Guest guest Posted December 18, 2003 Report Share Posted December 18, 2003 Hi : The seeds are best kept refrigerated. I keep mine in the vegi-bin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2003 Report Share Posted December 18, 2003 Hi : The seeds are best kept refrigerated. I keep mine in the vegi-bin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2003 Report Share Posted December 19, 2003 To the group: I am glad this discussion on Vit. B17 came up because I have read a copied article, from about 5-6 years ago, from Penthouse, the author, Rorvik. This article is part of a seven part series on the " The Politics of Cancer " , and this article was entitled " Laetrile- the Drug That Never Was " . This article opens with the statement " Laetrile,the most controversial drug in the history of cancer research- has actually not existed until recently.That is the staggering claim of a young Israeli cancer researcher, Dr. Rubin, and his colleagues, at the Israeli Medical Research Foundation. He says that there has been a misconception of more than two decades that amygdalin and Laetrile are the same. He notes further that the originators of Laetrile substituted an inferior one and called it Laetrile. The drug that has been called Laetrile, and has been at the centre of the controversy, is actually amygdalin. Amygdalin may be effective as a pain killer, and a general palliative agent in cancer, but for the real cancer killer they should look to the true Laetrile. Ernest T.Krebs, sometimes referred to as " The Founder of Vit. B17 " , in the early 1950s, claimed to have synthesized beta-glucuronic analogue of amygdalin, but it differed from ordinary amygdalin in one crucial aspect. Amygdalin would not do, bcause it is a glucoside which can be unlocked only by another enzyme, which does not exist in selectively higher concentrations in cancer cells. As I understand it the young Israeli researcher and his colleagues have made the true Laetrile. Now, the article from Penthouse, from which the above was taken, was a bad photo copy, and I couldn't get much more from the article. If anyone out there should have access to this article I would be very pleased to have a copy. It appears that this true Laetrile does wrok for cancer. Many thanks for your help. B. Re: B-17 > > In regard to the efficacy of vitamin B17, I quote from The Cancer > Industry by Ralph Moss (p. 146) concerning large scale mouse > research (published in 1978) by Harold Manner, Ph.D.: > > " Enzymes alone, combinations of enzymes and laetrile, or of vitamin > A and enzymes, produced between 52 and 54 percent total regressions > of cancer. Laetrile alone had no appreciable effect, but a > combination of enzymes, vitamin A, and laetrile was significantly > more effective than just enzymes and/or vitamin A. The triple > combination produced total regressions in 38 out of 50 cases, or 76 > percent). " > > The " enzymes " referred to above are pancreatic proteolytic enzymes. > > > > All the seeds of the common fruit are suppose to contain B-17. > > Apricot seeds are one of the richest in B-17. Is there anyone in > > this group that has real life experience that produced good > results? > > I'm considereing adding this to my father's diet, but i'm hesitant > > because of all the fuss about it containing traces of cyinide, and > > being banned by the FDA. > > > > I'm also looking into possibly getting help from McGrady, > > founder of CANHELP. He claims to get excellent results from a > strict > > nutritional diet. I found one person thus far that believes he was > > helpfull. Any ideas, or suggestions? > > > > Get HUGE info at http://www.cures for cancer.ws, and post your own links there. Unsubscribe by sending email to cures for cancer-unsubscribeegroups or by visiting http://www.bobhurt.com/subunsub.mv > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2003 Report Share Posted December 19, 2003 To the group: I am glad this discussion on Vit. B17 came up because I have read a copied article, from about 5-6 years ago, from Penthouse, the author, Rorvik. This article is part of a seven part series on the " The Politics of Cancer " , and this article was entitled " Laetrile- the Drug That Never Was " . This article opens with the statement " Laetrile,the most controversial drug in the history of cancer research- has actually not existed until recently.That is the staggering claim of a young Israeli cancer researcher, Dr. Rubin, and his colleagues, at the Israeli Medical Research Foundation. He says that there has been a misconception of more than two decades that amygdalin and Laetrile are the same. He notes further that the originators of Laetrile substituted an inferior one and called it Laetrile. The drug that has been called Laetrile, and has been at the centre of the controversy, is actually amygdalin. Amygdalin may be effective as a pain killer, and a general palliative agent in cancer, but for the real cancer killer they should look to the true Laetrile. Ernest T.Krebs, sometimes referred to as " The Founder of Vit. B17 " , in the early 1950s, claimed to have synthesized beta-glucuronic analogue of amygdalin, but it differed from ordinary amygdalin in one crucial aspect. Amygdalin would not do, bcause it is a glucoside which can be unlocked only by another enzyme, which does not exist in selectively higher concentrations in cancer cells. As I understand it the young Israeli researcher and his colleagues have made the true Laetrile. Now, the article from Penthouse, from which the above was taken, was a bad photo copy, and I couldn't get much more from the article. If anyone out there should have access to this article I would be very pleased to have a copy. It appears that this true Laetrile does wrok for cancer. Many thanks for your help. B. Re: B-17 > > In regard to the efficacy of vitamin B17, I quote from The Cancer > Industry by Ralph Moss (p. 146) concerning large scale mouse > research (published in 1978) by Harold Manner, Ph.D.: > > " Enzymes alone, combinations of enzymes and laetrile, or of vitamin > A and enzymes, produced between 52 and 54 percent total regressions > of cancer. Laetrile alone had no appreciable effect, but a > combination of enzymes, vitamin A, and laetrile was significantly > more effective than just enzymes and/or vitamin A. The triple > combination produced total regressions in 38 out of 50 cases, or 76 > percent). " > > The " enzymes " referred to above are pancreatic proteolytic enzymes. > > > > All the seeds of the common fruit are suppose to contain B-17. > > Apricot seeds are one of the richest in B-17. Is there anyone in > > this group that has real life experience that produced good > results? > > I'm considereing adding this to my father's diet, but i'm hesitant > > because of all the fuss about it containing traces of cyinide, and > > being banned by the FDA. > > > > I'm also looking into possibly getting help from McGrady, > > founder of CANHELP. He claims to get excellent results from a > strict > > nutritional diet. I found one person thus far that believes he was > > helpfull. Any ideas, or suggestions? > > > > Get HUGE info at http://www.cures for cancer.ws, and post your own links there. Unsubscribe by sending email to cures for cancer-unsubscribeegroups or by visiting http://www.bobhurt.com/subunsub.mv > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2003 Report Share Posted December 20, 2003 Does anyone know where to get the " real " laetrile? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2003 Report Share Posted December 20, 2003 Does anyone know where to get the " real " laetrile? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2003 Report Share Posted December 21, 2003 try: apricotpower.com Goodluck Ciro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2003 Report Share Posted December 21, 2003 try: apricotpower.com Goodluck Ciro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 Curious, Does anybody knows about B-17 laitrile? Does it really kills cancer? Any idea? Lookyee, Singha --------------------------------- Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 Good Health to all Today I am just remembering, I was wondering about B-17. Any success with it? NieeMA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 , Is any of this true laetrile available for purchase on the internet? I archived your article long ago and now find myself in personal need of a laetrile supplement. Thanks. Jeff From: Boswell <eboswell@...> Subject: Re: Re: B-17 cures for cancer Date: Friday, December 19, 2003, 10:43 PM To the group: I am glad this discussion on Vit. B17 came up because I have read a copied article, from about 5-6 years ago, from Penthouse, the author, Rorvik. This article is part of a seven part series on the " The Politics of Cancer " , and this article was entitled " Laetrile- the Drug That Never Was " . This article opens with the statement " Laetrile,the most controversial drug in the history of cancer research- has actually not existed until recently.That is the staggering claim of a young Israeli cancer researcher, Dr. Rubin, and his colleagues, at the Israeli Medical Research Foundation. He says that there has been a misconception of more than two decades that amygdalin and Laetrile are the same. He notes further that the originators of Laetrile substituted an inferior one and called it Laetrile. The drug that has been called Laetrile, and has been at the centre of the controversy, is actually amygdalin. Amygdalin may be effective as a pain killer, and a general palliative agent in cancer, but for the real cancer killer they should look to the true Laetrile. Ernest T.Krebs, sometimes referred to as " The Founder of Vit. B17 " , in the early 1950s, claimed to have synthesized beta-glucuronic analogue of amygdalin, but it differed from ordinary amygdalin in one crucial aspect. Amygdalin would not do, bcause it is a glucoside which can be unlocked only by another enzyme, which does not exist in selectively higher concentrations in cancer cells. As I understand it the young Israeli researcher and his colleagues have made the true Laetrile. Now, the article from Penthouse, from which the above was taken, was a bad photo copy, and I couldn't get much more from the article. If anyone out there should have access to this article I would be very pleased to have a copy. It appears that this true Laetrile does wrok for cancer. Many thanks for your help. B. Re: B-17 > > In regard to the efficacy of vitamin B17, I quote from The Cancer > Industry by Ralph Moss (p. 146) concerning large scale mouse > research (published in 1978) by Harold Manner, Ph.D.: > > " Enzymes alone, combinations of enzymes and laetrile, or of vitamin > A and enzymes, produced between 52 and 54 percent total regressions > of cancer. Laetrile alone had no appreciable effect, but a > combination of enzymes, vitamin A, and laetrile was significantly > more effective than just enzymes and/or vitamin A. The triple > combination produced total regressions in 38 out of 50 cases, or 76 > percent). " > > The " enzymes " referred to above are pancreatic proteolytic enzymes. > > > > All the seeds of the common fruit are suppose to contain B-17. > > Apricot seeds are one of the richest in B-17. Is there anyone in > > this group that has real life experience that produced good > results? > > I'm considereing adding this to my father's diet, but i'm hesitant > > because of all the fuss about it containing traces of cyinide, and > > being banned by the FDA. > > > > I'm also looking into possibly getting help from McGrady, > > founder of CANHELP. He claims to get excellent results from a > strict > > nutritional diet. I found one person thus far that believes he was > > helpfull. Any ideas, or suggestions? > > > > Get HUGE info at http://www.cures for cancer.ws, and post your own links there. Unsubscribe by sending email to cures for cancer-unsubscribeegroups or by visiting http://www.bobhurt.com/subunsub.mv > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.