Re: Re: alternative cancer cure studies

[Guest guest]

Luigi,

If you join the flaxseedoil2 group, you can read testimonials of people who used

the Budwig diet in their " files " section. Personal testimonies mean more to me

than research. It is hard to deny someone else's experience. Research can be

rigged to prove whatever they set out to prove. I know 3 middle-aged moms in my

church who did exactly what their doctors ordered, and they're DEAD. That's

enough for me. I do have two personal testimonials of men who " cured

themselves " of cancer by nutritional means. They are too extensive for me to

write out for you, but there are men I know of personally, and I feel confident

that they are legitimate. Even my surgeon admitted that chemo and radiation are

a " stab in the dark, " though she insisted that surgery was undeniably necessary.

I still said " no. "

As far as convincing other people, I have come to the conclusion that it's not

my job. They have to do what they believe is best. Maybe I will feel

differently when I am on the other side of this and have my own testimony of

cure to give. There is a guy on this list who has his own web site and claims

to have cured his own cancer. I cannot think of his name right now, but maybe

he will respond. A lot of people may be off-list for the holidays.

Hi ,

Do you know where I can find documented results ? Are there people on this

site who cured their cancer naturally ?

Luigi

[Guest guest]

The main person who needs to be convinced, Luigi, is you. The

information you are looking for is out there (thank God for the

Internet!). Keep digging for it. Stay with lists like ' ' and

'flaxseedoil2' and different posts will bring links to your attention.

Another outstanding book available on amazon.com is " Cure Your Cancer:

Your Guide to the Internet " by Bill . Also, Rudolph Breuss

claimed to have cured 40,000 people of cancer with simple fasting. His

book, also on amazon.com, contains many testimonials. Most of these

people are still living. If you are really serious about research, you

could go to Austria where he did most of his work. Gerson and Budwig

healed many of cancer using simple foods and their methods continue to

do so.

So far as convincing doctors (you mean, of course, allopaths), who

cares? It is important to understand that allopathic medicine is first

and foremost a business that sells the products of the pharmaceutical

industry. This is a trillion dollar industry and its interests are to

destroy any competition that may come from natural sources where it

cannot cut a profit. This is exactly what they have attempted to do to

dozens of working cancer cures that have been supported by decent

research and healer-patient experience. Why should they admit there is a

real cure for cancer which costs pennies when each cancer patient is

bringing in an average of $500,000 from surgery, chemo and radiation?

Just let your doctor step a little away from the party line and he will

be severely disciplined and his practice damaged when referrals stop

coming his way.

Posted recently on this list was documentation that chemo increases life

expectancy only 2%. What is important is to get the word out there one

person at a time that there are alternatives out there that work far

better than surgery, chemo and radiation. When people stop buying their

product, doctors will come around to a better way of thinking. There is

much value in the knowledge and training they have.

Dwight

luigis155 wrote:

>Thank you for your reply, Dwight. The reason why I'm looking for those

specific studies is that this is to me the only way people (and eventually

doctors) can be convinced to try alternative cancer therapies......

[Guest guest]

You have summarised the problem nicely. While many approaches can be done

simultaneously, others can't - and the Budwig protocol apparently doesn't mix so

the vitamin C and the fish oil you're taking are likely counteracting each

other. My own view is that one should do say the Budwig protocol for two months

and then see what effect if any that's had. If it's good then continue. If not

then move on to say intravenous vitamin C or a grape diet or CanCell. Repeat. I

am sure that even if one of these methods is not in itself 100% effective that

it will nevertheless slow things down and buy time.

wrote:

I understand the concept that we are all conducting our own research &

do so myself. However, how does one know, for example, whether one should sit in

an infrared sauna a couple times a day, down umpteen curcumin capsules, go for

acupuncture, get some kind of electro-magnet device, or juice? Part of the

problem, I think, is that for the most part we only read the success stories,

and you're left with the feeling that you should do all of the above ( & more).

However, it might be better to follow one plan faithfully rather than mix &

match. Also, how does one know how much of anything to take -- as much as he

body will tolerate ( & what is that number?)? .........