Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 Hi, I understand your source of the information but there are other sources that don't agree. When I started TRT, I was on one of the Mevacor or similar drugs in 1992 and have been on those different meds since the powder Cholostyramien after my by-pass in 1982. I did not have any significant change in my level of HDL or LDL when I got my yearly lipid profile. There are also other opinions regarding bone loss. Some sources say it strengthens the bones. I think Dr. Shippen's book, " The Testosterone Syndrome " encourages TRT for better physical health. T is used many places in the body. Yes there are forms of cancer that can be fed and grow very fast when TRT is being used. PSA tests and prostate checks are essential to avoid that risk. Some cancers of the prostate do not feed on T and TRT can be approved by the doctor for the patient following surgery. Diabetes may be cured with TRT and thyroid function may improve. I am currently on 30mg/day of lipitor and the doctor is satisfied with my numbers. ernestnolan > Doctors are reluctant to prescribe hormone supplements because of the recognized hazards of excess testosterone. One way we treat prostate cancer is to reduce testosterone levels to zero, which slows the cancer's growth. Therefore, it's logical to think that excess testosterone may speed growth if prostate cancer is present. Testosterone has also been associated with osteoporosis (weakened, brittle bones), and it lowers HDL cholesterol, the good cholesterol that helps protect us from atherosclerosis. > > With biweekly injections of testosterone--the most common delivery method--the drop is HDL cholesterol is usually less than 10 percent. Oral testosterone, on the other hand, should be avoided--not only for its dramatic effect on HDL cholesterol but also because it causes liver problems. > > This is a copy and paste from the link below. > http://www.malehealthcenter.com/Columns/testost.html > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 > Doctors are reluctant to prescribe hormone supplements because... ...they are woefully ignorant on the topic. > ...of the recognized hazards of excess > testosterone. The " hazards " of low T are far worse!!!!!!! > One way we treat prostate > cancer is to reduce testosterone levels to > zero, which slows the cancer's growth. And another way to " treat " prostate cancer is to do nothing. Which is what more and more doctors are doing every day. > Therefore, it's logical to think that excess > testosterone may speed growth if prostate cancer is present. The latest research indicates that low T is a primary CAUSE of prostate cancer. > Testosterone has also been associated with > osteoporosis (weakened, brittle bones)... Yes, LOW T is associated with oesteoporosis. In fact, when I was diagnosed with hypogonadidsm, I asked my urologist if I could hold off for a while, he said I could hold off for 3 months or so but after that one of the major risks of low T is OSTEOPOROSIS. > ...and it lowers HDL cholesterol, the good cholesterol > that helps protect us from atherosclerosis. Only at supraphisiological dosages. At replacement dosages, TRT vastly improves one's cardiovascular profile. > This is a copy and paste from the link below. > http://www.malehealthcenter.com/Columns/testost.html Don't waste your time on this ill-researched crap. Do your own research. It's not that hard to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 Read this on prostate cancer. http://www.prostatepointers.org/prostate/leibowitz/TEST-REV2.html Phil Z <davidzxxx2004@...> wrote: > Doctors are reluctant to prescribe hormone supplements because... ...they are woefully ignorant on the topic. > ...of the recognized hazards of excess > testosterone. The " hazards " of low T are far worse!!!!!!! > One way we treat prostate > cancer is to reduce testosterone levels to > zero, which slows the cancer's growth. And another way to " treat " prostate cancer is to do nothing. Which is what more and more doctors are doing every day. > Therefore, it's logical to think that excess > testosterone may speed growth if prostate cancer is present. The latest research indicates that low T is a primary CAUSE of prostate cancer. > Testosterone has also been associated with > osteoporosis (weakened, brittle bones)... Yes, LOW T is associated with oesteoporosis. In fact, when I was diagnosed with hypogonadidsm, I asked my urologist if I could hold off for a while, he said I could hold off for 3 months or so but after that one of the major risks of low T is OSTEOPOROSIS. > ...and it lowers HDL cholesterol, the good cholesterol > that helps protect us from atherosclerosis. Only at supraphisiological dosages. At replacement dosages, TRT vastly improves one's cardiovascular profile. > This is a copy and paste from the link below. > http://www.malehealthcenter.com/Columns/testost.html Don't waste your time on this ill-researched crap. Do your own research. It's not that hard to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 Overdosage with testosterone lowers the 'good' high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. However, in correct doses, testosterone has no relevant effect on lipid patterns. Kissie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:56:08 -0500, you wrote: >Testosterone has also been associated with osteoporosis (weakened, brittle bones), No - low testosterone is associated with osteoporosis. Take it from someone who cracked 8 ribs on his was to getting his diagnosis. - - - - Just another albino black sheep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 Dr. Ken Goldberg: " Nevertheless, I'm not ready to declare routine testosterone supplementation the solution to veropuase (male menopause). " Perhaps he'll be ready when he learns how to spell it. He gets a little closer when he later spells it " veropause " , but he's not there yet. > Doctors are reluctant to prescribe hormone supplements because of the recognized hazards of excess testosterone. One way we treat prostate cancer is to reduce testosterone levels to zero, which slows the cancer's growth. Therefore, it's logical to think that excess testosterone may speed growth if prostate cancer is present. Testosterone has also been associated with osteoporosis (weakened, brittle bones), and it lowers HDL cholesterol, the good cholesterol that helps protect us from atherosclerosis. > > With biweekly injections of testosterone--the most common delivery method--the drop is HDL cholesterol is usually less than 10 percent. Oral testosterone, on the other hand, should be avoided--not only for its dramatic effect on HDL cholesterol but also because it causes liver problems. > > This is a copy and paste from the link below. > http://www.malehealthcenter.com/Columns/testost.html > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 > >Testosterone has also been associated with osteoporosis (weakened, >brittle bones), > >No - low testosterone is associated with osteoporosis. Take it from >someone who cracked 8 ribs on his was to getting his diagnosis. > >- - - - Indeed, and take it also from someone who is 54, keeps his T at the highest level and whose bone density scan is quote " consistent with a young adult " as stated in the report. Keeping your T up is essential to bone density. When men take Lupron, a drug which chemically stops the production of T, as part of prostate cancer treatment, they lose a decade of bone density in the following two years - just as when women go through meno. As I state here from time to time (because I believe it firmly) men who have low T but stop treatment simply because they do not get the sexual or energy effects that they want are going to run into a world of deterioration down the road, including muscle mass and cognition. It is important to adjust your T level based on how you feel but it is important to also keep your T up into the upper third of the range regardless of how you feel. This is my opinion of course but I only got there by looking at the data. To each his own though. If you are in your 30's or 40's and dont think you will ever be 60 then you are all set. When you are 60 you will wish that you had preserved the last two to three decades of bone loss and then it gets worse from there. Dont let the drug ads on TV fool you. Osteoporosis cannot be reversed and a couple inches of height loss does not come back and neither do the collapsed vertebrae and general collapse of the frame. The available drugs can increase the density of whats left by just a small percentage - that is for those who can hold them down without vomiting. Many people cannot take Fosamax for example due to the nausea. If you know that you have low T and you are not treating it then that is where you are headed unless you want to try to beat the odds. Winter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 The following is a quote from the paper, " MY CURRENT BEST THOUGHTS ON HOW TO ADMINISTER TRT FOR MEN " by Crisler, DO ( http://www.growyoungandslim.com/articles/testosterone5404johncrislertrt.doc ). The section quoted is taken from the section discussing appropriate lab assays for TRT. -Begin Quote------- Lipid Panel This is drawn to provide your bragging rights when you drop the CHOL 30 points, thanks to your own good administration of TRT. You should expect to see lowered TRIG and LDL's, too. Be advised, this will not happen if you choose to elevate their androgens above the top of " normal " range, i.e. providing what amounts to an anabolic steroid cycle. Of course, this would no longer constitute TRT, as the practitioner would then be choosing to damage the health and well-being of the patient. HDL does frequently drop a bit, but that is believed to be due to increased REVERSE cholesterol transport; so much of the plaque is, after being scavenged from the lining of the CV system by HDL, now being chewed up by the liver. Androgens also elevate hepatic lipase, and this may have an effect. The important thing to keep in mind is that TRT inhibits foam cell formation. -End Quote--------- I would like to emphasize that serum testosterone levels do not have linear effects. This is true of so many things in nature and in particular, the human body. --mranak > Doctors are reluctant to prescribe hormone supplements because of the recognized hazards of excess testosterone. One way we treat prostate cancer is to reduce testosterone levels to zero, which slows the cancer's growth. Therefore, it's logical to think that excess testosterone may speed growth if prostate cancer is present. Testosterone has also been associated with osteoporosis (weakened, brittle bones), and it lowers HDL cholesterol, the good cholesterol that helps protect us from atherosclerosis. > > With biweekly injections of testosterone--the most common delivery method--the drop is HDL cholesterol is usually less than 10 percent. Oral testosterone, on the other hand, should be avoided--not only for its dramatic effect on HDL cholesterol but also because it causes liver problems. > > This is a copy and paste from the link below. > http://www.malehealthcenter.com/Columns/testost.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 We responded the way we did because of the statement, " Doctors are reluctant to prescribe hormone supplements because of the recognized hazards of excess testosterone. " That statement is overloaded. For example, the uninformed reader could easily conclude that any TRT is " excessive " if the patient already falls within the so-called 'normal' range for testosterone. This article does not help to alleviate misconceptions of proper HRT. Many of the folks here are very sensitive to that, and with good reason. I believe that the information that I provided was more clear and comprehensive than the original article, yet it did so in fewer words. So, I posted that information, along with a few comments to emphasize my point. Sorry if it seems like we are coming at your with knives and guns drawn. It must be all the 'excessive' testosterone in this forum! (Sorry, I couldn't help myself). But seriously, we are simply trying to exchange information for the better. --mranak > > Doctors are reluctant to prescribe hormone supplements because of > the recognized hazards of excess testosterone. One way we treat > prostate cancer is to reduce testosterone levels to zero, which slows > the cancer's growth. Therefore, it's logical to think that excess > testosterone may speed growth if prostate cancer is present. > Testosterone has also been associated with osteoporosis (weakened, > brittle bones), and it lowers HDL cholesterol, the good cholesterol > that helps protect us from atherosclerosis. > > > > With biweekly injections of testosterone--the most common delivery > method--the drop is HDL cholesterol is usually less than 10 percent. > Oral testosterone, on the other hand, should be avoided--not only for > its dramatic effect on HDL cholesterol but also because it causes > liver problems. > > > > This is a copy and paste from the link below. > > http://www.malehealthcenter.com/Columns/testost.html > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 Hi Kissie, I have no problem with your statements. I have a problem with Dr. Goldberg's article. I think it's unclear, sloppy and presents statements that are either incorrect or can easily be misinterpreted. If a member of this group made some of those statements, others would correct him. Like: " Normal levels are considered to be anywhere between 300 and 1,000 micrograms per deciliter, " He asks an intriguing question: " But what if it's (T level) only a little low? " . He doesn't really answer that. That's a hot topic with this group. When he says " With biweekly injections of testosterone--the most common delivery method... " does he mean biweekly injections are excessive? At what dose per injection? He says: " If your testosterone level is very low, and there is no correctable cause, supplementation is likely to be helpful. " , even though " what it does to the length of that (person's) life still isn't clear. " To me that seems like a grudging concession that treatment of hypogonadism is okay. If Dr. Goldberg isn't against properly administered TRT, there's one thing he does make clear: he isn't for it. I THINK what he's trying to say is that older men with moderately low testosterone should think twice before jumping into TRT. If so, that's good advice. The article definitely reads like an attack on TRT in general. Bruce > I think you guys are missing the point of my statement. I did not make the statement that properly administered TRT was harmful > in lowering your HDL. Yet everyone who has read the post has defended TRT therapy. My statement was that Overdosing on Testosterone lowers HDL and it does. Why are you all defending > properly administered TRT when it was never attacked. > Kissie --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 Hi, It would be helpful for readers if you could define what dosages you feel meet those requirements. ernestnolan > Overdosage with testosterone lowers the 'good' high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. However, in correct doses, testosterone has no relevant effect on lipid patterns. > Kissie > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 Hi, I think numbers would help a lot to calrify, but thanks for getting back to us who have been jumping up and down. We try to keep from making strong comments to each other as a courtesy and I appreciate that. ernestnolan > > Doctors are reluctant to prescribe hormone supplements because of > the recognized hazards of excess testosterone. One way we treat > prostate cancer is to reduce testosterone levels to zero, which slows > the cancer's growth. Therefore, it's logical to think that excess > testosterone may speed growth if prostate cancer is present. > Testosterone has also been associated with osteoporosis (weakened, > brittle bones), and it lowers HDL cholesterol, the good cholesterol > that helps protect us from atherosclerosis. > > > > With biweekly injections of testosterone--the most common delivery > method--the drop is HDL cholesterol is usually less than 10 percent. > Oral testosterone, on the other hand, should be avoided--not only for > its dramatic effect on HDL cholesterol but also because it causes > liver problems. > > > > This is a copy and paste from the link below. > > http://www.malehealthcenter.com/Columns/testost.html > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.