RE: Ok, fine..there's no autism epidemic..

[Guest guest]

I think this is a refreshing and logical way to look at autism. This may help

expedite progress in terms of research and prevention; maybe even a cure where

one is possible.....Anita

Sheri Nakken <vaccineinfo@...> wrote:

>From: Jagannath Chatterjee

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/there-is-no-autism-epidem_b...

There is No Autism Epidemic

Kirby.

It's been nearly two years since the release of my book, " Evidence of

Harm, Mercury in Vaccines and the Autism Epidemic - A Medical Controversy, "

and I continue to be vilified by critics who insist that mercury does not

cause autism, that autism is a stable genetic condition, and that it cannot

be an " epidemic. "

I am going to declare a New Year's truce, and announce that my critics are

100 percent correct.

This year, I hope we can ALL agree on one thing: There is no autism epidemic.

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

Would it be ok to forward this to a local autism support group in the

phoenix az area?

Deanne

_____

From: [mailto: ]

On Behalf Of Jagannath Chatterjee

Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:28 AM

alt_health_india ; healthg; healthgroup; healthgroup;

autism treatment ; healthgroup; healthgroup;

vaccinations ; healthgroup; healthgroup; healthgroup;

alternative_medicine_forum ;

health_and_healing ; medicalconspiraciesgooglegroups;

medicalconspiracies ; eoharm ; healthgroup;

healthgroup; healthgroup

Subject: [ ] Ok, fine..there's no autism epidemic..

http://www.huffingt

<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/there-is-no-autism-epidem_b...>

onpost.com/david-kirby/there-is-no-autism-epidem_b...

There is No Autism Epidemic

Kirby.

It's been nearly two years since the release of my book, " Evidence of Harm,

Mercury in Vaccines and the Autism Epidemic - A Medical Controversy, " and I

continue to be vilified by critics who insist that mercury does not cause

autism, that autism is a stable genetic

condition, and that it cannot be an " epidemic. "

I am going to declare a New Year's truce, and announce that my critics are

100 percent correct.

This year, I hope we can ALL agree on one thing: There is no autism

epidemic.

Among my most spirited and articulate detractors is a group of adults with

autism who belong to a movement that refers to itself as the

" neurodiversity " community.

These adults argue passionately that autism is neither a disease nor a

disorder, but rather a natural and special variation of the chance genetic

imprint left upon human behavior. Most of them, I believe, have what science

calls " Asperger's Syndrome, " or very high functioning

autism.

From their eloquent and well reasoned point of view, autism has no " cause, "

and it certainly requires no " cure. " To suggest otherwise is to brand these

adults with the stigma of disease and disability, which is patently absurd

given their educational and intellectual achievements.

It's like saying that left-handers or gays are deviant and need treatment -

something that reasonable people stopped doing years ago.

So maybe autism really is just an odd genetic peculiarity that yields

atypical people whose own set of talents and gifts can lead to perfectly

happy and fulfilled lives, with little or no dependence on others for their

survival.

If that's the case, then autism has always been with us at some steady, but

largely overlooked rate. Growing awareness and better diagnostics have

certainly helped us identify and count more people with the condition, who

might have been mislabeled as " quirky " or " nerdy " a decade ago.

But if that's autism, then the kids that I have met suffer from some other

condition entirely. When I talk about " curing " autism, I am not talking

about curing the " neurodiverse. "

I am talking about kids who begin talking and then, suddenly, never say

another word.

I'm talking about kids who may never learn to read, write, tie their shoes

or fall in love.

I'm talking about kids who sometimes wail in torture at three in the morning

because something inside them hurts like a burning coal, but they can't say

what or where it is.

I'm talking about kids who can barely keep food in their inflamed,

distressed guts, and when they do, it winds up in rivers of diarrhea or

swirls of feces spread on a favorite carpet or pet (no one said this kind of

" autism " was pretty).

I'm talking about kids who escape from their home in a blaze of alarms, only

to be found hours later, freezing, alone and wandering the Interstate.

I'm talking about kids who have bitten their mother so hard and so often,

they are on a first name basis at the emergency room.

I'm talking about kids who spin like fireworks until they fall and crack

their heads, kids who will play with a pencil but not with their sister,

kids who stare at nothing and scream at everything and don't even realize it

when their dad comes home from work.

These are the kids I want to see cured. And I don't believe they have

" autism. "

Scientists tell us that 1-in-104 American boys are currently diagnosed with

some form of autism spectrum disorder. But the mildest, " high functioning "

forms of autism have seemingly little in common with the most severe or even

moderate cases.

My hunch (and yes, that is all it is) is that most of these kids do not have

" autism " at all, and it's probably time we started calling it something

else.

American kids are in huge trouble. One in six has a learning disability.

Asthma, diabetes, allergies and arthritis are ravaging their bodies in

growing numbers. And little of this is due to " better diagnostics " or

" greater awareness. "

It can only be attributed to radical changes in our environment over the

last 10-20 years. There is something, or more likely some things in our

modern air, water, food and drugs that are making genetically susceptible

children sick, and we need to find out what they are.

Mercury remains a logical candidate for contributing to " autism spectrum

disorders, " either alone or in combination with other environmental insults.

Mercury exposure can kill brain cells. It can cause loss of speech and eye

contact, digestive and immune dysfunction,

social withdrawal and anxiety, and repetitive and self-injurious behaviors.

So maybe we should leave the autistics in peace and focus on these

environmentally toxic kids and what it is that ails them.

Maybe what these kids have is not autism, but something like, say,

" Environmentally-acquired Neuroimmune Disorder, " which we could call E.N.D.

(Great slogan: " Let's End E.N.D.).

Maybe that would explain why a recent CDC-funded study of the San Francisco

Bay Area showed that kids with " autism " were 50% more likely to be born in

neighborhoods with high levels of airborne toxins, especially mercury. If a

second study underway in Baltimore yields

similar data, it will be that much harder to defend the " better diagnosis "

argument, (other studies have shown an association between autism rates and

proximity to coal-fired power plants).

So maybe what we have here is just a semantic failure to communicate.

Columbus thought he had met " Indians, " and we only recently began to use the

term " Native American. "

Columbus was not in the Indies, mercury doesn't cause autism, and there is

no autism epidemic

" We have allowed (the drugs) industry to subvert the rules of science. We

have watched quietly as governments and academics have colluded with

industry to hide information critical to our patients. We have remained

silent as our medical schools have churned out graduates who have no

knowledge of the dilemmas and scandals of medicine. We have allowed many of

our medical journals to become corrupted and timid, " - Dr Aubrey Blumsohn

__________________________________________________