Guest guest Posted September 26, 2004 Report Share Posted September 26, 2004 I notice you don't give your name or whereabouts. so my question to you is twofold how specifically compared to who What is that old saying- never judge a man until you have walked in his shoes Most people who use these groups have tried the conventional methods with no success. Gullible?!!!!!! Look at history and notice the misery the human race has suffered by trusting others to make crucial descisions for them. Gullible? No. Just intelligent enough to be aware that I am the only one who really can direct my future. Gullible? Really! When was the car developed? Early 1900's Since then we have developed to the extent that on a area the size of a fingernail we can place more electronic components than a 100 old radios each covering a circuit approximately one sq ft. We are still using petrol allbeit maybe more efficient. Ever queried that. If not, thats gullible. Andy This is Quackery! You are all gullible fools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2004 Report Share Posted September 28, 2004 Quackery? Sounds like a frustrated MD.... > I notice you don't give your name or whereabouts. > so my question to you is twofold > how specifically > compared to who > What is that old saying- never judge a man until you have walked in his shoes > Most people who use these groups have tried the conventional methods with no success. Gullible?!!!!!! > Look at history and notice the misery the human race has suffered by trusting others to make crucial descisions for them. Gullible? No. Just intelligent enough to be aware that I am the only one who really can direct my future. > Gullible? Really! When was the car developed? Early 1900's > Since then we have developed to the extent that on a area the size of a fingernail we can place more electronic components than a 100 old radios each covering a circuit approximately one sq ft. We are still using petrol allbeit maybe more efficient. Ever queried that. If not, thats gullible. > Andy > This is Quackery! > > > > You are all gullible fools. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2004 Report Share Posted September 28, 2004 tempo33x <tempo33x@...> wrote:Quackery? Sounds like a frustrated MD....Sounds like an md with web feet to me!!! lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2004 Report Share Posted October 3, 2004 If Dr. 's research and recommendations are quackery than I am very grateful to quackery, because my health has improved very much, since I have been following her advice. Ingrid --- cornelis anderson <andersoncornelis@...> wrote: > I notice you don't give your name or whereabouts. > so my question to you is twofold > how specifically > compared to who > What is that old saying- never judge a man until you > have walked in his shoes > Most people who use these groups have tried the > conventional methods with no success. > Gullible?!!!!!! > Look at history and notice the misery the human > race has suffered by trusting others to make crucial > descisions for them. Gullible? No. Just intelligent > enough to be aware that I am the only one who really > can direct my future. > Gullible? Really! When was the car developed? Early > 1900's > Since then we have developed to the extent that on a > area the size of a fingernail we can place more > electronic components than a 100 old radios each > covering a circuit approximately one sq ft. We are > still using petrol allbeit maybe more efficient. > Ever queried that. If not, thats gullible. > Andy > This is Quackery! > > > > You are all gullible fools. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.