Guest guest Posted February 24, 2006 Report Share Posted February 24, 2006 Oh, you shouldn't have gotten me started..... We just moved to a small community in East Texas. We live on 7 acres OUTSIDE the city limits. When we went to put our name on record at the rural water department, hubby happened to mention that we had a well on the property. A guy who had just walked in from the back office immediately came over and said they would have to do a check on us to be sure we weren't using our well....ON OUR PROPERTY!!!!! I told him if he planned to be running around my property, I would be calling the police. They never did come out. Long story short though - you can't use well water in the house. We do use it for watering the garden, grass, etc. Makes me furious every time I think about it. How did these little water districts all over the country get so doggone much power? A friend down the road wants another water meter put a few feet from the house. They are going to charge her over $1000.00 for that meter. And get this: the power company is going to charge her $117 to put their meter right next to it. Jeanne >Message: 13 > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:33:16 -0500 > From: " " <tparker7600@...> >Subject: Re: Well water > >I would be interested in anything people have to say about digging your own >well too.... and I have heard some municipalities will deny you the right to >do it.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2006 Report Share Posted February 24, 2006 Thank you ..... that is what I was afraid of .... another battle to climb to get a decent glass of water to drink lol....I'll figure out a way some kind of way to get a real bath.....guess Ill have to build a swimming pool and bathe in it lol.... rom: BJ <pinemeadows@...> >Reply-Dr >Dr >Subject: Re: wells >Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:27:17 -0600 > >Oh, you shouldn't have gotten me started..... > >We just moved to a small community in East Texas. We live on 7 acres >OUTSIDE the city limits. When we went to put our name on record at the >rural water department, hubby happened to mention that we had a well on the >property. A guy who had just walked in from the back office immediately >came over and said they would have to do a check on us to be sure we >weren't using our well....ON OUR PROPERTY!!!!! I told him if he planned to >be running around my property, I would be calling the police. > >They never did come out. Long story short though - you can't use well >water in the house. We do use it for watering the garden, grass, etc. > >Makes me furious every time I think about it. How did these little water >districts all over the country get so doggone much power? A friend down >the road wants another water meter put a few feet from the house. They are >going to charge her over $1000.00 for that meter. And get this: the power >company is going to charge her $117 to put their meter right next to it. > > >Jeanne > > >Message: 13 > > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:33:16 -0500 > > From: " " <tparker7600@...> > >Subject: Re: Well water > > > >I would be interested in anything people have to say about digging your >own > >well too.... and I have heard some municipalities will deny you the right >to > >do it.... > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2006 Report Share Posted February 24, 2006 If it is a right, it cannot be denied. If it is a privilege, it can. Read the laws involved (on the web) and find out where exactly " they " get their authority over your property and well. Ask them to show you chapter and verse, and if they cannot, ignore them. Blessings! Arthur 888-533-7007 www.BestZapper.com www.BestWithoutDrugs.com Re: Well water > >I would be interested in anything people have to say about digging your own >well too.... and I have heard some municipalities will deny you the right to >do it.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2006 Report Share Posted February 26, 2006 Mainly, it's a darn good thing the water districts are vigilant. Arsenic in the groundwater is a huge problem across most of the USA. The WHO in 1999 estimated 13% of the small municipal systems in the United States, and an estimated 20% of private wells in the United States were above 10 ppb. In some western areas with volcanic rock and sulfide mineral deposits high in arsenic, arsenic levels up to 3,400 ppb have been observed, and in western mining areas up to 48,000 ppb have been reported. Arizona, Illinois, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Southern California, New England, areas around the Great Lakes, and much of the central plains have high arsenic levels. This is extremely troubling because 35 million people in the United States drink water every day from their community water systems that contain arsenic at a level of over 1 ppb, which presents a very significant cancer risk. Researchers from the University of California recently found increased rates of death from vascular diseases such as arteriosclerosis, aortic aneurysms, and other diseases of the arteries, arterioles, and capillaries among Americans living in areas with relatively higher levels of arsenic in their drinking water. Another study found a link between this widespread drinking water contaminant and diabetes mellitus. The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that a very small amount -- 5 parts per billion (ppb) -- Long term exposure to arsenic via drinking water causes cancer of the skin, lungs, urinary bladder, and kidney, and Health Canada adds thickening and discoloration of the skin; nausea and diarrhea; decreased production of blood cells; abnormal heart rhythm and blood vessel damage; numbness in the hands and feet. Further, Health Canada suggests that we invest in an in- home water treatment device that can reduce arsenic exposure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 Isn't it interesting that the water authorities who cheerfully insist on toxic levels of chlorine and fluoride in our water are so solicitous about our health with arsenic. Kind of like the cancer " experts " who treat cancer with chemo and radiation which are both PROVEN to cause cancer in healthy people. Blessings! Arthur 888-533-7007 www.BestZapper.com www.BestWithoutDrugs.com Re: wells Mainly, it's a darn good thing the water districts are vigilant. Arsenic in the groundwater is a huge problem across most of the USA. The WHO in 1999 estimated 13% of the small municipal systems in the United States, and an estimated 20% of private wells in the United States were above 10 ppb. In some western areas with volcanic rock and sulfide mineral deposits high in arsenic, arsenic levels up to 3,400 ppb have been observed, and in western mining areas up to 48,000 ppb have been reported. Arizona, Illinois, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Southern California, New England, areas around the Great Lakes, and much of the central plains have high arsenic levels. This is extremely troubling because 35 million people in the United States drink water every day from their community water systems that contain arsenic at a level of over 1 ppb, which presents a very significant cancer risk. Researchers from the University of California recently found increased rates of death from vascular diseases such as arteriosclerosis, aortic aneurysms, and other diseases of the arteries, arterioles, and capillaries among Americans living in areas with relatively higher levels of arsenic in their drinking water. Another study found a link between this widespread drinking water contaminant and diabetes mellitus. The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that a very small amount -- 5 parts per billion (ppb) -- Long term exposure to arsenic via drinking water causes cancer of the skin, lungs, urinary bladder, and kidney, and Health Canada adds thickening and discoloration of the skin; nausea and diarrhea; decreased production of blood cells; abnormal heart rhythm and blood vessel damage; numbness in the hands and feet. Further, Health Canada suggests that we invest in an in- home water treatment device that can reduce arsenic exposure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 Drinking water here in Long Island is so lousy that when I moved my family here I was forced to install two whole-house filters, a softener that uses solar salt and a super fine carbon unit from The Home Depot. I had not been diagnosed with cancer yet, so this was not on the advice on Dr. 's books. It was just that the water out of the faucet literally smelled of chlorine among the rest. The naturopath told me that my drinking water is fine as far as his equipment is concerned, but I think that one of these days I should have it examined anyway... Luigi Re: wells > > > Mainly, it's a darn good thing the water districts are vigilant. > > Arsenic in the groundwater is a huge problem across most of the USA. > > The WHO in 1999 estimated 13% of the small municipal systems in the > United States, and an estimated 20% of private wells in the United > States were above 10 ppb. In some western areas with volcanic rock > and sulfide mineral deposits high in arsenic, arsenic levels up to > 3,400 ppb have been observed, and in western mining areas up to > 48,000 ppb have been reported. Arizona, Illinois, New Hampshire, New > Mexico, Southern California, New England, areas around the Great > Lakes, and much of the central plains have high arsenic levels. > > This is extremely troubling because 35 million people in the United > States drink water every day from their community water systems that > contain arsenic at a level of over 1 ppb, which presents a very > significant cancer risk. > > Researchers from the University of California recently found > increased rates of death from vascular diseases such as > arteriosclerosis, aortic aneurysms, and other diseases of the > arteries, arterioles, and capillaries among Americans living in areas > with relatively higher levels of arsenic in their drinking water. > > Another study found a link between this widespread drinking water > contaminant and diabetes mellitus. > > The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that a very small > amount -- 5 parts per billion (ppb) -- Long term exposure to arsenic > via drinking water causes cancer of the skin, lungs, urinary bladder, > and kidney, and Health Canada adds thickening and discoloration of > the skin; nausea and diarrhea; decreased production of blood cells; > abnormal heart rhythm and blood vessel damage; numbness in the hands > and feet. Further, Health Canada suggests that we invest in an in- > home water treatment device that can reduce arsenic exposure. > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Filter systems exist. Anyone who has read Dr. 's " Prevention of All Cancers " knows that the Chlorination of the water supply is the worst chronic toxic exposure available to humans. It is my right to choose " filtered " arsenic water which may or may not be present vs. 50 other toxic metals which ARE present in bleached water. I take any studies done by the WHO with a grain of salt. They are always made public to promote the status quo which in this case appears to be forced use of " treated water " With the research available now by Dr. , one can easily target single toxins that may escape the filter system. Take out drops for Arsenic in any area of the body can be done with $30 worth of parts (zapper) If the level of arsenic is so high due to location then the municipal water will also contain it. Corey > > Mainly, it's a darn good thing the water districts are vigilant. > > Arsenic in the groundwater is a huge problem across most of the USA. > > The WHO in 1999 estimated 13% of the small municipal systems in the > United States, and an estimated 20% of private wells in the United > States were above 10 ppb. In some western areas with volcanic rock > and sulfide mineral deposits high in arsenic, arsenic levels up to > 3,400 ppb have been observed, and in western mining areas up to > 48,000 ppb have been reported. Arizona, Illinois, New Hampshire, New > Mexico, Southern California, New England, areas around the Great > Lakes, and much of the central plains have high arsenic levels. > > This is extremely troubling because 35 million people in the United > States drink water every day from their community water systems that > contain arsenic at a level of over 1 ppb, which presents a very > significant cancer risk. > > Researchers from the University of California recently found > increased rates of death from vascular diseases such as > arteriosclerosis, aortic aneurysms, and other diseases of the > arteries, arterioles, and capillaries among Americans living in areas > with relatively higher levels of arsenic in their drinking water. > > Another study found a link between this widespread drinking water > contaminant and diabetes mellitus. > > The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that a very small > amount -- 5 parts per billion (ppb) -- Long term exposure to arsenic > via drinking water causes cancer of the skin, lungs, urinary bladder, > and kidney, and Health Canada adds thickening and discoloration of > the skin; nausea and diarrhea; decreased production of blood cells; > abnormal heart rhythm and blood vessel damage; numbness in the hands > and feet. Further, Health Canada suggests that we invest in an in- > home water treatment device that can reduce arsenic exposure. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 I have no choice but to agree with you, citing for example two articles Big Pharma allowed newsmedia to publish on News-Health some days ago. The first of these articles mentioned that parasites have been noticed in prostate cancer. This article, which details what Dr. and a few others have been preaching for YEARS lasted all of three hours, then " disappeared " . The second article, on the same site, described " tests " that try to prove that alternative medicine does not work and is a waste of money and time. This article instead lasted well over two days. Is it not funny that what promotes the virtues of Big Pharma will be displayed for a lengthy stretch of time while things WE KNOW benefit the sick do not? Luigi Re: wells > Filter systems exist. > > Anyone who has read Dr. 's " Prevention of All Cancers " knows > that the Chlorination of the water supply is the worst chronic toxic > exposure available to humans. It is my right to choose " filtered " > arsenic water which may or may not be present vs. 50 other toxic > metals which ARE present in bleached water. > > I take any studies done by the WHO with a grain of salt. They are > always made public to promote the status quo which in this case > appears to be forced use of " treated water " > > With the research available now by Dr. , one can easily target > single toxins that may escape the filter system. Take out drops for > Arsenic in any area of the body can be done with $30 worth of parts > (zapper) > > If the level of arsenic is so high due to location then the > municipal water will also contain it. > > Corey > > > > > > > > >> >> Mainly, it's a darn good thing the water districts are vigilant. >> >> Arsenic in the groundwater is a huge problem across most of the > USA. >> >> The WHO in 1999 estimated 13% of the small municipal systems in > the >> United States, and an estimated 20% of private wells in the United >> States were above 10 ppb. In some western areas with volcanic rock >> and sulfide mineral deposits high in arsenic, arsenic levels up to >> 3,400 ppb have been observed, and in western mining areas up to >> 48,000 ppb have been reported. Arizona, Illinois, New Hampshire, > New >> Mexico, Southern California, New England, areas around the Great >> Lakes, and much of the central plains have high arsenic levels. >> >> This is extremely troubling because 35 million people in the > United >> States drink water every day from their community water systems > that >> contain arsenic at a level of over 1 ppb, which presents a very >> significant cancer risk. >> >> Researchers from the University of California recently found >> increased rates of death from vascular diseases such as >> arteriosclerosis, aortic aneurysms, and other diseases of the >> arteries, arterioles, and capillaries among Americans living in > areas >> with relatively higher levels of arsenic in their drinking water. >> >> Another study found a link between this widespread drinking water >> contaminant and diabetes mellitus. >> >> The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that a very small >> amount -- 5 parts per billion (ppb) -- Long term exposure to > arsenic >> via drinking water causes cancer of the skin, lungs, urinary > bladder, >> and kidney, and Health Canada adds thickening and discoloration of >> the skin; nausea and diarrhea; decreased production of blood > cells; >> abnormal heart rhythm and blood vessel damage; numbness in the > hands >> and feet. Further, Health Canada suggests that we invest in an in- >> home water treatment device that can reduce arsenic exposure. >> >> >> > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Luigi, Focusing on what Big Pharma is doing will do nothing to help yourself or others. Unless one is very disciplined then the sought after emotions are brought forward: fear, contempt, anger, hopelessness etc. This is exactly the intended result. Everything is put up on the TV, radio or internet for a very real reason. Either to promote the status quo or invoke emotions in those who oppose the status quo. I no longer watch TV, read newspapers, or listen to talk radio or call in etc. I no longer go to websites or blogs that inform what the powers that be are doing with my food, medicine or rights. I no longer waste my time on these things. Do you think Dr. is on the Internet right now and reading about how the FDA covered up the latest XYZ approval or how Congress just rammed through a bill to take away more freedoms? No. Dr. is sitting right now at her research desk using her syncrometer figuring out a SOLUTION. Corey > >> > >> Mainly, it's a darn good thing the water districts are vigilant. > >> > >> Arsenic in the groundwater is a huge problem across most of the > > USA. > >> > >> The WHO in 1999 estimated 13% of the small municipal systems in > > the > >> United States, and an estimated 20% of private wells in the United > >> States were above 10 ppb. In some western areas with volcanic rock > >> and sulfide mineral deposits high in arsenic, arsenic levels up to > >> 3,400 ppb have been observed, and in western mining areas up to > >> 48,000 ppb have been reported. Arizona, Illinois, New Hampshire, > > New > >> Mexico, Southern California, New England, areas around the Great > >> Lakes, and much of the central plains have high arsenic levels. > >> > >> This is extremely troubling because 35 million people in the > > United > >> States drink water every day from their community water systems > > that > >> contain arsenic at a level of over 1 ppb, which presents a very > >> significant cancer risk. > >> > >> Researchers from the University of California recently found > >> increased rates of death from vascular diseases such as > >> arteriosclerosis, aortic aneurysms, and other diseases of the > >> arteries, arterioles, and capillaries among Americans living in > > areas > >> with relatively higher levels of arsenic in their drinking water. > >> > >> Another study found a link between this widespread drinking water > >> contaminant and diabetes mellitus. > >> > >> The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that a very small > >> amount -- 5 parts per billion (ppb) -- Long term exposure to > > arsenic > >> via drinking water causes cancer of the skin, lungs, urinary > > bladder, > >> and kidney, and Health Canada adds thickening and discoloration of > >> the skin; nausea and diarrhea; decreased production of blood > > cells; > >> abnormal heart rhythm and blood vessel damage; numbness in the > > hands > >> and feet. Further, Health Canada suggests that we invest in an in- > >> home water treatment device that can reduce arsenic exposure. > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 > Filter systems exist. Most filter systems don't remove arsenic; there is a new one on the market that does, though, 100%, guaranteed. > Anyone who has read Dr. 's " Prevention of All Cancers " knows > that the Chlorination of the water supply is the worst chronic > toxic exposure available to humans. Chlorination may be called " worst " because it's ubiquitous, but fluoridation of the water supply is acknowledged to be the second worst " man-made " toxic exposure next to mercury. > It is my right to choose " filtered " > arsenic water which may or may not be present vs. 50 other toxic > metals which ARE present in bleached water. No argument on what you may prefer, but a filter that produces arsenic-free water that is also free of chlorine and the other 50 contaminants is available. It's a good idea to be aware of the risk because there is large increase in cancer among a popuation that gets even 1 part per billion of arsenic in drinking water, and thousands of times higher for about 20% of the USA that drinks 10 PPB or higher arsenic content. > I take any studies done by the WHO with a grain of salt. They are > always made public to promote the status quo which in this case > appears to be forced use of " treated water " OK, here are the stats from the EPA: http://www.nrdc.org/water/drinking/qarsenic.asp " Treated water " has not got all the arsenic removed, so that's a moot point, and stats do not arise from the WHO anyway, but from local companies and counties that tested their water. Here are some county maps: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/trace/pubs/geo_v46n11/fig3.html > With the research available now by Dr. , one can easily target > single toxins that may escape the filter system. Take out drops for > Arsenic in any area of the body can be done with $30 worth of parts > (zapper) I hadn't seen that one. How does it remove arsenic from the body? > If the level of arsenic is so high due to location then the > municipal water will also contain it. > > Corey I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 In my case instead I go through this forum as well as Rife's to chat with people who like to share tricks they have worked out to try and deal with diseases. But I do keep a keen eye on the news both for tidbits about cancers like mine and about things like ADHD, which in my case hit home as my 12 year old had been diagnosed with it. Picking up knowledge about real ways to defeat disease is very important, but so is knowing what " the other side " is up to. I have started showing articles like those I mention that describe the extent of some of the betrayals to friends, like for example neighbors with a (now formerly) autistic child: his parents had no idea that Ritalin is to all intents and purposes meth. Some tough love, adjustments to the diet and massive amounts of chelation pills (thank you, Dr. !) and the kid is off of drugs now almost a year and doing just fine. Luigi Re: wells > Luigi, > > Focusing on what Big Pharma is doing will do nothing to help > yourself or others. Unless one is very disciplined then the sought > after emotions are brought forward: fear, contempt, anger, > hopelessness etc. This is exactly the intended result. Everything is > put up on the TV, radio or internet for a very real reason. Either > to promote the status quo or invoke emotions in those who oppose the > status quo. > > I no longer watch TV, read newspapers, or listen to talk radio or > call in etc. I no longer go to websites or blogs that inform what > the powers that be are doing with my food, medicine or rights. I no > longer waste my time on these things. > > Do you think Dr. is on the Internet right now and reading > about how the FDA covered up the latest XYZ approval or how Congress > just rammed through a bill to take away more freedoms? No. > Dr. is sitting right now at her research desk using her > syncrometer figuring out a SOLUTION. > > Corey > > > > > >> >> >> >> Mainly, it's a darn good thing the water districts are vigilant. >> >> >> >> Arsenic in the groundwater is a huge problem across most of the >> > USA. >> >> >> >> The WHO in 1999 estimated 13% of the small municipal systems in >> > the >> >> United States, and an estimated 20% of private wells in the > United >> >> States were above 10 ppb. In some western areas with volcanic > rock >> >> and sulfide mineral deposits high in arsenic, arsenic levels up > to >> >> 3,400 ppb have been observed, and in western mining areas up to >> >> 48,000 ppb have been reported. Arizona, Illinois, New Hampshire, >> > New >> >> Mexico, Southern California, New England, areas around the Great >> >> Lakes, and much of the central plains have high arsenic levels. >> >> >> >> This is extremely troubling because 35 million people in the >> > United >> >> States drink water every day from their community water systems >> > that >> >> contain arsenic at a level of over 1 ppb, which presents a very >> >> significant cancer risk. >> >> >> >> Researchers from the University of California recently found >> >> increased rates of death from vascular diseases such as >> >> arteriosclerosis, aortic aneurysms, and other diseases of the >> >> arteries, arterioles, and capillaries among Americans living in >> > areas >> >> with relatively higher levels of arsenic in their drinking > water. >> >> >> >> Another study found a link between this widespread drinking > water >> >> contaminant and diabetes mellitus. >> >> >> >> The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that a very small >> >> amount -- 5 parts per billion (ppb) -- Long term exposure to >> > arsenic >> >> via drinking water causes cancer of the skin, lungs, urinary >> > bladder, >> >> and kidney, and Health Canada adds thickening and discoloration > of >> >> the skin; nausea and diarrhea; decreased production of blood >> > cells; >> >> abnormal heart rhythm and blood vessel damage; numbness in the >> > hands >> >> and feet. Further, Health Canada suggests that we invest in an > in- >> >> home water treatment device that can reduce arsenic exposure. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 , Thank you for the info. Would you be able to provide a link to the filter system you speak of hear? Corey > > > Filter systems exist. > > Most filter systems don't remove arsenic; there is a new one on the > market that does, though, 100%, guaranteed. > > > Anyone who has read Dr. 's " Prevention of All Cancers " knows > > that the Chlorination of the water supply is the worst chronic > > toxic exposure available to humans. > > Chlorination may be called " worst " because it's ubiquitous, but > fluoridation of the water supply is acknowledged to be the second > worst " man-made " toxic exposure next to mercury. > > > It is my right to choose " filtered " > > arsenic water which may or may not be present vs. 50 other toxic > > metals which ARE present in bleached water. > > No argument on what you may prefer, but a filter that produces > arsenic-free water that is also free of chlorine and the other 50 > contaminants is available. > > It's a good idea to be aware of the risk because there is large > increase in cancer among a popuation that gets even 1 part per > billion of arsenic in drinking water, and thousands of times higher > for about 20% of the USA that drinks 10 PPB or higher arsenic content. > > > I take any studies done by the WHO with a grain of salt. They are > > always made public to promote the status quo which in this case > > appears to be forced use of " treated water " > > OK, here are the stats from the EPA: > http://www.nrdc.org/water/drinking/qarsenic.asp > > " Treated water " has not got all the arsenic removed, so that's a moot > point, and stats do not arise from the WHO anyway, but from local > companies and counties that tested their water. Here are some county > maps: > http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/trace/pubs/geo_v46n11/fig3.html > > > With the research available now by Dr. , one can easily target > > single toxins that may escape the filter system. Take out drops for > > Arsenic in any area of the body can be done with $30 worth of parts > > (zapper) > > I hadn't seen that one. How does it remove arsenic from the body? > > > If the level of arsenic is so high due to location then the > > municipal water will also contain it. > > > > Corey > > I agree. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 > > Thank you for the info. Would you be able to provide a link to the > filter system you speak of hear? > > Corey Here's the arsenic filter and maps. http://www.codebluewater.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Thank you for the link. I did not see any prices or where to buy this. Any recommendations? Corey > > > > > Thank you for the info. Would you be able to provide a link to the > > filter system you speak of hear? > > > > Corey > > Here's the arsenic filter and maps. > > http://www.codebluewater.com > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.