Guest guest Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 In a one-month span of time, I could do four short rounds (each round being 3 days " on, " four days " off " ), or I could do two longer rounds (each round 7 days " on, " 8 days " off. " ) Assuming that side effects would be tolerable in either case, which scenario would move more mercury in that month? Which scenario would be a more efficient use of chelating time? After all the success stories I've read, I don't know what's better: chelating " on " for longer, or simply getting more " rounds " done. Do you become more able to increase dosage of your rounds over time more with the shorter rounds or with the longer rounds? I am chelating my 3yo daughter and myself at the same time. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.