Re: Some modern science behind an ancient protocol

[Guest guest]

Well Elena, that was a mouthful........or should I say a couple of screens

full?

Urotherapy added to Immunotherapy and the premise sounds promising.

Sometimes it doesn't matter that they put the cart before the horse because,

like with BCG, the immunotherapy sometimes works. Perhaps the Urotherapy

might work.....sometimes.

Just to remind some that when I said, 'cart before the horse' it related to

the good Doctor's

statement: " but the invention of a philosophy of medical explanation that

permitted germs to be causative agents of disease "

While to some it may be nitpicking, I believe it is such a critical part of

the conventional system being wrong, that I cannot buy into it. I don't

buy into the " germs to be causative agents of disease " ........unless they

begin to qualify it and say, 'germs are a secondary cause' because as the

article points out the failure of the immune system, for a number of

reasons, including age, is the more important issue.

HOWEVER, once the 'secondary cause', the germ has done its dirty work

something needs to be done. In the case of Bladders the BCG has a good

track record and that is supposedly the 'encouraging of the body's own

immune system to kick in. Perhaps Urotherapy will do the same thing.

This is why diet changes do not always work and as has brought out,

they often do not. That must be because the cancer is too difficult, once

established, to simply be 'eaten away' by veggies and fruit.

So I fault the medical profession for putting the cart before the horse and

blaming a lonely germ........or should I say 'lowly' germ when the real

culprit is the immune system but really, the reasons it isn't working.

Abuse, chemical assaults, wrong eating, enervation,.....blah blah blah.

Thank you Elena for this great piece and please everyone, I may sound like

I know what I am speaking about however, it is just my take 'plagiarized'

from others over the long years I have been around. Again, perhaps

nitpicking.............but IF the cart is really before the horse perhaps if

they ride it correctly we will all benefit from the medical machine instead

of having to dodge their efforts. Can you imagine the wonder of it all if

conventional health practices were working as some of our alternative

practitioners and thinking the same way?

I will go down believing that the germ must be considered secondary and

that is why I believe cancer returns even after being put into remission.

If that primary cause, the immune system take over after treatment then we

have what often says, " sustained remission " ................and that

is what I want. I told my Urologist, I am not interested in 'tumor

response'...........I am interested in surviving!

Joe C.