Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 According to the site... " Any truth, if it is known to some, cannot be suppressed by even the most powerful of organizations, especially if that truth evokes the emotions of fear or greed. As the California Gold Rush was inevitable after gold was discovered, Hulda 's cure for cancer would also have been unstoppable if there were any substance to it. Her cure would have immediately become the talk of the world, with millions of cured cancer people walking about as proof of it's effectiveness. Where are all the cured people? " The one thing this person does not take into consideration is: 1.) That Hulda 's program is not easy! You don't see a doc, sit in a bed, get pilled up, and get cut up. You have to make serious changes to every aspect of your livelyhood for several years, and you may even have to give up some things you love very much. 2.) And requires a minset that most people do not have: an alternative mindset that says the traditional medical system cannot help me; I must look elsewhere. How many cancer sufferers are looking and ACTUALLY trying out an alternative treatment? This person's website states the answer is simple as to why there are not millions cured of cancer right now. But it's not so simple. Every persons lifestyle, environment and eating habits are different, and the AVERAGE cancer sufferer is probably not going to drastically change their living in order to reduce or eradicate cancer from their body. -Ken Bagwell > > A common sense proof that Hulda does not have a cure for cancer. > > http://no-cancer-cure.tripod.com/ > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.