Guest guest Posted September 2, 2005 Report Share Posted September 2, 2005 In Theory you would have thought it possible that Tribulus maybe used as an alternative to HCG as it does increase endogenous testosterone production. However, some men (I have no idea as to their number) do not respond at all to Tribulus but do to HCG. Something makes me feel that HCG is more likely to work, but I do not know the different pharmcoloical effects involved in terms of comparison. Perhaps I am extrapolating from my own experiences a little, which were HCG raised testosterone levels but didn't work for me, but Tribulus did very little. I would have thought HCG would be preferable as there is more evidence to it working in this setting. That said like anything it is horses for courses and if it works well for you then go with it. > I'm wondering if protodioscin - which is allegedly the > active (or one of the active) LH-raising component(s) > in Tribulus terrestris - in a standardized form (such > as Twinlab Tribulus Fuel Extreme, which is alleged to > contain at least 20% protodioscin) might be employed > in combination with exogenously administered > testosterone in a similar way to HCG? > > (With protodioscin, it would be necessary that the > individual is capable of producing LH, versus HCG > which apparently acts as an analog of LH.) The > protodioscin could be taken orally, versus having to > do injections of (prescription) HCG. The problem is > trying to figure out at what stage(s) in the cycle the > protodioscin should be taken, the amount, etc. My > experience with herbals is that they work - when they > are standardized - but that a tolerance is rapidly > developed when they are taken every day. So taking > protodioscin, e.g., once or twice, or three times a > week might avoid the tolerance issue, while > stimulating a natural production of testosterone to > afford the benefits that Dr. mentions, e.g., in > his paper " An Update To The Crisler HCG Protocol, " > found here: > http://www.ironlife.com/mag/issue13/crisler.shtml > > Any thoughts on this? > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2005 Report Share Posted September 2, 2005 I will stay with HCG is only costs me $5.00 for 6 box's. I would have to pay for Tribulus out of my pocket. Phil Hardy <frankwhardy@...> wrote: I'm wondering if protodioscin - which is allegedly the active (or one of the active) LH-raising component(s) in Tribulus terrestris - in a standardized form (such as Twinlab Tribulus Fuel Extreme, which is alleged to contain at least 20% protodioscin) might be employed in combination with exogenously administered testosterone in a similar way to HCG? (With protodioscin, it would be necessary that the individual is capable of producing LH, versus HCG which apparently acts as an analog of LH.) The protodioscin could be taken orally, versus having to do injections of (prescription) HCG. The problem is trying to figure out at what stage(s) in the cycle the protodioscin should be taken, the amount, etc. My experience with herbals is that they work - when they are standardized - but that a tolerance is rapidly developed when they are taken every day. So taking protodioscin, e.g., once or twice, or three times a week might avoid the tolerance issue, while stimulating a natural production of testosterone to afford the benefits that Dr. mentions, e.g., in his paper " An Update To The Crisler HCG Protocol, " found here: http://www.ironlife.com/mag/issue13/crisler.shtml Any thoughts on this? __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2005 Report Share Posted September 3, 2005 Phil, I was mostly thinking about the protodioscin (Tribulus) as a possibility for people who couldn't get their doctor to prescribe HCG. I've gotten my doctor to switch me from 200mg T cypionate every 2 weeks to 100mg once a week, but getting him to add in the HCG may be more difficult. Maybe I'll get lucky, though. I'm definitely going to need some sort of " bridge " to boost my T levels in between injections, because after only about 3 days or so the effects of the injection fall very rapidly. It's early in the game for me, since I've only just had my second injection (100mg given 9 days after a first injection of 200mg, which I'm viewing as a loading dose), but I have a bad feeling that if I just had to resort to T-cyp injections, alone, that I would need to do something on the order of 120-150mg every 3-5 days to feel good. (I'm not noticing as good an effect with the 100mg injection as the 200mg, but I could tell that the 200mg dose was too much, at least initially.) A nurse is going to be teaching me how to self-inject next week, so I could theoretically try a more frequent dosing scheme than once a week, but I really like Dr. 's idea of doing a combination of exogenous T plus stimulating the body to produce its own T. > I'm wondering if protodioscin - which is allegedly the > active (or one of the active) LH-raising component(s) > in Tribulus terrestris - in a standardized form (such > as Twinlab Tribulus Fuel Extreme, which is alleged to > contain at least 20% protodioscin) might be employed > in combination with exogenously administered > testosterone in a similar way to HCG? > > (With protodioscin, it would be necessary that the > individual is capable of producing LH, versus HCG > which apparently acts as an analog of LH.) The > protodioscin could be taken orally, versus having to > do injections of (prescription) HCG. The problem is > trying to figure out at what stage(s) in the cycle the > protodioscin should be taken, the amount, etc. My > experience with herbals is that they work - when they > are standardized - but that a tolerance is rapidly > developed when they are taken every day. So taking > protodioscin, e.g., once or twice, or three times a > week might avoid the tolerance issue, while > stimulating a natural production of testosterone to > afford the benefits that Dr. mentions, e.g., in > his paper " An Update To The Crisler HCG Protocol, " > found here: > http://www.ironlife.com/mag/issue13/crisler.shtml > > Any thoughts on this? > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2005 Report Share Posted September 3, 2005 , Don't take more then 100 mgs. a week for at least 4 weeks then get your blood tested and if your under 800 then up the dose to 150 mgs. A week Dr. dose not start his men on HCG right away he waits like 2 to 4 months until they stabilize. Don't be in a big hurry give it time first you need to get your levels high enough then you need to give your body and brain time to repair the damage that having low T did. So take your time it is on your side. When the time is right print out this link and show it to your Dr. this should get him on board on giving you HCG. http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/90/5/2595 Phil frankwhardy <frankwhardy@...> wrote: Phil, I was mostly thinking about the protodioscin (Tribulus) as a possibility for people who couldn't get their doctor to prescribe HCG. I've gotten my doctor to switch me from 200mg T cypionate every 2 weeks to 100mg once a week, but getting him to add in the HCG may be more difficult. Maybe I'll get lucky, though. I'm definitely going to need some sort of " bridge " to boost my T levels in between injections, because after only about 3 days or so the effects of the injection fall very rapidly. It's early in the game for me, since I've only just had my second injection (100mg given 9 days after a first injection of 200mg, which I'm viewing as a loading dose), but I have a bad feeling that if I just had to resort to T-cyp injections, alone, that I would need to do something on the order of 120-150mg every 3-5 days to feel good. (I'm not noticing as good an effect with the 100mg injection as the 200mg, but I could tell that the 200mg dose was too much, at least initially.) A nurse is going to be teaching me how to self-inject next week, so I could theoretically try a more frequent dosing scheme than once a week, but I really like Dr. 's idea of doing a combination of exogenous T plus stimulating the body to produce its own T. > I'm wondering if protodioscin - which is allegedly the > active (or one of the active) LH-raising component(s) > in Tribulus terrestris - in a standardized form (such > as Twinlab Tribulus Fuel Extreme, which is alleged to > contain at least 20% protodioscin) might be employed > in combination with exogenously administered > testosterone in a similar way to HCG? > > (With protodioscin, it would be necessary that the > individual is capable of producing LH, versus HCG > which apparently acts as an analog of LH.) The > protodioscin could be taken orally, versus having to > do injections of (prescription) HCG. The problem is > trying to figure out at what stage(s) in the cycle the > protodioscin should be taken, the amount, etc. My > experience with herbals is that they work - when they > are standardized - but that a tolerance is rapidly > developed when they are taken every day. So taking > protodioscin, e.g., once or twice, or three times a > week might avoid the tolerance issue, while > stimulating a natural production of testosterone to > afford the benefits that Dr. mentions, e.g., in > his paper " An Update To The Crisler HCG Protocol, " > found here: > http://www.ironlife.com/mag/issue13/crisler.shtml > > Any thoughts on this? > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2005 Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 Hi Phil, I've been meaning to ask you a question about the improvement that you see when you add the HCG (the good stuff, that is) to your weekly dosage of 150mg Depo-T: I think you mentioned that the HCG gives you an improved sense of well-being, and I was just wondering if the extra improvement that you feel - as compared to when you were just doing the Depo-T injection by itself - is just for the period of the couple of days just prior to your next Depo-T injection (by which time your T levels that are due to the Depo-T injection have dropped), or if the improvement is an overall improvement that you feel for ALL of the days of each cycle? In other words, is the HCG acting more like a " bridge " to keep your T levels from dropping too much in between Depo-T injections, or is it having some broader effect, or both? I hope that made sense, and thanks! ********************************** philip georgian <pmgamer18@...> wrote: , Don't take more then 100 mgs. a week for at least 4 weeks then get your blood tested and if your under 800 then up the dose to 150 mgs. A week Dr. dose not start his men on HCG right away he waits like 2 to 4 months until they stabilize. Don't be in a big hurry give it time first you need to get your levels high enough then you need to give your body and brain time to repair the damage that having low T did. So take your time it is on your side. When the time is right print out this link and show it to your Dr. this should get him on board on giving you HCG. http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/90/5/2595 Phil frankwhardy <frankwhardy@...> wrote: Phil, I was mostly thinking about the protodioscin (Tribulus) as a possibility for people who couldn't get their doctor to prescribe HCG. I've gotten my doctor to switch me from 200mg T cypionate every 2 weeks to 100mg once a week, but getting him to add in the HCG may be more difficult. Maybe I'll get lucky, though. I'm definitely going to need some sort of " bridge " to boost my T levels in between injections, because after only about 3 days or so the effects of the injection fall very rapidly. It's early in the game for me, since I've only just had my second injection (100mg given 9 days after a first injection of 200mg, which I'm viewing as a loading dose), but I have a bad feeling that if I just had to resort to T-cyp injections, alone, that I would need to do something on the order of 120-150mg every 3-5 days to feel good. (I'm not noticing as good an effect with the 100mg injection as the 200mg, but I could tell that the 200mg dose was too much, at least initially.) A nurse is going to be teaching me how to self-inject next week, so I could theoretically try a more frequent dosing scheme than once a week, but I really like Dr. 's idea of doing a combination of exogenous T plus stimulating the body to produce its own T. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2005 Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 Phil, There's a new type of HCG, the following is something I copied from a chat with one of Shippen's patients. ---------------------------------------------- made through Recombinant DNA new CG Made with bacteria, instead of pregnant women stuff suppose to be exactly like the human produced cg. > Phil, > > I was mostly thinking about the protodioscin > (Tribulus) as a > possibility for people who couldn't get their doctor > to prescribe > HCG. I've gotten my doctor to switch me from 200mg T > cypionate every > 2 weeks to 100mg once a week, but getting him to add > in the HCG may > be more difficult. Maybe I'll get lucky, though. > > I'm definitely going to need some sort of " bridge " to > boost my T > levels in between injections, because after only about > 3 days or so > the effects of the injection fall very rapidly. It's > early in the > game for me, since I've only just had my second > injection (100mg > given 9 days after a first injection of 200mg, which > I'm viewing as a > loading dose), but I have a bad feeling that if I just > had to resort > to T-cyp injections, alone, that I would need to do > something on the > order of 120-150mg every 3-5 days to feel good. (I'm > not noticing as > good an effect with the 100mg injection as the 200mg, > but I could > tell that the 200mg dose was too much, at least > initially.) > > A nurse is going to be teaching me how to self-inject > next week, so I > could theoretically try a more frequent dosing scheme > than once a > week, but I really like Dr. 's idea of doing a > combination of > exogenous T plus stimulating the body to produce its > own T. > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2005 Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 > Phil, > > Keep us posted on your results with switching over to Pergonal or Profasi. I just refilled my script today with the APP brand but will switch over too if it's going to make a difference. drugstore.com has Pergonal for $43.45 which is about the same as i pay for the generic APP so no big savings there. > When I searched on drugstore.com for pergonal, the site took me to pregnyl. Both are fine but they aren't the same thing. Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2005 Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 > Thanks I have not had time to look to this I wish Z was posting where the heck is he. Have not heard from him in some time. His stuff he put in the files and links section are not there anymore did he get mad and take it off. > Phil > He unsubscribed himself several weeks ago. Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2005 Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 I have all 's papers on my hard drive if you guys want me to post them up on the files section again. > > Phil, > > > > Keep us posted on your results with switching over to Pergonal or > Profasi. I just refilled my script today with the APP brand but will > switch over too if it's going to make a difference. drugstore.com has > Pergonal for $43.45 which is about the same as i pay for the generic > APP so no big savings there. > > > > > When I searched on drugstore.com for pergonal, the site took me to > pregnyl. Both are fine but they aren't the same thing. > > Brad > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2005 Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 > I have all 's papers on my hard drive if you guys want me to > post them up on the files section again. > I don't want them there unless the author wants them there. Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2005 Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 I wasn't aware that he told anyone he didn't want them on the board. As far as I know we don't know how or why the files were removed. Could have been the result of his ID being revoked or closed or a bunch of other possibilities which could have resulted in all associated files and entries being deleted. How do we know what he wants or wanted? If he didn't explicitly say anything why assume he didn't' want them on the board? Regardless, if Brad decides to not allow them on the board I'll email them to anyone that wants them, They're only 36k bytes zipped. > > I have all 's papers on my hard drive if you guys want me to > > post them up on the files section again. > > > > > I don't want them there unless the author wants them there. > > Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2005 Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 Just checked. Seems z's last post was August 2nd, 2005 and then he disappeared. Seems very strange! Twilight Zone strange considering how active he was on this board and the positive tone of his last message. Weird! > > I have all 's papers on my hard drive if you guys want me to > > post them up on the files section again. > > > > > I don't want them there unless the author wants them there. > > Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 > I wasn't aware that he told anyone he didn't want them on the > board. As far as I know we don't know how or why the files were > removed. Could have been the result of his ID being revoked or > closed or a bunch of other possibilities which could have resulted > in all associated files and entries being deleted. How do we know > what he wants or wanted? If he didn't explicitly say anything why > assume he didn't' want them on the board? > > Regardless, if Brad decides to not allow them on the board I'll > email them to anyone that wants them, They're only 36k bytes zipped. > He () deleted the files. Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 It actually tells you that " " deleted them? Or are you assuming that he did because they could only be deleted by him or you? I'm wondering if they could have been automatically deleted if a ID is expired or removed. Did you delete them? I just don't know if we know for sure what happened. I mean, if we had a post or something, anything, indicating his intensions that would at least be something. > > I wasn't aware that he told anyone he didn't want them on the > > board. As far as I know we don't know how or why the files were > > removed. Could have been the result of his ID being revoked or > > closed or a bunch of other possibilities which could have resulted > > in all associated files and entries being deleted. How do we know > > what he wants or wanted? If he didn't explicitly say anything why > > assume he didn't' want them on the board? > > > > Regardless, if Brad decides to not allow them on the board I'll > > email them to anyone that wants them, They're only 36k bytes zipped. > > > > He () deleted the files. > > Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 > It actually tells you that " " deleted them? Yes, it actually tells me that deleted them. > Or are you assuming that he did because they could only be deleted > by him or you? No, I am assuming nothing. > I'm wondering if they could have been automatically deleted if > a ID is expired or removed. I don't think so. > Did you delete them? No, deleted them. > I just don't know if we know for sure what happened. I know what happened because I looked at the log. deleted files he had previously uploaded and then unsubscribed himself from the group. > I mean, if we had a post or something, anything, indicating his > intensions that would at least be something. Deleting a series of files indicates to me his intent is to not have them in the files section. Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 I agree, I didn't know how you knew what exactly happened without direct communication from him. But if the way the system works indicates that he personally deleted them and then unsubscribed from the group then that's a pretty good indication of his desires. Thanks! I will still send the files to anyone that wants them as personal email. Just let me know if you do. Kind of rude to just leave like that in my opinion with no explaination! > > It actually tells you that " " deleted them? > > Yes, it actually tells me that deleted them. > > > Or are you assuming that he did because they could only be deleted > > by him or you? > > No, I am assuming nothing. > > > I'm wondering if they could have been automatically deleted if > > a ID is expired or removed. > > I don't think so. > > > Did you delete them? > > No, deleted them. > > > I just don't know if we know for sure what happened. > > I know what happened because I looked at the log. deleted files > he had previously uploaded and then unsubscribed himself from the > group. > > > I mean, if we had a post or something, anything, indicating his > > intensions that would at least be something. > > Deleting a series of files indicates to me his intent is to not have > them in the files section. > > Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 > > Kind of rude to just leave like that in my opinion with no > explaination! > It's customary. On any given day, several people subscribe and several unsubscribe. Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 It's only rude because he was so active and so many people interacted with him. People that unsubscribe but hardly ever post, and who no one really knows, doesn't really matter if they post a goodbye or not. I think that as many people as had interactions with him on this board warrants a goodbye, IMO. > > > > > Kind of rude to just leave like that in my opinion with no > > explaination! > > > > It's customary. On any given day, several people subscribe and > several unsubscribe. > > Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 > Thanks! I will still send the files to anyone that wants them as > personal email. Just let me know if you do. I'd appreciate that. You can mail them to me at: colinpaulturner@... Many thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2005 Report Share Posted September 9, 2005 I do not consider it rude to unsubscribe & not tell everyone why. I have been on several groups & usually do not explain WHY I leave. If I am dis-satisfied for some reason, I usually explain why I am leaving, but not always. G \ > > > > > > > > Kind of rude to just leave like that in my opinion with no > > > explaination! > > > > > > > It's customary. On any given day, several people subscribe and > > several unsubscribe. > > > > Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2005 Report Share Posted September 9, 2005 Yea, that's the problem, He gave no mention of what he was doing so we're all guessing as to why he left. Would have been better if he would have at least left a one sentence note to us. I think it's rude for anyone to leave like he did. This is a community of people and as a community there is a particular decorum that is expected IMO even though this is just an online community. > > > > > Kind of rude to just leave like that in my opinion with no > > explaination! > > > > It's customary. On any given day, several people subscribe and > several unsubscribe. > > Brad > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2005 Report Share Posted September 11, 2005 There is not need to unsubscribe just Edit Membership and click on no E-Mails and hit save. I do this all the time when I will be out of town and when I get back I put it back. Phil > > > > > Kind of rude to just leave like that in my opinion with no > > explaination! > > > > It's customary. On any given day, several people subscribe and > several unsubscribe. > > Brad > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2005 Report Share Posted September 11, 2005 Yea, unfortunately isn't on " vacation " , if he was he wouldn't have removed his files from the files section. Something happened and he rudely bailed with no explanation. Lame! > > > > > > > > Kind of rude to just leave like that in my opinion with no > > > explaination! > > > > > > > It's customary. On any given day, several people subscribe and > > several unsubscribe. > > > > Brad > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Dr waited 10 months before starting me on HCG... Re: A possible alternative to HCG in the Crisler HCG Protocol , Don't take more then 100 mgs. a week for at least 4 weeks then get your blood tested and if your under 800 then up the dose to 150 mgs. A week Dr. dose not start his men on HCG right away he waits like 2 to 4 months until they stabilize. Don't be in a big hurry give it time first you need to get your levels high enough then you need to give your body and brain time to repair the damage that having low T did. So take your time it is on your side. When the time is right print out this link and show it to your Dr. this should get him on board on giving you HCG. http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/90/5/2595 Phil frankwhardy <frankwhardy@...> wrote: Phil, I was mostly thinking about the protodioscin (Tribulus) as a possibility for people who couldn't get their doctor to prescribe HCG. I've gotten my doctor to switch me from 200mg T cypionate every 2 weeks to 100mg once a week, but getting him to add in the HCG may be more difficult. Maybe I'll get lucky, though. I'm definitely going to need some sort of " bridge " to boost my T levels in between injections, because after only about 3 days or so the effects of the injection fall very rapidly. It's early in the game for me, since I've only just had my second injection (100mg given 9 days after a first injection of 200mg, which I'm viewing as a loading dose), but I have a bad feeling that if I just had to resort to T-cyp injections, alone, that I would need to do something on the order of 120-150mg every 3-5 days to feel good. (I'm not noticing as good an effect with the 100mg injection as the 200mg, but I could tell that the 200mg dose was too much, at least initially.) A nurse is going to be teaching me how to self-inject next week, so I could theoretically try a more frequent dosing scheme than once a week, but I really like Dr. 's idea of doing a combination of exogenous T plus stimulating the body to produce its own T. > I'm wondering if protodioscin - which is allegedly the > active (or one of the active) LH-raising component(s) > in Tribulus terrestris - in a standardized form (such > as Twinlab Tribulus Fuel Extreme, which is alleged to > contain at least 20% protodioscin) might be employed > in combination with exogenously administered > testosterone in a similar way to HCG? > > (With protodioscin, it would be necessary that the > individual is capable of producing LH, versus HCG > which apparently acts as an analog of LH.) The > protodioscin could be taken orally, versus having to > do injections of (prescription) HCG. The problem is > trying to figure out at what stage(s) in the cycle the > protodioscin should be taken, the amount, etc. My > experience with herbals is that they work - when they > are standardized - but that a tolerance is rapidly > developed when they are taken every day. So taking > protodioscin, e.g., once or twice, or three times a > week might avoid the tolerance issue, while > stimulating a natural production of testosterone to > afford the benefits that Dr. mentions, e.g., in > his paper " An Update To The Crisler HCG Protocol, " > found here: > http://www.ironlife.com/mag/issue13/crisler.shtml > > Any thoughts on this? > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.