Guest guest Posted April 19, 2005 Report Share Posted April 19, 2005 Liz, I've never heard of it, what is it? Grace lcarveth <l.carveth@...> wrote: Has anyone used Bioresonance???? Liz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 In einer eMail vom 20.04.05 01:23:31 (MEZ) - Mitteleurop. Sommerzeit schreibt foxyfoxgrace@...: > Liz, > > I've never heard of it, what is it? > > Grace > > lcarveth <l.carveth@...> wrote: > > Has anyone used Bioresonance???? > Liz > > > > Grace, it is Dr. Hulda zapping and the technology according to R. R. Rife. Go to http://www.royalrife.com Dr. Loyd's website. Best to you! Katharina Mit freundlichen Gruessen Katharina Gutsche www.Auto-Thera.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 Katharina/Grace, I have no standard to raise and claim no expertise BUT... One explanation which I have found that `The zapper and bioresonance technology are somewhat similar, both used in the field of bioelectical therapy. The zapper, however, targets individual entities (bacteria, viruses, toxins) for elimination, while bioresonance usually is used to balances the electromagnetic fields of the body.' Feeding 'bioresonance [feedback]' into Google gives a number of sites/approaches. It seems to be a fairly broad field combining and encompassing many wholistic approaches [and a fair amount of physics and maths theory !] with computer programs and deals with a veritible panacea of issues which might affect/challange the workings of the body/mind. eg nutrition/toxins/emotional/mental states/allergens/musco skeletal etc. there are at least 2 Newsgroups. I came across it this week when a kinesiologist attatched my son's wrists to her device from www.nutrienergetics.com and the computer worked out a detailed report on his 'Energetic Mis-alaignment of the body-field'. She says it enables her to do her work a million times more quickly and accurately. It appears that not everyone calls it bioresonance and there may be other programs/diagnostic tools out there including one called Waverider developped by Tom Stone.] No comment. I am suspending my prejudices becauseI am sufficiently impressed/curious to keep going back.If you Katherina or anyone has any experience in this type of thing, please post or write to me off list. Liz > > > > Has anyone used Bioresonance???? > > Liz > > > > > > > > > > Grace, it is Dr. Hulda zapping and the technology according to R. R. > Rife. > Go to > http://www.royalrife.com > Dr. Loyd's website. > > Best to you! > Katharina > > > > > Mit freundlichen Gruessen > > Katharina Gutsche www.Auto-Thera.com > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Does anyone have suggestions what term we DO use instead of Bioresonance therefore and is this relevant only in Canada and The States or worldwide? Thanks Donna > From: Gilbert <john2002@...> > Reply-qxci-english > Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:05:10 -0700 (PDT) > QXCI-English > Subject: Bioresonance > > Gentlepeople, > > There's a miscopnception about the term " bioresonance. " > > In the US and Canada bioresonance is a well defined medical term. The FDA > defines it as " magnetic resonance imaging " (MRI) and similar technologies. > According to the FDA requirements one must be a medical doctor or under the > supervision of a medical doctor to engage in the operation of a MRI and > similar technologies. Also according to both the FDA and Health Canada the > EPFX and SCIO are not Registered to do bioresonance. > > I have discussed this issue with Professor Bill and he is fully aware > of the FDA and Health Canada position and has asked all EPFX and SCIO > distributors to delete any reference to bioresonance in their literature, web > sites and teaching materials. > > Unless you are a licensed medical doctor or under the supervision of a > licensed medical doctor in either the US or Canada, it is illegal for you to > do bioresonance with any device. Certification by the NBCB absolutely does > not qualify you to do bioresonance training. > > If you have any doubts about this issue, please visit FDA.gov and follow the > links to the medical equipment devices division and obtain the telphone > numbers to call the 800 consumer line. > > > Regards, > Gilbert > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Donna, if you are looking for the best terminology to describe yourself as a qxci/scio practitioner I would suggest "bio-feedback provider" not because it describes what the systems does, but it is , in my oponion the, the safest terminology to use. I am working on a paper for the group that hopefully will clarify some misunderstanding in this area. Barry at QWC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Has anyone experienced treatment with bioresonance-type machines, and did it do any good? commented on these that the published explanations of how they work seem to be handwaving and hype, and I feel the same. But like so many things, they might work empirically? Dr Dowson argues against them for ES, saying that one of his patients tried it and got worse. But as all individuals seem to react differently, has it helped other people? Sue was treated twice on a machine of this general type (the Raytheon). The first time gave unexpected results; her ES was worsened but her MCS was helped! The second time it just made her ES worse, and we have not tried it since. Ian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Hello Ian, you misunderstood me. Real bioresonance machines are a godsend. I mean the Rife machines. (see my website) Not the Mora, or a Biocom, or such types, which are more acupuncture machines. A real Rife machine works with a big lamp, or has hand- and foot electrodes, or big round antennas. And does not hinder electrosensible people. And can improve health considerably. In my former posting, I only wanted to explain, that for ordinary people, looking for the influence of frequencies, it is not obvious what to expect. One may have a reaction, a *Herx*, or a socalled *Hit*. The frequency may do something in your aura only (or not). But the frequency may also enter your body and make or make not reactions in cells. Like with homeopathy, when one has the impression that the illness is getting worse, this means, that you are on the richt track, and that the therapy is catching on. Soon afterwards, the illness will be gone. Around the body we have frequency fields in the MHz region. The body itsself emits freuqncies around 90 GHz. So, take your pick. Be aware, that people with MCS may also have Lyme Disease, which is difficult to detect. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus RE: Bioresonance > Has anyone experienced treatment with bioresonance-type machines, and did > it > do any good? commented on these that the published explanations > of > how they work seem to be handwaving and hype, and I feel the same. But > like > so many things, they might work empirically? > > Dr Dowson argues against them for ES, saying that one of his > patients > tried it and got worse. But as all individuals seem to react differently, > has it helped other people? > > Sue was treated twice on a machine of this general type (the Raytheon). > The > first time gave unexpected results; her ES was worsened but her MCS was > helped! The second time it just made her ES worse, and we have not tried > it > since. > > Ian > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Thanks for clarifying this . How about the Raytheon machine (German) - which type does that belong to? Ian _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of charles Sent: 16 February 2006 17:34 Subject: Re: Bioresonance Hello Ian, you misunderstood me. Real bioresonance machines are a godsend. I mean the Rife machines. (see my website) Not the Mora, or a Biocom, or such types, which are more acupuncture machines. A real Rife machine works with a big lamp, or has hand- and foot electrodes, or big round antennas. And does not hinder electrosensible people. And can improve health considerably. In my former posting, I only wanted to explain, that for ordinary people, looking for the influence of frequencies, it is not obvious what to expect. One may have a reaction, a *Herx*, or a socalled *Hit*. The frequency may do something in your aura only (or not). But the frequency may also enter your body and make or make not reactions in cells. Like with homeopathy, when one has the impression that the illness is getting worse, this means, that you are on the richt track, and that the therapy is catching on. Soon afterwards, the illness will be gone. Around the body we have frequency fields in the MHz region. The body itsself emits freuqncies around 90 GHz. So, take your pick. Be aware, that people with MCS may also have Lyme Disease, which is difficult to detect. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus RE: Bioresonance > Has anyone experienced treatment with bioresonance-type machines, and did > it > do any good? commented on these that the published explanations > of > how they work seem to be handwaving and hype, and I feel the same. But > like > so many things, they might work empirically? > > Dr Dowson argues against them for ES, saying that one of his > patients > tried it and got worse. But as all individuals seem to react differently, > has it helped other people? > > Sue was treated twice on a machine of this general type (the Raytheon). > The > first time gave unexpected results; her ES was worsened but her MCS was > helped! The second time it just made her ES worse, and we have not tried > it > since. > > Ian > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Hello Ian, I am sorry, but could not find any information about your Raytheon machine. It is certainly not mentioned in our list of Rife machines. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus RE: Bioresonance > > >> Has anyone experienced treatment with bioresonance-type machines, and did >> it >> do any good? commented on these that the published explanations >> of >> how they work seem to be handwaving and hype, and I feel the same. But >> like >> so many things, they might work empirically? >> >> Dr Dowson argues against them for ES, saying that one of his >> patients >> tried it and got worse. But as all individuals seem to react >> differently, >> has it helped other people? >> >> Sue was treated twice on a machine of this general type (the Raytheon). >> The >> first time gave unexpected results; her ES was worsened but her MCS was >> helped! The second time it just made her ES worse, and we have not tried >> it >> since. >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 I wonder if I have got the name slightly wrong. I can't find it on the Internet either. It was supplied from Germany and there were quite a few around. It ran through a variety of frequency programmes which tended to last between half an hour and an hour. The naturopath who used it didn't really understand how it worked, to be honest. Ian _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of charles Sent: 16 February 2006 18:15 Subject: Re: Bioresonance Hello Ian, I am sorry, but could not find any information about your Raytheon machine. It is certainly not mentioned in our list of Rife machines. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus RE: Bioresonance > > >> Has anyone experienced treatment with bioresonance-type machines, and did >> it >> do any good? commented on these that the published explanations >> of >> how they work seem to be handwaving and hype, and I feel the same. But >> like >> so many things, they might work empirically? >> >> Dr Dowson argues against them for ES, saying that one of his >> patients >> tried it and got worse. But as all individuals seem to react >> differently, >> has it helped other people? >> >> Sue was treated twice on a machine of this general type (the Raytheon). >> The >> first time gave unexpected results; her ES was worsened but her MCS was >> helped! The second time it just made her ES worse, and we have not tried >> it >> since. >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Hi, Ian and , Thanks for writing this, . I was thinking this also when I read Ian's post--when people get ill from a treatment, it doesn't always mean this is a bad sign, but that the body is moving toxins or making changes of various kinds that are temporarily causing a bad reaction. I didn't reply to Ian because I am not really ES except when using a cell phone and feel somewhat unqualified to say these things here. But in my case, where CFIDS (ME), FM, MCS, etc, etc were concerned, there have been many times I thought I was getting worse from a treatment I was trying. Only later I found it was helping, but it took abit of pain (sometimes great pain!) to reach that point. This was expecially true of anything that detoxed my body, and alot of my illness was centered around toxins. I did not know that for most of my life. I am now even having to diet to lose fat that accummulated toxins. It has been very difficult and I have gotten quite ill from losing this fat! The nutritionist I am seeing is the one who figured this out--I was not able to lose weight at all, it just would not budge. He told me that my body could not deal with all the toxins and found a way to put it into long term storage in my adipose fat. I was very fatigued, partly because my body would not touch my fat for energy needs. I had to take supplements and germicidals, etc, to get this weight to come off, in addition to very low carb dieting. I got very ill (and still do) when I am losing. I take breaks along the way so that I am not ill for many months on end and feel really great now when I am on these breaks. I have about 20 more pounds to go. The nutritionist said to go down to at least 110 pounds, but I may have to go under 100 pounds, if I still have any adipose fat left. After I get all the weight off, tho, I can put on some weight again till I reach the level that feels right for me (around 118 to 125 pounds--and that fat will no longer be toxic.) I thought I had gotten the toxins all out before, but I keep finding them in new places. And mobilizing them in any way seems to always make me very ill. The nutritionist says I will periodically have to be on a maintenance program to eliminate toxins for the rest of my life. But I have them down to a level now where they no longer make me chronically ill. It was not till I dealt with the fat issue tho, that I could get past adrenal dysfunction. Every supplement that I now take made me very ill initially from die-off or some other reaction. Sue might want to revisit some of these therapies that she felt made her worse. Some things you just have to go slower on or lower doses of, till you can better tolerate the worsening symptoms. Others can be attempted at a later date when the toxins are at more managable levels. My best to Sue, Diane charles <charles@...> wrote: Hello Ian, you misunderstood me. Real bioresonance machines are a godsend. I mean the Rife machines. (see my website) Not the Mora, or a Biocom, or such types, which are more acupuncture machines. A real Rife machine works with a big lamp, or has hand- and foot electrodes, or big round antennas. And does not hinder electrosensible people. And can improve health considerably. In my former posting, I only wanted to explain, that for ordinary people, looking for the influence of frequencies, it is not obvious what to expect. One may have a reaction, a *Herx*, or a socalled *Hit*. The frequency may do something in your aura only (or not). But the frequency may also enter your body and make or make not reactions in cells. Like with homeopathy, when one has the impression that the illness is getting worse, this means, that you are on the richt track, and that the therapy is catching on. Soon afterwards, the illness will be gone. Around the body we have frequency fields in the MHz region. The body itsself emits freuqncies around 90 GHz. So, take your pick. Be aware, that people with MCS may also have Lyme Disease, which is difficult to detect. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 I read someone from our local support group using Bioresonance to remove metals...and his child is metal free after one yr. The only thing bioresonance couldn't remove is mercury. does anyone know of such therapy and whether or not it's effective like what he claimed? -- Priscilla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.