Re: zapper, synchrometer, Rife machine, QXCI and so on

[Guest guest]

----- Original Message -----

From: " Pavel ©kerlj " <pavel.skerlj@...>

> If you were a " scientist " and you contacted these people offering to

do

> an " evaluation " they would most likely donate the equipment to you,

IMO.

> P>>> OK, very good point!

> I will try this argument with most of this vendors and i will see the

> results (I am not so convinced, that they are going to donate the

> equioment).

Yes, that might be a bit enthusiastic. But if even one manufacturer

takes you up on the offer you are ahead of the game!

> A study was done of published articles in scientific journals. Of the

> articles that complained that about the sunject not being

" scientific " ,

> it was found that 95% of the critical authors themselves did not know

> what constituted good " science " . This was determined by other

statement

> made within the same article. You say you want proof, and yet 95% of

> " scientists " do not know what constitues " proof " themselves!?!?

> P>>>Yes, there is some truth here. I am in a organization where we

are

> fighting to change the law about vaccination (vaccination is

obligatory

> here). I read

> many scientific trials which were pure junk. FLAWED!

That would be a good thing to get rid of....President Bush began to talk

about it here and met *very* heavy resistance to the idea. It appears he

has backed off, at least publically....

> There are others here who know my real name. I get enough porno in my

> email now. I don't want more.

> P>>>OK, there is a lot of truth (i have words SEX, porno, enlarge,...

in my

> spam filter too).

And they still manage to get some through, no!? LOL!

OK..TTYL

Khepri

[Guest guest]

I admire Dr. Beneviste's work also....

> >.Ask your self this. Why would a doctor of cellular

> >physiology put their reputation on the line with such outrageous

claims?

> >Money? Dr. is not what I would " rich " by the standards used

here,

>

> Dr has a PhD in cellular physiology? That is impressive.

>

> PPP>Yes, that is a good one. Reading quackwatch, her education is not

so

> impressive. This is so important, but things look different.

Well, as I said to her....it may be her specialization..and not a

degree....that's is my understanding, I'll have to look into it further

as it appears to be a point of contention....

When you read quackwatch Pavel, keep in mind that the author of that

websites " education " has been exposed in court and is not so impressive

either....: )

Anyway, I'll have a look at that to determine whether I should keep

saying it or not...: )

Kheepri

[Guest guest]

----- Original Message -----

From: " Pavel ©kerlj " <pavel.skerlj@...>

> Ann, make a good point - why , Beck and other don't publish in

> alternative health journals?

>

> pavel

Well, for starters, Beck is dead. Secondly, I'd like to know what

Alternative Jounals she's referring to as I am not aware of any...and if

there are any, how does one aquire them.......and thirdly, it's doubtful

that publishing in an Alternate Journal would give then any more

credibility in the " science " world than they have now so it's pointless,

fourth,......most of these authors published books that are open to

review...publishing in a journal would simply be a summary of what's in

the book.

My take....

Khepri

[Guest guest]

----- Original Message -----

From: " Pavel ©kerlj " <pavel.skerlj@...>

> PPP>I am sending questions to equipment sellers all around and MOST

OF THEM

> DON'T ANSWER! WHY?

> Dr. is not available via mail.

I have no idea....maybe they think you are someone from the US

government trying to set them up or something....just speculating....

Which email did you use....?

Khepri

[Guest guest]

We, homeopaths, do not like vaccines but in order to stay in business, we have

to keep our heads down as lots of the establishment would like to see us banned.

Liz