714X

[Guest guest]

Excellent article covering Gaston Naessens, his 'somatid' theory, 714X, the

French medical authorities, the Canadian medical authorities and the FDA.

Courtesy of Ralph Moss PhD.

http://www.ralphmoss.com/naessens1.html

- Art

[Guest guest]

Art,

Thanks for the great information, I also found this article in The Yoga Journal,

September/October 1993:

A New Answer to Cancer

By Hiller

Thirty-nine year old Jacques Viens had gone home to die. Seven-eighths of his

stomach had been removed, and the cancer had already spread to the lymph. Since

there seemed to be no hope of recovery, his doctor offered him a new,

experimental treatment called 714X. He tried it. Four months later he was

healthy enough to go hunting, and not long after that he resumed his job.

Fifty-one-year-old Marcel Caron suffered from intestinal cancer, but he refused

to have his intestine removed. His wife's breast cancer had been successfully

treated with the same experimental medicine Viens had used; Caron wanted to try

it too. Sixty-five days after he started treatment, no cancer was to be found in

Caron's body. Eight years later, he was still healthy.

These are just two among hundreds of case histories of patients who recovered

using a little-known approach to cancer and other degenerative diseases that

proponents claim could revolutionize medical practice. The first person to use

it--more than 20 years ago--is still alive. What would happen if an effective

treatment for cancer were finally found--a nontoxic, natural, and inexpensive

treatment that could be self-administered at home with a success rate of 75

percent?

It sounds like a dream come true, a miracle. We would all breathe a little

easier, that's for certain. Many lives would be saved. And a multibillion-dollar

enterprise--the pharmaceutical-medical-insurance complex, the most profitable

industry in America today--would be forever transformed. Dozens of giant

pharmaceutical and medical supply companies would be forced out of business. The

" cancer industry " would be no more.

Little wonder, then that we have heard so little about a 69-year-old French

microbiologist who says he's discovered such a treatment. His name is Gaston

Naessens, and he calls his immune-system therapy 714X.

When Naessens' unorthodox treatment methods began yielding dramatic successes in

his native France, French medical authorities closed his lab, confiscated his

equipment, and heavily fined him for practicing medicine without a license.

Naessens went to Canada, where, with the help of the prestigious Mac

Foundation (which for years has funded cancer research), he set up a small

laboratory outside Montreal.

There he and his wife, Francoise, continued their careful research until 1989,

when Naessens was again brought to trial by the medical authorities, accused of

contributing to the death of a woman who did not recover after using his

treatment.

After a long trial, in which numerous testimonies were offered by patients and

physicians using his approach, he was finally acquitted. (The full story of the

trial is told in Bird's book The Persecution and Trial of Gaston

Naessens.) Now, a handful of doctors are struggling to make Naessens'

controversial treatments readily available in the United States.

Born in northern France in 1924, the young Naessens was a precocious inventor

who built a small, functioning automobile-type vehicle when he was only five,

followed by a homemade motorcycle. By the age of 12 he had constructed a plane

that could fly. (His mother burned it to prevent him from flying it, however.)

When his university studies of physics, chemistry, and biology were interrupted

by World War II, Naessens earned an unofficial diploma from the Union

Scientifique Francaise in Lilles, where most of his university professors had

fled to escape the Nazi invasion. (He never bothered to pursue its formal

equivalent after De Gaulle restructured France, a decision that would later lead

to accusations that he lacked a college degree.) With his mother's support,

Naessens continued his studies on his own. While pursuing the study of

hematology, he observed " something moving in the blood, " but the particle was

too small to be identified by the optical methods he had at his disposal.

Fascinated, Naessens enlisted the help of optical specialists in Germany in

developing a stronger microscope.

Called the somatoscope, the microscope itself was a significant scientific

achievement. Using a unique combination of incandescent and ultraviolet rays, it

allowed him to look at living blood (without first fixing and staining it, which

is the usual method) at a magnification of 30,000 times with a resolution of 150

angstroms--a capacity that has not been exceeded to date.

Using this unique method of microscopy, Naessens was able to study what he had

glimpsed previously but could not identify: motile microorganisms in the blood

plasma. Naessens observed a number of different forms of these microorganisms

but came to the conclusion that they were all stages of the development of one

sub cellular entity he named the " somatid. "

Naessens found these somatids everywhere--in the sap of plants, in the blood of

animals, even in apparently lifeless organic matter like ashes. Culturing them

and observing the somatid cycle, he discovered that somatids are resistant to

acids and bases as well as heat and that they cannot be cut with a diamond.

For example, they withstood 2 megarads of radiation capable of killing any

living thing, as well as carbonization temperatures of more than 200! C. He

concluded that they are indestructible. Recently, a faculty member of the

University of California at , showed me the somatids in my own blood on a

TB screen, using Naessens' " condenser, " an attachment he developed that converts

a regular microscope into one resembling his invention.

Lots of bright little bodies were busily circulating around the red blood cells,

platelet, and lymphocytes in my blood, their motion not unlike that of swarming

bees. Cell division cannot take place without these busy, glowing bodies,

Naessens postulates, because in the course of its cycle the somatid releases the

growth hormone trephone, which enables cells to divide and multiply.

Naessens goes even further--he believes the electrically charged, luminous

somatid is the original spark of life, the pinpoint where energy condenses into

matter. According to Naessens, the somatid represents the manifestation of

cosmic energy in a tiny, moving dot of physicality. The pleomorphic cycle of

this tiny entity is what explains how degenerative diseases occur, Naessens

says.

Such diseases, which include not only cancer and AIDS but rheumatoid arthritis,

lupus, multiple sclerosis, and any viral or degenerative disease such as chronic

fatigue, are the least understood of all the illnesses of modern times. While

doctors' prescriptions may ease the pain, modern medicine has been unable to

truly cure any of them.

In these diseases, the immune system apparently malfunctions. It either weakens

and becomes unable to resist opportunistic disease, as in cancer or AIDS, or it

doubles its vigilance, attacking the body itself and producing diseases like

rheumatoid arthritis. Holistic medicine urges that we approach these diseases,

which are frequently attributed to environmental toxicity, by rejuvenating the

body's defenses. Holistic treatments, like the traditional methods from which

they evolved, consist of appropriate diet, exercise, and support plant medicines

to replenish our depleted reserves and restore strength.

Naessens' theories align with the tenets of holistic practice. But unlike most

holistic healers, Naessens is able to provide scientific documentation and

evidence of what traditional and Naturopathic approaches have suggested all

along--that disease represents imbalance in the ecology of the whole organism.

In healthy individuals, says Naessens, the somatid moves through a three stage

cycle that produces the right amount of the growth hormone trephone to keep

cells reproducing at the appropriate rate. (This growth hormone was first

identified by Nobel laureate is Carrel, who did not, however, link it to a

subcellular entity in the blood.) When the body is stressed or weak, however,

the somatid shifts into a longer macrocycle that features 13 additional stages,

including forms that resemble bacteria, viruses, and yeast cells.

Other scientists have seen some of these forms in the blood of cancer patients

and have posited a bacterial and, later, a viral cause of cancer. However,

according to these theories (which have not been confirmed by scientific

evidence), the disease carrier has always been thought to enter the body from

somewhere outside, as germs do.

In Naessens' view, these microbial forms are simple phases of the somatid in its

extended cycle. In this amplified cycle, the somatid produces excessive

quantities of growth hormone, creating the abnormally rapid cell growth we call

cancer. Naessens is not the first scientist to describe polymorphic entities in

the blood.

In the early 1800s, Antoine Bechamp, like Guenther Enderlein and many other

pioneers, using far more primitive microscopes than Naessens', perceived

microzymas, or " little bodies, " which were thought to be fundamental elements of

cells and whole living organisms. When the organism is disturbed by a serious

event, Bechamp theorized, the symbiotic relationship between the microzymas and

the body becomes imbalanced, leading to disease. In this view, illness

originates within the body.

The scientific establishment rejected Bechamp's work in favor of that of

Pasteur, who was convinced that disease is caused by bacteria entering the body

from without. Pasteur's work, which had wide application to a host of infectious

diseases, led to the important discovery of immunization.

Bechamp's theory was rejected, and germ theory became a sacred tenet in

medicine, despite the fact that a number of diseases do not appear to conform to

that pattern.

On his deathbed, Pasteur was said to disavow his own theories and exclaim, " He

is right. The terrain is all. The microbe is nothing! " (He was referring to

French physiologist Claude Bernard, who had disputed Pasteur on the basis that

the microbe meant much less than the condition of the whole.)

In Naessens' theory, the microcycle of the somatid is held at three stages by

blood inhibitors, which consist of certain digestive enzymes, hormones, and

minerals. Poor diet and stress apparently reduce the number of blood inhibitors,

allowing the somatid to commence its extended 13-phase macrocycle. The presence

of these extra somatid forms signifies the beginning of degenerative disease

before it has manifested itself in the body.

Be well,

Rand

A C Brown <abrown101@...> wrote: Excellent article covering Gaston

Naessens, his 'somatid' theory, 714X, the

French medical authorities, the Canadian medical authorities and the FDA.

Courtesy of Ralph Moss PhD.

http://www.ralphmoss.com/naessens1.html

- Art

[Guest guest]

Hi Art,

I found the article very interesting, especially this part

RAISING HACKLES

Naessens also raises hackles when he says that the somatid " microbe " and some of

its dependent phases inhabit normal blood. Every medical student learns that

normal human blood is sterile. A profusion of living organisms in the blood

would not be normal or common: in fact, it sounds like septicemia, a condition

that would require immediate treatment with antibiotics.

But the most fundamental challenge comes in cancer. For it is the prevailing

belief of oncologists that microbes have nothing to do with the onset of cancer.

When they do occur in cancer patients' blood, it is only as an " opportunistic "

infection or as a contaminant on a slide. The very idea of bacterial causes,

once a popular hypothesis has now dropped out of the very consciousness of

modern science. It goes unmentioned in DeVita's 2,747-page orthodox textbook on

cancer.

One of the reasons I find it interesting is because some cancers are known to

respond to the antibiotic Doxycyline. Adenocarcinoma is not one that responded

well to the Doxy or else I would try it. The thrapy for this calls for 100 mg

twice a day for 30 days. If I recall correctly, squamous cell responded pretty

well to Doxy.

DG DISPATCH - CHEST: Doxycycline Inhibits Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Growth

By Margaret Pearson

Special to DG News

CHICAGO, IL -- November 3, 1999 -- Lung cancer is one of the most common causes

of death from malignancy among men and women. For non-small cell lung cancer

(NSCLC), the five-year survival rate is less than 20 percent.

Doxycycline is a tetracycline antibiotic and has been shown to have anti-tumor

activity in vitro. Since its anti-tumor effect on NSCLC has not been previously

investigated, Dr. Rubins and colleagues in the Pulmonary Medicine

Department at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center, in Minneapolis, MN, assayed its

impact on cultured lung cancer cells. They presented the results of their study

yesterday (Nov. 2) at the American College of Chest Physician meeting, in

Chicago, IL.

Cultured NSLC cell lines were treated with varying doses of doxycycline.

Analysis of cell growth kinetics showed that doxycyline slowed NSCLC growth in a

dose-dependent manner, with higher doses producing net cell death. Of the cell

lines tested, one of the large cell lines used was consistently more sensitive

to doxycycline than were the adenocarcinoma cell lines.

The researchers concluded that oral doxycycline holds potential as an adjunct

treatment of NSCLC. The mechanisms of doxycycline's effect on NSCLC cell growth

and reasons why certain cell lines have different susceptibilities to

doxycycline are currently being investigated.

November 3, 1999

Source: American College of Chest Physicians conference, Chicago, Illinois and

Doctors Guide News November 3, 1999

Doxycycline for cancer treatment?

November 03, 1999

Doxycycline is an antibiotic commonly used in the treatment of a wide variety of

bacterial infections. In addition to its bacteria-fighting properties,

doxycycline may also slow the growth of certain tumor cells. A study presented

at the conference of the American College of Chest Physicians said that

doxycycline may help treat non-small cell lung cancer.

In this study, the growth of non-small cell lung cancer cells was shown to be

slowed or even stopped with the addition of varying amounts of doxycycline. This

study involved only laboratory grown cancer cells. Further studies are needed to

determine if the same effect will be observed in humans.

Current Research in Osteosarcoma:

An Athymic Mouse Model for osteosarcoma was established by injecting human

transformed osteosarcoma cells into the tibias of athymic mice which are

incapable of rejecting the tissue growth. Eighty percent of the mice developed

metastatic osteosarcoma with very large primary tumors. Half of the mice were

given doxycycline in their water supply and half were not. The two groups both

developed primary tibia tumors as well as pulmonary lesions but the group

treated with doxycycline had significantly less pulmonary metastases as

determined by weight of the right lung. In fact the average untreated lung

weighed almost three times that of the treated mouse lung. This finding suggests

that doxycycline, which has anti-angiogenesis characteristics, cannot prevent

primary tumor growth and spread, but may be effective in slowing metastatic

growth. These effects have previously been demonstrated in a published report of

a study carried out in vitro by our bone cancer research team of Drs. Fife and

Rougraff.

[ ] re: 714X

Excellent article covering Gaston Naessens, his 'somatid' theory, 714X, the

French medical authorities, the Canadian medical authorities and the FDA.

Courtesy of Ralph Moss PhD.

http://www.ralphmoss.com/naessens1.html

- Art

[Guest guest]

The article mentions the NCAHF (Quackbusters). Quackbusters has

listed Dr. Linus ding, the only individual to have won two

unshared Nobel Prizes, and virtually every other award for scientific

achievement, both national and international.

Here is an interesting email i recently received from the NCAHF's

biggest, and perhaps most effective, critic Tim Bolen. It's

definitely a worthwhile, often hilarious, read:

Quackpots Baratz and Barrett BOTH Hiding Under the Bed...

Opinion by consumer advocate Tim Bolen

The quackbusters are on the run. The smell of fear is in the

air. Quackpot leaders are in hiding - avoiding subpoenas. And

there is no way out for them.

In a laughable assault in California, top quackpots Bobbie Baratz

and Barrett, attacked about thirty-nine Internet health

providers in a California Superior Court, activating what is

called " the private Attorney General Law. " Among other LUDICROUS

claims, the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF) had

defined the entire health discipline of " homeopathy " as health

fraud, because, as they stated, it has never been scientifically

proven. In the very first court case, the NCAHF claim was thrown

out of court with the declaration of a " Non-Suit " by the Judge -

the reason given by the Judge - was that the NCAHF has little

credibility. The Judge's decision is online, and can be found by

going to www.save.org and clicking on " California Judge

Lambastes Quackpots. " It will take you to the Judge's actual

words.

But it gets even better. There are thirty-eight more cases that

the quackbuster idiots must now face up to. And, the defendants

in those cases want their attorney fees paid - by the so-called

" Plaintiffs " (the NCAHF) and/or the individual board members that

initiated these FRIVOLOUS attacks. Let's do a little math - If

each defendant expended $50,000 on their own case fighting the

frivolous attack, then the attorney fees would total $1,950,000.

If Bobbie and Stevie get tagged for this, how are they going to

pay? Bobbie's income from Naponsett Medical Center was

terminated in 1999. Stevie doesn't appear to have had a paying

job since the 1970s.

And, the NCAHF has no money. It looks like their California

assault was to RAISE money and prestige - not spend it. In

California they ran right into the waiting FIST of the Health

Freedom Movement - and they are incapable of getting up off the

floor.

Bobbie Baratz is desperately avoiding " deposition " in California.

So is Barrett. But Judges don't have to put up with

quackpot machinations when they order something to happen -

Bobbie and Stevie had better show up - or JAIL could loom in

their future. Judges are like that.

For more information about Bobbie Baratz go to

http://www.save.org/quackpots/bobbie_baratz1.htm, and for

Barrett go to

http://www.save.org/quackpots/barrett.htm.

SPECIAL NOTE: Litigation is not cheap - neither for the

Defendant nor the Plaintiff. Let's do some more math, this time

for the Plaintiff, for the Plaintiff has to put up money to carry

cases (filing fees, document fees, witness fees, etc.). Let's,

just for conversation, say that each of the thirty-nine cases,

cost the Plaintiff $5,000. 39 times $5,000 = $195,000. The

question is: " Who financed this? " The NCAHF didn't, their

office is in a skin care salon. Mehrban, the NCAHF's dubious

attorney, works out of a back room, of an old house, in a scary

neighborhood, in Los Angeles. So, " who put up the money? " - the

Defendants want to know.

Quackbuster busting is fun...

Tim Bolen

Consumer Advocate

[Addendum]

This " Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter " is about

the battle between " Health and Medicine " on Planet Earth. Tim

Bolen is an op/ed writer with extensive knowledge of the

activities of a subversive organization calling itself the

" quackbusters, " and that organization's attempts to suppress,

and discredit, any, and all health modalities that compete with

the allopathic (MD) paradigm for consumer health dollars. The

focus of the newsletter is on the ongoing activities, battles,

politics, and the victories won by members of the " Health Freedom

Movement " against the " quackbusters " It details " who the

quackbusters are, what they are, where they are operating, when

they appear, and how they operate - and how easy it is to beat

them... "

For background information on the " Battle between Health and

Medicine " go to: http://www.save.org/by_whom2.htm.

>Excellent article covering Gaston Naessens, his 'somatid' theory, 714X, the

>French medical authorities, the Canadian medical authorities and the FDA.

>

>Courtesy of Ralph Moss PhD.

>

>http://www.ralphmoss.com/naessens1.html

>

>- Art

>

--

--

Neil Jensen: neil@...

The WWW VL: Sumeria http://www.sumeria.net/

" It was always much pleasanter... when one wasn't always

being ordered about by mice and rabbits. " -- Alice

[Guest guest]

Has anyone heard of 714X? I have been hearing about it lately. It will be

available soon at a health food store I frequent.

Here's a bit on it:

http://www.cancertutor.com/Cancer/The714x.html

http://www.apfn.org/THEWINDS/archive/medical/charles_pixley08-98.html

[Guest guest]

i work with a doctor in Barcelona who has some patients using 714 X, I think

some of them benefit from this quite abit although they also do vitamin C

IV, SOme of them use Ukrain ( chelidonium majus ) chemotherpy which is an

alternative type of chemo, and they do a cycle of 714 and a cycle of ukrain.

In my belief if there is no growth of tumours this might be a good sign,

that indicates that the product is at least stopping the disease from

spreading more..

Most patients that I know that use 714 x have peritoneal mets, lung mets or

primary tumors and prostate and bladder cancer..

Hope this helps although i Guess it´s not very concrte information

Best wishes

Lillian

2008/2/16, pams4699 <pams4699@...>:

>

> I am a stage 4 cancer patient and was looking into alternative cancer

> treatments.

>

> I have been using 714X for the last 5 months. I was wondering if anyone

> has either experimented with this protocol or has any info on the subject

>

> Thanks Pam

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Here's some more info (near top of page):

http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/cancer1/altthrpy.htm

Posted by: " lineridergarcia22 " lineridergarcia22@...  

lineridergarcia22

Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:47 am (PST)

>

> Excellent article covering Gaston Naessens, his 'somatid' theory,

714X, the

> French medical authorities, the Canadian medical authorities and the

FDA.

>

> Courtesy of Ralph Moss PhD.

>

> http://www.ralphmoss.com/naessens1.html

>

> - Art

>

I would love to see more on this !! At my stage I would be the first to

raise my hand and try it. Such a shame America is NOT America, the home

of the free. P.S. as a Nam era vet don't try and say I have no right to

criticize.

[Guest guest]

I am a stage 4 cancer patient and was looking into alternative cancer

treatments.

I have been using 714X for the last 5 months. I was wondering if anyone

has either experimented with this protocol or has any info on the subject

Thanks Pam

Pam,

With 714X, it is imperative that you get the injections in the nodes.

Hopefully, you got a video, and have someone who can make sure that the

injections

are given properly. If it does not get in the nodes, there will be no

benefit.

Barb

RN, Wholistic Healthcare Consultant

**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.

(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/

2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)

[Guest guest]

Go to: www.cancertutor.com

Regards,

De: pams4699

I am a stage 4 cancer patient and was looking into alternative cancer

treatments.

I have been using 714X for the last 5 months. I was wondering if anyone

has either experimented with this protocol or has any info on the subject

Thanks Pam