When will Doctors Learn?

[Guest guest]

Dear Friends,

" I have just in the past few days been told I have secondary cancer

due to breast cancer in sept 2004.I had a full masectomy in sept 2004

with two different types chemo and 5 weeks radio. Complained of sore

back and hip about six months ago was told wear and tear after4 scans

discovered the cancer has returned. Tumour now in the spine and has

travelled to right hip. Had two shots of radio last two days with

another two mon/tues. Please advise on alternative medicines and cures

DESPERATE at this stage. "

Maybe this is just preaching to the choir.

This is an incredible example of what does not work for cancer. I

was a cancer researcher in the 1960's at Sloan Kettering and even back

then we knew that for cancer to occur in the body requires a change in

the DNA of the entire body. Every cell in your body has changed.

So why would any doctor think that treating a specific site or tumor

is going to cure this condition other than temporarily. They often

misrepresent the cure rates by siting the 5 year figures. Go and look

at the 10 and 20 year figures for reoccurance of cancer. And these do

not include other cancers that occur in the body but are 'not related'

to the original cancer.

Their protocols of slash, poison and burn even when it temporarily

succeeds, destroys the imune system and if and when the cancer

reoccurs, it comes back with a vengence to patients who are seriously

debilitated.

That this doctor needed to remove a breast which is lymph tissue, is

to say that it is in the lymph system and therefore throughout the body.

There are more than 150 alternative methods around the world for

getting rid of cancer. I would suggest that people try some of these

first. I will be glad to send out info on this to anyone who is

requesting it.

>

>

>