Guest guest Posted February 15, 2004 Report Share Posted February 15, 2004 Hello, all! I think I have the answer to your question. Study Alfred Russel Wallace. During the 1870's, several objective English doctors were observing that good food and personal hygiene were much more conducive to stopping smallpox outbreaks in England than the smallpox vaccine. By 1898 Alfred Russel Wallace wrote a well documented report " Vaccination a Delusion: Its Penal Enforcement a Crime. " You can read this report at www.whale.to/vaccine/wallace/4.html Wallace’s research clearly pointed out that the people in a town that was over 90% vaccinated had six times more smallpox and eight times more smallpox deaths than a town that was not vaccinated. Wallace wrote the above referenced essay to Parliament in an attempt to get them to rescind the Vaccination Laws that made it mandatory for everyone in England to be vaccinated against smallpox. With his essay and the work of other famous men, the Vaccination Act was repealed in 1907. It is interesting to note that by 1919, England and Wales had become one of the least vaccinated countries, and had only 28 deaths from smallpox, out of a population of 37.8 million people. By contrast, during that same year, out of a population of 10 million -- all triply vaccinated over the prior 6 years -- the Philippine Islands registered 47,368 deaths from smallpox. Ask yourselves one question. If vaccination really works, why did England repeal their forced vaccination law? Vic ---- Original Message ----- From: <LINDAELLIS@...> <Dr > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 9:29 AM Subject: Vaccine and hygiene question >I've been following this conversation on vaccines, and wonder if anybody out >there has run across something I found a while back, but can't find now.... > >There is an article somewhere which gives the names and dates of the >scientists who began advocating better hygiene - like doctors washing hands before >doing surgery, basic stuff like that. & amp;nbsp; As I recall, he was resoundingly >rebuffed for years or decades, but when it became accepted that disease was >transferred by dirty hands, they started tracking the decline of these diseases. > >Also, the advent of modern indoor plumbing, which promoted better waste >disposal and more frequent baths and showers; > >The advent of the automobile, which took a whole lot of horse manure off the >streets: " > >The widespread use of electricity and the development of modern refrigeration >and food storage processes, which dramatically reduced the growth and >transmission of bacteria and disease via the food supply. > >If anybody can pinpoint where I read this stuff before, and point me at the >links, I'd be very grateful. & amp;nbsp; As it happens, we had dinner a while back >with someone who used exactly the line " look at the development of the polio >vaccine, and how it eradicated the disease entirely. " & amp;nbsp; Then this thread >started here. & amp;nbsp; I've printed off some of the links to send him, but want this >basic info on hygiene and refrigeration to complement my argument. > >Finally, it is interesting to note that infection and disease is often spread >in a hospital setting TODAY due to lack of proper hygiene amongst the staff. & amp; >nbsp; Doctors and nurses are often understaffed and pressed for time, and >neglect to wash up before touching patients. & amp;nbsp; Thus, pneumonia, staph and >other illness is a common problem in hospitals. & amp;nbsp; A friend of mine recently >said she was going in for knee replacement surgery, and commented that she had >to find something for her mother to do to keep busy and not drive her nuts. & amp; >nbsp; I suggest that a good role for her mother would be to " police " the people >who entered her room, insisting that they all wash up before any contact at >all, as this was a) a role that her mother would take to like a duck to water; >and be the surest preventive against contracting a secondary infection or >other illness. > >Just had a friend who had back surgery last year, and contracted a secondary >infection while hospitalized. & amp;nbsp; The end result was over six months of IV >antibiotics, able to walk only with a cane until last week, and a loss of about >80 pounds (which she could afford, so that wasn't a major problem, though it >hadn't been her goal...). > > > _________________________________________________________________ Get some great ideas here for your sweetheart on Valentine's Day - and beyond. http://special.msn.com/network/celebrateromance.armx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2004 Report Share Posted February 16, 2004 In a message dated 2/15/2004 4:50:18 PM Central Standard Time, cindycharlebois@... writes: > I think I have the answer to your question. Study Alfred Russel Wallace. > During the 1870's, several objective English doctors were observing that good > food and personal hygiene were much more conducive to stopping smallpox > outbreaks in England than the smallpox vaccine. By 1898 Alfred Russel Wallace > wrote a well documented report " Vaccination a Delusion: Its Penal Enforcement a > Crime. " You can read this report at www.whale.to/vaccine/wallace/4.html Thanks, . This was all good reading, and a good start. What I'm looking for, especially, is one particular doctor's name, who publicly advocated better hygiene for doctors while treating patients. Specifically, he urged that doctors WASH THEIR HANDS before performing surgery! What a concept! As I recall, his work was resoundingly rejected in his time, and it took decades before it became accepted that doctors were causing at least as much harm to their patients as good by failing to address sanitation issues. I'm still looking through everything I've collected, but I'd sure like to find that reference again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2004 Report Share Posted February 16, 2004 Well, 2 that come to mind are; Nostradomis and Louis Pasteur Louis Pasteur http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Pasteur.html He pressed doctors to disinfect their instruments by boiling and steaming. Pasteur found that septicemia was caused by an anaerobic bacterium. He urged surgeons to use clean instruments, wash their hands, and disinfect their gauze and bandages in " The Germ Theory and its Application to Medicine and Surgery, " much as <http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Lister.html> Lister was to do. Are one of those who you might be talking about? Re: Vaccine and a hygiene question - Answer... In a message dated 2/15/2004 4:50:18 PM Central Standard Time, cindycharlebois@... writes: > I think I have the answer to your question. Study Alfred Russel Wallace. > During the 1870's, several objective English doctors were observing that good > food and personal hygiene were much more conducive to stopping smallpox > outbreaks in England than the smallpox vaccine. By 1898 Alfred Russel Wallace > wrote a well documented report " Vaccination a Delusion: Its Penal Enforcement a > Crime. " You can read this report at www.whale.to/vaccine/wallace/4.html Thanks, . This was all good reading, and a good start. What I'm looking for, especially, is one particular doctor's name, who publicly advocated better hygiene for doctors while treating patients. Specifically, he urged that doctors WASH THEIR HANDS before performing surgery! What a concept! As I recall, his work was resoundingly rejected in his time, and it took decades before it became accepted that doctors were causing at least as much harm to their patients as good by failing to address sanitation issues. I'm still looking through everything I've collected, but I'd sure like to find that reference again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2004 Report Share Posted February 16, 2004 It might have been Pasteur, but someone else emailed me privately of a Hungarian doctor names Ignaz Semmelweis, and he also urged hand-washing between patients - particularly when a doctor was going from working on a cadaver to working on a pregnant woman (ugh!). The doctors rebuffed his suggestions as too time-consuming. How far we HAVEN'T come in 150 years.....these days it's staph infections in hospitals, and one of the reasons given that doctors and nurses neglect the hygiene protocol even though it is acknowledged to fight the spread of disease is .....they are pressed for time! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.