Guest guest Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 Perhaps while we are on the subject of mercury through the gut, people who haven't seen the Rooney chelation paper should give it a read. It raises the question on the need for further research in the potential role of fibre in assisting heavy metal excretion, once the metal is IN the gut. Alan Foossolvesunified.com wrote: > > Okay, well, no I do NOT speak in vague or anthro terms... not after 8 > years of chemistry. The chelation process is meant to bind to mercury > ions chemically. To do that, they must not be otherwise bound at the > time, so although mercury ions are chemically bound in the body, and > very tightly so, they are yet clearly free some of the time. This is > not vague, it is called statistical thermodyamics, a very rigorous and > well established science, real science, not vaccination wishful > thinking. And the appropriate concept in this matter is covered in the > principles of chemical equilibrium, as not vague as you can get. All > matter in that sense is actually a bit like a lava lamp (perhaps the > only true scientific law, the 2nd law of thermodynamics). That's why > according to real science, mercury is going to leak out of amalgams, > as all of us on this list already know.... is that better? > > > >> > >>From: michelleboyle3 > >><<mailto:michelle b oyle3%40. com>michelleboyle3> > >>Subject: [ ] Scared of Cutler Chelation > >><mailto:Autism- Mercury%40g roups.com>Autism- Mercury@ > >>groups. com > >>Date: Saturday, January 24, 2009, 1:26 PM > >> > >>My son's DAN has spent months scaring us away from the Cutler > >>chelation protocol. He says since my son's gut is so leaky and has > >>such malabsorption that this type of chelation will either make his > >>gut worse or not do anything since anything entering his gut is not > >>absorbed. And do we did one round of IV chelation this week with DMPS > >>and EDTA. We've seen nothing. But I am concerned about all the time > >>spent in between chelations and what is happening to the displaced > >>metals now. Should I be giving him charcoal around the clock? Is > >>Cutler's chelation hard on the liver? My son's liver enzymes have > >>been elevated in the past. And, if we do decide to try Cutler's > >>chelation, what is done to prevent recirculation of metals during the > >>time off--in particular with the use of ALA so it does not relodge in > > >the brain? Thank you. > >> > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Our N.D. prescribes fiber during chelation, but she says it has to be non-soluable fiber. The stuff is like cardboard. Impossible to get it in our boys. Anybody have any luck mixing this stuff with anything? TJ ________________________________ From: Reynolds <peter@...> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 8:43:54 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Whoa... Perhaps while we are on the subject of mercury through the gut, people who haven't seen the Rooney chelation paper should give it a read. It raises the question on the need for further research in the potential role of fibre in assisting heavy metal excretion, once the metal is IN the gut. Alan Foossolvesunified. com wrote: > > Okay, well, no I do NOT speak in vague or anthro terms... not after 8 > years of chemistry. The chelation process is meant to bind to mercury > ions chemically. To do that, they must not be otherwise bound at the > time, so although mercury ions are chemically bound in the body, and > very tightly so, they are yet clearly free some of the time. This is > not vague, it is called statistical thermodyamics, a very rigorous and > well established science, real science, not vaccination wishful > thinking. And the appropriate concept in this matter is covered in the > principles of chemical equilibrium, as not vague as you can get. All > matter in that sense is actually a bit like a lava lamp (perhaps the > only true scientific law, the 2nd law of thermodynamics) . That's why > according to real science, mercury is going to leak out of amalgams, > as all of us on this list already know.... is that better? > > > >> > >>From: michelleboyle3 > >><<mailto:michelle b oyle3%40. com>michelleboyle3> > >>Subject: [ ] Scared of Cutler Chelation > >><mailto:Autism- Mercury%40g roups.com>Autism- Mercury@ > >>groups. com > >>Date: Saturday, January 24, 2009, 1:26 PM > >> > >>My son's DAN has spent months scaring us away from the Cutler > >>chelation protocol. He says since my son's gut is so leaky and has > >>such malabsorption that this type of chelation will either make his > >>gut worse or not do anything since anything entering his gut is not > >>absorbed. And do we did one round of IV chelation this week with DMPS > >>and EDTA. We've seen nothing. But I am concerned about all the time > >>spent in between chelations and what is happening to the displaced > >>metals now. Should I be giving him charcoal around the clock? Is > >>Cutler's chelation hard on the liver? My son's liver enzymes have > >>been elevated in the past. And, if we do decide to try Cutler's > >>chelation, what is done to prevent recirculation of metals during the > >>time off--in particular with the use of ALA so it does not relodge in > > >the brain? Thank you. > >> > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.