was : Feedback, please? Now: fluoride.

[Guest guest]

Yes, that is because Europe knows it's poison. Here in the US, the

fertilizer companies have a by product called fluoride that is labeled

as hazardous waste. The companies would need to pay a lot of money to

dispose of this stuff, except they found this profit making loop hole

of selling it to the water authority. And they in turn put it in our

water, and then someone pays the ADA to say it's good for our teeth.

This lovely ritual began during the era of Atomic bombs. A by-product

of atomic production was fluoride. They did not kown what to do with

all this fluoride so this theory of tooth decay protection was

falsified to promote the ingestion of fluoride. Studies showed it

bonded to bone in place of calcium, so they thought it would somehow

strengthen teeth. This was ONE study. And apparently that was all they

needed to decide fluoridation was a good idea. We now know it leads

to softer, brittle teeth, and later on osteoporosis and probably many

other things. Why not put calcium in our water...that would work better!

To reduce uptake of Lead, give calcium and zinc. No Iron despite what

those county brochures say on reducing lead in your kid. Iron is toxic

to children.

> >

> > Fluoride is known

> > to increase the uptake of lead

>

> Thanks, that's interesting. I just did a little research and learned

it's illegal to fluoridate the

> water where we live (Europe).

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Jan,

Why is supplemental iron considered toxic to children? My son has

extremely low iron levels and I have recently commenced some iron

supps combined with B's and C.

Thanks

na

>

> Yes, that is because Europe knows it's poison. Here in the US, the

> fertilizer companies have a by product called fluoride that is

labeled

> as hazardous waste. The companies would need to pay a lot of money

to

> dispose of this stuff, except they found this profit making loop

hole

> of selling it to the water authority. And they in turn put it in our

> water, and then someone pays the ADA to say it's good for our

teeth.

>

> This lovely ritual began during the era of Atomic bombs. A by-

product

> of atomic production was fluoride. They did not kown what to do with

> all this fluoride so this theory of tooth decay protection was

> falsified to promote the ingestion of fluoride. Studies showed it

> bonded to bone in place of calcium, so they thought it would somehow

> strengthen teeth. This was ONE study. And apparently that was all

they

> needed to decide fluoridation was a good idea. We now know it leads

> to softer, brittle teeth, and later on osteoporosis and probably

many

> other things. Why not put calcium in our water...that would work

better!

>

> To reduce uptake of Lead, give calcium and zinc. No Iron despite

what

> those county brochures say on reducing lead in your kid. Iron is

toxic

> to children.

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Excessive amounts of supplemental iron are toxic to children because they absorb

it far

better than adults. Ordinary supplementary amounts are not a problem.

Andy

> >

> > Yes, that is because Europe knows it's poison. Here in the US, the

> > fertilizer companies have a by product called fluoride that is

> labeled

> > as hazardous waste. The companies would need to pay a lot of money

> to

> > dispose of this stuff, except they found this profit making loop

> hole

> > of selling it to the water authority. And they in turn put it in our

> > water, and then someone pays the ADA to say it's good for our

> teeth.

> >

> > This lovely ritual began during the era of Atomic bombs. A by-

> product

> > of atomic production was fluoride. They did not kown what to do with

> > all this fluoride so this theory of tooth decay protection was

> > falsified to promote the ingestion of fluoride. Studies showed it

> > bonded to bone in place of calcium, so they thought it would somehow

> > strengthen teeth. This was ONE study. And apparently that was all

> they

> > needed to decide fluoridation was a good idea. We now know it leads

> > to softer, brittle teeth, and later on osteoporosis and probably

> many

> > other things. Why not put calcium in our water...that would work

> better!

> >

> > To reduce uptake of Lead, give calcium and zinc. No Iron despite

> what

> > those county brochures say on reducing lead in your kid. Iron is

> toxic

> > to children.

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Supplemental iron is a poison to anyone really and as I have read

best not to supplement. More so if your mercury toxic. It does say in

Andy's books not to supplement iron if your mercury toxic. There is

also a warning on bottles of iron pills that says " keep out of reach

of children " . Children can be poisoned by it.

Low iron in relation to mercury toxicity goes like this: Iron is an

oxidizer. Mercury is also an oxidizer. When your body is mercury

toxic, it dumps whatever oxidizers it can to reduce damage to the

body. If it cannot dump the mercury, it dumps the iron. this causes a

chronic low iron condition (anemia). Usually, iron supplementation

does nothing to correct this, and often makes you feel sicker. (I can

personally attest to this). I have had anemia for years that was

never corrected with iron supps. They made me worse. The iron levels

will correct themselves with chelation to remove the mercury.Eating

iron rich food is a better way to get it in there. That source of

iron is natural. Andy's book (Hair test Interpretation) also says

that using Hydrochloric acid or abscorbic acid will improve

absorption from food. But on page 253 it explains that the body needs

to keep iron low, and in this case supplementary iron may lead to a

worsening of symptoms.

Ferretin is a better option for attempting to correct iron problems.

But usually as long as the Hg is there, it won't correct.

> >

> > Yes, that is because Europe knows it's poison. Here in the US, the

> > fertilizer companies have a by product called fluoride that is

> labeled

> > as hazardous waste. The companies would need to pay a lot of

money

> to

> > dispose of this stuff, except they found this profit making loop

> hole

> > of selling it to the water authority. And they in turn put it in

our

> > water, and then someone pays the ADA to say it's good for our

> teeth.

> >

> > This lovely ritual began during the era of Atomic bombs. A by-

> product

> > of atomic production was fluoride. They did not kown what to do

with

> > all this fluoride so this theory of tooth decay protection was

> > falsified to promote the ingestion of fluoride. Studies showed it

> > bonded to bone in place of calcium, so they thought it would

somehow

> > strengthen teeth. This was ONE study. And apparently that was all

> they

> > needed to decide fluoridation was a good idea. We now know it

leads

> > to softer, brittle teeth, and later on osteoporosis and probably

> many

> > other things. Why not put calcium in our water...that would work

> better!

> >

> > To reduce uptake of Lead, give calcium and zinc. No Iron despite

> what

> > those county brochures say on reducing lead in your kid. Iron is

> toxic

> > to children.

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks for the responses and Jan.

I will take care in giving him this supplement, his bloodwork showed

levels associated with iron, iron stores etc dropping every year,

having removed red meat from the diet of my son on the suggestion of

the paed (and his gastric distress after eating it).

Am almost confident that we have a suitable diet for him so that we

can resume chelation (which seems to be the answer for most of us).

Am reading more, and it seems parasites have a lot to answer for too.

na

> >

> > Hi Jan,

> > Why is supplemental iron considered toxic to children? My son

has

> > extremely low iron levels and I have recently commenced some iron

> > supps combined with B's and C.

> >

> > Thanks

> >

> > na

> >

>