Guest guest Posted February 23, 2007 Report Share Posted February 23, 2007 oops, wrongo, looks like it is not available any longer??? >>we have the link on the TA site - its the old copy Steph wnats if I read her right - and you need to keep that copy yourself as far as I know you can't go back and call it up. Steph your best bet is to think back and do it again, cut and paste from the screen and add the desired date. In the meantime I can mail Steve Edelson and see if there is anyway to trace the old one? Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2007 Report Share Posted February 23, 2007 http://www.healing-arts.org/children/ATEC.htm the above link leads you to it, and more > > I completed an ATEC when I started biomed about 2 years ago and I cant > find the ruddy thing anywhere. > > I also can't find on the ARI web site where the previous one might > have been stored. ANy ideas? Just done Tom again and he's at 79, > which might not sound great but I know he was much higher than that > two years ago, just can't find out where! Also he has 29 in > health/physical/behaviour which should improve soon! > > I now need the info for a meeting with his paediatrician. > > I hoped it would recognise my email address but no! > > Steph > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2007 Report Share Posted February 23, 2007 oops, wrongo, looks like it is not available any longer??? > > > > I completed an ATEC when I started biomed about 2 years ago and I > cant > > find the ruddy thing anywhere. > > > > I also can't find on the ARI web site where the previous one might > > have been stored. ANy ideas? Just done Tom again and he's at 79, > > which might not sound great but I know he was much higher than that > > two years ago, just can't find out where! Also he has 29 in > > health/physical/behaviour which should improve soon! > > > > I now need the info for a meeting with his paediatrician. > > > > I hoped it would recognise my email address but no! > > > > Steph > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 I remember that the ability to save and return to the old one was there when I created it. Damn! Should have kept it somewhere. I probably have but my Tom FIles now run to a mountain! Steph x > > > In a message dated 23/02/2007 22:13:29 GMT Standard Time, > bbrowne123@... writes: > > oops, wrongo, looks like it is not available any longer??? > > > > >>we have the link on the TA site - its the old copy Steph wnats if I read > her right - and you need to keep that copy yourself as far as I know you can't > go back and call it up. > > Steph your best bet is to think back and do it again, cut and paste from the > screen and add the desired date. In the meantime I can mail Steve Edelson > and see if there is anyway to trace the old one? > > Mandi x > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 Alasdair got a 32. I am going to try to use this to keep track of chelation progress. >>>Don't worry if it doesn't move much - once you get down to lower 30's its hard to move quickly - where does he score highest? - Sam is 38 now (and functions no where near the level of Alasdair) but 22 of those points are Speech and Language - I don't count PECs or signs as words - if I did the ATEC would have him as recovered. When we started out it was health that scored the highest. Make a note of the ambiguous parts of the ATEC so you remember how you filled it in. Get the therapists to do it too - you can print it and they can fill in and then you enter on site and get the score. Some answers that change over time can change the score when perhaps they shouldn't because of being age related - like is it a major problem if a 2 year old is in diapers - not at all - if he is 12 then it is. I still think the ATEC is valuable - just be aware of its limitations Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 OK, this just worked for me: http://www.ARI-ATEC.com Alasdair got a 32. I am going to try to use this to keep track of chelation progress. Steph S-M x > > > > > > In a message dated 23/02/2007 22:13:29 GMT Standard Time, > > bbrowne123@ writes: > > > > oops, wrongo, looks like it is not available any longer??? > > > > > > > > >>we have the link on the TA site - its the old copy Steph wnats if > I read > > her right - and you need to keep that copy yourself as far as I know > you can't > > go back and call it up. > > > > Steph your best bet is to think back and do it again, cut and paste > from the > > screen and add the desired date. In the meantime I can mail Steve > Edelson > > and see if there is anyway to trace the old one? > > > > Mandi x > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2007 Report Share Posted February 26, 2007 Hi Mandi, I have pasted his test and scoring below. Yes, I thought it was good but not sensitive enough - for example, a lot of Alasdair's weakness shows up in interaction with other children. He does not see things from their point of view and it leads to social misunderstanding and isolation. His weaknesses are social, although I was surprised that cognitive stuff showed up highest on his ATEC. So maybe ATEC is not the most sensitive tool for measuring improvement in the Aspergery end of things. We are on round 5 of chelation - doing round 6 this weekend. I have lower back pain going on seven days and am worried it is kidneys, although I have no history of kidney probs. Alasdair seems fine - we will have results of kidney/liver function tests soon so that will tell us more. We have results of UTMs and Alasdair is excreting a lot of lead and nickel - lead almost very elevated range, nickel elevated. Also excreting mercury, arsenic, cadmium,thallium, tin and tungsten. I am excreting arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, nickel, thallium and tin, all within reference range although mercury and nickel are at the highest end, almost into the elevated range. My memory is just as bad as ever and Alasdair seems to be a bit better overall, although it is hard to tell. I will keep you updated. Steph S-M x Total Score: 32I. Speech/Language/Communication: 4II. Sociability: 8III. Sensory/Cognitive Awareness: 13IV. Health/Physical/Behavior: 7 **I. Speech/Language/Communication1. Knows own name: Very true2. Responds to `No' or `Stop': Very true3. Can follow some commands: Very true4. Can use one word at a time: Very true5. Can use 2 words at a time: Very true6. Can use 3 words at a time: Very true7. Knows 10 or more words: Very true8. Can use sentences with 4 or more words: Very true9. Explains what he/she wants: Very true10. Asks meaningful questions: Very true11. Speech tends to be meaningful/relevant: Very true12. Often uses several successive sentences: Very true13. s on fairly good conversation: Not true14. Has normal ability to com municate for his/her age: Not true **II. Sociability1. Seems to be in a shell - you cannot reach him/her: Somewhat descriptive2. Ignores other people: Not descriptive3. Pays little or no attention when addressed: Somewhat descriptive4. Uncooperative and resistant: Not descriptive5. No eye contact: Somewhat descriptive6. Prefers to be left alone: Not descriptive7. Shows no affection: Not descriptive8. Fails to greet parents: Somewhat descriptive9. Avoids contact with others: Not descriptive10. Does not imitate: Somewhat descriptive11. Dislikes being held/cuddled: Not descriptive12. Does not share or show: Not descriptive13. Does not wave `bye bye': Somewhat descriptive14. Disagreeable/not compliant: Not descriptive15. Temper tantrums: Not descriptive16. Lacks friends/companions: Somewhat descriptive17. Rarely smiles: Not descriptive18. Insensitive to other's feelings: Somewhat descriptive19. Indifferent to being liked: Not descriptive20. Indifferent if parent(s) leave: Not descriptive **III. Sensory/Cognitive Awareness1. Responds to own name: Very descriptive2. Responds to praise: Very descriptive3. Looks at people and animals: Not descriptive4. Looks at pictures (and T.V.): Very descriptive5. Does drawing, coloring, art: Not descriptive6. Plays with toys appropriately: Somewhat descriptive7. Appropriate facial expression: Not descriptive8. Understands stories on T.V.: Very descriptive9. Understands explanations: Very descriptive10. Aware of environment: Very descriptive11. Aware of danger: Very descriptive12. Shows imagination: Somewhat descriptive13. Initiates activities: Somewhat descriptive14. Dresses self: Somewhat descriptive15. Curious, interested: Very descriptive16. Venturesome - explores: Very descriptive17. Tuned in - Not spacey: Somewhat descriptive18. Looks where others are looking: Not descriptive **IV. Health/Physical/Behavior1. Bed-wetting: Not a Problem2. Wets pants/diapers: Not a Problem3. Soils pants/diapers: Not a Problem4. Diarrhea: Moderate Problem5. Constipation: Not a Problem6. Sleep problems: Not a Problem7. Eats too much/too little: Not a Problem8. Extremely limited diet: Not a Problem9. Hyperactive: Moderate Problem10. Lethargic: Not a Problem11. Hits or injures self: Not a Problem12. Hits or injures others: Not a Problem13. Destructive: Not a Problem14. Sound-sensitive: Minor Problem15. Anxious/fearful: Not a Problem16. Unhappy/crying: Not a Problem17. Seizures: Not a Problem18. Obsessive speech: Not a Problem19. Rigid routines: Not a Problem20. Shouts or screams: Not a Problem21. Demands sameness: Not a Problem22. Often agitated: Not a Problem23. Not sensitive to pain: Minor Problem24. Hooked or fixated on certain objects/topics: Minor Problem25. Repetitive movements: Not a Problem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Hi, I would like to do an ATEC assessment for my child, can someone point me to a working online assessment website?The one at ARI doesnt' work. Thanks -- Priscilla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 I don't know why it isn't working but if you don't fill out the email spot just fill out the questions you can get the score. You could print off the form and fill it out to have a copy of how you answered the questions then save the results to a file. Maybe once they fix it you can go back and enter the info again. Just leave everything blank except the questions. Tressie For the interpretation http://www.autism.com/ari/atec/atec_report.htm Mild 0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99 Severe > > Hi, > I would like to do an ATEC assessment for my child, can someone point me to > a working online assessment website?The one at ARI doesnt' work. > Thanks > > -- > Priscilla > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.