Guest guest Posted October 12, 2004 Report Share Posted October 12, 2004 , I'm not an engineer. Just someone who's used both devices. As I understand it, the rife machine produces a much stronger frequency wave that is able to fully penetrate the body cavity (bowels), and resonates with higher and stronger waves. I also noticed that you can FEEL the Rife machine as it's working. Literally makes you " zing " with energy. (At first it can make you feel very ill, as your blood stream fills with all the dead bacteria, viruses, and parasites.) One reason I THINK the price remains around the $2000 mark is because of all the legal issues the manufacturer is always facing. FDA wants this machine off the market. But, Ron Rockwell continues the good fight. So far, he has been able to keep selling the machines because the FDA CAN'T BEAT HIM. His data has thus far kept them at bay. It simply works. (sorry Pam) BIG PHARMA does NOT want Rife of therapies publicized! They'd lose their trillions. One last thought: The cost of my brother's battle with terminal cancer reached $200,000 over the course of about 90 days, with absolutely ZERO improvement (except for the 18 inch long tumor they removed / and portions of his colon) Literally - less than 30 days after beginning Rife sessions, he was released... 100% cancer free. The doctors, of course, are to this day dumbfounded. They have had 0% success with patients in his stage of cancer. ZERO %! $2000 vs $200,000 hmmmmmm, let's see... which is more out of line? $200k for bullcrap drugs, chemo, and therapy or an EFFECTIVE, easy to use, noninvasive approach? $2000 seems like a pretty good deal. So much so, we now sell authentic rife machines for Mr. Rockwell. Although we've just begun, so far we've used is successfully in battling MS, asthma, scoriosis, arthritis, and cancer. It's been the best $2000 we've EVER spent! You can take this message - or leave it. Just don't give up the fight. The NATURAL path is the way to go. Keep positive thoughts, and keep trying holistic remedies. You'll be fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2004 Report Share Posted October 12, 2004 It finally dawned on me where I've met Pam before. It was in a past life and at the time she was touting the propositions that the earth was flat and the sun revolved around it. We didn't listen to her then and we shouldn't listen to her now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2004 Report Share Posted October 12, 2004 > So is the rife machine really better than the zapper. Why. I have a > back ground in electronic and there is not more than $100 worth of > electronic in that little box. So why is it so expensive? > So who know the truth about zappers and rife machine? There is no comparison, as they work by different mechanisms that only overlap a litle bit. The zapper gives a lot of frequencies through actual power surges. There's no control over which frequencies or the actual amount of power, at least in the original. The rife machine affords the ability to target a specific set of frequencies and drench the body in those freqs, not by electricity but by magnetic, and turned up loud. I think the biggest difference is that the zapper is supposed to be a parasite tormentor; it was never meant to kill diverse pathogens. Rife machines are good for that and so-so at shrinking tumours. Do you hear reports of the zapper ever shrinking tumours? It wouldn't be my choice for that exercise. What kind of Rife machine did you sample that has less than $100 worth of parts? The generally acknowledged " best " if there is such a thing is the Rife/Bare; following Rife's experiments prettyu closely, the Phanotron tubes alone are over $200. The zapper on the other hand contains about $25 in parts. Duncan Crow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2004 Report Share Posted October 12, 2004 > There is no operational difference between a Zapper and a Rife > machine. Both of them do nothing at all. There is only enough > electronics in them to convince a casual observer that it is a " real " > machine. The profit margin is huge. A real medical device would be > required to undergo expensive testing. Pam, lab proof exists that it blasts pathogens, and data is accumulating on cancer treatment as the science matures for a second time. Rife had 16 out of 16 doctor-vetted advanced cancer cases go away using his gear, and he was doing the testing you mention to prove to a medical certainty what all it worked on, when the FDA burned his lab and smashed all his equipment they got their hands on. If it didn't do anything, would they have bothered this researcher at all? Anyway, the device is undergoing the expensive testing as we speak, in Australia. There are sources of information that should interest you if you still have an open mind. regards, Duncan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.