Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 Hi, I was jsut reading your posting about your daughter and was wondering what Vantin is. I have never heard of this drug being used for Lyme. Do you know what class of abx it is? I think that your daughter should be symptom free (NO SYMPTOMS) for at least 3-6 months before stopping all abx. I have been better before only to relapse months or a year later. I don't think I was ever on abx long enough and never killed off the spirochete for good. Hope your daughter continues to feel better. Please think about additional treatment. She might have a chance to get cured if she is treated for a long enough time. -Val Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 I have been reading this digest for a while and really enjoy the information. I finally got my 13 year old daughters' February test results. She started out getting ill in July(both my daughters had pneumonia and they never really are ever sick with anything) and was put on Zithromax and then Augmentin. In September she started getting headaches, quite severe and over the counter medicine did not help. She received more antibiotic in October for possible sinus problems. She then had a continuous headaches from October through January. Some days not as bad as others but always there in the morning and getting worse towards the end of the day. She went from specialist to specialist and had CAT Scan. The first lyme test was done when she was still on antibiotics and taking daily dosages of tylenol or ibuprofen. This is from LabCorp: Lyme Total AB., EIA Negative Lyme AB, IGM, EIA 1.95H Index Lyme AB IGM Interp Positive Lyme AB IGG By WB: P39 AB and P23 Present Lyme IGG WB Interp Negative Lyme AB IGM BY WB: P399 AB. and p23 AB Present Lyme IGM WB Interp Positive Test at StonyBrook: Lyme Serology was borderline and Western Blot IgG and IgM both Inderminate As she had no history of circular rash and only headache in forehead above eyes and was extremely fatigued and slept alot, all of the doctors would not diagnose Lyme or give us any antibiotics. She did have body rashes and ear lobe swollen and pulse rate skipping but even the Lyme doctor said nothing to do with Lyme when ever we tried to give them a symptom that we felt would help in the diagnosis. She repeated above tests in January with the following results: Labcorp. Lyme AB Total Immunoglobulins 1.15 H Index Lyme AB Interp. EIA Positive Lyme Disease, Quant, IgM 1.46 H Index Lyme AB IgM Interp. EIA Positive P42 Present Lyme IgG WB Interp. Negative P23 AB Present Lyme IgM WB Interp. Negative Stonybrook Western Blot IgM and IgG both Inderminate Finally in February I insisted on antibiotics and she was given 6 weeks of Vantin. She has not had the headaches since 2 weeks after the last course of antibiotics and is almost back to her old self. I am waiting for the other shoe to drop so to speak. My question is to all of you is what your opinions are as to whether she had, has or will have problems in the future. Was she treated long enough? etc. Should she again be tested in a few months to see if her totals have changed? Sorry this is so long and thank you all for any help you give. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 Hi....I read your posting but don't know what all of the results you posted were for, even though I have been dealing with this disease for over a decade. But sometimes when a definitive serology isn't present, a urine antigen can be. Usually the doctor puts the patient on a 5 day course of strong antiobiotics and you take urine samples for day 3,4 5, (first am) and freeze and send out to Igenex Labs in Palto Alto, California. In all the years I have had lyme, I have only had 2 positive serology tests, but my urine tests have always been high. Try to collect when herxing. I don't know of another lab that does that particular test, and I don't think insurance will cover it...but maybe they do now. Good luck, and don't ever stop seeking answers. The fact that her headaches subsided when on abx seems like it may be connected. Also, she did have some positive tests as you wrote....usually you don't get false positive .....more often you get false negatives.. Good luck, take care, Gail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 1999 Report Share Posted May 5, 1999 Hi Barbara, I sent you an explanation of the WB and what the results mean by private email, as it is quite long and involved, I hope this will help answer some of your questions, Best to you and your daughter. Marta >From: Barbara <u1004720@...> > >I have been reading this digest for a while and really enjoy the >information. >I finally got my 13 year old daughters' February test results. She >started out getting ill in July(both my daughters had pneumonia and they >never really are ever sick with anything) and was put on Zithromax and >then Augmentin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 1999 Report Share Posted May 5, 1999 lab corp......hahahahahahahah..... i went undiagnosed for 2 years partially thanks to them .....in my opinion and many other lymies they are the worst testing lab for lyme....to have test done by them is more a waste of money then anywhere else......igenex ....a lab that does mainly lyme only claims a 40 % accuracy rate......LYME IS DIAGNOSED BY SYMPTOMS blood test may be of some help however even the social security agency now puts little weight in lyme blood test.....with all the information available i can't believe that so many are still hung up on testing positive ....the elisa tests and titre test are by the labs own addmissions totally unreliable.....western blot is not far behind ......the pcr welll the jury is still out on that one......sorry to sound aggravated but having lived with this disease for 11 years and gone thru so much i get so* & & )()*^%$## ....PEOPLE GET THE LIST OF SYMPTOMS .....COMPARE THEM TO HOW U FEEL.......THEN LET U AND UR DOCTOR DECIDE IF HE SAYS NO.....GET ANOTHER DOCTOR..... in 1988 i was told by 4 doctors that even though i had 37 lyme symptoms that i cpould not have lyme because i did not have a bullseye rash......well we now know that less than 50% of lymies have one......but that was the standard then ......no wonder so many of us suffer from chronic lyme........ Reid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2000 Report Share Posted March 2, 2000 11 years ago my triglycerides and cholesterol were high even though I exercised and ate a healthy diet. I was tested for hypothyroidism using only a test of my free thyroxin, which was a low normal. 5 years later I was tested again using the TSH test and found out that I have Hashimoto's hypothyroidism. My mother was tested and diagnosed with it also, and it was only then that we found out that my grandmother had been diagnosed with it years before. Ever since I began taking Synthroid for the hypothyroidism my triglycerides and cholesterol have been normal, even when I eat high cholesterol foods and although I have been unable to exercise for the last year. I think that everyone should be tested for thyroid problems, especially if they are female, over- or under-weight, and/or suffer from fatigue. I would like to point out that my hypothyroidism symptoms were atypical. I suffered from oily rather than dry skin, and I was intolerant of heat (sweating very easily) rather than intolerant of cold. I did have a low basal temperature, but that no longer applies as I now suffer from a chronic low-grade fever. I would also like to mention that while taking Synthroid has alleviated some of my symptoms, I still suffer from increasing fatigue, I am still overweight and I am still intolerant of heat. My skin has become more normal, but I am now in my late 30's and I'm not surprised that it has become drier. I mention these things because I think that its quite possible to have hypothyroidsim AND CFS/FMS, in fact I've read that hypothyroidism is common in Fibromyalgia patients. But I don't think that treating the hypothyroidism is the whole answer and in fact I think that my doctors often passed off my fatigue as being caused by hypothyroidism and depression and thus failed to look further for the real cause. The latter is a source of much frustration for me, as I have a history of depression but find that I often become depressed because I am so tired, rather than becoming tired because I am depressed. Who WOULDN'T find it depressing to have chronic fatigue? I sometimes wish all my doctors would come down with it and then try to explain to their psychiatrists that they really have a medical rather than mental problem. I know this is an evil thought but they just make me so angry sometimes! Anyway, I recommend that everyone be tested for hypothyroidism with a TSH test just because it is a simple, easy (and I think it must be inexpensive or it wouldn't be covered for me!) test for a condition that has often been overlooked. Abra >From: mcamp10139@... >Reply-onelist >onelist >Subject: Re: tests results >Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 18:59:54 EST > >In a message dated 3/1/00 10:42:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, >onelist writes: > ><< my choesterol before this DD was 130. It's now almost 300 and my eating > habits are probably better. Lack of excercise? > > White blood cell: 3.6 normal range: 4-10 >> > >Christa, you have the same results that I had for 6 years. Now, after 7 >years >with CFS, the cholesterol has gotten better but the WBC count is still low. >Mine was 3.2 last time. My doc was concerned about this result. Low WBC >count is usually indicative of a chronic viral infection, although it is >seen >in >chronic bacterial infections such as brucellosis. What to do? Nothing to >do >re the WBC count. Your doc should be concerned about the cholesterol >unless it is just a one time deal. Have you gained weight? If so, you >should >try to lose weight. I took niacin which is recommended in the Merck Manual >as a first line treatment for high C. In addition to niacin (you can get >niacinamide >which doesn't cause flushing), I quit eating any ice cream, most cheese and >other animal products except for the chicken and fish that I tried to eat >to >maintain protein intake. C went from 280 to 210. However, I also lost >about >15 pounds. What were your tryglicerides? Mine were high when the C was >high. >I guess the good news is that after 7 years some of my results are getting >better so hopefully you can look forward to some improvement too. > >Mike > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2000 Report Share Posted March 2, 2000 In a message dated 3/1/00 10:42:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, onelist writes: << my choesterol before this DD was 130. It's now almost 300 and my eating habits are probably better. Lack of excercise? White blood cell: 3.6 normal range: 4-10 >> Christa, you have the same results that I had for 6 years. Now, after 7 years with CFS, the cholesterol has gotten better but the WBC count is still low. Mine was 3.2 last time. My doc was concerned about this result. Low WBC count is usually indicative of a chronic viral infection, although it is seen in chronic bacterial infections such as brucellosis. What to do? Nothing to do re the WBC count. Your doc should be concerned about the cholesterol unless it is just a one time deal. Have you gained weight? If so, you should try to lose weight. I took niacin which is recommended in the Merck Manual as a first line treatment for high C. In addition to niacin (you can get niacinamide which doesn't cause flushing), I quit eating any ice cream, most cheese and other animal products except for the chicken and fish that I tried to eat to maintain protein intake. C went from 280 to 210. However, I also lost about 15 pounds. What were your tryglicerides? Mine were high when the C was high. I guess the good news is that after 7 years some of my results are getting better so hopefully you can look forward to some improvement too. Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2001 Report Share Posted March 21, 2001 > band 41 positive > band igm 23 positive Is the 41 an IGM or an IGG? the 23 is a lyme specific band, its for an outer surface protien of the lyme itself, shown only in lyme disease, the 41 is for flagellan like bacteria and is the 1st to appear for lyme,but is supposedly (from what I have read) not specific for lyme itself--I have read in some few articles that it is, but either way it counts. If both were IGM's you are literally + no matter what kind of dr you goto (still goto a LLMD) as the CDC criteria is 2 out of 3 igm bands. If the 41 is an IGG, it shows that your body has been making an antibody response for a bit, since IGG shows later on in infection. To be + for the IGG part of the test you need to have 5 out of 10 specific CDC required bands. SO even thou, if the IGM is only the 23, it's still significant, as it should only show up if it's lyme disease, no other cause or reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2001 Report Share Posted March 21, 2001 - it showed WB IGG at 41 positive and 23 at IGM?? So does it mean I am positive???? -- In @y..., pttllc@a... wrote: > > band 41 positive > > band igm 23 positive > > Is the 41 an IGM or an IGG? the 23 is a lyme specific band, its for > an outer surface protien of the lyme itself, shown only in lyme > disease, the 41 is for flagellan like bacteria and is the 1st to > appear for lyme,but is supposedly (from what I have read) not > specific for lyme itself--I have read in some few articles that it > is, but either way it counts. > If both were IGM's you are literally + no matter what kind of dr you > goto (still goto a LLMD) as the CDC criteria is 2 out of 3 igm bands. > If the 41 is an IGG, it shows that your body has been making an > antibody response for a bit, since IGG shows later on in infection. > To be + for the IGG part of the test you need to have 5 out of 10 > specific CDC required bands. > SO even thou, if the IGM is only the 23, it's still significant, as > it should only show up if it's lyme disease, no other cause or reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2001 Report Share Posted March 21, 2001 , you are not + by CDC standards. However having bands 23 which is the outer surface protein of the Lyme spirochete, and band 41 'usually the first to appear after Bb infection. This would point to you having Lyme. Metzler Chocolates Fine Artisan candies, handmade with the finest ingredients. ___~----..,,. // ( )___ ) \.\ // // // \\ // // \\ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2001 Report Share Posted March 22, 2001 > The only way to have band 23, which is totally specific for the lyme bacteria, is to be exposed to it. Is this your 1st western blot test?? Some doctors will treat a person for lyme, IF they have 1 specific band, other doctors DO NOT unless you meet the CDC criteria of 2 out of 3 specific bands on IGM, and 5 out of 10 specific bands on IGG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2001 Report Share Posted October 19, 2001 stevku@... wrote: Hi Everyone, I went back to the doctor today. She told me that my thyroid tests came back fine. Liz, Did she give you the actual numbers? How about a copy of the tests? However she also told me that I have anemia, but she doesn't know why. She wants me to undergo a lot of tests trial and error to find out what's going on. She wants me to start out by going to a gastroelogist (sp.) to rule out an ulcer, I have NO symptoms of ulcers. Huh? Anemia is related to ulcers? To me it seems to coincidental to be having neck pain, Can you describe your neck pain? I had a lump in my neck a few months ago, off and on, then pain came and I made it go away with Jell-O... but unfortunately now the lump is back (pain came back a little too, but once again I got rid of the pain with Jell-O). I'm getting freaked out and will make an appt. with a chiro sometime this week. -- Mindy ----------------------- "...that they may be one..." - Jesus, 17:22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2001 Report Share Posted October 19, 2001 > Huh? Anemia is related to ulcers? Blood loss from bleeding ulcers can lead to anemia . . .. C-MI __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2001 Report Share Posted October 22, 2001 Hi Mindy, No, she didn't give me the actual numbers, I'll have to get them from her. As for the neck pain: When I'm having actual pain it's usually more on the right side, however it is a little on the left and in the middle, but the right is just about always worse. When I'm not having " ouch pain " if you know what I mean, there's a pretty constant uncomfortable feeling across the front of my neck. Does this make any sense? Thanks!!! Liz ------ Liz, Did she give you the actual numbers? How about a copy of the tests? Can you describe your neck pain? I had a lump in my neck a few months ago, off and on, then pain came and I made it go away with Jell-O... but unfortunately now the lump is back (pain came back a little too, but once again I got rid of the pain with Jell-O). I'm getting freaked out and will make an appt. with a chiro sometime this week. -- Mindy ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2001 Report Share Posted October 27, 2001 stevku@... wrote: When I'm not having "ouch pain" if you know what I mean, there's a pretty constant uncomfortable feeling across the front of my neck. Does this make any sense? Hmm, that is where your thyroid is located. Interesting... in that case, I don't think jello would work for you! (my neck pain was more of a joint-related pain) -- Mindy ----------------------- "...that they may be one..." - Jesus, 17:22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2001 Report Share Posted December 6, 2001 i was under the impression that ultrasound doesnt work on the thyroid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 test reuslts free testosterone 7.4 nmo/l range 6-27 lh 3 iu/l range 1-9 fsh 2 iu/l range 1-19 shbg and free testosteron have not come back as yet,i deidcded to phone the lab at hospital and theb guy really beleioves those are all normal!! and says they did do my shbg in may and did tell my doctor and said it was normal there definition of normal is not mine regardws paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.