Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Xenoestrogens the next mercury? Composite the next amalgam?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I have read Cutler's book and decided to replace my 13 amalgams, but

composites have xenoestrogenic plastics like bishenol-A (and also

Aluminum Oxide). This has me very concerned and I am going crazy

trying to decide if I should get composites. After researching

xenoestrogens they seem horrific, with plenty of scientists claiming

them to be harmful. bisphenol-A affects the enodrine system in very

small amounts and accumulates in the body, cause breast/prostate

cancer and damage hormone activity.

Xenoestrogens/composites seems similar to where mercury amalgams

were a few decades ago - the ADA/dentists saying it is perfectly

safe, and unbiased scientists saying it is not. Is a composite

backlash coming soon, the way amalgams were exposed?

Gold and porcelain fillings have metals and are probably out of my

league financially. Which is the least evil - mercury in amalgams,

xenoestrogens in composites, aluminum in porcelain, or mixed metals

in gold?

Is my concern unfounded? Have my 13 mercury fillings made me

paranoid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there someone who can answer this persons question about which is the

lesser of the evils concerning the fillings? I recently decided, after also

researching - and finding out the I cannot afford 800 dollars per porcelain

tooth,

and decided that perhaps the plastic was the lesser of two evils and had 5

mercury fillings taken out and replaced with the plastic. I did not know that

the

plastic had xenoestrogens. I also had a scare recently that I had breast

cancer (they did not find it in the biopsy, but I did have a positive blood

elevation of antimalignans, therefore I may still have it somewhere that they

haven't

checked). I am now afraid for my life. If there is anyone who knows - which

is worse - mercury fillings or the composite? please respond..........

Also, would the xenoestrogens be combated with progesterone cream?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go to HalHuggins.com for literature on fillings. My

husband had his mercury removed by a dentist

recommended by the Hal Huggins organization (there are

very few in the country). As we understood it, a

filling with a negative charge (amalgams, mercury) is

highly toxic. He was tested for tolerance to many

types of dental material that would replace the

mercury and the material that maintains a positive

charge is used. Everyone tolerates different material

so everyone's results to this type of test would be

different and different dental material is used for

different people. If the dentist tells you the exact

composite in your teeth you can go to a naturpath and

be tested for tolerance for about $50.00 If you don't

know what is in your mouth and you are worried about

cancer or testing positive for a cancer marker you

should remove the teeth completely and have partials

made. It is difficult to combat a toxin that seeps

into your system constantly. Get yourself tested

before the partials are made.

Good Luck!

--- jedidonna@... wrote:

> Is there someone who can answer this persons

> question about which is the

> lesser of the evils concerning the fillings? I

> recently decided, after also

> researching - and finding out the I cannot afford

> 800 dollars per porcelain tooth,

> and decided that perhaps the plastic was the lesser

> of two evils and had 5

> mercury fillings taken out and replaced with the

> plastic. I did not know that the

> plastic had xenoestrogens. I also had a scare

> recently that I had breast

> cancer (they did not find it in the biopsy, but I

> did have a positive blood

> elevation of antimalignans, therefore I may still

> have it somewhere that they haven't

> checked). I am now afraid for my life. If there is

> anyone who knows - which

> is worse - mercury fillings or the composite? please

> respond..........

>

> Also, would the xenoestrogens be combated with

> progesterone cream?

>

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...