Guest guest Posted April 17, 2000 Report Share Posted April 17, 2000 Type II (adult-onset) diabetes is much different from Type I (juvenile-onset) diabetes. Type II is often helped with diet, exercise, and most importantly weight loss. Type I is much different, and to my knowledge NEVER been cured. I'd like to see one good documented case from Dr. or anyone. What I mean of good documentation is proof positive that a person HAD diabetes, and now does NOT have diabetes. One thing that has really made me disillusioned with Dr. (though I agree with some things she says) is the titles of her books. NOTHING is a panacea. And for , I would recommend that you wait until the baby is born to undertake a cleanse for the several reasons already cited. Find the CAUSE of your hives, and eliminate it. Allergy panels and/or elimination techniques should help; if not email me privately at mailto:drgeorge@... Dr. At 06:10 AM 4/15/00 +0000, you wrote: A naturopath told me he had cured three persons with adult diabetes, they had stayed symptom free for several months. Several relapsed due to inattention to Hulda 's protocol. Leo. > In a message dated 4/14/00 10:09:45 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > pjwylie@... writes: > > << Another win for the medical experts! The FDA keeps on > winning for the sake of people loosing. Seems to me that > Nazi German Doctors used to conduct human medical > experiments as well. The world needs to learn there > is a cure for the diabetic and that is not through > the process of ingesting destructive pharmacological > sorcery. > >> > what does that mean? clue me in....where is a cure for the diabetic...l > havent seen it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2000 Report Share Posted April 18, 2000 Naturally Dr. is (hopefully) too busy to read what goes on in the list for her enthusiast. But being of sound mind, I can speculate the reason she titled her book's so confidently is because she personally---and as the scientist she wants us all to become, has found irrefutable evidence supporting her claims. Would you, being in her exact position, title your books with something less revealing of your conclusions based on your own tests? Would not the question have then been ---if your books cure everything, then why don't you just come out and say so? This approach, at a time when Doctors have the audacity to routinely pronounce estimated time for Death's arrival, typically after all the checks have been cashed, and the next patient is 'reviewed'? Sadly, you are right in saying outright: 'I doubt there is a cure for all diseases'. We do not live in a world in which common sense is valued more than common knowledge. Instead the two ideas are pitted against one another. To the death and detriment of the unfortunate 'patient'. So here we go again. Those familiar with Dr. 's protocols choosing to express doubt simply because they haven't cured anybody themselves---or know of anyone 'personally'. I only hope, that if someone is cured of what doubters love to call incurable disease, it was because they were not swayed by the strange mix of support and discouragement now so freely sprinkled to this dedicated Dr. list. Marve Type II (adult-onset) diabetes is much different from Type I (juvenile-onset) diabetes. Type II is often helped with diet, exercise, and most importantly weight loss. Type I is much different, and to my knowledge NEVER been cured. I'd like to see one good documented case from Dr. or anyone. What I mean of good documentation is proof positive that a person HAD diabetes, and now does NOT have diabetes. One thing that has really made me disillusioned with Dr. (though I agree with some things she says) is the titles of her books. NOTHING is a panacea. And for , I would recommend that you wait until the baby is born to undertake a cleanse for the several reasons already cited. Find the CAUSE of your hives, and eliminate it. Allergy panels and/or elimination techniques should help; if not email me privately at mailto:drgeorge@... Dr. At 06:10 AM 4/15/00 +0000, you wrote: A naturopath told me he had cured three persons with adult diabetes, they had stayed symptom free for several months. Several relapsed due to inattention to Hulda 's protocol. Leo. > In a message dated 4/14/00 10:09:45 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > pjwylie@... writes: > > << Another win for the medical experts! The FDA keeps on > winning for the sake of people loosing. Seems to me that > Nazi German Doctors used to conduct human medical > experiments as well. The world needs to learn there > is a cure for the diabetic and that is not through > the process of ingesting destructive pharmacological > sorcery. > >> > what does that mean? clue me in....where is a cure for the diabetic...l > havent seen it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2000 Report Share Posted April 18, 2000 At 06:07 PM 4/17/00 -0700, you wrote: Naturally Dr. is (hopefully) too busy to read what goes on in the list for her enthusiast. But being of sound mind, I can speculate the reason she titled her book's so confidently is because she personally---and as the scientist she wants us all to become, has found irrefutable evidence supporting her claims. Irrefutable evidence is not case studies; this is what Dr. provides as evidence in her books. Would you, being in her exact position, title your books with something less revealing of your conclusions based on your own tests? I would not be in her exact position. I would not go public with my research until I had enough evidence to defend it. Then, I would title it something more appropriate, like " A Cause and Treatment for Some Types of Cancer. " The " A " and " Some " parts indicate that there are other known causes. One well-known and documented cause is exposure to mutagenic/teratogenic substances. These substances can cause cancer in mice within days of exposure, and are used routinely to test cancer treatments. If Dr. was certain about her theory that parasites are the ONLY cause of cancer, then why doesn't she use her syncrometer to make certain she does not have any parasites, and then swallow these teratogenic substances in appropriate dosages, and then wait to see if she does come down with cancer. If she did this experiment successfully (and without getting cancer), she would certainly get some positive attention. The scientist that proved that H. pylori is a cause of gastric ulcers did a similar experiment. He was scoped for ulcers, and found to be ulcer-free. Then he swallowed a sample of H. pylori, and waited. Then he was scoped again, and found to have ulcers. Then he took the treatment he was advocating in the researched dosage, and then he was scoped and found to be ulcer-free. Bacteria as a cause of ulcers was known back in the 1930's, but was not researched and accepted until the early 90's. Royal Lee, a nutritionist and founder of Standard Process Labs stated in __**1933**__ the following: " Stomach ulcers are probably the best instance of a bacterial invasion primarily due to lowered resistance resulting from vitamin deficiency. That is why, even though the ulcers are healed by careful diet, they tend to recur time after time. " Dr. Royal Lee, Vitamins News, Sept. 18, 1933 Now, Royal Lee was well aware that a cause of stomach ulcers was bacteria (secondary to lowered resistance). His treatment was nutritional therapy to correct the lowered resistance (that's my treatment, too). But the research was not done in allopathic medicine until the 90's (BTW, they treat H. pylori with antibiotics which I think lowers resistance further, and is counter-productive to overall health status). In this example, the gold standard for diagnosing ulcers is to scope the stomach (seeing is believing). Dr. uses the syncrometer for diagnosing cancer, but the gold standard for diagnosing cancer in allopathic medicine is a biopsy. If Dr. would like her syncrometer to be a cheaper and more reliable gold standard, she will have to prove it by doing biopsies on the tissue that she believes is cancerous. Actually, this would be an excellent way for her research to go. Proving with the standards of allopathic methods that the syncrometer can diagnose cancer as reliably as a biopsy would be a phenomenal improvement in oncology. Dr. would be an instant celebrity and billionaire. Think about how many people could avoid the risk and uncertainty of biopsy if cancer could be diagnosed with the syncrometer, and this was accepted by the medical community. Sadly, you are right in saying outright: 'I doubt there is a cure for all diseases'. We do not live in a world in which common sense is valued more than common knowledge. Instead the two ideas are pitted against one another. To the death and detriment of the unfortunate 'patient'. Tell me what " common sense " has to do with a one-cure-for-all-people-and-conditions mentality. So here we go again. Those familiar with Dr. 's protocols choosing to express doubt simply because they haven't cured anybody themselves---or know of anyone 'personally'. I have been helped with Dr. 's liver cleanse (which she doesn't take credit for because it did not originate from her). I saw dozens of intestinal flukes that were probably the cause of my leaky gut. I followed up with 2 additional liver cleanses which resulted in additional stones, but no additional flukes (that I could see). I BELIEVE that my leaky gut was allowing antigenic foods to pass the intestinal lining and start an allergic reaction (allergy) that caused sinus and cold-like symptoms. My main triggers were dairy and (somewhat less) wheat. After the cleanses, I enjoy dairy very occasionally with much less symptoms(a little bit of congestion in the throat, and also in my eyes (my contacts bug me more than usual)). I can consume wheat normally and with no known problems since the cleanse. Given this, I still don't recommend to every patient in my office that suffer with sinus problems to go on a Dr. liver cleanse. Other causes for leaky gut are yeast infections, and dysbiosis in general. Other causes for sinus problems are too many to even start listing. By the way, I did the parasite cleanse and kidney cleanse first with no discernible positive effects. My dad was diagnosed with prostate cancer over 2 years ago. He made 3 trips to see Dr. over a 15 month period. She has definitely helped them (both my parents which have followed her protocols religiously) live a healthier life. But they have invested countless hours in following her protocols, and have only a few of their original teeth and $20K less in savings now. I can testify that they have followed everything she has said to a near-perfect level (no matter how many times it would change). However, there seems to be no improvement in his prostate cancer or in his benign hand tremor. Dr. finally referred him for chelation therapy, which he is still doing now. The PSA still suggests he has cancer even though Dr. has often pronounced him cancer-free. I only hope, that if someone is cured of what doubters love to call incurable disease, it was because they were not swayed by the strange mix of support and discouragement now so freely sprinkled to this dedicated Dr. list. I do not mean to discourage anyone that wants to do Dr. 's protocols. I have confidence that they are often helpful, and rarely counter-productive. I have trouble with those that give people false hope of a cure for Type I diabetes because, to my knowledge, no one has ever been cured using ANY method or protocol other than transplantation of the pancreas (used very rarely in the most severe of cases). My nephew has Type I diabetes, and has tried the Dr. protocols. He uses the Lugol's iodine in place of alcohol for cleaning his injection site, and the bruising has disappeared. His insulin needs were decreased when he was on the full Dr. protocols most likely due to the improvement in diet, but never was he able to go without his insulin. He is diabetic, and the islet cells of his pancreas are dead. This is irreversible damage, and he will remain diabetic for his entire life. This does not mean that he can not control his blood sugar levels with proper diet, but he will always be dependent on exogenous insulin because his body is simply incapable of producing insulin. If anyone has evidence of a Type I diabetic (IDDM, juvenile-onset) that was properly diagnosed (lab work, etc) and put on insulin, and now is completely off all insulin, and has laboratory evidence that he/she is producing endogenous insulin (except as a result of a pancreas transplant), I would like to meet this person. Do not confuse Type I diabetes with Type II diabetes. They are completely different. Dr. Sooley _______________________________________________________ R. Sooley, DC (217) 431-3290 voice G.F. Sooley, DC (209) 797-6521 fax Sooley Chiropractic Health Center 11 E. Fairchild St. http://www.sooleychiro.com Danville, IL 61832-3140 mailto:drgeorge@... " Let thy food be thy medicine, and thy medicine be thy food. " --Hippocrates, the Father of Modern Medicine " A cheerful heart is good medicine... " Prov 17:22a Get paid for surfing the web! AllAdvantage.com pays you while you surf the net. It's free to join and it takes about a minute (no survey to fill out). Just go to http://alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=BEC162 ____________________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2000 Report Share Posted April 19, 2000 Old Dr. , the herbalist from San Francisco, used to say there were NO incurable diseases. But he died from bronchial pneumonia, as I recall. I think his son took over the business. A friend's granddaughter has type 1 diabetes and she is only 3 years old. It runs in that family, but then, so does the average American diet. Anybody know how other countries rate for the incidence of diabetes I and II? Bernice in Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2000 Report Share Posted April 19, 2000 Gosh, Leo, I don't think I ever found out how old he was. This must have been at least 20 years ago. I was at his shop in downtown S.F. a couple times, long before that -- maybe in the 50s. I think they shipped all over the world. Nature's Way in Utah put out some formulas reading Approved by Dr. R. , Herbalist. Maybe one of the other list members can answer your question. I have the feeling he might have been only in his 60s, come to think about it, but at the time I thought he was old, yet not so old that he should have died from bronchial pneumonia. However, I guess that can get life threatening quite quickly. Sorry I don't have any details. Bernice in Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2000 Report Share Posted April 19, 2000 Thanks, Dr. ! And I'm not a bit surprised at those research results. Probably 30-35 years ago the Nat'l. Health Federation published an article concerning homogenized milk and somebody's study that indicated when milk is put under pressure like that, it reacts differently in our bodies. A comparision was made with countries like Finland and Japan, who at that time did not use homogenized milk and their heart attack rates were only 1 - 2 percent. Yet the Finnish people used lots of butter and cream in their diets, those products being full of cholesterol, of course. The problem in Japan was a high rate of stomach ulcers and like ailments, but not heart attacks. Thanks again for taking time to answer my diabetes question, regarding Type II, anyway. Bernice in Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2000 Report Share Posted April 19, 2000 At what age did " Old Dr. " go to his reward? Leo. > Old Dr. , the herbalist from San Francisco, used to > say there were NO incurable diseases. But he died from bronchial > pneumonia, as I recall. I think his son took over the business. > > A friend's granddaughter has type 1 diabetes and she is only 3 years > old. It runs in that family, but then, so does the average American > diet. Anybody know how other countries rate for the incidence of > diabetes I and II? Bernice in Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2000 Report Share Posted April 19, 2000 At 11:30 PM 4/18/00 +0000, you wrote: Old Dr. , the herbalist from San Francisco, used to say there were NO incurable diseases. But he died from bronchial pneumonia, as I recall. I think his son took over the business. A friend's granddaughter has type 1 diabetes and she is only 3 years old. It runs in that family, but then, so does the average American diet. Anybody know how other countries rate for the incidence of diabetes I and II? Bernice in Oregon I copied the following from a computer dietary analysis I use in the office. One thing to keep in mind: Diabetes mentioned here is Type II. Dr. Sooley Consider Eskimos in Northern Canada, who, prior to the 1940s, had no exposure to Western civilization. Prior to 1940, these people were much healthier than they were after eating the type of diet we take for granted. Some women developed breast cancer, which was unheard of before 1940. Teenagers began to have acne, another condition that didn't exist before they began eating a more " civilized " diet. Diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, obesity and gross obesity all became more common. Pacific Islanders have been studied. People living on Pukapuka eat a traditional diet. Their diet averages about 1800 calories per day, which includes about 70 grams of fat and 9 grams of sugar. People living on Rarotonga eat a combination of Western and traditional diet. Their diet averages about 2100 calories per day, which includes abut 63 grams of fat and 35 grams of sugar. The Maori of New Zealand eat a completely modern diet. They average 2500 calories with 125 grams of fat per day and 71 grams of sugar per day (the average American eats 150 grams of sugar per day). In Raratonga, gross obesity is 5.2 times more common than it is on Pukapuka. The New Zealand Maori have 13 times more gross obesity than the people on Pukapuka. Diabetes is 3.1 times more prevalent on Raratonga than on Pukapuka. There is almost six times more diabetes in New Zealand than on Pukapuka. Heart disease is twice as common on Raratonga and 2 1/2 times more common in New Zealand than it is on Pukapuka. High blood pressure is seen in 10 times more people on Raratonga and in 8 1/2 more times more people in New Zealand than on Pukapuka. As diet contains more refined and processed foods, disease increases, we begin to see more obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease and even cancer. Eating a nutrient deficient diet causes other problems like fatigue, allergies, depression, chronic pain, skin problems and many other problems that affect the quality of our lives. --copied from " General Dietary Information " copyright Varnas, DC _______________________________________________________ R. Sooley, DC (217) 431-3290 voice G.F. Sooley, DC (209) 797-6521 fax Sooley Chiropractic Health Center 11 E. Fairchild St. http://www.sooleychiro.com Danville, IL 61832-3140 mailto:drgeorge@... " Let thy food be thy medicine, and thy medicine be thy food. " --Hippocrates, the Father of Modern Medicine " A cheerful heart is good medicine... " Prov 17:22a Get paid for surfing the web! AllAdvantage.com pays you while you surf the net. It's free to join and it takes about a minute (no survey to fill out). Just go to http://alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=BEC162 ____________________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.