Re: AC Protocol vs. Biofilm Protocol

[Guest guest]

April wrote:

>

> Has anyone tried the biofilm protocol? I was going to try it after

> listening to Dr. Usman speak at a conference until I heard Dr.

> McCandless say that she tried the biofilm protocol on herself and

> could not tolerate it. The thing that I like about the biofilm

> protocol is that it seems to attack yeast and toxins and the same time

> which also reduces the effect of die off. I've heard many of you

> mention that the AC protocol can spike up yeast. We've been fighting

> yeast for so long that it makes me cringe to think about spiking it up

> again.

>

This " biofilm protocol " involves the use of EDTA, which is known (as

written in standard medical textbooks) to cause lots of harm when used

in the presence of mercury.

Yeast problems will disappear when the mercury is gone. The sooner you

chelate using the Cutler protocol, the sooner the yeast will be gone.

> Thanks, April

>

>

[Guest guest]

Good call.  I'm planning to do our first chelation later this month over spring

break.  Looking forward to asking you guys more questions.  Thanks.

http://aydansrecovery.blogspot.com/2009_08_01_archive.html

>

> Has anyone tried the biofilm protocol? I was going to try it after

> listening to Dr. Usman speak at a conference until I heard Dr.

> McCandless say that she tried the biofilm protocol on herself and

> could not tolerate it. The thing that I like about the biofilm

> protocol is that it seems to attack yeast and toxins and the same time

> which also reduces the effect of die off. I've heard many of you

> mention that the AC protocol can spike up yeast. We've been fighting

> yeast for so long that it makes me cringe to think about spiking it up

> again.

>

This " biofilm protocol " involves the use of EDTA, which is known (as

written in standard medical textbooks) to cause lots of harm when used

in the presence of mercury.

Yeast problems will disappear when the mercury is gone. The sooner you

chelate using the Cutler protocol, the sooner the yeast will be gone.

> Thanks, April

>

>

------------------------------------

=======================================================

[Guest guest]

We actually do both. During the weeks when we aren't chelating, we do the

biofilm protocol once a day, upon waking. One major difference is that we do

NOT use the EDTA portion of the protocol. We use Klaire Labs Interfase, not the

Interfase Plus which contains EDTA. We started out using that one and had major

irritation, once we removed the EDTA we had amazing results! The enzyme pokes

wholes in the biofilm which is made up of polysaccharides and metals, these

holes allow the anti-microbials of choice to really get in there and clear

things out. Then the final step is a mop-up with pectin. It's been a life

saver for us during the bad bacteria stages. Be aware that is it moves through

pockets of biofilm, you may see some die off, even with the mop-up step, just

increase it when you see this.

>

> Has anyone tried the biofilm protocol? I was going to try it after listening

to Dr. Usman speak at a conference until I heard Dr. McCandless say that she

tried the biofilm protocol on herself and could not tolerate it. The thing that

I like about the biofilm protocol is that it seems to attack yeast and toxins

and the same time which also reduces the effect of die off. I've heard many of

you mention that the AC protocol can spike up yeast. We've been fighting yeast

for so long that it makes me cringe to think about spiking it up again.

>

> Thanks, April

>