Wikipedia LDN page is now written so bad it's an embarrassment

[Guest guest]

Someone has edited a very well written piece(don't know who originally authored

it but it was good) and now it doesn't even give you a description of what LDN

is(how it works) or what it does, no dosage description. The page should be

removed it is so terribly authored. I'm glad I re-checked it because I see I

need to remove the link to it from my forum. What a disappointment. LDN's

history and dosage should be first, not all the studies listed first, the trials

should be listed in their own category much further down on the page. Thought I

would warn everyone not to use that Wikipedia page anymore for referrence, it

used to be so easy to read and understand, now it's a nightmare.

http://en.wikipedia.org/