Re: Salt, sodium, & cancer

[Guest guest]

> Salt is Vital to Your Life.

Yes, but so is sugar. That doesn't mean that people in general, let alone

cancer patients, need more of it than they're already getting. Moreover,

sugar and sodium are even more vital to your cancer cells' life.

The processing of ordinary (supermarket) salt may be the primary problem for

the general population, and unprocessed salt may be good for the general

population (though this is controversial if not questionable; I've read

repeatedly that the American get many times the optimal amount of salt [see

Boik, 1995, p. 52], and I can hardly recall hearing of anyone in America w/a

salt or sodium deficiency).

However, the processing is certainly not the only problem for cancer

patients. The sodium is a primary problem. It's my understanding that cancer

cells have a particular need for sodium and that they function well in a

high-sodium, low-potassium environment and function very poorly in a

high-potassium, low-sodium environment. Max Gerson recognized this and

accordingly Gerson therapy restricts salt and sodium (as do many [but

certainly not all] other alt. cancer practitioners, such as Contreras) even

to the point of prohibiting the use of toothpaste that contains baking soda

(sodium bicarbonate). I thought this was going overboard until I read a story

reported by Charlotte Gerson: A cancer patient was treated at the Gerson

clinic, and their tumor apparently went away in response to Gerson therapy.

The patient then went home and maintained the Gerson diet but used baking

soda toothpaste, and the tumor grew back. When the patient stopped using the

toothpaste, the tumor went away again.

" A promising theory suggests that removing the sodium (desodification) from

the cancer cells would open them once more to the body's immune system "

(Fischer, 1984, p. 219).

" Dr. Nieper uses...to restore immune function...`desodification' (elimination

of sodium). `By this method, cancer cells are " detoxified " ' " (Lerner, 1996,

p. 600; see also p. 268).

" Salt...causes the body's tissues to retain fluid....By feeding salt to

cancerous tissues, a patient is not aiding the healing process " (Jochems,

1990, p. 58).

" decrease the high sodium foods " (Livingston-Wheeler, 1984, p. 145). See also

Falcone (1996).

For more info on the physiological reasons why salt and other sources of

sodium tend to be bad for cancer patients, see Pelton & Overhelser (1994, pp.

43-44), Glassman (1983, pp. 85-86), Max Gerson's _A Cancer Therapy_, and

other Gerson therapy literature.

References:

Boik, (1995). Cancer and Natural Medicine. Princeton,

MN: Oregon Medical Press.

Falcone, Ron (1996). Natural Medicine for Breast Cancer. New

York: Dell.

Fischer, L. (1994). How to Fight Cancer and Win (2nd

ed.). Canfield, OH: Fischer.

Gerson, Max, M.D. A Cancer Therapy. Gerson Inst.

Glassman, Judith (1983). The Cancer Survivors. Dial Press.

Jochems, Ruth (1990). Dr. Moerman's Anti-Cancer Diet. New

York: Avery.

Lerner, (1994). Choices in Healing: Integrating the

Best of Conventional and Complementary Approaches to Cancer.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. www.commonweal.org/choicescontents.html

Livingston-Wheeler, Virginia, with Addeo, Edmond G. (1984)

The Conquest of Cancer. New York: lin Watts.

Pelton, Ross, & Overholser, Lee (1994). Alternatives in

Cancer Therapy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Leonard

[Guest guest]

Dave,

My first thought is that all the info below is by doctors who are either

in denial or ignorant of the fact that it is a lack of oxygen that

causes cancer. So, naturally, they would look for other indicators.

Surely, there are many things that contribute to cancer, but the peg all

of them hang their hat on is hypoxia.

And, for someone with cancer, they may be right to limit salt intake.

But, I can't see that it is an important one if most oxidative therapies

have cured virtually all forms of cancer without addressing sodium. The

reverse can't be said.

Just opinions. Mine.

jim

Dave wrote:

>

> Hi all,

>

> The post below is from another list. I tend to trust more the members

> of this list, so I would like feedback on the statement below that salt

> and sodium promote cancer growth. I have been taking 1/2 tsp of sea

> salt daily, and also 1/2 tsp of baking soda. According to the post below,

> this is a BAD idea!!

>

> Dave

>

> -------------------------

> Subject: Re: Salt, sodium, & cancer

>

> > Salt is Vital to Your Life.

>

> Yes, but so is sugar. That doesn't mean that people in general, let alone

> cancer patients, need more of it than they're already getting. Moreover,

> sugar and sodium are even more vital to your cancer cells' life.

>

> The processing of ordinary (supermarket) salt may be the primary problem for

> the general population, and unprocessed salt may be good for the general

> population (though this is controversial if not questionable; I've read

> repeatedly that the American get many times the optimal amount of salt [see--

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people seem bright

until you hear them speak. --Lou Rubinacci

jlambert@... http://www.entrance.to/madscience

http://www.entrance.to/poetry

[Guest guest]

Dave,

My first thought is that all the info below is by doctors who are either

in denial or ignorant of the fact that it is a lack of oxygen that

causes cancer. So, naturally, they would look for other indicators.

Surely, there are many things that contribute to cancer, but the peg all

of them hang their hat on is hypoxia.

And, for someone with cancer, they may be right to limit salt intake.

But, I can't see that it is an important one if most oxidative therapies

have cured virtually all forms of cancer without addressing sodium. The

reverse can't be said.

Just opinions. Mine.

jim

Dave wrote:

>

> Hi all,

>

> The post below is from another list. I tend to trust more the members

> of this list, so I would like feedback on the statement below that salt

> and sodium promote cancer growth. I have been taking 1/2 tsp of sea

> salt daily, and also 1/2 tsp of baking soda. According to the post below,

> this is a BAD idea!!

>

> Dave

>

> -------------------------

> Subject: Re: Salt, sodium, & cancer

>

> > Salt is Vital to Your Life.

>

> Yes, but so is sugar. That doesn't mean that people in general, let alone

> cancer patients, need more of it than they're already getting. Moreover,

> sugar and sodium are even more vital to your cancer cells' life.

>

> The processing of ordinary (supermarket) salt may be the primary problem for

> the general population, and unprocessed salt may be good for the general

> population (though this is controversial if not questionable; I've read

> repeatedly that the American get many times the optimal amount of salt [see--

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people seem bright

until you hear them speak. --Lou Rubinacci

jlambert@... http://www.entrance.to/madscience

http://www.entrance.to/poetry

[Guest guest]

Dave,

My first thought is that all the info below is by doctors who are either

in denial or ignorant of the fact that it is a lack of oxygen that

causes cancer. So, naturally, they would look for other indicators.

Surely, there are many things that contribute to cancer, but the peg all

of them hang their hat on is hypoxia.

And, for someone with cancer, they may be right to limit salt intake.

But, I can't see that it is an important one if most oxidative therapies

have cured virtually all forms of cancer without addressing sodium. The

reverse can't be said.

Just opinions. Mine.

jim

Dave wrote:

>

> Hi all,

>

> The post below is from another list. I tend to trust more the members

> of this list, so I would like feedback on the statement below that salt

> and sodium promote cancer growth. I have been taking 1/2 tsp of sea

> salt daily, and also 1/2 tsp of baking soda. According to the post below,

> this is a BAD idea!!

>

> Dave

>

> -------------------------

> Subject: Re: Salt, sodium, & cancer

>

> > Salt is Vital to Your Life.

>

> Yes, but so is sugar. That doesn't mean that people in general, let alone

> cancer patients, need more of it than they're already getting. Moreover,

> sugar and sodium are even more vital to your cancer cells' life.

>

> The processing of ordinary (supermarket) salt may be the primary problem for

> the general population, and unprocessed salt may be good for the general

> population (though this is controversial if not questionable; I've read

> repeatedly that the American get many times the optimal amount of salt [see--

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people seem bright

until you hear them speak. --Lou Rubinacci

jlambert@... http://www.entrance.to/madscience

http://www.entrance.to/poetry

[Guest guest]

There are other viewpoints about salt and cancer. Dr. Rath (www.drrath.com)

uses primarily lysine, proline and vitamin C in his cures for cancer and I don't

recall salt being mentioned.

Dr. Batmangehelid (www.watercure.com) advocates using salt with a lot of water.

Previous cancer work by Brewster and others point out the usefulness of the

alkaline metals in cancer therapy. Usually potassium, cesium, magnesium,

rubidium. But sodium is a part of that group, too. If my chemistry is bad,

please forgive me as it was at least 50 years ago.

One thing health oriented people always seem to leave out is the placebo effect.

I've seen it work wondrous cures, but of course it doesn't work with everybody.

Nothing does. So whatever you do, there is a psychological effect. Not usually

discernible by yourself. But properly administered by others it can be very

effective.

I'm sure there are lots of cures of cancer where a salt-free diet was not

adhered to. I put salt on my cottage cheese and flax oil (pepper, too). Did Dr.

Budwig say " NO SALT " ? I don't recall that she did. Her methods have gotten lots

of cures. And Essiac will now be studied by our government. Did Caisse

advocate a salt free diet? At least a 20 % cure rate. Did they go salt free? I'd

say the jury is still out on salt.

Loren Parks

Dave wrote:

> Hi all,

>

> The post below is from another list. I tend to trust more the members

> of this list, so I would like feedback on the statement below that salt

> and sodium promote cancer growth. I have been taking 1/2 tsp of sea

> salt daily, and also 1/2 tsp of baking soda. According to the post below,

> this is a BAD idea!!

>

> Dave

>

> -------------------------

> Subject: Re: Salt, sodium, & cancer

>

> > Salt is Vital to Your Life.

>

> Yes, but so is sugar. That doesn't mean that people in general, let alone

> cancer patients, need more of it than they're already getting. Moreover,

> sugar and sodium are even more vital to your cancer cells' life.

>

> The processing of ordinary (supermarket) salt may be the primary problem for

> the general population, and unprocessed salt may be good for the general

> population (though this is controversial if not questionable; I've read

> repeatedly that the American get many times the optimal amount of salt [see

> Boik, 1995, p. 52], and I can hardly recall hearing of anyone in America w/a

> salt or sodium deficiency).

>

> However, the processing is certainly not the only problem for cancer

> patients. The sodium is a primary problem. It's my understanding that cancer

> cells have a particular need for sodium and that they function well in a

> high-sodium, low-potassium environment and function very poorly in a

> high-potassium, low-sodium environment. Max Gerson recognized this and

> accordingly Gerson therapy restricts salt and sodium (as do many [but

> certainly not all] other alt. cancer practitioners, such as Contreras) even

> to the point of prohibiting the use of toothpaste that contains baking soda

> (sodium bicarbonate). I thought this was going overboard until I read a

> story

> reported by Charlotte Gerson: A cancer patient was treated at the Gerson

> clinic, and their tumor apparently went away in response to Gerson therapy.

> The patient then went home and maintained the Gerson diet but used baking

> soda toothpaste, and the tumor grew back. When the patient stopped using the

> toothpaste, the tumor went away again.

>

> " A promising theory suggests that removing the sodium (desodification) from

> the cancer cells would open them once more to the body's immune system "

> (Fischer, 1984, p. 219).

>

> " Dr. Nieper uses...to restore immune function...`desodification'

> (elimination

> of sodium). `By this method, cancer cells are " detoxified " ' " (Lerner, 1996,

> p. 600; see also p. 268).

>

> " Salt...causes the body's tissues to retain fluid....By feeding salt to

> cancerous tissues, a patient is not aiding the healing process " (Jochems,

> 1990, p. 58).

>

> " decrease the high sodium foods " (Livingston-Wheeler, 1984, p. 145). See

> also

> Falcone (1996).

>

> For more info on the physiological reasons why salt and other sources of

> sodium tend to be bad for cancer patients, see Pelton & Overhelser (1994,

> pp.

> 43-44), Glassman (1983, pp. 85-86), Max Gerson's _A Cancer Therapy_, and

> other Gerson therapy literature.

>

> References:

> Boik, (1995). Cancer and Natural Medicine. Princeton,

> MN: Oregon Medical Press.

> Falcone, Ron (1996). Natural Medicine for Breast Cancer. New

> York: Dell.

> Fischer, L. (1994). How to Fight Cancer and Win (2nd

> ed.). Canfield, OH: Fischer.

> Gerson, Max, M.D. A Cancer Therapy. Gerson Inst.

> Glassman, Judith (1983). The Cancer Survivors. Dial Press.

> Jochems, Ruth (1990). Dr. Moerman's Anti-Cancer Diet. New

> York: Avery.

> Lerner, (1994). Choices in Healing: Integrating the

> Best of Conventional and Complementary Approaches to Cancer.

> Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. www.commonweal.org/choicescontents.html

> Livingston-Wheeler, Virginia, with Addeo, Edmond G. (1984)

> The Conquest of Cancer. New York: lin Watts.

> Pelton, Ross, & Overholser, Lee (1994). Alternatives in

> Cancer Therapy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

>

> OxyPLUS is an unmoderated e-ring dealing with oxidative therapies, and other

alternative self-help subjects.

>

> THERE IS NO MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!

>

> This list is the 1st Amendment in action. The things you will find here are

for information and research purposes only. We are people sharing information

we believe in. If you act on ideas found here, you do so at your own risk.

Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and the ability to take

responsibility for your own actions. By joining the list you agree to hold

yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself. Do not use any ideas found here

without consulting a medical professional, unless you are a researcher or health

care provider.

>

> You can unsubscribe via e-mail by sending A NEW e-mail to the following

address - NOT TO THE OXYPLUS LIST! -

> DO NOT USE REPLY BUTTON & DO NOT PUT THIS IN THE SUBJECT LINE or BODY of the

message! :

>

> oxyplus-unsubscribeegroups

>

> oxyplus-normalonelist - switch your subscription to normal mode.

>

>

[Guest guest]

There are other viewpoints about salt and cancer. Dr. Rath (www.drrath.com)

uses primarily lysine, proline and vitamin C in his cures for cancer and I don't

recall salt being mentioned.

Dr. Batmangehelid (www.watercure.com) advocates using salt with a lot of water.

Previous cancer work by Brewster and others point out the usefulness of the

alkaline metals in cancer therapy. Usually potassium, cesium, magnesium,

rubidium. But sodium is a part of that group, too. If my chemistry is bad,

please forgive me as it was at least 50 years ago.

One thing health oriented people always seem to leave out is the placebo effect.

I've seen it work wondrous cures, but of course it doesn't work with everybody.

Nothing does. So whatever you do, there is a psychological effect. Not usually

discernible by yourself. But properly administered by others it can be very

effective.

I'm sure there are lots of cures of cancer where a salt-free diet was not

adhered to. I put salt on my cottage cheese and flax oil (pepper, too). Did Dr.

Budwig say " NO SALT " ? I don't recall that she did. Her methods have gotten lots

of cures. And Essiac will now be studied by our government. Did Caisse

advocate a salt free diet? At least a 20 % cure rate. Did they go salt free? I'd

say the jury is still out on salt.

Loren Parks

Dave wrote:

> Hi all,

>

> The post below is from another list. I tend to trust more the members

> of this list, so I would like feedback on the statement below that salt

> and sodium promote cancer growth. I have been taking 1/2 tsp of sea

> salt daily, and also 1/2 tsp of baking soda. According to the post below,

> this is a BAD idea!!

>

> Dave

>

> -------------------------

> Subject: Re: Salt, sodium, & cancer

>

> > Salt is Vital to Your Life.

>

> Yes, but so is sugar. That doesn't mean that people in general, let alone

> cancer patients, need more of it than they're already getting. Moreover,

> sugar and sodium are even more vital to your cancer cells' life.

>

> The processing of ordinary (supermarket) salt may be the primary problem for

> the general population, and unprocessed salt may be good for the general

> population (though this is controversial if not questionable; I've read

> repeatedly that the American get many times the optimal amount of salt [see

> Boik, 1995, p. 52], and I can hardly recall hearing of anyone in America w/a

> salt or sodium deficiency).

>

> However, the processing is certainly not the only problem for cancer

> patients. The sodium is a primary problem. It's my understanding that cancer

> cells have a particular need for sodium and that they function well in a

> high-sodium, low-potassium environment and function very poorly in a

> high-potassium, low-sodium environment. Max Gerson recognized this and

> accordingly Gerson therapy restricts salt and sodium (as do many [but

> certainly not all] other alt. cancer practitioners, such as Contreras) even

> to the point of prohibiting the use of toothpaste that contains baking soda

> (sodium bicarbonate). I thought this was going overboard until I read a

> story

> reported by Charlotte Gerson: A cancer patient was treated at the Gerson

> clinic, and their tumor apparently went away in response to Gerson therapy.

> The patient then went home and maintained the Gerson diet but used baking

> soda toothpaste, and the tumor grew back. When the patient stopped using the

> toothpaste, the tumor went away again.

>

> " A promising theory suggests that removing the sodium (desodification) from

> the cancer cells would open them once more to the body's immune system "

> (Fischer, 1984, p. 219).

>

> " Dr. Nieper uses...to restore immune function...`desodification'

> (elimination

> of sodium). `By this method, cancer cells are " detoxified " ' " (Lerner, 1996,

> p. 600; see also p. 268).

>

> " Salt...causes the body's tissues to retain fluid....By feeding salt to

> cancerous tissues, a patient is not aiding the healing process " (Jochems,

> 1990, p. 58).

>

> " decrease the high sodium foods " (Livingston-Wheeler, 1984, p. 145). See

> also

> Falcone (1996).

>

> For more info on the physiological reasons why salt and other sources of

> sodium tend to be bad for cancer patients, see Pelton & Overhelser (1994,

> pp.

> 43-44), Glassman (1983, pp. 85-86), Max Gerson's _A Cancer Therapy_, and

> other Gerson therapy literature.

>

> References:

> Boik, (1995). Cancer and Natural Medicine. Princeton,

> MN: Oregon Medical Press.

> Falcone, Ron (1996). Natural Medicine for Breast Cancer. New

> York: Dell.

> Fischer, L. (1994). How to Fight Cancer and Win (2nd

> ed.). Canfield, OH: Fischer.

> Gerson, Max, M.D. A Cancer Therapy. Gerson Inst.

> Glassman, Judith (1983). The Cancer Survivors. Dial Press.

> Jochems, Ruth (1990). Dr. Moerman's Anti-Cancer Diet. New

> York: Avery.

> Lerner, (1994). Choices in Healing: Integrating the

> Best of Conventional and Complementary Approaches to Cancer.

> Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. www.commonweal.org/choicescontents.html

> Livingston-Wheeler, Virginia, with Addeo, Edmond G. (1984)

> The Conquest of Cancer. New York: lin Watts.

> Pelton, Ross, & Overholser, Lee (1994). Alternatives in

> Cancer Therapy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

>

> OxyPLUS is an unmoderated e-ring dealing with oxidative therapies, and other

alternative self-help subjects.

>

> THERE IS NO MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!

>

> This list is the 1st Amendment in action. The things you will find here are

for information and research purposes only. We are people sharing information

we believe in. If you act on ideas found here, you do so at your own risk.

Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and the ability to take

responsibility for your own actions. By joining the list you agree to hold

yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself. Do not use any ideas found here

without consulting a medical professional, unless you are a researcher or health

care provider.

>

> You can unsubscribe via e-mail by sending A NEW e-mail to the following

address - NOT TO THE OXYPLUS LIST! -

> DO NOT USE REPLY BUTTON & DO NOT PUT THIS IN THE SUBJECT LINE or BODY of the

message! :

>

> oxyplus-unsubscribeegroups

>

> oxyplus-normalonelist - switch your subscription to normal mode.

>

>

[Guest guest]

There are other viewpoints about salt and cancer. Dr. Rath (www.drrath.com)

uses primarily lysine, proline and vitamin C in his cures for cancer and I don't

recall salt being mentioned.

Dr. Batmangehelid (www.watercure.com) advocates using salt with a lot of water.

Previous cancer work by Brewster and others point out the usefulness of the

alkaline metals in cancer therapy. Usually potassium, cesium, magnesium,

rubidium. But sodium is a part of that group, too. If my chemistry is bad,

please forgive me as it was at least 50 years ago.

One thing health oriented people always seem to leave out is the placebo effect.

I've seen it work wondrous cures, but of course it doesn't work with everybody.

Nothing does. So whatever you do, there is a psychological effect. Not usually

discernible by yourself. But properly administered by others it can be very

effective.

I'm sure there are lots of cures of cancer where a salt-free diet was not

adhered to. I put salt on my cottage cheese and flax oil (pepper, too). Did Dr.

Budwig say " NO SALT " ? I don't recall that she did. Her methods have gotten lots

of cures. And Essiac will now be studied by our government. Did Caisse

advocate a salt free diet? At least a 20 % cure rate. Did they go salt free? I'd

say the jury is still out on salt.

Loren Parks

Dave wrote:

> Hi all,

>

> The post below is from another list. I tend to trust more the members

> of this list, so I would like feedback on the statement below that salt

> and sodium promote cancer growth. I have been taking 1/2 tsp of sea

> salt daily, and also 1/2 tsp of baking soda. According to the post below,

> this is a BAD idea!!

>

> Dave

>

> -------------------------

> Subject: Re: Salt, sodium, & cancer

>

> > Salt is Vital to Your Life.

>

> Yes, but so is sugar. That doesn't mean that people in general, let alone

> cancer patients, need more of it than they're already getting. Moreover,

> sugar and sodium are even more vital to your cancer cells' life.

>

> The processing of ordinary (supermarket) salt may be the primary problem for

> the general population, and unprocessed salt may be good for the general

> population (though this is controversial if not questionable; I've read

> repeatedly that the American get many times the optimal amount of salt [see

> Boik, 1995, p. 52], and I can hardly recall hearing of anyone in America w/a

> salt or sodium deficiency).

>

> However, the processing is certainly not the only problem for cancer

> patients. The sodium is a primary problem. It's my understanding that cancer

> cells have a particular need for sodium and that they function well in a

> high-sodium, low-potassium environment and function very poorly in a

> high-potassium, low-sodium environment. Max Gerson recognized this and

> accordingly Gerson therapy restricts salt and sodium (as do many [but

> certainly not all] other alt. cancer practitioners, such as Contreras) even

> to the point of prohibiting the use of toothpaste that contains baking soda

> (sodium bicarbonate). I thought this was going overboard until I read a

> story

> reported by Charlotte Gerson: A cancer patient was treated at the Gerson

> clinic, and their tumor apparently went away in response to Gerson therapy.

> The patient then went home and maintained the Gerson diet but used baking

> soda toothpaste, and the tumor grew back. When the patient stopped using the

> toothpaste, the tumor went away again.

>

> " A promising theory suggests that removing the sodium (desodification) from

> the cancer cells would open them once more to the body's immune system "

> (Fischer, 1984, p. 219).

>

> " Dr. Nieper uses...to restore immune function...`desodification'

> (elimination

> of sodium). `By this method, cancer cells are " detoxified " ' " (Lerner, 1996,

> p. 600; see also p. 268).

>

> " Salt...causes the body's tissues to retain fluid....By feeding salt to

> cancerous tissues, a patient is not aiding the healing process " (Jochems,

> 1990, p. 58).

>

> " decrease the high sodium foods " (Livingston-Wheeler, 1984, p. 145). See

> also

> Falcone (1996).

>

> For more info on the physiological reasons why salt and other sources of

> sodium tend to be bad for cancer patients, see Pelton & Overhelser (1994,

> pp.

> 43-44), Glassman (1983, pp. 85-86), Max Gerson's _A Cancer Therapy_, and

> other Gerson therapy literature.

>

> References:

> Boik, (1995). Cancer and Natural Medicine. Princeton,

> MN: Oregon Medical Press.

> Falcone, Ron (1996). Natural Medicine for Breast Cancer. New

> York: Dell.

> Fischer, L. (1994). How to Fight Cancer and Win (2nd

> ed.). Canfield, OH: Fischer.

> Gerson, Max, M.D. A Cancer Therapy. Gerson Inst.

> Glassman, Judith (1983). The Cancer Survivors. Dial Press.

> Jochems, Ruth (1990). Dr. Moerman's Anti-Cancer Diet. New

> York: Avery.

> Lerner, (1994). Choices in Healing: Integrating the

> Best of Conventional and Complementary Approaches to Cancer.

> Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. www.commonweal.org/choicescontents.html

> Livingston-Wheeler, Virginia, with Addeo, Edmond G. (1984)

> The Conquest of Cancer. New York: lin Watts.

> Pelton, Ross, & Overholser, Lee (1994). Alternatives in

> Cancer Therapy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

>

> OxyPLUS is an unmoderated e-ring dealing with oxidative therapies, and other

alternative self-help subjects.

>

> THERE IS NO MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!

>

> This list is the 1st Amendment in action. The things you will find here are

for information and research purposes only. We are people sharing information

we believe in. If you act on ideas found here, you do so at your own risk.

Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and the ability to take

responsibility for your own actions. By joining the list you agree to hold

yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself. Do not use any ideas found here

without consulting a medical professional, unless you are a researcher or health

care provider.

>

> You can unsubscribe via e-mail by sending A NEW e-mail to the following

address - NOT TO THE OXYPLUS LIST! -

> DO NOT USE REPLY BUTTON & DO NOT PUT THIS IN THE SUBJECT LINE or BODY of the

message! :

>

> oxyplus-unsubscribeegroups

>

> oxyplus-normalonelist - switch your subscription to normal mode.

>

>

[Guest guest]

I don't know where you got the idea Wallach is a medical doctor. I saw

him a couple of weeks ago. He is in So. Cal and is still a veterinarian

and perhaps Naturopath. He's a marketing man, primarily. Used to be in

my area. Never heard of him then.

Loren

Joyce Inouye wrote:

>

> I'm not so much interested in research because it has sabotaged

> so many natural cancer cures. What I look for is results. Does

> it work, or doesn't it?

>

> Dr Wallach, in his book " Dead Doctors Dont Lie " stresses the

> importance of minerals in one's diet. Luckily, he was a

> veterinarian before becoming a medical doctor. At that time,

> animal doctors were not controlled/restricted from curing

> diseases. They did what worked, freely curing all kinds of

> diseases humans are suffering from.

>

> One day it dawned on Dr. Wallach to try some of the nutritional

> cures for animals on humans. IT WORKED! The same Cell Medicines

> (usually minerals) used to cure animal diseases works for

> humans.

>

> To maintain health, a farmer puts out WATER and NATURAL SALT

> BLOCKS, where cows and horses can lick as much salt as they want.

> I recently saw a website that sells the salts used for cows.

> Man-adultered salt is a different story. Chemical additives can

> mess up normal reactions in our bodies. The website below is not

> " scientific " but uses Dr. Wallach's " common sense " .

>

> http://www.elementsofhealth.com/b3.htm

>

> For cancer patients, I would recommend CELLFOOD for a mineral

> source--it also contains other cancer-fighting elements, such as

> available oxygen, hydrogen, etc. (Click on picture below.)

>

> http://www.coralconnection.net

>

> Coral Connection has NEW SILVER, an excellent and powerful germ

> killer. They also have ALKAMINE to nutralize an acidic body so

> common of cancer patients.

>

> Celtic Sea salt contains some of the minerals to prevent cancer,

> which is the reason I recommended it.

>

> \\\

> Joyce =(o o)=

> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--V---+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

>

>

>

>

>

>