RE: Interstital Cystitis (Bladder) and Lyme- preliminay report on LYMEMD - DMSO

[Guest guest]

Keep in mind that Wiki tends to err on the side of big money. Go outside and

get more information! I HIGHLY recommend the book! Its an eye opener!

> [ ] Interstital Cystitis (Bladder) and

> Lyme- preliminay report on LYMEMD - DMSO

>

>

> Now I recall why I never tried it .. it is used for a wide range of

> applications, including medical conditions, but if you read

> this in full

> .. I air on the side of caution .. I think its mode of action is an

> alergesic(numbing agent)..at least thats my guess. Still, as with

> pharmicueticals .. Im just not sure this is safe. Esp when taking so

> many other herbsm etc .. and so many imblances .. Seems like it has

> the potential to effect more than it is intended to...

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyl_sulfoxide

> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyl_sulfoxide>

>

>

> > Have you tried DMSO? It's the one aliment that the FDS HAS

> approved it

> for.

> > I use it for a variety of things and I am very happy to

> have it in my

> > medicine cabinet!

> >

> > Www.dmso.org

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Get the book " DMSO: Nature's Healer " or at least read the FAQ page at the

website below. I use it for many things on myself and my animals. It's well

worth investigating for yourself!

> [ ] Interstital Cystitis (Bladder) and

> Lyme- preliminay report on LYMEMD - DMSO

>

>

> Hi .. nopers, havent tried it yet .. do recalling

> hearing about it

> for something lyme relating in 2000. Does it clear frequent

> urination ?

> Do you know how it works ? Does one have to use it continualaly ?

>

> Thank you...

>

>

>

> > Have you tried DMSO? It's the one aliment that the FDS HAS

> approved it

> for.

> > I use it for a variety of things and I am very happy to

> have it in my

> > medicine cabinet!

> >

> > Www.dmso.org

>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

> Buy Healing Lyme: Natural Healing And Prevention of Lyme

> Borreliosis And Its Coinfections by Buhner at one of

> these locations:

> http://tinyurl.com/3bgm5d

>

>

[Guest guest]

Actualy wikipedia.org ,, if you read .. is an International collaberative

Project anyone can contribute to.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About and other links on the left of

the page no one pays attention to..But who's " appropriate standards " is the

question...

" Visitors do not need specialized qualifications to contribute. Wikipedia's

intent is to have articles that cover existing knowledge, not create new

knowledge (original research). This means that people of all ages and cultural

and social backgrounds can write Wikipedia articles. Most of the articles can be

edited by anyone with access to the Internet, simply by clicking the edit this

page link. Anyone is welcome to add information, cross-references, or citations,

as long as they do so within Wikipedia's editing policies and to an appropriate

standard. Substandard or disputed information is subject to removal. Users need

not worry about accidentally damaging Wikipedia when adding or improving

information, as other editors are always around to advise or correct obvious

errors, and Wikipedia's software is carefully designed to allow easy reversal of

editorial mistakes. "

We should all look up Lyme .. write a piece based on research and submit it,

afterall a lot of people rely on this site and comes up first in the google

search engines .. anyone with the writing ability to put together a bit of the

truth and submit it ?

Since when do we trust gov to make correct calls ? Im not knocking DMSO

because there was negative comment on wikipedia. But, because of its properties

... Im using intuition on this one... Other sites/books have their agenda's as

well keep in mind.

[Guest guest]

One problem I have heard of is large corporations hiring " wiki editors " to

keep their side of the story going. Editing wars are no fun, especially

against someone being paid to promote something!

Sorry I have no facts or references to back this up, but if you read the

articles pertaining to big pharma you will see the trend.

> [ ] Re: Interstital Cystitis (Bladder)

> and Lyme- preliminay report on LYMEMD - DMSO

>

> Actualy wikipedia.org ,, if you read .. is an

> International collaberative Project anyone can contribute to.

>

> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About and other

> links on the left of the page no one pays attention to..But

> who's " appropriate standards " is the question...

>

> " Visitors do not need specialized qualifications to

> contribute. Wikipedia's intent is to have articles that cover

> existing knowledge, not create new knowledge (original

> research). This means that people of all ages and cultural

> and social backgrounds can write Wikipedia articles. Most of

> the articles can be edited by anyone with access to the

> Internet, simply by clicking the edit this page link. Anyone

> is welcome to add information, cross-references, or

> citations, as long as they do so within Wikipedia's editing

> policies and to an appropriate standard. Substandard or

> disputed information is subject to removal. Users need not

> worry about accidentally damaging Wikipedia when adding or

> improving information, as other editors are always around to

> advise or correct obvious errors, and Wikipedia's software is

> carefully designed to allow easy reversal of editorial mistakes. "

>

> We should all look up Lyme .. write a piece based on

> research and submit it, afterall a lot of people rely on this

> site and comes up first in the google search engines ..

> anyone with the writing ability to put together a bit of the

> truth and submit it ?

>

> Since when do we trust gov to make correct calls ? Im not

> knocking DMSO because there was negative comment on

> wikipedia. But, because of its properties .. Im using

> intuition on this one... Other sites/books have their

> agenda's as well keep in mind.

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

> Buy Healing Lyme: Natural Healing And Prevention of Lyme

> Borreliosis And Its Coinfections by Buhner at one of

> these locations:

> http://tinyurl.com/3bgm5d

>

>

[Guest guest]

>

> We should all look up Lyme .. write a piece based on research and submit it,

afterall a lot of people rely on this site and comes up first in the google

search engines .. anyone with the writing ability to put together a bit of the

truth and submit it ?

I remember some stories from a few years ago about how lots of 'sensitive' Lyme

information (e.g. about Plum Island) was removed from Wikipedia articles by

sleazebags working for the US Government. All to protect us, of course

[Guest guest]

Oh, No Doubt Pharm Ind is evil to no end .. they produce a few good products,

but their ethic's and the extent they will go to with miss information and

outrights lies that harm peoples lives is worse then the tobacco industry...

[Guest guest]

Wikipedia should have a record of that in the archives. As far as I know, it is

still a " public domain " type of organization, so the webmasters are unlikely to

knowingly participate in some sort of information conspiracy. Perhaps a brief

note to the site managers re that deletion would pull the information up out of

the trashbin.

Steve C.

From: knot_weed <tek0nik@...>

Subject: [ ] Re: Interstital Cystitis (Bladder) and Lyme-

preliminay report on LYMEMD - DMSO

Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 1:37 PM

 

>

> We should all look up Lyme .. write a piece based on research and submit it,

afterall a lot of people rely on this site and comes up first in the google

search engines .. anyone with the writing ability to put together a bit of the

truth and submit it ?

I remember some stories from a few years ago about how lots of 'sensitive' Lyme

information (e.g. about Plum Island) was removed from Wikipedia articles by

sleazebags working for the US Government. All to protect us, of course

[Guest guest]

>

> Wikipedia should have a record of that in the archives. As far as I know, it

is still a " public domain " type of organization, so the webmasters are unlikely

to knowingly participate in some sort of information conspiracy. Perhaps a brief

note to the site managers re that deletion would pull the information up out of

the trashbin.

From what I understand, Wiki will completely remove material and editing

discussion if a number of 'experts' agree that the material does not belong

there, or has insufficient data to support it. In this case it is completely

removed (maybe it is archived somewhere, but the general public can no longer

see it, nor the fact that is has been discussed).

This is what happened to some subjects related to Lyme (e.g. the Plum Island

story). A group of 'wiki experts' working for the US Government - judging from

their internet addresses - agreed within a short time to remove all information

related to this.