Guest guest Posted August 11, 2001 Report Share Posted August 11, 2001 > ... I was glad to hear that it is recommended to continue > NSAIDS while one is on the antibiotic therapy and that the > antibiotics can actually slow the progression of this disease > quite rapidly. Is it acceptable to take sulfasalazine along > with the antibiotics and NSAIDS simultaneously? I would > appreciate hearing from anyone who has tried the antibiotic > therapy and sulfasalazine at the same time. > > I have an appointment with my rheumatologist this Monday and > will discuss this combination with her. In the past she has > not been very optimistic about alternative treatments so I'm > curious to see her reaction. > > Thanks, Joe Godfrey Joe, I've been on sulfasalazine for about 15 years in combination with just about any NSAID you could probably mention, and started antibiotics about three months ago. An orthopedic surgeon started me on Feldene after my second knee surgery in 1989, and when I later started complaining about pain in my fingers to my Dermatologist, he sent me to a Rheumatologist. The Rheumatologist recommended sulfasalazine because he thought it was pretty safe and if I remember correctly he thought it might also help my Psoriasis. He also prescribed a different NSAID (I forget which one, Naprosyn I think) and later kept switching me around to different ones to try to find one that worked best (Plaquenil was a total disaster, it made me break out in Psoriasis all over my body), but I kept taking sulfasalazine the whole time. He tried to get me to up the dose of sulfasalazine to 2000 mg a day, but it caused such a loud ringing in my ears that I told him I couldn't tolerate it. We finally settled on 1500 mg of sulfasalazine, 1500 mg of Relafen, and a couple 200 mcg cytotec pills each day. About three years ago my Rheumatologist had two heart attacks in succession and quit his practice. I just had my regular GP (internist) prescribe the arthritis pills for the next year or so until I had a severe flare in what I thought was my left hip and he didn't know what to do. That was when I started going to a new Rheumatologist. She gave me a shot of cortisone in my hip and went on a month's vacation. Uncharacteristically, the cortisone shot didn't help at all. I spent the following month in and out of an orthopedic surgeon's office who prescribed physical therapy (Ouch!), and took Xrays of my back and an MRI of my hip. He finally decided it was a back problem (L5-S1 Spondylitis with radiculopathy and spinal stenosis) and recommended surgery. After being in excruciating pain for a month, my Rheumy finally returned from vacation and I explained what had happened. She said it was most likely my sacroiliac joint, and that was where she had tried to inject the cortisone but that it is a difficult joint to reach with a needle and that she had probably missed. She also said that surgeons never suspect the sacroiliac joint because it's not something they're typically taught to operate on. There's an interesting historical story about why the sacroiliac joint often escapes evaluation at: http://www.sacroiliac.com/new_page_6.htm Anyhow, she put me on oral Predisone and two days later I was pain free and feeling fine, and haven't been bothered with it since. About that time, I also finally agreed to start Methotrexate. Every rheumatologist I've ever gone to wanted to put me on Methotrexate, but I had resisted because of the possible liver damage (and because I'd have to become a tee-totler as far as alcohol is concerned), but that last flare was enough to convince me that I needed something stronger than NSAIDS. My new Rheumy also tried to get me to increase the sulfasalazine to 2000 mg with the same results (loud ringing in my ears) and she switched me to Naprosyn - I'm still not sure why, as the Relafen seemed to work just as well. So anyhow, I was then on the 1500 mg of sulfasalazine, with 1500 mg of Naprosyn, and a couple 200 mcg cytotec pills each day, and 10 mg of Methotrexate each week for the next six months. What did all that have to do with your question? Well, absolutely nothing at all - I just felt like rambling! ;-) To (finally) get to the point - back in May of this year, Greenly's posts finally began to penetrate into my consciousness, and I decided to look into antibiotic therapy. I generally relegate unconventional therapies to the realm of quackery, or at the very least give them no more consideration than I would the remedies in the " It Works for Me " column of the National Psoriasis Foundation's (NPF) monthly bulletin, in which readers write in with their favorite, and usually very unique, remedies for Psoriasis. But I read some of the material on antibiotic therapy for rheumatic diseases, and bought Henry Scammell's book " The New Arthritis Breakthrough. " That book is the only one I have read in many years that brought tears to my eyes. It kept using the word " cure " , which is the one word we never, ever hear in relation to our disease - though in all fairness, the book made it quite clear that antibiotic treatment was in most cases very slow acting (except for intravenous Clindamycin) and very long term, sometimes lifelong, and was primarily about rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatic diseases other than psoriatic arthritis. One of the final chapters even discusses the other more conventional view that antibiotics are beneficial only because of their anti-inflammatory properties. I mailed my rheumatologist copies of the material I had on the therapy prior to my next appointment with her, and even purchased an extra copy of the book to present her with. The reason I decided to try antibiotics is that it is the *only* therapy that offers even the slightest hope of actually curing our disease, and even if that's a false hope at the very least it acts as an effective anti-inflammatory that's far safer than anything else we take. Those are the arguments I presented my rheumatologist with. She agreed that minocycline is one of the safest drugs there is, and even grudgingly admitted that it does have anti-inflammatory properties, though for different reasons than those claimed in Scammell's book. Those are the points I think you should make with your own rheumatologist; ie, 1. It's safe, and 2. It does have anti-inflammatory properties, whatever the reason. Basically the only change to my treatment was that I stopped taking Methotrexate and started taking minocycline. I continued with the 1500 mg of sulfasalazine, 1500 mg of Naprosyn, and two 200 mcg cytotec pills. At my next visit two months later, I said that I'd like to cut back on the sulfasalazine to 1000 mg per day simply because even the 1500 mg/day dose had always caused a slight ringing in my ears that was irritating, and that I'd like to cut back on the Naprosyn because I didn't feel I needed that much (1500 mg). She Ok'd the reduction in sulfasalazine on the condition that if I started getting worse I would go back to my regular dosage, and said that I could take the Naprosyn as needed (ie; only when I was in pain). I already knew that sulfa drugs had been used for their antibiotic properties long before penicillin, tetracycline, etc., ever came along, and she told me that sulfasalazine (a sulfur based drug) also has antibiotic properties. I thought it was interesting that she would choose that particular visit to mention it (ie; after I had asked for a prescription of the antibiotic minocycline for use as an anti-inflammatory), particularly since no other rheumatologist I'd ever gone to before had said anything about sulfasalazine being an antibiotic. I think perhaps it signaled a change in her attitude. Nowadays, I take 1000 mg of sulfasalazine each day, and usually 500 mg of Naprosyn in the morning along with a cytotec, and 100 mg of minocycline Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. So far, I'm feeling as well as I ever have. Feel free to contact me either privately or on this forum if you have any other questions. Good luck, and I hope it works for you. -- Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2001 Report Share Posted August 11, 2001 > Dean, what type of test do you get to determine the kind of mycoplasm > which may have invaded your body? Please elaborate. Also, I recently > started a new diet which eliminates red meat, dairy, sugar (refined), > wheat products and plants within the nightshade family. I know that > you have had a lot of success with your diet and would appreciate > your input. > > Thanks, Joe Godfrey Hi Joe. I'll apologize up front as this will be a very long post. My understanding is that it can be very difficult to get a reading on mycoplasma and mycoplasma strain due to their need for specialized cultures and testing. They don't grow well in normal testing situations. However, I've read that effective tests are being used..one using DNA-fluorochrome staining. Here is one testing lab that specializes in mycoplasma screening and what they have to say about it: http://www.bionique.com/general.htm. There are other labs out there that specialize in mycoplasma testing as well. While I don't know the exact name of the test, your doctor will. My understanding is that they will test for the 4 main strains of pathogenic mycoplasma and report back to your doctor on whether they show up. The key thing to note is that while some doctors will prescribe specialized antibiotics for certain strains, the strains that are known to cause arthritic conditions are all susceptible to the tetracycline family (with mino and doxy being the most widely used). Those of us who have multiple diagnoses and those with lupus will want to make sure they take the test up front to determine a specific strain or strains as other disease families have shown better results on other antibiotics. Here is a great link to find out more info on mycoplasma and what they are. http://www.mercola.com/2001/jul/14/mycoplasmas.htm While I've done a ton of research on antibiotic treatments all over the net, I still find Dr. Mercola's site to be a great information resource on just about anything. He talks about things in great detail and in layman's terms so you can understand it. To get an understanding of how he developed his own protocol go here: http://www.mercola.com/article/misc/Rheumatoid Arthritis.htm. I'm glad you've decided to try the diet out. If nothing else, keep on that and I'm almost positive you'll notice improvements. Some additional notes: It's very important to eliminate sodas and carbonated beverages and add a lot more water. Water to us is like oil to the Tin Man in The Wizard of Oz...it lubricates our joints and does a nice job of transporting toxins out of the body. Like you, I've eliminated a lot of dairy, but I upped the yogurt to provide good flora for my stomach while I'm on the antibiotics. You may want to test beyond the nightshade family and eventually include all underground vegetables and corn (not give them up forever, but test them to see if your body reacts to them). After a month on the diet I was at a point where I felt good so that I could start testing out certain foods to see if my body reacted to them. I soon found out that corn and tomatoes made me flare up. They also make a lot of people flare up too due to food sensitivities in our bodies. You'll soon find what foods you can tolerate and those that you can't. One of the main things that I think really helped me was simply cooking my own food. I had fallen into the trap of buying out food at a deli or restaurant because I was too busy. Unfortunately, restaurants use a lot of ingredients like MSG that can make food sensitive folks flare up. Now I cook 90% of my own meals and use the " whole foods " theory when I eat out. The more simple it is, the safer it is. At first, the whole diet thing was a huge monster to me. I didn't want to give up all those things I loved. But like all things it gets easy once you establish a pattern. You'll also soon find great substitutes like rice pastas and gluten-free breads that will allow you to eat the way you are used to eating and not have food flares. And heck, if you end up feeling great, who really needs that piece of cheesecake, right? As a side bar (or file it under " If you think antibiotics are hoohaa, wait till you hear this " hehe)...after reading through Dr. Mercola's information, I have contacted a physical therapist locally who is knowledgeable in Neurostructural Therapy (NST). This therapy realigns the immune system to better fight the mycoplasma that invade our body. If I've read his site properly, Dr. Mercola is actually weaning people off antibiotics in favor of NST and a special diet. My local practitioner is taking the advanced NST course over Labor Day and I'll be meeting with her to talk about it further detail after that time. If anyone is interested, I can post what I learn. I hope that helps! Have a great weekend. deano Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2001 Report Share Posted August 11, 2001 I quit the sulfa when i started antibiotics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.