Guest guest Posted May 22, 2000 Report Share Posted May 22, 2000 To All, FYI. Larry NV Potato Peel Extract Holds Potential as Antibiotic ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- By Alka Agrawal LOS ANGELES, May 23 (Reuters Health) - An extract made from potato peel prevents adhesion of bacteria to host cells, which researchers suggest is a strategy that should be studied as an alternative to traditional antibiotics. " Most people interpret anti-infective compounds in the traditional antimicrobial sense, meaning some kind of chemical that's going to inhibit the growth or kill bacteria or other microorganisms, " Dr. Marjorie M. Cowan, of Miami University, in Oxford, Ohio, told Reuters Health. " We were aware that there were components in plants that instead block the adhesion of microorganisms to the host tissues. " Potatoes are widely used medicinally in indigenous cultures, and contain large amounts of polyphenol oxidase (PPO), she noted. Since PPO is known to have anti-adhesive properties, her group screened potato extracts and found that a component of the peel inhibited the adhesion of Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 and type 1-fimbriated Escherichia coli to their host receptors, but did not kill the bacteria. She described her team's findings in a presentation here yesterday at the annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. Her group suspected that PPO might be responsible for the inhibition, because the extract had PPO activity, the extract contained a protein that was the same size as purified PPO, and PPO inhibitors blocked the extract's ability to block bacterial adhesion. Dr. Cowan said that PPO is known to work on tyrosines and convert them to quinones, and that 60% of bacterial binding proteins are known to have a conserved critical tyrosine residue. However, whether the anti-adhesive action is due to PPO is not really the issue. " Adhesion is a necessary first step in order to cause disease, otherwise [bacteria] just get washed out of the body, " she said. " All the thousands and thousands of people who are screening plants to find antimicrobial substances, their initial screening techniques would only catch substances that inhibit growth and would not catch anti-adhesives. " Researchers working on antiviral strategies already work on blocking viral attachment to the host, she noted, but blocking adhesion is considered a novel strategy for antimicrobial compounds. She noted that antibiotics that kill bacteria can cause release of toxic substances that can cause damaging inflammatory responses, which would not be an issue with an anti-adhesive. In addition, she thinks that bacteria would be less inclined to develop resistance to an anti-adhesive, although she envisions these compounds as " another weapon in what needs to be a diverse arsenal of antimicrobial therapies. " Oxygen-Binding Protein Found in Anaerobic Bacteria May Be Antibiotic Target ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WESTPORT, May 23 (Reuters Health) - A protein that senses oxygen in marine worms has also been identified in certain bacteria, according to a report in the May 15th issue of Biochemistry. The finding may point to a new class of antibacterial agents. " We weren't looking for this, " Dr. M. Kurtz, Jr., from the University of Georgia, Athens, told Reuters Health, " it came about by chance. " Dr. Kurtz and a multicenter team were studying an oxygen-binding protein, hemerythrin (Hr), found in a few species of marine worms. In searching protein sequence databases they came across " a sequence that looked like the same kind of protein except it was in a bacterium, which had never been found before. " This oxygen-binding protein was actually a domain in a larger protein in this bacterium, (DcrH), a chemotaxis protein. " We presumed, " Dr. Kurtz continued, " that this protein in the bacterium is there to sense oxygen. That is, it's poisoned by oxygen and so it tends to swim away from oxygen. " The researchers isolated and characterized the Hr protein and found that it does bind oxygen, and from databases found it in at least 12 other bacteria. " It's apparently common. We didn't know that, but as more and more bacterial genomes are sequenced these proteins seem to come up. " What we are thinking, " Dr. Kurtz said, " is that maybe this is a general way that anaerobic bacteria sense oxygen in their environment and are able to get away from it. " Dr. Kurtz noted that many pathogenic bacteria are anaerobic, and he believes that it might be possible to develop drugs that would inactivate this protein. " The thing that interests me is how this protein developed in the first place, " Dr. Kuntz said. He noted that originally the earth was an anaerobic environment, but as oxygen accumulated bacteria either had to adapt or die. " We think that's when this oxygen-sensing protein developed. It's funny that it's found in bacteria and not in any organism in between, such as yeast, and then all of a sudden you find it in these marine worms. The worms don't need to avoid oxygen so they use it for a different purpose. They adapted the protein from the bacteria for their own use as an oxygen-storage reservoir to bind oxygen like we use hemoglobin. " Diagnosis of Viral Meningitis With EV-PCR Eliminates Unnecessary Interventions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- By Reinberg WESTPORT, May 24 (Reuters Health) - Enterovirus polymerase chain reaction (EV-PCR) testing for aseptic meningitis in children aids clinical decision-making by avoiding unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and promoting rapid patient discharge, according to a report from California. Dr. Mark H. Sawyer from the University of California, La Jolla, and a multicenter team retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 276 pediatric patients who had undergone a cerebrospinal fluid diagnostic EV-PCR test in 1998. " This is one of the first studies that really looks at the impact of new and rapid diagnostic testing on physicians' decision-making, " Dr. Sawyer told Reuters Health. As Dr. Sawyer's team reports in the May 24/31 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association, 137 patients had a positive cerebrospinal fluid EV-PCR result. The 95 patients for whom the positive diagnosis was available prior to discharge had significantly fewer ancillary tests performed compared with the 92 patients who were EV-negative: 26% versus 72% had at least one test performed. The EV-positive group also received intravenous antibiotics for less time than the EV-negative group, a median of 2.0 days versus 3.5 days, and stayed in the hospital fewer hours, a median of 42 hours versus 71.5 hours. In addition, the researchers report that patients who were EV-positive stayed in the hospital for a median of 5.2 hours after EV-PCR results were obtained, compared with 27.4 hours for those who were EV-negative. Dr. Sawyer said that EV-PCR testing " leads physicians to a conclusion more quickly than they would be able to reach just by clinical observation alone. It works well in our setting and I would encourage other laboratories to consider this type of testing, because not only is it useful clinically, but for the bottom-line people it actually saves money. " He noted that " in general, because the test comes back so quickly it really speeds up the process. Physicians can pinpoint infections in hours that in the past took days or even weeks to diagnose. JAMA 2000;283:2680-2685. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.