Re: Simple Carbs & Sugars Feed Cancer

[Guest guest]

It would feed cancer because cancer cells have turned off the aerobic

respiration of the mitochondria, and have gone to an anerobic

fermentation process, which requires 15x the glucose of normal aerobic

cells.

Now here's my beef. Scientists can see this happening in the cells.

They can look at cancerous cells under microscopes and see how they got

there from precancerous cells and from normal cells. What they don't

see are little tiny mushrooms or any such thing.

Now, it may be almost proper to say that cancer cells ACT LIKE fungus

cells, but this doesn't make them fungus cells. Whales act like fish,

but they aren't fish.

Now if it just so happens that certain anti-fungal agents kill cancer,

so be it. That would be great.

>

> OMG what a light bulb moment. Of course, simple carbs and sugar feeds

> cancer, that's Cancer 101. Why would it feed cancer unless it's a

fungus!!

>

> L

> Toronto, ON

>

[Guest guest]

Cancer cells are fungal. They are members of a family of 10

pleomorphic organisms that change their form and function based upon

the nutritional conditions of the terrain they live in. They are what

we call germs. Thier purpose is not to produce disease but to

scavenge it. It is their excreted toxins that are detected when we

feel sick because these toxic chemicals dilute the blood and lymph

supply which can be readily seen in a phase contrast or darkfield

microscope. Researchers see this stuff all the time and ignore it

because they were taught that what have been calling Russel Bodies

are simply artifacts meaning junk that broke loose from somewhere and

is circulating in the blood and lymph fluids. They see the fungi and

most know what it is they are looking at. They don't see it as a cause

and it isn't directly which is why it is ignored.

When bacteria and fungi are seen in the body fliuds and tissues they

believe that the body has been invaded from outside and must be

targeted for chemical and radiological destruction. What they don't

understand is that these germs are produced by the body itself and is

not the cause of the disease but are the result of it. The disease

comes first, the germs arrive after the fact. Killing the germs, ie.,

destroying cancer cells with chemo, does drop the toxic load on the

body and the body condition improves for a while. But the cause of

the condition to develop in the first place was never addressed and

that is why conventional treatments fail.

The Rife/Kendall experiment proved pleomorphism. Rife observed the

microbe that is responsible for cancer and this has been well-

accepted in most branches of biological research. What isn't

understood is that these organisms are pleomorphic and thus become

the germs incorrectly thought to originate from outside the body.

When Progenitor cryptocides morphs into the myceilial stages, it is a

fungus. Earlier in the cycle much smaller organisms were seen by Rife

that cannot be seen in normal light microscopes. By transferring

these invisible microbes via a microfine filtering process, he was

able to induce cancer at will, in laboratory animals. He would then

section the resulting tumors, filter them down to sub-visible forms

and then infect another animal thus re-producing the disease. When

the tumors formed it was obvious that they were coated with a fungus.

What Rife proved is that the earlier invisible microbe developed into

the fungus and when he altered the terrain, he was able to turn that

fungus back into a harmless life form. In other words, cancer is

curable by shifting the environment in which is lives. All successful

cancer treatments operate on this basic psincipal which the

conventional medical circles refuse to accept and this is why they

fail to cure this disease.

OMG what a light bulb moment. Of course, simple carbs and sugar

feeds cancer, that's Cancer 101. Why would it feed cancer unless it's a fungus!!

[Guest guest]

Hello ,

Well, you can't make that deduction. All cells burn sugar, not just

cancer cells and fungus cells. In fact, not all cancer cells are

anaerobic. There is generally some impairment of the electron

transport chain, but the cells are often not just anaerobic.

Mike

Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 10:01:19 AM, you wrote:

JL> OMG what a light bulb moment. Of course, simple carbs and sugar feeds

JL> cancer, that’s Cancer 101. Why would it feed cancer unless it’s a fungus!!

JL> L

JL> Toronto, ON

Best regards,

goldenmike mailto:goldenmike@...

[Guest guest]

Cancer cells consume much more sugar than do healthy cells and they

are all anaerobes. They ferment sugars and expell lactic acid and

carbon monoxide, only using small amounts of oxygen. Oxygen kills

them. Dr. Warburg covered this topic thoroughly and was awarded the

1931 Nobel Prize for his efforts. Just for the record, he did not

receive a second Nobel Prize. He was nominated for a second prize but

Hitler forbade him from accepting the nomination. Hitler did now want

a Jew to be a national hero.

goldenmike@... wrote:

> Hello ,

> Well, you can't make that deduction. All cells burn sugar, not just

> cancer cells and fungus cells. In fact, not all cancer cells are

> anaerobic. There is generally some impairment of the electron

> transport chain, but the cells are often not just anaerobic.

> Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 10:01:19 AM, you wrote:

> OMG what a light bulb moment. Of course, simple carbs and sugar

feeds cancer, that's Cancer 101. Why would it feed cancer unless it's

a fungus!! L

[Guest guest]

So Mike -- when you say not all cancer cells are anaerobic, are you

saying that certain types of cancer are aerobic, or are you saying

that within a given type, some are aerobic and some are anaerobic?

>

> JL> OMG what a light bulb moment. Of course, simple carbs and sugar

feeds

> JL> cancer, that?s Cancer 101. Why would it feed cancer unless it?s

a fungus!!

>

> JL> L

> JL> Toronto, ON

>

> Best regards,

> goldenmike mailto:goldenmike@...

>

[Guest guest]

So therapies intended to increase ATP and get the mitochodria working

would not work on aerobic cancers, I would guess.

> >>

> >> JL> OMG what a light bulb moment. Of course, simple carbs and

sugar

> j> feeds

> >> JL> cancer, that?s Cancer 101. Why would it feed cancer unless

it?s

> j> a fungus!!

> >>

> >> JL> L

> >> JL> Toronto, ON

> >>

> >> Best regards,

> >> goldenmike mailto:goldenmike@

> >>

>

>

>

>

>

> --

> Best regards,

> Mike mailto:goldenmike@...

>

[Guest guest]

jrrjim,

The best anti-fungal I know is the Virgin Coconut Oil Detox.

http://www.curemanual.com/detox-protocols/intestinal-cleansing/virgin-coconut-oi\

l-detox

Couple that with a high fat / low carb diet and you are one your way to

great health.

Edwin

[Guest guest]

I can get the coconut oil. Can you supply the virgin?

>

> jrrjim,

>

> The best anti-fungal I know is the Virgin Coconut Oil Detox.

> http://www.curemanual.com/detox-protocols/intestinal-cleansing/virgin-

coconut-oil-detox

>

> Couple that with a high fat / low carb diet and you are one your way

to

> great health.

>

> Edwin

>

[Guest guest]

I agree with your description but remember that I did say that it

uses some oxygen. But nonetheless, cancer cells are primarily

anaerobic. When adequate levels of oxygen are applied, the cancer

dies.

As far as lung cancer is concerned, if adequate levels were able to

reach the external aivioli there probably wouldn't be any cancer. My

uncle, who died from emphasema would be a good example. His lungs

were coated with tar, a known carcinogen. His lungs were not

aspirated with enough to assimilate needed levels of oxygen and he

developed cancer beneath the crud that caused him such stress and

strain when breathing. The fact that he lived as long as he did is

testimony as to the robustness of the human frame. People who smoke

are insane!

PawPaw and Protocell address the electrical potentials of the

cytoplasm to nucleus ratio as infected cells have near apoptosis

threshold potentials. By driving down overall tissue potentials like

all boats in a falling tide, the weakened cells which are the cancer

cells expire. That reaction has little to do with oxygen potentials

but has much to do with pH which is primarily electrical.

> c> Cancer cells consume much more sugar than do healthy cells and

they are all anaerobes. They ferment sugars and expell lactic acid

and carbon monoxide, only using small amounts of oxygen. Oxygen

kills them. Dr. Warburg covered this topic thoroughly and was awarded

the 1931 Nobel Prize for his efforts. Just for the record, he did

not receive a second Nobel Prize. He was nominated for a second

prize but Hitler forbade him from accepting the nomination. Hitler did now want

a Jew to be a national hero.

>

[Guest guest]

There are no aerobic cancers! Partial aerobes, yes, but they are

funcitionally anaerobes and all they succomb to increased oxygen

levels. That is the key to eliminating them. Try to think Ockham's

Razor: Keep it simple...

> >

> > SNIP

[Guest guest]

Yeh, but the mechanism is still electrical. It is the drop in

potential that causes the cells to expire. here is a quote from the

following website:

http://alternativecancer.us/pawpaw.htm

[Guest guest]

Oops! The quote didn't go through. Here it is again:

" By reducing this voltage level from 70 to 110 mv to something in the

50 mv region, normal cells can still function. However, cancer and

viral cells cannot process energy at this low voltage level and start

to starve. The process of starving is a slower process than being

poisoned which is why Paw Paw works slower than chemo. When Paw Paw

does not work,it is usually because it is not absorbed sufficiently

into the cells of the body to cause this voltage reduction. Both

Cantron and Protocel are designed to cause this voltage reduction.

If Paw Paw does not work for a person, Cantron or Protocel may work.

The pharmacology of Cantron and Protocel have an expanded explanation

for the role ATP energy reduction in cancer treatment... "

>

> Yeh, but the mechanism is still electrical. It is the drop in

> potential that causes the cells to expire. here is a quote from the

> following website:

>

> http://alternativecancer.us/pawpaw.htm

>