Re: Hair Elements Test - Need Interpretation Input and Suggestions

[Guest guest]

Your hair test did not go through. Most ASD kids show LOW mercury excretion or

none at all, that's the problem. Also unless there is orderly mineral transport

the toxic elements are not reliable, except for lead.

People who accumulate mercury often accumulate aluminum with it. When the

mercury leaves so will the aluminum.

[ ] Hair Elements Test - Need Interpretation Input and

Suggestions

Dear Listers,

Below are the results of my nine-year-old grandson’s hair elements test from

Doctor’s Data:

In the section “Potentially Toxic Elementsâ€, all are in normal range

except

for Aluminum which should be below 8.0 and was 23, at the farthest right of

the yellow zone.

We have been wracking our brains to try and figure out where the Al comes

from as we have tried to eliminate sources for more than a year and a half

since

our last hair test after the removal from all metal dental work from his

mouth.

We started hair testing because we suspected Mercury toxicity but the level

on this test is 0.08 (reference range

[Guest guest]

" We have been wracking our brains to try and figure out where the Al comes

from as we have tried to eliminate sources for more than a year and a half since

our last hair test after the removal from all metal dental work from his mouth. "

I recently requested the MSDS (materials safety data sheet) of some composites I

had placed in my teeth a couple years ago. They contained aluminum. You might

want to look into what they replaced the mercury with.

-Olif

[Guest guest]

Try posting them again using the template Moria created.

S S

<p>Dear Listers,<br>

<br>

Below are the results of my nine-year-old grandson’s hair elements test from

<br>

Doctor’s Data:<br>

<br>

In the section “Potentially Toxic Elements�, all are in normal range except

<br>

for Aluminum which should be below 8.0 and was 23, at the farthest right of <br>

the yellow zone.<br>

<br>

We have been wracking our brains to try and figure out where the Al comes <br>

from as we have tried to eliminate sources for more than a year and a half since

<br>

our last hair test after the removal from all metal dental work from his

mouth.<br>

<br>

We started hair testing because we suspected Mercury toxicity but the level <br>

on this test is 0.08 (reference range <br>

_______________________________________________

Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com

The most personalized portal on the Web!

[Guest guest]

Also it is in just about all foods that use commerical baking

powder.

Unless you purchase all natural products or organics or stuff that

specifically says.. " aluminum free baking powder " .

Most foods come packaged in containers that are sealed with aluminum

such as pudding cups. Yes, composites as well. Vaccines, baking

pans, processed cheese is high in al also,

and if your chelating it could be that subsequent hair tests are

high due to dumping aluminum. See Dana's site for sources of Al.

>

> " We have been wracking our brains to try and figure out where the

Al comes

> from as we have tried to eliminate sources for more than a year

and a half since

> our last hair test after the removal from all metal dental work

from his mouth. "

>

> I recently requested the MSDS (materials safety data sheet) of

some composites I had placed in my teeth a couple years ago. They

contained aluminum. You might want to look into what they replaced

the mercury with.

>

> -Olif

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Please post the complete test result for an accurate interpretation.

There are many things that must be looked at to determine mercury

toxicity. If he is 9 years old and received vaccinations, his baby

vaccines would have contained mercury. So it is very likely it's

there. He may show normal range toxic elements but the real clue is

in what his essential minerals look like. He is very high in

aluminum though.

O

>

> Dear Listers,

>

> Below are the results of my nine-year-old grandson’s hair

elements test from

> Doctor’s Data:

>

> In the section “Potentially Toxic Elementsâ€, all are in normal

range except

> for Aluminum which should be below 8.0 and was 23, at the farthest

right of

> the yellow zone.

>

> We have been wracking our brains to try and figure out where the

Al comes

> from as we have tried to eliminate sources for more than a year

and a half since

> our last hair test after the removal from all metal dental work

from his mouth.

>

> We started hair testing because we suspected Mercury toxicity but

the level

> on this test is 0.08 (reference range

>

>

>