Burned by Bill Ross

[Guest guest]

You have put it well. Something that is unsafe outside the mouth but

then is safe in the mouth, is the craziest proposition I can imagine.

Here is my experience with Bill Ross. I had given him Bill the names

and phone numbers of three cancer patients who had been cured (or

vastly improved) after taking 's therapy, and who had refused

conventional treatment. I did this because Bill Ross had challenged

me

to come up with proof that it worked.

Well, he did phone all three of them. He came back with (and I

summarize here):

1. Not enough names. There should be hundreds (or thousands) of names

and phone numbers for him to check.

2. Person " 1 " had been cured too recently to be counted,

3. Person " 2 " 's doctor figured he might still have a malignancy,

4. Person " 3 " ' hadn't been to her doctor lately for a checkup.

So for these reasons Bill told me, he would continue to oppose

Hulda's

claims and treatments wherever he could.

AT NO TIME did Bill Ross attempt to account for why they were still

alive or so healthy today. Nor did he express any joy in their

recoveries.

My own father died of cancer. Now, I value health more because of

that

sad event. But Bill Ross expressed no appreciation or value for the

patients who had recovered from terminal cancer.

When I saw what I thought to be such a total disregard for the

wellbeing of these people who had been left to die, I lost all

respect

for Bill Ross, and the people he associates with. I had to see it

(his

attitude) for myself, and did I ever see it!

But I decided to learn something from my experience with Bill Ross. I

now require the skeptics and cynics first of all, to define what they

mean by " proof " , what kind of sample size the need, etc, etc., before

I place names and phone numbers at their disposal. I will not again

be

part of an exercize in futility. My time is far to valuable.

I hope the recounting of my experience will help someone else.

Best wishes,

Leo.

> Jan asked for Bill Ross's Websites:

> http://www.hcrc.org/contrib/ross/pac.html

>

> http://www.hcrc.org/search.htm

>

> The archives can be searched also for further URL's to Dr. Barrettes

> operatives...

> Jan responded:

> >Thank you. I corresponded with him just

> > last night. He has his mind made up. He

> > knows of my experience with mercury

> > poisoning and still prefers to believe all

> > the medical *experts* who say that

> > metal in the mouth is safe. Yet it

> > becomes *dangerous* immediately

> > AFTER it leaves the mouth. He also

> > points to Quack Barrett's websites.

> > Need I say more?? Isn't it strange that

> > so many ASK for PROOF, but Quack

> > Barrett has NONE? I think it is time for

> > him to PROVE all the garbage on his

> > websites.

>

> >Jan