Guest guest Posted July 17, 2007 Report Share Posted July 17, 2007 Hair analysis tests should never be used as a definite go by. You can be very heavy metal toxic and still show low levels on a hair analysis test. This means you are not able to excrete metals as effectively compared to someone who shows high levels on a hair test. Rather the distribution of minerals should be analyzed to arrive at a conclusion of heavy metal toxicity along with other factors. > > Okay, so Andy's protocol that I've found here on this group > sounds smarter than the Pfeiffer metallathionein idea. Am I right? > When I'd learned about Pfeiffer, I thought it sounded like THE PLAN. > But now after re-analyzing my son's hair test with Andy's counting > rules, I'm not convinced he's mercury toxic. And if not, does that > mean his autism could be the effects of his arsenic overload? Arsenic- > induced autism? Just get in there with some ALA and get the metal out > of there? > Thanks, > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.