Re: New claims about cancer cures

[Guest guest]

Hey, it's not all that expensive to try, and sure is easier on the

system than surgery, radiation and chemo (chemo claimed by Australian

Oncologists to only be 2.5 % effective at most!). Why not give it a

try!! Remember that in the early 1900's a leading cancer treatment of

the medical community was the Koch Treatment, giving a patient a serious

illness, which got the immune system riled up, and was effective in also

getting rid of the cancer over 50% of the time. The phytonutrient theory

sure looks interesting and simple!! I'd be willing to try it!

Dave

On 4/4/2008 9:24:12 AM, imsinfo (imsinfo@...) wrote:

> http://www.umac-core-usa.com/

>

>

> I came across this article today and I wonder if somebody here

> knows about it or has tried such an exotic treatment?

> It looks fake but who knows...

>

> Liz

>

[Guest guest]

I think it may be safe to say " some things work for some people some of

the time, " with regard to the phytoplankton, but this surely looks like

an advertisement, and if I were diagnosed with cancer, I certainly

would not try just using phytoplankton alone.

Best of health,

Elliot

[Guest guest]

I have serious doubts about the product .Phytoplankton is the oceans version of

blue green algae. In both there is two main problems the cellular walls are

still in tacked and can't be broken down in humans and the biggest issue for me

is it is packaged and is a dead food. This is very expensive for this sea

algae.I feel it is much better to use wheat grass juice.

In their ad, they add apples and oranges. They state that phytoplankton is

responsible for most of the worlds oxygen, " no wonder its good for cancer. "

Sounds good but it's the result of chlorophyll and plant respiration; not some

magical properties. Again,I feel living chorophyll of wheat grass juice.

They also mislead by saying it can last up to 200 days supply. Thats at taking

1/4tsp a day but elsewhere they tell you to take a tbl. a day.

I'll stick with wheat grass juice.

Joe/turtle

ltdd wrote:

Hey, it's not all that expensive to try..The phytonutrient theory sure looks

interesting and simple!! I'd be willing to try it! Dave

imsinfo wrote: http://www.umac-core-usa.com/

[Guest guest]

i agree! I wish I had been one of teh lucky ones who takes one thing and is

cured! I know its happens although some are surely scams but geesh how

wonderful! There is a company that does 3rd party verification of

testimonials. For serious claims of cure I wish companied woudl ustilize

that a bit more - although Im sure its costly!

On 4/4/08, breathedeepnow <aug20@...> wrote:

>

> I think it may be safe to say " some things work for some people some of

> the time, " with regard to the phytoplankton, but this surely looks like

> an advertisement, and if I were diagnosed with cancer, I certainly

> would not try just using phytoplankton alone.

> Best of health,

> Elliot

[Guest guest]

This sounds like Coley's Toxins, not Koch. Koch was known to be a

single injection of a substance he called Galoxolide. Neither

treatment is available today although some claim to have the Koch

formula and claim success which I rather doubt.

Dave wrote:

>...Remember that in the early 1900's a leading cancer treatment of the medical

community was the Koch Treatment, giving a patient a serious illness, which got

the immune system riled up, and was effective in also getting rid of the cancer

over 50% of the time. The phytonutrient theory sure looks interesting and

simple!!

imsinfo wrote: http://www.umac-core-usa.com/

[Guest guest]

This stuff is legitimate. I happen to live about 15 minutes away from

the place where the phytoplankton is grown, not in the ocean but in

tanks so it doesn't pick up toxins.

This is also the main ingredient in Frequensea.

I met the owner's daughter at a local health show a few years

back. She is stunning and has the most beautiful skin I've ever seen

in an adult her age. Certainly a good advertisement! Her father cured

himself of cancer with the phytoplankton and then decided to

manufacture and market it. I can't say that it will cure every cancer

and I don't know that much about it but many of the locals are happy

with this product (I don't sell it).

Even if it doesn't cure cancer, it will provide a good spectrum of

nutrients which are of course important for every function in the

body. It's very popular for arthritis, skin conditions, fibro, etc.

Basically I would put it in the superfood category. It's available

here in health food stores in pill, powder and liquid form.

When I was writing my alternative cancer guide I had planned to add

this one in there under the nutrition category after doing a bit more

research on it. When one of my clients tells me they're taking it,

it's one of the few things I don't tell them to toss out.

Sharon Hoehner

>

> http://www.umac-core-usa.com/

>

>

> I came across this article today and I wonder if somebody here

> knows about it or has tried such an exotic treatment?

> It looks fake but who knows...

>

> Liz

>

[Guest guest]

Sharon I am not familiar with this particular plankton but I have written yards

about spirulina which I am familiar with for almost 30 years. Lots of science

about how it would be useful for cancer and also radiation sickness.

[ ] Re: New claims about cancer cures

This stuff is legitimate. I happen to live about 15 minutes away from

the place where the phytoplankton is grown, not in the ocean but in

tanks so it doesn't pick up toxins.

This is also the main ingredient in Frequensea.

I met the owner's daughter at a local health show a few years

back. She is stunning and has the most beautiful skin I've ever seen

in an adult her age. Certainly a good advertisement! Her father cured

himself of cancer with the phytoplankton and then decided to

manufacture and market it. I can't say that it will cure every cancer

and I don't know that much about it but many of the locals are happy

with this product (I don't sell it).

Even if it doesn't cure cancer, it will provide a good spectrum of

nutrients which are of course important for every function in the

body. It's very popular for arthritis, skin conditions, fibro, etc.

Basically I would put it in the superfood category. It's available

here in health food stores in pill, powder and liquid form.

When I was writing my alternative cancer guide I had planned to add

this one in there under the nutrition category after doing a bit more

research on it. When one of my clients tells me they're taking it,

it's one of the few things I don't tell them to toss out.

Sharon Hoehner

>

> http://www.umac-core-usa.com/

>

>

> I came across this article today and I wonder if somebody here

> knows about it or has tried such an exotic treatment?

> It looks fake but who knows...

>

> Liz

>

--

I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.

It has removed 107114 spam emails to date.

Paying users do not have this message in their emails.

Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

[Guest guest]

Hi, Sharon.

With regard to the exoskeltons of phytoplankton, I take it the stuff

is put through a process that allows for good absorption?

I do have some reservations about getting hung up on " exotic "

supplements, and wonder if they are necessary. On another board,

someone recently posted a message touting seal oil as the best oil

anyone can take in order to get proper Omega 3/Omega 6 balance.

I have also seen krill oil being advertised as the most potent oil.

All of these supplements are expensive, and I feel we should try to

simplify, as much as possible, what we do to get healthy and to

maintain health. I did buy some krill oil, but then realized it was

not at all necessary for me to take it, and I sold it on eBay.

Based on my experience with krill oil, I ignored the " marvels " of

seal oil.

Thanks and best of health,

Elliot

[Guest guest]

I'm also a big spirulina fan. It's the main ingredient in my

probiotic superfood that I take regularily. The bacteria eat the

outer cell walls so you only get the nutrients from the spirulina.

I've done a lot of experimenting due to liver issues (completely fine

now) and found it really easy to tolerate.

I've never taken the Frequensea or UMACore but from my observations it

must be easily digestible. Seems to be good for people with bowel

problems. Takes a while though.

Sharon Hoehner