Re: A brief summary of the favored protocol here?

[Guest guest]

If I got that just about right I want to thank you all for as much.. .

I have started the chelation protocol on myself in that respect, that my wife

would allow anyone to do so on my son, otherwise? That I would go with that on

my son, otherwise (At this point in trying things? if you know what I mean...

with respect to all that I've tried and gone with in that respect, with the way

the world really is I mean (For the Real deal.. .

Everything seems to be going OK so far (Thereof, I Feel as understand.. .

Glavic

A man with such experience

Where you wanted to know as much for your self? that we could handle the world,

(so reasonably?) otherwise.. .

Leader of my world ( " F " those who don't think so?!. *Fail* those who don't think

so, I would recommend for Us (OK, you could be more gentle about It? Good-luck

in that respect.. . Oh, and wish me luck, too?!.

That I need authority, otherwise

BWT

>

> If I've got this right?:

>

> The main think with ALA chelation has to do with the half-life of ALA? (the

chelator in question? if not also an anti-oxidant for all that we are trying to

accomplish with anti-oxidants) and administering the chelator accordingly, in

smaller doses more often than might be typical with what others might be doing?

(Say, every 4 or 5 hours) for a few days and laying off for a week or so, to be

individualized in that/this respect? (for evacuation, of the toxin/s, and

nutrient assimilation?) supplementing for the minerals that might also be lost

along the way (of not such a tedious thing to do, really, though watch out for

phonies and shams?) in that respect of what chelation does and dealing with a

likely increase in yeast during the first few weeks where yeast would most

likely be/become a problem? realizing that the supplements that can be tolerated

and assimilated after such a regime are more than likely what it would

eventually take to nurture back to health, where lack of nutrients and nutrient

absorption/assimilation and such would be the problem?

>

> The results should be manifest in our greater understanding from as much? (of

our feeling/s? even, if not Especially?) where not also aided and abetted by

hair analysis, or whatever (more objective measures?) we can muster in that

respect? .. .

>

> Hey, to be honest, for our selves.. . but if you found that *entertaining,*

(also!?) for the *social* factor, (Thereof?) consider that a/the bonus? .. .

>

> Please do.

>

> Glavic

>

> On the primary thing/s. Of *my* primary thing/s, nonetheless

>

> I know where to buy books, etc.. . Do you know where and how to get me?!.

>

> BWT.

>

[Guest guest]

Glad to hear its going well!

Karla

> >

> > If I've got this right?:

> >

> > The main think with ALA chelation has to do with the half-life of ALA? (the

chelator in question? if not also an anti-oxidant for all that we are trying to

accomplish with anti-oxidants) and administering the chelator accordingly, in

smaller doses more often than might be typical with what others might be doing?

(Say, every 4 or 5 hours) for a few days and laying off for a week or so, to be

individualized in that/this respect? (for evacuation, of the toxin/s, and

nutrient assimilation?) supplementing for the minerals that might also be lost

along the way (of not such a tedious thing to do, really, though watch out for

phonies and shams?) in that respect of what chelation does and dealing with a

likely increase in yeast during the first few weeks where yeast would most

likely be/become a problem? realizing that the supplements that can be tolerated

and assimilated after such a regime are more than likely what it would

eventually take to nurture back to health, where lack of nutrients and nutrient

absorption/assimilation and such would be the problem?

> >

> > The results should be manifest in our greater understanding from as much?

(of our feeling/s? even, if not Especially?) where not also aided and abetted by

hair analysis, or whatever (more objective measures?) we can muster in that

respect? .. .

> >

> > Hey, to be honest, for our selves.. . but if you found that *entertaining,*

(also!?) for the *social* factor, (Thereof?) consider that a/the bonus? .. .

> >

> > Please do.

> >

> > Glavic

> >

> > On the primary thing/s. Of *my* primary thing/s, nonetheless

> >

> > I know where to buy books, etc.. . Do you know where and how to get me?!.

> >

> > BWT.

> >

>