Guest guest Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 > Pam - > > I don't think my response was unkind. In fact, I think of it as >respectful. I am willing to go to the same level as Charlie, who >exploded into this conversation with a hostile attack out of >nowhere. And if you don't find " are you a toxicologist? " and his >sneering about experiments to be hostile, a far cry from reasoned >discussion, then we will just have to differ. Actually Dave, I was responding to your comment: " Yeah, she's wrong. No matter how much you give the body still gets rid of it in four hours. So what she is doing is dangerous " remark. I was simply asking if you were a toxicologist as the information you are promulgating is simply not accurate and you seemed so sure that it was that maybe it was me that was wrong. My point is that newbies count on you to receive information that is factual and promulgating anything less actually does a disservice and provides cannon fodder for Jim Laidler. You may think I'm an asshole and I really could care less. If it wasn't for good folks giving me accurate information, my son would still be on the spectrum. Charlie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.