Guest guest Posted October 24, 2001 Report Share Posted October 24, 2001 http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/terrorism/anthrax/1024cdc.html Anthrax strategy assailed on Hill By LARRY LIPMAN and JEFF NESMITH Atlanta Journal-Constitution Staff Writers Washington -- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention came under sharp criticism Tuesday from lawmakers who questioned the agency's handling of a growing national anthrax threat. Rick McKay / AJC CDC chief Koplan defended his agency's efforts. Particularly troublesome to members of Congress were anthrax attacks that resulted in the deaths of two postal workers who may have come in contact with mail destined for the U.S. Capitol. But the CDC's director, Dr. Koplan, defended his agency's handling of the anthrax outbreak and said any mistakes stemmed from a lack of adequate knowledge about the rare disease. At a congressional hearing Tuesday, questions were also raised about whether the FBI was sharing information it has developed in response to anthrax outbreaks in Florida, New York, New Jersey and Washington, D.C., with other law enforcement and public health agencies in a timely fashion. Koplan and FBI Deputy Assistant Director Caruso said their agencies have been working closely and cooperatively in sharing information. Sen. Tom Harkin, an Iowa Democrat, said he was particularly concerned that workers at the Brentwood Road mail processing center -- which handles mail headed for the Capitol -- were not tested and treated quickly enough after anthrax was discovered at a Trenton, N.J., postal facility and the office of Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.). " We have officials in Trenton, New Jersey, at the postal facility, who come down with the skin form of anthrax. In between it goes through Brentwood, and yet the people at Brentwood said, 'Don't worry about it,' " said Harkin, who is chairman of the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on labor, health and human services and education. " I have deep concerns . . . about the actions of the CDC recently involving the events surrounding the deaths of the two postal workers. " Harkin read from a news article that quoted CDC spokesman Tom Skinner as saying, " We're dealing with something that up until two or three weeks ago we had not dealt with before. " The senator said he expected more from the agency. " That's what CDC is for. Of course there are things we haven't been up against before, but we'd hope that CDC would have some kind of a plan that they could have used to trace back . . . and make sure that everything was covered, " Harkin said. Noting that hundreds of congressional staffers were tested and treated after the anthrax-laced letter was found in Daschle's office, Harkin said: " Maybe I'm wrong, but it just seems to me that something broke down here . . . Whatever happened at Brentwood, we just can't afford to have it happen anywhere else. We count on CDC. You're our line of defense at CDC. " Koplan responded that the CDC has launched an around-the-clock effort that involves 200 people in field investigations across the country working with state and local public health agencies. " But the system is stressed through years of neglect and under-investment, " Koplan said. " Labs are inundated with specimens. Epidemiological and investigative staff, where present, are being run ragged. Communications capabilities are strained, and cash-strapped states and localities are facing extraordinary unbudgeted costs. " Despite the workload, the CDC director said, the public health system " has performed admirably. " Tracing the history of the recent anthrax outbreak -- which surfaced when s, a photo editor for the supermarket tabloid The Sun in Florida, was diagnosed with the rare disease less than three weeks ago -- Koplan said that until the most recent deaths, of the two postal workers, all of the cases had involved mail that was opened. For that reason, he said, postal workers who handled -- but did not open -- mail were not thought to be at risk for the deadly inhalation form of anthrax. Koplan said congressional staffers did not receive preferential treatment over postal workers. " I can say absolutely that we used the same standards, we used the same approach, and we tried to be as diligent and as quick and as thorough no matter where and to whom these cases appear or where the threat is, " Koplan said. " We work in pubic health. There is no favoritism. In fact it's quite the reverse. We are most interested in folks who are less famous, less well-off and less visible throughout the field of public health. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.