Guest guest Posted December 17, 2004 Report Share Posted December 17, 2004 On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 19:19:26 -0000, you wrote: > >Testosterone Levels by Age Groups >Nothing comes up. >Phil Looks like they pulled it. It was another group. Perhaps you can post and get them to repost it or send the file to you for posting here? - - - - Just another albino black sheep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 Hey Phil check out How real is the male menopause, that may help. Later. > > Testosterone Levels by Age Groups > Nothing comes up. > Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 Sorry Phil, Try this........... http://f2.grp.fs.com/v1/IFHFQZTUWPvNtWNDmDKioCwdqvlPuGQ6ZsowA3Om Kn8O_F6bj7LMnWcNnefXYSSi8Lofa52F6CugLAB7NICcm0xLB2M7bhcqMXk/How% 20real%20is%20the%20male%20menopause%3F.pdf > > > > Testosterone Levels by Age Groups > > Nothing comes up. > > Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 > >Testosterone Levels by Age Groups > >Nothing comes up. > >Phil > > Looks like they pulled it. It was another group. Perhaps > you can post and get them to repost it or send the file to you > for posting here? I developed this table from an article that appears at www.wellmanclinic.org. Someone posted the link to this article in the ASI newsgroup back in July 2000. The original tables were based on the values of measurement commonly used in Europe. Someone else posted the conversion factor of 28.83. So I clipboarded it into Excel and did the conversion. Then someone else formatted it for the ASI website. I modified my tables into a Word document and posted them in the files section of this group. - Z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 > No it dose not work. I need it for a guy in the UK. > Phil Just divide the table I posted in the files section by 28.85 and you'll have the original table. I think that units of measurement used in the original table from the article were in nmol/L, but I'm not sure. - Z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 Thanks it is just a dam shame we lost this it was good for men that have Dr.'s that would look at a test result and say you are in the normal range. Most Dr.'s when shown this normal ranges for ages wake up and smell the coffee. Phil Z <davidzxxx2004@...> wrote: > No it dose not work. I need it for a guy in the UK. > Phil Just divide the table I posted in the files section by 28.85 and you'll have the original table. I think that units of measurement used in the original table from the article were in nmol/L, but I'm not sure. - Z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 >>>>>> Thanks it is just a dam shame we lost this... it was good for men that have Dr.'s that would look at a test result and say you are in the normal range. Most Dr.'s when shown this normal ranges for ages wake up and smell the coffee. > Phil<<<<<< I don't understand. What did we lose? It's now in the files section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 >>>>>>Thanks I guess you never saw the old one it had ranges for all ages and the US, and UK unit of measure. Also it had Total, Free, LH, and it had it all.<<<< Phil, I *made* the old one!!!!!! Unless they changed if afterwards, the old table did *not* have LH. The table I put in the files section today has all the same information as the old table had except the original values in the common European unit of measure which you can get just by dividing the values in my table by 28.85. If you want me to do that for you let me know, but I just don't understand what you're complaining about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 You made this one here is cut & past on the link. Testosterone Levels by Age Groups xyz23 http://www.alt-support-impotence.org/hormone_charts.htm When it would come up it had a color back ground I think RED and GREEN. I sent the one you put in the files and this guy is so sick he can't think straight I hope he can understand it. Her is a cut & paste on his post it sounds like my story. Phil [ Reply | Next | Previous | Up ] 51yr old UK male needs help? From: Date: 16/12/2004 Time: 16:24:27 Remote Name: 193.195.21.194 Comments Hi folks, I'm educated, managerial position, work in audiology with a high IQ but the NHS treat me so bad that I signed my last letter to them with my hospital number because that is all I felt I was. OK gripe over:PROBLEM: Over the last 10 years: 1. Started with panic attacks 2. Fatigue crept in very slowly, now it is debilitating. 3. My concentration is now very poor. 4. My memory is a standing joke at work. 5. Brain fog is awful. 6. Libido NIL 7. ED ....total 8. I ache all over. My 'T' has been checked over the last 3 months as follows: 7.5;10.5;8.5; & the last one 12.5. My endocrinologist says that these are mostly within normal limits of 8 to 29, so 'T' is not a problem. All other tests thyroid etc I'm told are 'within normal limits' I have after a big battle managed to have my blood sampled at Barts in London (140miles from home), but have to await February for the results and my 5 mins with the consultant. What questions should I be asking? I would just like to regain cognitive ability and energy. Oh yes, and a decent nights sleep. Your help would be very much appreciated as I feel I must take this up myself or I will never get anywhere with our NHS. Should you ever consider self treatment, I'm aware of the prostrate connection. Any UK men out there with an answer, or advice from the USA? --------------------------------- Last changed: December 16, 2004 Z <davidzxxx2004@...> wrote: >>>>>>Thanks I guess you never saw the old one it had ranges for all ages and the US, and UK unit of measure. Also it had Total, Free, LH, and it had it all.<<<< Phil, I *made* the old one!!!!!! Unless they changed if afterwards, the old table did *not* have LH. The table I put in the files section today has all the same information as the old table had except the original values in the common European unit of measure which you can get just by dividing the values in my table by 28.85. If you want me to do that for you let me know, but I just don't understand what you're complaining about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 Phil, I calculated the numbers and Fred from ASI formatted them onto the ASI web site. I developed this table from an article that appears at www.wellmanclinic.org. A guy named zchuss posted the link to this article in the ASI newsgroup back in July 2000. The original tables were based on the values of measurement commonly used in Europe. A guy named Steve posted the conversion factor of 28.85. So I clipboarded the table data into Excel, did the conversion and then posted the converted table in the ASI newsgroup. Then Fred formatted my table data, and the original table with the European values, on the ASI website. Here's the original thread that describes how the table was created: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.support.impotence/browse_frm/thr ead/1cf73c65b376110c/bcfaa694027e6a59?q=teamwork & _done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.su pport.impotence%2Fsearch%3Fgroup%3Dalt.support.impotence%26q%3Dteamwork% 26qt_g%3D1%26searchnow%3DSearch+this+group%26 & _doneTitle=Back+to+Search & & d#bcfaa694027e6a59 Re: Re: What happened to this link. > > You made this one here is cut & past on the link. > Testosterone Levels by Age Groups > xyz23 > http://www.alt-support-impotence.org/hormone_charts.htm > When it would come up it had a color back ground I think RED and GREEN. > I sent the one you put in the files and this guy is so sick he can't think straight I hope he can understand it. > Her is a cut & paste on his post it sounds like my story. > Phil > > > > [ Reply | Next | Previous | Up ] > 51yr old UK male needs help? > From: > Date: 16/12/2004 > Time: 16:24:27 > Remote Name: 193.195.21.194 > > Comments > Hi folks, I'm educated, managerial position, work in audiology with a high IQ but the NHS treat me so bad that I signed my last letter to them with my hospital number because that is all I felt I was. OK gripe over:PROBLEM: Over the last 10 years: 1. Started with panic attacks 2. Fatigue crept in very slowly, now it is debilitating. 3. My concentration is now very poor. 4. My memory is a standing joke at work. 5. Brain fog is awful. 6. Libido NIL 7. ED ...total 8. I ache all over. My 'T' has been checked over the last 3 months as follows: 7.5;10.5;8.5; & the last one 12.5. My endocrinologist says that these are mostly within normal limits of 8 to 29, so 'T' is not a problem. All other tests thyroid etc I'm told are 'within normal limits' I have after a big battle managed to have my blood sampled at Barts in London (140miles from home), but have to await February for the results and my 5 mins with the consultant. What questions should I be asking? I would just like to regain cognitive > ability and energy. Oh yes, and a decent nights sleep. Your help would be very much appreciated as I feel I must take this up myself or I will never get anywhere with our NHS. Should you ever consider self treatment, I'm aware of the prostrate connection. Any UK men out there with an answer, or advice from the USA? > > --------------------------------- > Last changed: December 16, 2004 > > Z <davidzxxx2004@...> wrote: > >>>>>>Thanks I guess you never saw the old one it had ranges for all > ages and the US, and UK unit of measure. Also it had Total, Free, LH, > and it had it all.<<<< > > Phil, I *made* the old one!!!!!! > > Unless they changed if afterwards, the old table did *not* have LH. The > table I put in the files section today has all the same information as > the old table had except the original values in the common European unit > of measure which you can get just by dividing the values in my table by > 28.85. If you want me to do that for you let me know, but I just don't > understand what you're complaining about. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 Hi Phil, The info. is for T, free T & SHBG. I took info. from the non-working link: http://www.alt-support-impotence.org/hormone_charts.htm pasted to Excel, re-formatted & pasted it to MS Word. Makes me really appreciate Z's work. It includes the info. in international units. Hope that helps your friend. I replaced the Explorer file that didn't open with the Word document, in the files section, titled: Testosterone Levels by Age Grp. Bruce > >>>>>>Thanks I guess you never saw the old one it had ranges for all > ages and the US, and UK unit of measure. Also it had Total, Free, LH, > and it had it all.<<<< > > Phil, I *made* the old one!!!!!! > > Unless they changed if afterwards, the old table did *not* have LH. The > table I put in the files section today has all the same information as > the old table had except the original values in the common European unit > of measure which you can get just by dividing the values in my table by > 28.85. If you want me to do that for you let me know, but I just don't > understand what you're complaining about. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 > Hi Phil, > > The info. is for T, free T & SHBG. I took info. from the non-working link: > http://www.alt-support-impotence.org/hormone_charts.htm > pasted to Excel, re-formatted & pasted it to MS Word. Makes me really > appreciate Z's work. > > It includes the info. in international units. Hope that helps your friend. > > I replaced the Explorer file that didn't open with the Word document, in the > files section, titled: Testosterone Levels by Age Grp. That one works! Nice job, Bruce. BTW, I omitted the SHBG from my table because I believe the US values are incorrect. I multiplied the European SHBG values by the same 28.85 factor, but IIRC that's not the appropriate factor for the SHBG. I forget exactly why. - Z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 Hi Dave, Your right: The conventional-IU conversion factor for testosterone doesn't work for SHBG. My lab reports (in U.S.) use 13-71 nmol/L for SHBG (R: 13-71) I suspect nmol/L units are used both in the U.S. and internationally. But if that's true, why were the units converted on the Sex Hormones by Age Group table? I just put a new URL in the links section here, titled " Unit Conversion Factors " . It lists factors for about everything but SHBG. http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/scales/clinical_data.html Peace, Bruce > > That one works! Nice job, Bruce. > > BTW, I omitted the SHBG from my table because I believe the US values > are incorrect. I multiplied the European SHBG values by the same 28.85 > factor, but IIRC that's not the appropriate factor for the SHBG. I > forget exactly why. > > - Z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 --- In , " Z " <davidzxxx2004@s...> > BTW, I omitted the SHBG from my table because I believe the US values > are incorrect. I multiplied the European SHBG values by the same 28.85 > factor, but IIRC that's not the appropriate factor for the SHBG. I > forget exactly why. > > - Z Because the molecular weight of SHBG is different from that of testosterone. So a mole of SHBG has a different mass than a mole of testosterone. Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 23:19:41 -0500, you wrote: > >> Hi Phil, >> >> The info. is for T, free T & SHBG. I took info. from the non-working >link: >> http://www.alt-support-impotence.org/hormone_charts.htm >> pasted to Excel, re-formatted & pasted it to MS Word. Makes me really >> appreciate Z's work. >> >> It includes the info. in international units. Hope that helps your >friend. >> >> I replaced the Explorer file that didn't open with the Word document, >in the >> files section, titled: Testosterone Levels by Age Grp. > >That one works! Nice job, Bruce. > >BTW, I omitted the SHBG from my table because I believe the US values >are incorrect. I multiplied the European SHBG values by the same 28.85 >factor, but IIRC that's not the appropriate factor for the SHBG. I >forget exactly why. I believe that conversion only works for T and Free T. It's based on weight. One of the measure is molar. And that a weight /per standard unit (avogadros constant) of atoms. So each compound has its own conversion number. The table used to have the two studies the numbers came from. it would be great to get those back in. I find doctors need those to over come skepticism. Thanks! - - - - Just another albino black sheep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 > Hi Dave, > > Your right: The conventional-IU conversion factor for testosterone doesn't > work for SHBG. > > My lab reports (in U.S.) use 13-71 nmol/L for SHBG (R: 13-71) I suspect > nmol/L units are used both in the U.S. and internationally. But if that's true, > why were the units converted on the Sex Hormones by Age Group table? Because when I copied the data into Excel, I applied the 28.85 factor to all values the table. It turns out that the 28.85 factor is the right factor for every item in the table except SHBG. The error was caught after the table was formatted and posted to the web. The guy who formatted it (Fred) was informed, but he never bothered to correct the error. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 > The table used to have the two studies the numbers came from. it would > be great to get those back in. I find doctors need those to over come > skepticism. The table Bruce posted has all that information in the footnotes. I'll delete my table from the files section since Bruce's table has everything mine has plus the source references for the studies. Also, Bruce should delete the converted SHBG values because, as discussed in the thread, those values are erroneous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 > > The table used to have the two studies the numbers came from. it would > > be great to get those back in. I find doctors need those to over come > > skepticism. > > The table Bruce posted has all that information in the footnotes. I'll > delete my table from the files section since Bruce's table has > everything mine has plus the source references for the studies. Also, > Bruce should delete the converted SHBG values because, as discussed in > the thread, those values are erroneous. LabCorp uses nmol/l so conversion may not be necessary. If it is, we can sort that out later. Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 Thanks I tryed to send it to but it would not work so I asked him to send me and e-mail so I could send him a cut & paste. Phil Z <davidzxxx2004@...> wrote: Phil, I calculated the numbers and Fred from ASI formatted them onto the ASI web site. I developed this table from an article that appears at www.wellmanclinic.org. A guy named zchuss posted the link to this article in the ASI newsgroup back in July 2000. The original tables were based on the values of measurement commonly used in Europe. A guy named Steve posted the conversion factor of 28.85. So I clipboarded the table data into Excel, did the conversion and then posted the converted table in the ASI newsgroup. Then Fred formatted my table data, and the original table with the European values, on the ASI website. Here's the original thread that describes how the table was created: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.support.impotence/browse_frm/thr ead/1cf73c65b376110c/bcfaa694027e6a59?q=teamwork & _done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.su pport.impotence%2Fsearch%3Fgroup%3Dalt.support.impotence%26q%3Dteamwork% 26qt_g%3D1%26searchnow%3DSearch+this+group%26 & _doneTitle=Back+to+Search & & d#bcfaa694027e6a59 Re: Re: What happened to this link. > > You made this one here is cut & past on the link. > Testosterone Levels by Age Groups > xyz23 > http://www.alt-support-impotence.org/hormone_charts.htm > When it would come up it had a color back ground I think RED and GREEN. > I sent the one you put in the files and this guy is so sick he can't think straight I hope he can understand it. > Her is a cut & paste on his post it sounds like my story. > Phil > > > > [ Reply | Next | Previous | Up ] > 51yr old UK male needs help? > From: > Date: 16/12/2004 > Time: 16:24:27 > Remote Name: 193.195.21.194 > > Comments > Hi folks, I'm educated, managerial position, work in audiology with a high IQ but the NHS treat me so bad that I signed my last letter to them with my hospital number because that is all I felt I was. OK gripe over:PROBLEM: Over the last 10 years: 1. Started with panic attacks 2. Fatigue crept in very slowly, now it is debilitating. 3. My concentration is now very poor. 4. My memory is a standing joke at work. 5. Brain fog is awful. 6. Libido NIL 7. ED ...total 8. I ache all over. My 'T' has been checked over the last 3 months as follows: 7.5;10.5;8.5; & the last one 12.5. My endocrinologist says that these are mostly within normal limits of 8 to 29, so 'T' is not a problem. All other tests thyroid etc I'm told are 'within normal limits' I have after a big battle managed to have my blood sampled at Barts in London (140miles from home), but have to await February for the results and my 5 mins with the consultant. What questions should I be asking? I would just like to regain cognitive > ability and energy. Oh yes, and a decent nights sleep. Your help would be very much appreciated as I feel I must take this up myself or I will never get anywhere with our NHS. Should you ever consider self treatment, I'm aware of the prostrate connection. Any UK men out there with an answer, or advice from the USA? > > --------------------------------- > Last changed: December 16, 2004 > > Z <davidzxxx2004@...> wrote: > >>>>>>Thanks I guess you never saw the old one it had ranges for all > ages and the US, and UK unit of measure. Also it had Total, Free, LH, > and it had it all.<<<< > > Phil, I *made* the old one!!!!!! > > Unless they changed if afterwards, the old table did *not* have LH. The > table I put in the files section today has all the same information as > the old table had except the original values in the common European unit > of measure which you can get just by dividing the values in my table by > 28.85. If you want me to do that for you let me know, but I just don't > understand what you're complaining about. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 > > Bruce should delete the converted SHBG values because, > > as discussed in the thread, those values are erroneous. > > LabCorp uses nmol/l so conversion may not be necessary. If it is, we > can sort that out later. > Brad I'm saying Bruce should delete the SHBG values on the " US " table, not the European table. Alternatively, you could replace the US SHBG values with the European SHBG values and label them as nmol/L. That way both tables would show the SHBG values in the same units. I think when SHBG is tested in the US it's in nmol/L. Actually, SHBG is not tested in the US that often. In the US, doctors test for Free T instead, which generally gives them the same data. If SHBG is high, then Free T is low and vice versa, because the more SHBG present, the more it binds to T and the less Free T there is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 Thanks Bruce that is the one now if I could only figure out how to send it as a link or file. Phil Bruce <bruceharvey@...> wrote: Hi Phil, The info. is for T, free T & SHBG. I took info. from the non-working link: http://www.alt-support-impotence.org/hormone_charts.htm pasted to Excel, re-formatted & pasted it to MS Word. Makes me really appreciate Z's work. It includes the info. in international units. Hope that helps your friend. I replaced the Explorer file that didn't open with the Word document, in the files section, titled: Testosterone Levels by Age Grp. Bruce > >>>>>>Thanks I guess you never saw the old one it had ranges for all > ages and the US, and UK unit of measure. Also it had Total, Free, LH, > and it had it all.<<<< > > Phil, I *made* the old one!!!!!! > > Unless they changed if afterwards, the old table did *not* have LH. The > table I put in the files section today has all the same information as > the old table had except the original values in the common European unit > of measure which you can get just by dividing the values in my table by > 28.85. If you want me to do that for you let me know, but I just don't > understand what you're complaining about. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 > Thanks Bruce that is the one now if I could only figure out how to send it as a link or file. > Phil > The link is burdensome. If you can use Internet Explorer, simply right-click the document title and select " Save Target as ... " from the context menu. That will let you save the file to your local disk. Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 Hi, 1. I've corrected the tables in the file " Testosterone Levels by Age Grp. " , notice of the new file has just been sent. 2. I found the tables as part of an article at another web page: http://www.natural-hrt.com/andropause04.html These tables still have the incorrect numbers for U.S. SHBG. I've just added it in the links section here as " Testosterone Levels by Age Groups 2 " Bruce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 > 1. I've corrected the tables in the file " Testosterone Levels > by Age Grp. " , notice of the new file has just been sent. Thanks again, Bruce. > 2. I found the tables as part of an article at another web page: > http://www.natural-hrt.com/andropause04.html > These tables still have the incorrect numbers for U.S. SHBG. > I've just added it in the links section here as " Testosterone Levels by Age > Groups 2 " They copied the table without giving any credit to the source? I wonder if they'd be interested in knowing there's an error in the table. Maybe then they'd give credit to the source. :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 > > > http://www.natural-hrt.com/andropause04.html > > They copied the table without giving any credit to the source? I wonder > if they'd be interested in knowing there's an error in the table. Maybe > then they'd give credit to the source. :-) Yeah, that's a riot. If their going to steal intellectual property they should at least proofread it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.