immune activity, not too much. > >Probably the old view of such diseases is why there has been so little >progress in treating them. But stimulation of the immune system, >strengthening of the immune system, increases health and decreases debility >from such diseases. > >I also agree with Art's and Cris's comments. > >-- ~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ --A.J. Muste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 LDN is a conventional Western medicine. So I guess how it works would not apply to your experience, yet the way it works for me appears consistent with what Zagon's research explains.I'll just wait for more research to uncover more details. It's very exciting.“The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth.†Neils BohrJackie>MMmmm I have to disagree .. I have MS complicated by Hashimotos. This >seems to be common for others on this forum. My immune system was in >overdrive attacking my body. This was confirmed by testing and being put >on prednisone to knock out my immune system. I am a currently in >remission for my MS, per my doc. However I am still fighting the battle >with Hashimotos. Every person with immune problems has different levels >of medical issues. Mari>Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry>> Re: [low dose naltrexone] Re: FW: Dosing of LDN twice a day at> 4.5mg>>> > Now, use your head - would you want more immune response if you> > > have MS or arthritis or lupus. No. This would make autoimmune diseases> > > worse. If I did not do so earlier, I will attach 2 papers on MS.> > > Dr. Zagon>>I'm sorry, but this viewpoint on autoimmune diseases is outmoded. It is now>well known among cutting edge researchers, nutritional therapists,>naturopaths, and integrative physicians that autoimmune diseases are the>result of too little immune activity, not too much.>>Probably the old view of such diseases is why there has been so little>progress in treating them. But stimulation of the immune system,>strengthening of the immune system, increases health and decreases debility>from such diseases.>>I also agree with Art's and Cris's comments.>>--~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ --A.J. Muste------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 I find Dr Zagon's information extremely interesting, and expect much of it will prove to be exactly what is happening with LDN. I would like to make a point though that in MS, Lupus or in RA; you might want an EFFECTIVE inflammation to clear an infectious cause of these disease(s). The problem is that in these disease processes the typical inflammation is not functionally effective in clearing the purported pathogens. If LDN can modulate the patient's immune system to not have such an ineffective immune response by being immuno-suppressive, then that can be a valuable tool to reduce an inappropriate inflammatory process, as has been repeatedly shown. That LDN does not totally disable the immune response seems pretty clear, or people on LDN would be getting acute infections much more often than they do. That is why I would tend to use the term immuno-modulatory to describe the actions of LDN. I do not feel that LDN precludes clearance of chronic infections by permitting the enabling the innate immune response through activation of the Vitamin D receptor to transcribe antimicrobial peptides. We at Chronic Illness Recovery use a non-calcigenic vitamin D analog to do just this, and so far have seen signs that it can be compatible with the use of LDN even if LDN down-regulates certain immune cells subsets. Interestingly Vitamin D analogs can be both immuno-suppressive and immune stimulating at the same time by different biochemical mechanisms. One can not totally rule out that even LDN itself might have more that one mechanism of action that affects physiologic responses, given the tremendous complexity of biochemical systems. Many believe that strong pain itself can be immuno-suppressive, so a reduction in pain may still have a net positive effect even if some opioids (even endogenous) do contribute to immuno-suppression by reducing numbers of some immune cell sets. Pain, the Immune System, and Opioimmunotoxicity http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cog/ria/2004/00000008/00000001/art00001 Pain management: is opioid immunosuppression a clinical problem? http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL & _udi=B6VKN-4K9C2S8-2 & _user=1\ 0 & _coverDate=08%2F31%2F2006 & _rdoc=1 & _fmt=high & _orig=search & _sort=d & _docanchor= & v\ iew=c & _acct=C000050221 & _version=1 & _urlVersion=0 & _userid=10 & md5=ef34f6f07f7624c14\ 866ce9b60346dd9 In my opinion, if needed one would want to choose an opioid that is the least immuno-suppressive in most cases if possible, and studying the endogenous opioids produced by LDN's intermittent blockade is key information. In any case, in my experience LDN sure beats long term steroids, or drugs like Enbrel or Remicade in most applications, and is still usually preferable to exogenous opiates when it is possible to use it in their place. best, P.B. > > Further to my earlier email from Dr Zagon, I questioned LDN being an immuno > suppressant - please see his response below and articles attached. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 which opioids are non-immunosuppressing?~EileenOn Jun 21, 2010, at 1:22 AM, ursus357 wrote: In my opinion, if needed one would want to choose an opioid that is the least immuno-suppressive in most cases if possible, and studying the endogenous opioids produced by LDN's intermittent blockade is key information. In any case, in my experience LDN sure beats long term steroids, or drugs like Enbrel or Remicade in most applications, and is still usually preferable to exogenous opiates when it is possible to use it in their place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Eileen,I am not absolutely certain about this but so far I think the only endogenous opioid peptide that has been directly observed to have immunosuppressive characteristics is methionine enkephalin also known as OGF or opioid growth factor in a role other than as a neurotransmitter.There may be others that have been observed that I don't know about, or that have not yet been discovered to have this effect.Jackie In my opinion, if needed one would want to choose an opioid that is the least immuno-suppressive in most cases if possible, and studying the endogenous opioids produced by LDN's intermittent blockade is key information. In any case, in my experience LDN sure beats long term steroids, or drugs like Enbrel or Remicade in most applications, and is still usually preferable to exogenous opiates when it is possible to use it in their place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.