Re: Important caviat concerning SyncroZap program

[Guest guest]

No doubt Lulu something happened between your orginal post and this

most recent one.

You said, " unless the user proves that he or she is under the

care of a licensed physician. "

As The Lord is my witness, I hope I can never " claim " again I'm under

the care of licensed physician if they have anything to do with

allopathic medicine. Yes, absolutely they have their place.

And as such, since many of us strive to NOT require their " services " ,

a good majority of us will not be able to prove that we are under

their supervision and thus will be unable to utilize your software.

The net result will be less feedback for your father to analyze. I

hope you take this into account over time and lift this limitation.

Is your objective to prove hulda's research further? And if so I

understand that your means of proof is the very information that you

*may be* concerned will create some level of trouble with you.

If you feel that " proof is in the pudding " , then do claims need to be

made? I mean the actual results/effectiveness/merits via experimenter

feedback alone will speak volumes whether this new software approach

has " legs " and can " sink or swim " on its own.

That said, I'm of the opinion that if this software (particularly the

syncrometer function) is as your father claims, utilizing more

" experimenters " in your fathers research can provide the feedback

necessary for your fathers team to further enhance and tweek his

design. Not to mention, more users equals more research findings

equals more widespread use equals more happy healthy people.

If however, your team at some point wants to sell equipment and

" goods " in the near/distant future, I would understand your teams

concerns about " claims and proof " .

You *may* want to do a search for the Bowens on this forum. Jan Bowen

and Tim? Bowan. That may not be correct spelling. They are VERY

knowledgeable about the legal aspects of this type of stuff, have been

involved with Hulda herself for years, and frequenct these forums.

They have become a lethal asset on the side of us " experimenters. "

Was not " SyncroZap " a Trade Mark of another zapper at one time?

Keep us in the loop Lulu.

I'm off like a dirty shirt.

>

>

> We have had some interested responses from this and other sources. In

> order to avoid any misrepresentation we must apply the following

> conditions to the use of the SyncroZap program:

>

> 1. The program will not be enabled to work, by downloading a

> software " key " , unless the user proves that he or she is under the

> care of a licensed physician. At the time the user is ready, we will

> explain the method of proof.

>

> 2. It will only be enabled for people who have life threatening

> conditions, such as cancer or AIDS.

>

> We are well aware that many of the people in the club have

> given up on traditional medicine. We have no quarrel with that

> decision but we must set these conditions in order to protect

> ourselves legally. We regret that it must be this way.

>

> We are publishing this fact now in order to avoid raising false

> hopes. We wish to serve this community as best we can.

>

> Thank you for your understanding.

>

> Lulu Freen

[Guest guest]

It's Tim and Jan Bolen.

The_Comeback_Kid <tf7676@...> wrote:

No doubt Lulu something happened between your orginal post and this

most recent one.

You said, " unless the user proves that he or she is under the

care of a licensed physician. "

As The Lord is my witness, I hope I can never " claim " again I'm under

the care of licensed physician if they have anything to do with

allopathic medicine. Yes, absolutely they have their place.

And as such, since many of us strive to NOT require their " services " ,

a good majority of us will not be able to prove that we are under

their supervision and thus will be unable to utilize your software.

The net result will be less feedback for your father to analyze. I

hope you take this into account over time and lift this limitation.

Is your objective to prove hulda's research further? And if so I

understand that your means of proof is the very information that you

*may be* concerned will create some level of trouble with you.

If you feel that " proof is in the pudding " , then do claims need to be

made? I mean the actual results/effectiveness/merits via experimenter

feedback alone will speak volumes whether this new software approach

has " legs " and can " sink or swim " on its own.

That said, I'm of the opinion that if this software (particularly the

syncrometer function) is as your father claims, utilizing more

" experimenters " in your fathers research can provide the feedback

necessary for your fathers team to further enhance and tweek his

design. Not to mention, more users equals more research findings

equals more widespread use equals more happy healthy people.

If however, your team at some point wants to sell equipment and

" goods " in the near/distant future, I would understand your teams

concerns about " claims and proof " .

You *may* want to do a search for the Bowens on this forum. Jan Bowen

and Tim? Bowan. That may not be correct spelling. They are VERY

knowledgeable about the legal aspects of this type of stuff, have been

involved with Hulda herself for years, and frequenct these forums.

They have become a lethal asset on the side of us " experimenters. "

Was not " SyncroZap " a Trade Mark of another zapper at one time?

Keep us in the loop Lulu.

I'm off like a dirty shirt.

>

>

> We have had some interested responses from this and other sources. In

> order to avoid any misrepresentation we must apply the following

> conditions to the use of the SyncroZap program:

>

> 1. The program will not be enabled to work, by downloading a

> software " key " , unless the user proves that he or she is under the

> care of a licensed physician. At the time the user is ready, we will

> explain the method of proof.

>

> 2. It will only be enabled for people who have life threatening

> conditions, such as cancer or AIDS.

>

> We are well aware that many of the people in the club have

> given up on traditional medicine. We have no quarrel with that

> decision but we must set these conditions in order to protect

> ourselves legally. We regret that it must be this way.

>

> We are publishing this fact now in order to avoid raising false

> hopes. We wish to serve this community as best we can.

>

> Thank you for your understanding.

>

> Lulu Freen

[Guest guest]

Lulu Freen must be laughing. He/she/it/hosed us again. No proof she

has a father doing any research, no proof of anything. Sure getting

attention. How about it Lulu?

Leo

----------------------

> >

> >

> > We have had some interested responses from this and other sources.

In

> > order to avoid any misrepresentation we must apply the following

> > conditions to the use of the SyncroZap program:

> >

> > 1. The program will not be enabled to work, by downloading a

> > software " key " , unless the user proves that he or she is under the

> > care of a licensed physician. At the time the user is ready, we

will

> > explain the method of proof.

> >

> > 2. It will only be enabled for people who have life threatening

> > conditions, such as cancer or AIDS.

> >

> > We are well aware that many of the people in the club have

> > given up on traditional medicine. We have no quarrel with that

> > decision but we must set these conditions in order to protect

> > ourselves legally. We regret that it must be this way.

> >

> > We are publishing this fact now in order to avoid raising false

> > hopes. We wish to serve this community as best we can.

> >

> > Thank you for your understanding.

> >

> > Lulu Freen

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Brother Leo, what'd I miss? I haven't been checking in for many

months much, but have caught the fun loving Pam " in living color. "

However, I have been taking Lulu serious actually. As far as the

syncrometer function..well I would seriously have to see it to

believe. However their are others working on this, we have the

fscan2, and their have been otrher apparent acheivements in the past

with making the syncrometer more " user friendly. " As far as a pc

audio card delivering frequencies, this is old news. But I had

figured Lulu's father had put a new twist perhaps on an old dance and

have therefore been open minded to their software. I can see an

o-scope being involved and configured into the " circuit " to *possibly*

acheive tissue comarative/coordinate resonance (bug oscillation),

however Lulu makes reference that no other serious equip will be

required except for the pc and a few cheap acessories. So, although I

don't get " it " yet...I may be the only one " hosed " here as I have

no experience with this poster.

Assuming this is real. Again, Ken is working on much the same stuff

as well---he makes it freeware too and I believe rightfully so does

not concern himself with " Men In Black " storm troopin his cabana or

anything as may be the concern with Lulu's software. Placing

equipment like Ken's, others and hopefully Lulu's if this is not a

joke, is the best means of further feedback and refinement. Including

experienced end users with hands on equipment experimentation with the

likes of ionized plasma machines, contact frequency experimentation,

bob beck devices, qxci/scio bioresonance, scalar, EAV and radionics,

and of course experimenters familiar and practicing with hulda clark

created electrical devices such as plate zapping would be a smart move

by Lulu's team (opinion).

Leo, you got the goods on this one?

>

> Lulu Freen must be laughing. He/she/it/hosed us again. No proof she

> has a father doing any research, no proof of anything. Sure getting

> attention. How about it Lulu?

> Leo

of this message have been removed]

[Guest guest]

Brother Leo, what'd I miss? I haven't been checking in for many

months much, but have caught the fun loving Pam " in living color. "

However, I have been taking Lulu serious actually. As far as the

syncrometer function..well I would seriously have to see it to

believe. However their are others working on this, we have the

fscan2, and their have been otrher apparent acheivements in the past

with making the syncrometer more " user friendly. " As far as a pc

audio card delivering frequencies, this is old news. But I had

figured Lulu's father had put a new twist perhaps on an old dance and

have therefore been open minded to their software. I can see an

o-scope being involved and configured into the " circuit " to *possibly*

acheive tissue comarative/coordinate resonance (bug oscillation),

however Lulu makes reference that no other serious equip will be

required except for the pc and a few cheap acessories. So, although I

don't get " it " yet...I may be the only one " hosed " here as I have

no experience with this poster.

Assuming this is real. Again, Ken is working on much the same stuff

as well---he makes it freeware too and I believe rightfully so does

not concern himself with " Men In Black " storm troopin his cabana or

anything as may be the concern with Lulu's software. Placing

equipment like Ken's, others and hopefully Lulu's if this is not a

joke, is the best means of further feedback and refinement. Including

experienced end users with hands on equipment experimentation with the

likes of ionized plasma machines, contact frequency experimentation,

bob beck devices, qxci/scio bioresonance, scalar, EAV and radionics,

and of course experimenters familiar and practicing with hulda clark

created electrical devices such as plate zapping would be a smart move

by Lulu's team (opinion).

Leo, you got the goods on this one? Keep up the superb moderation my

friend!

>

> Lulu Freen must be laughing. He/she/it/hosed us again. No proof she

> has a father doing any research, no proof of anything. Sure getting

> attention. How about it Lulu?

> Leo

of this message have been removed]

[Guest guest]

Can't give free software away, or " she'd " be liable????? I'm confused....

>From: " regehr2001 " <leoelfie@...>

>Reply-Dr

>Dr

>Subject: Re: Important caviat concerning SyncroZap program

>Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:02:29 -0000

>

>

>Lulu Freen must be laughing. He/she/it/hosed us again. No proof she

>has a father doing any research, no proof of anything. Sure getting

>attention. How about it Lulu?

>Leo

>----------------------

>

> > >

> > >

> > > We have had some interested responses from this and other sources.

>In

> > > order to avoid any misrepresentation we must apply the following

> > > conditions to the use of the SyncroZap program:

> > >

> > > 1. The program will not be enabled to work, by downloading a

> > > software " key " , unless the user proves that he or she is under the

> > > care of a licensed physician. At the time the user is ready, we

>will

> > > explain the method of proof.

> > >

> > > 2. It will only be enabled for people who have life threatening

> > > conditions, such as cancer or AIDS.

> > >

> > > We are well aware that many of the people in the club have

> > > given up on traditional medicine. We have no quarrel with that

> > > decision but we must set these conditions in order to protect

> > > ourselves legally. We regret that it must be this way.

> > >

> > > We are publishing this fact now in order to avoid raising false

> > > hopes. We wish to serve this community as best we can.

> > >

> > > Thank you for your understanding.

> > >

> > > Lulu Freen

_________________________________________________________________

Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®

Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963