Guest guest Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 Aerosolized? Excuse me? It dies in air, there is too much oxygen for it to survive. ------------------------------------- Yes, that is what the doctor/medical researcher told me during my last consult with him. He is highly respected. And he is the second Texas doctor who has told me that. In addition, I have friends with Lyme in California and land, and they were both told that on their last visit to their doctors. I'm housebound and primarily bedridden with the disease. My consult with the doc was by phone. I got the bill today. I am going to call him and ask where get got that information. Josie __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2008 Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 even Drs can be wrong--they often simply repeat what theyv heard or what theyve seen written and almost never go back to the source to make sure its true IF you can, many here would appreciate any further info you can find out--like the source for Lyme Borrelia being aerosolized and like I said even IF thats true (highly doubt it) that doesnt mean it can? be transmitted that way. not all things in the air droplets and that get into the body become infective. many are digested or dissolved. Its a very different thing to be able to transmit and then make more disease...hence " communicable " --able to be passed along like the common cold virus,.and as far as Ive seen or read Borrelia is still only " vector borne " needing a vector to pass it along other than if its in a transfusion of blood. F Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2008 Report Share Posted October 27, 2008 I would like to add " why can't the cyst Bb be aerosolized and propagate ? " it is in a high gear survival mode that can spring back to full adult Bb several months later, perhaps years. This bacteria is extremely adaptive, accepting vectro borne transference is very narrow minded. Most of the scientific community that accepts this theory also sells you on taking 10 days of antibiotics, max 21 days of IV antibiotics. We all know what happens next........... ________________________________ From: " FinRussak@... " <FinRussak@...> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:30:16 PM Subject: [ ] Re:Lyme Disease Transmission even Drs can be wrong--they often simply repeat what theyv heard or what theyve seen written and almost never go back to the source to make sure its true IF you can, many here would appreciate any further info you can find out--like the source for Lyme Borrelia being aerosolized and like I said even IF thats true (highly doubt it) that doesnt mean it can? be transmitted that way. not all things in the air droplets and that get into the body become infective. many are digested or dissolved. Its a very different thing to be able to transmit and then make more disease...hence " communicable " --able to be passed along like the common cold virus,.and as far as Ive seen or read Borrelia is still only " vector borne " needing a vector to pass it along other than if its in a transfusion of blood. F Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2008 Report Share Posted October 28, 2008 [i would like to add " why can't the cyst?Bb be aerosolized and propagate ? " it is in a high gear survival mode that can spring back?to full adult Bb several months later, perhaps years. This bacteria is extremely adaptive, accepting vectro borne transference is very narrow minded. Most of the scientific community that accepts this theory also sells you on taking 10 days of antibiotics, max 21 days of IV?antibiotics. We all know what happens next........... ] its not a matter of who you " believe " . there are simple biological limits to every organism. Some could live on the moon, others not so much its fact that some organisms need to live INSIDE another organism to survive. yes some can lie dormant in the environment--like anthrax--in spore form ,BUT many cannot ( and thankfully so) Borrelia spirochetes cannot live outside a host and therefore require some sort of transmission. Also their lifecycle like malaria requires a host/vecotr system--there MAY be other vectors yet to be found and other transmission methods..but that doesnt mean you discard what we know about that organism--it cannot live outside another host and thats one reason its so VERY hard to culture it in a lab...its very picky about where and how ?it " likes " to live. ONLY inside another organsim can it " spring back to life " and we arent even sure under what circumstances and for how long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2008 Report Share Posted October 29, 2008 If this is only a vector born disease as you have stated, can it be transmitted via mothers milk or other body fluids? This one has already been given a yes from informed researchers. ________________________________ From: " FinRussak@... " <FinRussak@...> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:13:52 PM Subject: [ ] Re: Lyme Disease Transmission [i would like to add " why can't the cyst?Bb be aerosolized and propagate ? " it is in a high gear survival mode that can spring back?to full adult Bb several months later, perhaps years. This bacteria is extremely adaptive, accepting vectro borne transference is very narrow minded. Most of the scientific community that accepts this theory also sells you on taking 10 days of antibiotics, max 21 days of IV?antibiotics. We all know what happens next........ ... ] its not a matter of who you " believe " . there are simple biological limits to every organism. Some could live on the moon, others not so much its fact that some organisms need to live INSIDE another organism to survive. yes some can lie dormant in the environment- -like anthrax--in spore form ,BUT many cannot ( and thankfully so) Borrelia spirochetes cannot live outside a host and therefore require some sort of transmission. Also their lifecycle like malaria requires a host/vecotr system--there MAY be other vectors yet to be found and other transmission methods..but that doesnt mean you discard what we know about that organism--it cannot live outside another host and thats one reason its so VERY hard to culture it in a lab...its very picky about where and how ?it " likes " to live. ONLY inside another organsim can it " spring back to life " and we arent even sure under what circumstances and for how long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2008 Report Share Posted October 30, 2008 I nursed both my kids and I want to know the real truth and not conjecture. Have they found the Bb in any form in breast milk and then have they proven it does cause infection? I read somewhere about huters drinking deer blood and not getting lyme. Perhaps the factors in the deer blood that keep the deer from getting lyme help.. but the article said something about a more developed digestive tract (?). Is there scientific evidence that breat milk transfers Bb that transforms into infection or is it based on assumption? Also... I hear some warn agains raw cow milk.. then I hear of others saying raw cow milk has helped them.. ????????? I want to know! Once we get to the milk stage of our GAPS diet, I want to use raw goat or cow. Sal > > If this is only a vector born disease as you have stated, can it be transmitted via mothers milk or other body fluids? This one has already been given a yes from informed researchers. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: " FinRussak@... " <FinRussak@...> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:13:52 PM > Subject: [ ] Re: Lyme Disease Transmission > > > > > [i would like to add " why can't the cyst?Bb be aerosolized and propagate ? " it is in a high gear survival mode that can spring back? to full adult Bb several months later, perhaps years. This bacteria is extremely adaptive, accepting vectro borne transference is very narrow minded. Most of the scientific community that accepts this theory also sells you on taking 10 days of antibiotics, max 21 days of IV?antibiotics. We all know what happens next........ ... > > ] > > its not a matter of who you " believe " . there are simple biological limits to every organism. Some could live on the moon, others not so much > > its fact that some organisms need to live INSIDE another organism to survive. yes some can lie dormant in the environment- -like anthrax--in spore form ,BUT many cannot ( and thankfully so) > > Borrelia spirochetes cannot live outside a host and therefore require some sort of transmission. Also their lifecycle like malaria requires a host/vecotr system--there MAY be other vectors yet to be found and other transmission methods..but that doesnt mean you discard what we know about that organism--it cannot live outside another host > > and thats one reason its so VERY hard to culture it in a lab...its very picky about where and how ?it " likes " to live. > > ONLY inside another organsim can it " spring back to life " and we arent even sure under what circumstances and for how long. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2008 Report Share Posted October 30, 2008 Hi Sal, I was told by my LLMD that an adult stomach is different (more developed with acids and such?- I can not fully remember) than an infant's. For this reason, it is possible that the adult stomach can kill off the Bb in deer blood and possibly an infant can not kill Bb in milk. There are some tests that show evidence of Bb in breast milk. There is a belief by some that it can be transmitted by human breast milk (it's been done in rats). There are antibiotics that can be taken to better protect the baby from this possible transmission. Below are some clips that I took from their following links (To confuse you more, I included both sides on the issue). Since there is no clear cut answer, I'll let you decide what believe. Take care, Rich (skiweasel7) --------------------------- This research project had found the Bb antigen in whole blood, breast milk, placental tissue, semen, eye fluid, tooth, foot nodule, shoulder fluid, spinal fluid, finger joint fluid and African dust. http://www.wildernetwork.org/bowen.html …breast milk from two lactating women with erythema migrans was tested and also found reactive. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez? cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_uids=7648832 & dopt=Abstract Dr. Ray , the leading pediatric specialist on Lyme Disease, has found 12 breast fed children who have developed LD. Miscarriage, premature births, stillborn, birth defects, and transplacental infection of the fetus have all been reported. Studies at the Univ. of Vienna have found Bb in urine and breast milk of LD mothers. http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james26.htm There is no evidence for parvovirus transmission through breast milk in humans, although it has been identified in rat milk. Continued breastfeeding by a mother with parvovirus infection is reasonable. (Page 516 – or 16 of 28) The existence, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic Lyme disease remain highly controversial. B burgdorferi is primarily arthropod- borne and -transmitted. It is transmitted prenatally uncommonly, even in endemic areas [93], but B burgdorferi as the cause of illness in the fetus or congenital abnormalities is debated [94 – 96]. B burgdorferi DNA has been reported in breast milk, but there is no evidence for illness in the infant or transmission of the spirochete to the infant through breast milk [97]. In spite of the paucity of data, caution may be warranted. With a confirmed diagnosis of acute Lyme disease in the mother, it is appropriate to discuss the available information with the mother or parents and to recommend temporarily avoiding breastfeeding and breast milk for 24 to 48 hours after beginning maternal antibiotic therapy (amoxicillin [Amoxil, Trimox, and others], penicillin [numerous trade names], or ceftriaxone [Rocephin]). (Page 517-518 – or 17-18 of 28) http://www.dynabizvenezuela.com/images/dynabiz/ID3749/siteinfo/Breast% 20milk%20and%20infection.pdf Here is what we know: • In a paper from the US Centers for Disease Control website ( & Feder, 2004), it is stated that: " B. burgdorferi has never been cultured from human breast milk, and there is no case of an infant developing symptomatic or asymptomatic B. burgdorferi infection from breast milk. " • In one study (Ziska et al, 1996), seven breastfeeding mothers with Lyme disease were studied, and none of their babies contracted Lyme disease. • In another study (Schmidt et al, 1995), DNA associated with Lyme disease were detected in the breastmilk of two mothers, but neither of their babies contracted Lyme disease - per Lawrence & Lawrence (2005), it is not known whether the DNA were from infectious spirochetes or were non-infectious DNA fragments. The general consensus is that breastfeeding should continue if a mother has Lyme disease, especially if she has already started or completed treatment. There are several medications that can be used to treat Lyme disease in breastfeeding mothers. http://www.kellymom.com/health/illness/lyme-disease.html Lyme disease is not transmitted by breast milk. The American Academy of Pediatrics RedBook® states that no causal relationship between maternal Lyme disease and pregnancy complications or congenital abnormalities has been conclusively documented. (this site has a few things I disagree with, but since I found it, I will be fair and share it): http://www.pediatriceducation.org/2007/04/23 > > > I nursed both my kids and I want to know the real truth and not > conjecture. Have they found the Bb in any form in breast milk and > then have they proven it does cause infection? I read somewhere about > huters drinking deer blood and not getting lyme. Perhaps the factors > in the deer blood that keep the deer from getting lyme help.. but the > article said something about a more developed digestive tract (?). Is > there scientific evidence that breat milk transfers Bb that > transforms into infection or is it based on assumption? Also... I > hear some warn agains raw cow milk.. then I hear of others saying raw > cow milk has helped them.. ????????? I want to know! Once we get to > the milk stage of our GAPS diet, I want to use raw goat or cow. Sal > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2008 Report Share Posted October 30, 2008 I said so far known to be vector borne--and the presence in breast milk cant prove transmission--how do we know the baby didnt get it while in utero?? you cant and thats far more likely due to shared blood Until and unless a women breast feeds spirochetes to an adopted baby who wasnt exposed to a single tick and then gets Lyme anyway-you cant prove it " informed researchers'??? scientists who study spiro's havent confirmed this yet at all again while it may be possible its not probable and no where near " proven " . so while it may be prudent to take more care, theres no reason for hysteria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2008 Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 Rich, Firstly, let me say THANK YOU for taking the time to find and share those links. That was really helpful and appreciated. I want to make a point to breast feeding mothers. On one of the studies listed, a researcher recommends that a mother temporarily stop breast feeding when she first begins treatment for Lyme. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, pump and dump if you decide to stop for a day or a few days. In addition to preventing you from getting engorged, it is important that you keep your breasts' filters in tact. Your breasts have an incredibly effective filter that help prevent many things from entering your child's system. When you stop breast feeding, the filter begins to break down as your body prepares to stop lactating. Thus it is important to pump and dump so that your filter remains intact. (It makes you wonder if the women's filters were in tact when the researchers found the spirochetes in the breast milk) I hope this helps. I breast fed my child for almost two years before I found out I had Lyme. Everyone tried to get me to stop immediately. A lot of people (especially doctors) recommend that you stop breast feeding immediately, even it situations where it is completely safe. Many doctors have no idea how healthful breast milk is and how well designed a woman's body is for breastfeeding. They often promote formula as " just as good " . Yeah. Right. ~M My blog: www.iammimi.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2008 Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 Thank you, Rick. Sal > > > > > > I nursed both my kids and I want to know the real truth and not > > conjecture. Have they found the Bb in any form in breast milk and > > then have they proven it does cause infection? I read somewhere > about > > huters drinking deer blood and not getting lyme. Perhaps the > factors > > in the deer blood that keep the deer from getting lyme help.. but > the > > article said something about a more developed digestive tract (?). > Is > > there scientific evidence that breat milk transfers Bb that > > transforms into infection or is it based on assumption? Also... I > > hear some warn agains raw cow milk.. then I hear of others saying > raw > > cow milk has helped them.. ????????? I want to know! Once we get to > > the milk stage of our GAPS diet, I want to use raw goat or cow. Sal > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2008 Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 Thanks, Finette. I really dont need more hysteria in my life (but I think that is a by product when people dont know and no one can say for sure 100% one way or the other), and I am grateful I dont have to make the decision to breastfeed.. the deed has been done in that regard, whether good or bad. I would like to think my babies got antibodies from the breast milk and other good things that might help them if they contracted in utero. I do think it is Cowden who has warned against raw milk from cows.. could be wrong about that. I *am* currently purchasing raw cheese and I hope that is safe. I want to purchase raw goat or cow milk in the near future. I hear some with Lyme say yay and others say nay. What do you think? Everyone else? Sal > > I said so far known to be vector borne--and the presence in breast milk cant prove transmission--how do we know the baby didnt get it while in utero?? you cant and thats far more likely due to shared blood > > Until and unless a women breast feeds spirochetes to an adopted baby who wasnt exposed to a single tick and then gets Lyme anyway-you cant prove it > > > > " informed researchers'??? scientists who study spiro's havent confirmed this yet at all > > again while it may be possible its not probable and no where near " proven " . > so while it may be prudent to take more care, theres no reason for hysteria > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2008 Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 Borrelia burgdorferi is micro aerophilic and dies in the oxygen content/partial pressure of air. It cannot be aerosolized and thus your Texas docs, whoever they are, have probably gone off the deep end...no offense intended. Absolutely, biologically, scientifically, this is simply not possible. It would be like defying the law of gravity. They have no evidence of such and frankly if it were easily transmissible and aerosolized it would spread like the seasonal flu. That's really silly. Again, not trying to offend you. > ------------------------------------- > > Yes, that is what the doctor/medical researcher told me during my last consult with him. > He is highly respected. And he is the second Texas doctor who has told me that. > > In addition, I have friends with Lyme in California and land, and they were both told that on their last visit to their doctors. > > I'm housebound and primarily bedridden with the disease. My consult with the doc was by phone. I got the bill today. I am going to call him and ask where get got that information. > > Josie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2008 Report Share Posted November 1, 2008 Regarding Vector Borne... does that mean only blood or fluid to fluid, mucous membrane born? Then, how much Bb? Seems a little tick would not have much to " share " so to speak... As far as oxygen killing the Bb... that would also mean dried fluids? (meaning blood) Sal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2008 Report Share Posted November 1, 2008 I'm not sure what you mean by " a little tick would not have much to share " . Ticks, like mosquitoes that transmit malaria, are a fine vector. Yes, my assumption is it's blood to blood. That means a vector like a tick which feeds for 3 days, is the best vector to transmit it. OTOH perhaps occasionally other insects can transmit it, who knows for sure. And certainly vertical transmission is possible from mother to child in the womb. Beyond that I think its all speculation and likely all false. I do not think couples pass it to each other, nor do I think breastmilk passes it (digestive acids would likely kill it). There is a question about urine if it splashes in your eye could transmit it, there has been an occasional rare anecdote to that effect. > > Regarding Vector Borne... does that mean only blood or fluid to fluid, > mucous membrane born? Then, how much Bb? Seems a little tick would not > have much to " share " so to speak... > > As far as oxygen killing the Bb... that would also mean dried fluids? > (meaning blood) > > Sal > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2008 Report Share Posted November 1, 2008 if it was so easily killed by digestive acids, wouldn't someone have already figured out a way to kill it by now? cathleen jill1313 wrote: > > I'm not sure what you mean by " a little tick would not have much to > share " . Ticks, like mosquitoes that transmit malaria, are a fine vector. > > Yes, my assumption is it's blood to blood. That means a vector like a > tick which feeds for 3 days, is the best vector to transmit it. OTOH > perhaps occasionally other insects can transmit it, who knows for > sure. And certainly vertical transmission is possible from mother to > child in the womb. > > Beyond that I think its all speculation and likely all false. I do not > think couples pass it to each other, nor do I think breastmilk passes > it (digestive acids would likely kill it). There is a question about > urine if it splashes in your eye could transmit it, there has been an > occasional rare anecdote to that effect. > > > > > > Regarding Vector Borne... does that mean only blood or fluid to fluid, > > mucous membrane born? Then, how much Bb? Seems a little tick would not > > have much to " share " so to speak... > > > > As far as oxygen killing the Bb... that would also mean dried fluids? > > (meaning blood) > > > > Sal > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2008 Report Share Posted November 1, 2008 I agree that blood to blood is the easiest way to get it. If there is a chance that it is in breast milk then I would be concerned if the child was teething and had any open cuts or sores in her mouth. The bacteria would be able to enter the bloodstream that way. Bonita > Yes, my assumption is it's blood to blood. That means a vector like a > tick which feeds for 3 days, is the best vector to transmit it. OTOH > perhaps occasionally other insects can transmit it, who knows for > sure. And certainly vertical transmission is possible from mother to > child in the womb. > > Beyond that I think its all speculation and likely all false. I do not > think couples pass it to each other, nor do I think breastmilk passes > it (digestive acids would likely kill it). There is a question about > urine if it splashes in your eye could transmit it, there has been an > occasional rare anecdote to that effect. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 I mean by " little to share " that blood to blood possibly may not take much blood or Bb to infect. That would make sense that feeding for three days makes the tick more " potent " ? I wonder how much Bb it takes. Thank you. Sal > > > > Regarding Vector Borne... does that mean only blood or fluid to fluid, > > mucous membrane born? Then, how much Bb? Seems a little tick would not > > have much to " share " so to speak... > > > > As far as oxygen killing the Bb... that would also mean dried fluids? > > (meaning blood) > > > > Sal > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 Some mothers have taken abx while breastfeeding but I think that's not a good idea--for a baby to get abx in breastmilk every day. I am not sure what I would do if I had active lyme and a baby. I might get a wet nurse! > > I agree that blood to blood is the easiest way to get it. If there is a > chance that it is in breast milk then I would be concerned if the child was > teething and had any open cuts or sores in her mouth. The bacteria would be > able to enter the bloodstream that way. > Bonita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 The current thinking is that as the tick feeds on human blood, the spirochetes in the gut begin to express new proteins and get " ready " for transmission, because human blood is hotter (temp) and perhaps also its components signal to the spirochetes. So they start expressing different Osp's (surface antigens) and start preparing for the journey to the human host. Supposedly about the time the tick is done feeding it essentially throws up--regurgitates its gut contents, right into your bloodstream. Whether this happens because spirochetes emit something to make it vomit, or whether all ticks do this anyway, who knows. Other pathogens--who knows, they could be transmitted more rapidly? Bartonella, babesia, worms, I mean, its confusing. Spirochetes are very adaptable among so many different hosts. > > I mean by " little to share " that blood to blood possibly may not take > much blood or Bb to infect. That would make sense that feeding for > three days makes the tick more " potent " ? I wonder how much Bb it > takes. Thank you. Sal s, my assumption is it's blood to blood. That means a vector like Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 It doesn't take long - I've heard of people getting infected after a tick exposure of an hour and a half. And what of the folks who get it through another insect bite? We're talking instant bingo. In a message dated 11/2/2008 7:18:12 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, creekhopper@... writes: I mean by " little to share " that blood to blood possibly may not take much blood or Bb to infect. That would make sense that feeding for three days makes the tick more " potent " ? I wonder how much Bb it takes. Thank you. Sal > > > > Regarding Vector Borne... does that mean only blood or fluid to fluid, > > mucous membrane born? Then, how much Bb? Seems a little tick would not > > have much to " share " so to speak... > > > > As far as oxygen killing the Bb... that would also mean dried fluids? > > (meaning blood) > > > > Sal > > > **************Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Today's Hot 5 Travel Deals! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212416248x1200771803/aol?redir=http://\ travel.aol.com/discount-travel?ncid=emlcntustrav00000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 mosquitos are very tiny, don't stay attached to the skin for more than a few seconds and they transmit some very bad diseases that have been well documented for a very long time. cathleen sfrobink@... wrote: > > It doesn't take long - I've heard of people getting infected after a tick > exposure of an hour and a half. And what of the folks who get it through > another insect bite? We're talking instant bingo. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 Wow. Thats interesting. As for pregnancy, breastfeeding and abx... I worry when I allow myself to, about my dd's future as a mother. I hope we've come a long way by then. How do you all deal with that possibility regarding your children? Can they safely have children? Even if so, and it has to be such a big deal, then what a burden for them to grow up into that awareness. Sal > > > > It doesn't take long - I've heard of people getting infected after a tick > > exposure of an hour and a half. And what of the folks who get it through > > another insect bite? We're talking instant bingo. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 To all: Here's a quote from the most respected pediatrician in the field of treating children with lyme disease, over 8000 cases, Dr. . " Lyme disease is transmitted through a tick bite. But it can also be transmitted through semen, breast milk and gestational fluids. This means that a fetus can be infected by its mother " To date, Dr. has successfully treated Lyme-infected pregnant women and their babies, who were born with the disease. The implications for a fetus which contracts Lyme in utero are anatomical defects of the heart and eye, fewer or more digits than normal, cataracts, learning disabilities and extreme irritability " Kind of says it all in my humble opinion.......... ________________________________ From: jill1313 <jenbooks13@...> Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2008 1:05:43 PM Subject: [ ] Re: Lyme Disease Transmission I'm not sure what you mean by " a little tick would not have much to share " . Ticks, like mosquitoes that transmit malaria, are a fine vector. Yes, my assumption is it's blood to blood. That means a vector like a tick which feeds for 3 days, is the best vector to transmit it. OTOH perhaps occasionally other insects can transmit it, who knows for sure. And certainly vertical transmission is possible from mother to child in the womb. Beyond that I think its all speculation and likely all false. I do not think couples pass it to each other, nor do I think breastmilk passes it (digestive acids would likely kill it). There is a question about urine if it splashes in your eye could transmit it, there has been an occasional rare anecdote to that effect. > > Regarding Vector Borne... does that mean only blood or fluid to fluid, > mucous membrane born? Then, how much Bb? Seems a little tick would not > have much to " share " so to speak... > > As far as oxygen killing the Bb... that would also mean dried fluids? > (meaning blood) > > Sal > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 I wouldn't so hastily write off the survivability of the cyst mode unless you have documented trials to proof otherwise. Its a far different microbe then its adult parent.......... ________________________________ From: jill1313 <jenbooks13@...> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 5:45:13 PM Subject: [ ] Re: Lyme Disease Transmission Borrelia burgdorferi is micro aerophilic and dies in the oxygen content/partial pressure of air. It cannot be aerosolized and thus your Texas docs, whoever they are, have probably gone off the deep end...no offense intended. Absolutely, biologically, scientifically, this is simply not possible. It would be like defying the law of gravity. They have no evidence of such and frankly if it were easily transmissible and aerosolized it would spread like the seasonal flu. That's really silly. Again, not trying to offend you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 Please see Dr. comments, a well respected pediatrician that treats lyme children, he has countless cases that contradicts breast feeding while infected with lyme disease. ________________________________ From: Mimi <mimi@...> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 11:51:59 AM Subject: [ ] Re: Lyme Disease Transmission Rich, Firstly, let me say THANK YOU for taking the time to find and share those links. That was really helpful and appreciated. I want to make a point to breast feeding mothers. On one of the studies listed, a researcher recommends that a mother temporarily stop breast feeding when she first begins treatment for Lyme. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, pump and dump if you decide to stop for a day or a few days. In addition to preventing you from getting engorged, it is important that you keep your breasts' filters in tact. Your breasts have an incredibly effective filter that help prevent many things from entering your child's system. When you stop breast feeding, the filter begins to break down as your body prepares to stop lactating. Thus it is important to pump and dump so that your filter remains intact. (It makes you wonder if the women's filters were in tact when the researchers found the spirochetes in the breast milk) I hope this helps. I breast fed my child for almost two years before I found out I had Lyme. Everyone tried to get me to stop immediately. A lot of people (especially doctors) recommend that you stop breast feeding immediately, even it situations where it is completely safe. Many doctors have no idea how healthful breast milk is and how well designed a woman's body is for breastfeeding. They often promote formula as " just as good " . Yeah. Right. ~M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.