Re: Communicating Partners

[Guest guest]

Don't know if you've already visited his website or group. So here are the

links. From my experience, I'd say that it is on the opposite end of the

spectrum from ABA.

communicating/?yguid=441733353

http://jamesdmacdonald.org/Articles/MacStart.html

>

> Anybody heard about this training way? Or doing this?

> I am teaching too much academic and not good development for social and

communication to others.

>

> corinna

>

[Guest guest]

I have read the book by Mc. I have heard it was the precursory to

RDI. My son had been too young to really benefit from it at the time and now at

4 I am ready to pull it out again.

Caryn

>

> Anybody heard about this training way? Or doing this?

> I am teaching too much academic and not good development for social and

communication to others.

>

> corinna

>

[Guest guest]

It doesn't really sound different from ABA with respect to principle and

curriculum (so much?) as far as I'm concerned, of my principles.. ABA follows

the evidence, and some might think ABAers are not so much for unregulated

communication (in resolving abuse otherwise?) It seems Communicating Partners is

also about regulated (of a conforming) communication, where ABA is not really

defined by that. (Contrary to opinion?)

I think the confusion is in the curriculum or emphasis on the curriculum,

perhaps? (of what ABAers defer to of who is paying for them and for what? of

being *so,* professional? That I may not stand for) Many ABAers are not focused

on Communication being the primary thing in all that they are trying to

accomplish, (in that respect, perhaps? of who's paying for what, sadly?) and

Communicating Partners might seem to be for as much (contrary to some

*consumers/customers/clients/partners?* not wanting to pay for that)

That the discussion group accepted me immediately upon applying would suggest

they are *for* communication, more than many in that respect, evidently for

communication in that respect (and not of a conforming censorship or editorship,

otherwise, so much) but the studies they suggest they have (based upon

scientific models? of what constitutes a valid scientific study?) I found

something wanting, (misleading?) though I'm not holding that against them, where

they actually support the individual of communication... with conditions

supportive of as much, as they have done with me, so far

Thanks for the lead. I'm a member of the group (communication) now, and will

continue to see if they are truly about what I'm especially interested in, of

communication... and will endeavour to get back to us in that respect, where, if

it's not abusive or unjust, as untrue? to a greater Understanding, of More? (as

not so reasonable, what that should have to do with *social?*) I have to ask why

would we be limited in our communication in that/this respect? of, what should

be defining everything else? (so meaningful? that I would equate conforming [as

to the ways some force that, for what other?] to a given *language* as

communication? [Not, but rather of abuse otherwise, thereof, which I would like

to think has very little if anything to do with ABA as *I* practice It, [of my

mission?] language *distinced/distinguished* from as much, not so much of

Communication, Thereof.. .

Glavic

Where I serve *justness* in serving as much, that social and communication would

mean anything otherwise? (re., where Justness is the thing with *me* as far as

social and communication *should* be concerned.. . Where such justness/service

makes the greater communication possible, of Feeling as understanding and what I

hope for us

No, *I* don't find that digressing from Communication at All, so compare me with

Communication Partners in that respect of as much, Thereof? .. .

I'm not really so sure people are looking for *Communication* (beyond anything

else? of acting upon our Feeling/s, of Understanding in that respect of our

Feeling/s?) of the problem, otherwise, where I have found any rules for

Communication at All, but what I understand by as much.. .

I suppose you could call my understanding my *conscience* in that respect? .. .

I go with that, and not much else, of what I aspire for us? And when people try

to interrupt me with so-called inappropriate communication, I deal with it

*with* communication in supporting as much and not with something else, but that

would be just *me,* of how I'm trying to be.. .

On Communication. It's more than you may think (Otherwise?!. I Feel as

understand (More than just a language as we know It?!.

You'd be surprised how many people don't like being called abusive/of so

reasonable? and how they act/behave upon as much, relative to what they profess

to be about and say? I mean.. .

I look forward to a rewarding partnership with Communication Partners in that

respect of, understanding for my self! that Communication could be about

anything else. I also wish as much for ABA, that ABA would conform to such

principle/s, where I find *people* often don't, in *whatever* stripe they might

identify themselves.. .

Thanks For The thread

> >

> > Anybody heard about this training way? Or doing this?

> > I am teaching too much academic and not good development for social and

communication to others.

> >

> > corinna

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Sorry. The group's name is " communicating " and not " communication. "

For whatever that's worth.. .

No, I'm not afraid to say so

BWT.

Glavic

> > >

> > > Anybody heard about this training way? Or doing this?

> > > I am teaching too much academic and not good development for social and

communication to others.

> > >

> > > corinna

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

After a brief foray on " communicating " (of Communicating Partners?) I must say,

that just because something is called communicating doesn't mean it *is*

communicating, (so much?) if you know what I mean.. .

They do practice *extinction* (ignoring communication, etc., even, of not

posting communications for others to have, and evaluate, and benefit from, of

how communication really works?) of censuring and editing, and ignoring things

to move on with their agenda (otherwise of real communication? and the primary,

I'd be thinkin') just like many ABAers do, (I will grant us) but of course it

isn't my intention to generalize in that respect, no (but I must concur with

Christ, and Machiavelli? that we are all sinners somewhat in that respect, if

not in many others by as much, that I would favor that we strive to be princes

and princesses? in that respect of More? No.

Saints, (or Volunteers) perhaps.. . of Understanding More, I'd be thinkin, of as

much.. .

Best wishes, Thereof? (of trying so hard?!. for what that's worth, of

Understanding More, but call It Communication if you wish.. . (as Feel, or

Whatever? .. .

Glavic

I ABA

ABA for Understanding

Not a consensus/conformer shaper so much, no, of where I find Communication

really takes Us, and I'm going as with as much.. .

There are many worse groups than the " communicating " group, no doubt. Relative

to as much, they might even be considered " good " .. .

My report?!.

BWT.

> > >

> > > Anybody heard about this training way? Or doing this?

> > > I am teaching too much academic and not good development for social and

communication to others.

> > >

> > > corinna

> > >

> >

>