Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Dental Questions

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi Peggy,

Will this dental procedure require both a temporary crown and a permanent

crown? If so, there's a new process where it can be done in one visit. I'm

e-mailing you an article that was in the New York Times science section

recently. (If others are interested, I'll e-mail it to them--or post it.)

Anyway, here's something from the article that mentions adhesive:

" Not only is the process more convenient than waiting for the lab, Dr.

Spector said, it also produces a stronger crown. Instead of enamel, the

crown is made of compressed porcelain " 40 percent stronger than what a lab

can press, " he said. " And the material has the same properties as enamel -

it wears away at the same rate, and it has the same thermal coefficient, so

when you drink hot coffee it will expand just as much as the teeth around

it. " It leaves more of the original tooth intact because the material can be

cemented directly to the tooth with no metal interlayer. "

I don't know how this compressed porcelain is different from the ceramic you

mentioned, and I don't know which is better.

Sue B.,

Upstate New York

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

I'd like to see that article if you could send it to me.

Re: Dental Questions

> Hi Peggy,

>

> Will this dental procedure require both a temporary crown and a permanent

> crown? If so, there's a new process where it can be done in one visit.

I'm

> e-mailing you an article that was in the New York Times science section

> recently. (If others are interested, I'll e-mail it to them--or post it.)

>

> Anyway, here's something from the article that mentions adhesive:

>

> " Not only is the process more convenient than waiting for the lab, Dr.

> Spector said, it also produces a stronger crown. Instead of enamel, the

> crown is made of compressed porcelain " 40 percent stronger than what a lab

> can press, " he said. " And the material has the same properties as enamel -

> it wears away at the same rate, and it has the same thermal coefficient,

so

> when you drink hot coffee it will expand just as much as the teeth around

> it. " It leaves more of the original tooth intact because the material can

be

> cemented directly to the tooth with no metal interlayer. "

>

> I don't know how this compressed porcelain is different from the ceramic

you

> mentioned, and I don't know which is better.

>

> Sue B.,

> Upstate New York

>

>

>

> This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each

other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment

discussed here, please consult your doctor.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

Wow, I am so gonna order Andy's books come payday... Was just browsing some of

the archived messages and wishing that I had used his protocol for my son (and

myself) 10 years ago. It is reassuring to see that his protocol remains

unchanged after all these years. The thing that prevented me from having my son

chelated 10 years ago (he is now almost 14)is that I was not confident in the

seemingly ever-changing/tweaking of our Dan doc's chelation arsenal. We ran out

of funds before we could get him " ready " to be chelated-he reacted to almost

every suup! Anyway, that was then, this is now. After reading Andy's post

replies, I believe that I am vaccine injured myself. While in nursing school I

was asked to get the MMR because clinicals were closing in and the doctor's

office lost my titers. At the time I knew no better so I complied (even though

my mother said that I had had 2 different types of measles as a child). I know

that the MMR doesn't contain mercury but has other issues. Of course that was

followed a year or so later with the Hep B vaccine series. I also had Rhogam

during my first pregnancy (with my son) and a mouth full of amalgams. My

question now is, I have a NP who says she will work with me on Andy's protocol

but, although I have had only one remaining amalgam for years (which will be

pulled shortly), is there a protocol that needs to be followd for extractions as

well as fillings? It is a very small filling at the gumline-don't know if it

will come out with the tooth or what. My dentist uses no amalgam but not sure

he is convinced that special precautions need to be taken in their removal. The

other question is that I found out after switching to a different dentist (after

20 years with a dentist who switched from amalgams to composite late in the

game) that a root canal that I have has a part of a dental tool broken off

inside it! The new dentist said if it didn't bother me not to worry about it

because it would take oral surgery to correct! Will I still be ok to chelate

with this unknown metal inside my root canal???

Rosie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...