Re: Hair test result after 1.5 years on BioMed, what does this mean?

April 26, 2007

We really need to see the essential elements. Did/does he meet the counting

rules? Have you identified and reduced/removed sources of exposure to antimony

& arsenic? What biomed have you been doing? Looks like he's heading in the

right direction.

S S

Hello, I got my son (4 y.o.) the second hair test result back

after

1.5 years on BioMed intervention. To my surprise, most of them are in

green zone now, except antimony and arsenic. Especialy, mercury was in

red zone in the first test, now it is in green zone. Also the total

toxic representation was almost reach the end of red zone, but now it

is just in the beginning of yellow zone. During BioMed, we do get high

mercury pull, even now I believe he is still dumping mercury. Just two

weeks ago, UTM shows mercury still in middle of yellow zone. What does

this really mean? Does this mean we are reaching the end of chelation?

I'm waiting for French lab testing to see how it is. I will be really

appreciated any comments. Thanks. Wenwei

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Second Hair testing result on April 23 2007: POTENTIALLY TOXIC

ELEMENTS

element result ref range color

====================================================

aluminum 3.6 < 8.0 green

antimony 0.073 < 0.066 yellow

arsenic 0.14 < 0.080 yellow

beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

bismuth 0.071 < 2.00 green

cadmium 0.097 < 0.15 green

lead 0.35 < 1.0 green

mercury 0.36 < 0.40 green

platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

uranium 0.008 < 0.060 green

nickel 0.07 < 0.40 green

silver 0.09 < 0.20 green

tin 0.17 < 0.30 green

titanium 0.58 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic representation:

just reach the start of yellow zone

========================================================

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

First Hair testing result on November 15 2005 POTENTIALLY TOXIC

ELEMENTS

element result ref range color

====================================================

aluminum 3.9 < 8.0 green

antimony 0.11 < 0.066 yellow

arsenic 0.12 < 0.080 yellow

beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

bismuth 0.048 < 0.13 green

cadmium 0.20 < 0.15 yellow

lead 1.1 < 1.0 yellow

mercury 2.2 < 0.40 red

platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

uranium 0.016 < 0.060 green

nickel 0.14 < 0.40 green

silver 0.08 < 0.20 green

tin 0.42 < 0.30 yellow

titanium 0.67 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic representation:

almost reach the end of red zone

========================================================

April 26, 2007

,

Thanks for your comments. Here is essential elements of second test

and first test.

We are doing mainly Dr. Amy Yasko protocol, invested $$$$ in it.

I haven't learn the counting rule yet, even though I bought Andy's

book.

Appreciate any further comments.

Thanks.

Wenwei

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Second test: ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS April 23 2007

element result ref range color under/over 50%

============================================================

Calcium 242 125- 370 green over 50% (green)

Magnesium 34 12- 30 yellow over 50% (yellow)

Sodium 790 12- 90 red over 50% (red)

Potassium 580 12- 40 red over 50% (red)

Copper 8.0 8.0- 16 green under 50% (green)

Zinc 130 100- 190 yellow 50% (white)

Manganese 0.13 0.20- 0.55 green under 50% (yellow)

Chromium 0.39 0.26- 0.50 yellow over 50% (green)

Vanadium 0.025 0.030- 0.10 green under 50% (yellow)

Molybdenum 0.120 0.050- 0.13 white over 50% (green)

Boron 7.6 0.60- 4.0 red over 50% (yellow)

Iodine 0.47 0.25- 1.3 green under 50% (green)

Lithium 0.22 0.007- 0.023 green over 50% (red)

Phosphorus 247 160- 250 green over 50% (green)

Selenium 0.74 0.95- 1.7 green under 50% (yellow)

Strontium 0.53 0.16- 1.0 green over 50% (green)

Sulfur 46000 45500- 53000 yellow under 50% (green)

Barium 0.44 0.16- 0.80 yellow over 50% (green)

Cobalt 0.004 0.013- 0.035 yellow under 50% (red)

Iron 8.6 8.0- 19 green under 50% (green)

Germanium 0.038 0.045- 0.065 yellow under 50% (yellow)

Rubidium 0.78 0.016- 0.18 red over 50% (red)

Zirconium 0.12 0.040- 1.0 white under 50% (green)

============================================================

Methodoloy: ICP-MS

RATIOS

========================================

ELEMENTS RATIOS EXPECTED RANGE

Ca/Mg 7.12 4- 30

Ca/P 0.98 0.8- 8

Na/K 1.36 0.5- 10

Zn/Cu 16.3 4- 20

Zn/Cd >999 > 800

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FIRST: ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS November 15 2005

element result ref range color under/over 50%

============================================================

Calcium 347 125- 370 green over 50%

Magnesium 34 12- 30 yellow over 50%

Sodium 720 12- 90 red over 50%

Potassium 830 12- 40 red over 50%

Copper 8.4 8.0- 16 green under 50%

Zinc 96 100- 190 yellow under 50%

Manganese 0.21 0.20- 0.55 green under 50%

Chromium 0.58 0.26- 0.50 yellow over 50%

Vanadium 0.088 0.030- 0.10 green over 50%

Molybdenum 0.078 0.050- 0.13 white under 50%

Boron 11 0.60- 4.0 red over 50%

Iodine 0.92 0.25- 1.3 green over 50%

Lithium 0.016 0.007- 0.023 green over 50%

Phosphorus 177 160- 250 green under 50%

Selenium 1.0 0.95- 1.7 green under 50%

Strontium 1.1 0.16- 1.0 green over 50%

Sulfur 43700 45500- 53000 yellow under 50%

Barium 1.0 0.16- 0.80 yellow over 50%

Cobalt 0.008 0.013- 0.035 yellow under 50%

Iron 8.5 8.0- 19 green under 50%

Germanium 0.033 0.045- 0.065 yellow under 50%

Rubidium 0.89 0.016- 0.18 red over 50%

Zirconium 0.28 0.040- 1.0 white under 50%

============================================================

Methodoloy: ICP-MS

RATIOS

========================================

ELEMENTS RATIOS EXPECTED RANGE

Ca/Mg 10.2 4- 30

Ca/P 1.96 0.8- 8

Na/K 0.867 0.5- 10

Zn/Cu 11.4 4- 20

Zn/Cd 480 > 800

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>

> Hello, I got my son (4 y.o.) the second hair test

result back after

> 1.5 years on BioMed intervention. To my surprise, most of them

are in

> green zone now, except antimony and arsenic. Especialy, mercury was

in

> red zone in the first test, now it is in green zone. Also the total

> toxic representation was almost reach the end of red zone, but now

it

> is just in the beginning of yellow zone. During BioMed, we do get

high

> mercury pull, even now I believe he is still dumping mercury. Just

two

> weeks ago, UTM shows mercury still in middle of yellow zone. What

does

> this really mean? Does this mean we are reaching the end of

chelation?

> I'm waiting for French lab testing to see how it is. I will be

really

> appreciated any comments. Thanks. Wenwei

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> Second Hair testing result on April 23 2007: POTENTIALLY

TOXIC

> ELEMENTS

> element result ref range color

> ====================================================

> aluminum 3.6 < 8.0 green

> antimony 0.073 < 0.066 yellow

> arsenic 0.14 < 0.080 yellow

> beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

> bismuth 0.071 < 2.00 green

> cadmium 0.097 < 0.15 green

> lead 0.35 < 1.0 green

> mercury 0.36 < 0.40 green

> platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

> thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

> thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

> uranium 0.008 < 0.060 green

> nickel 0.07 < 0.40 green

> silver 0.09 < 0.20 green

> tin 0.17 < 0.30 green

> titanium 0.58 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic

representation:

> just reach the start of yellow zone

> ========================================================

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> First Hair testing result on November 15 2005 POTENTIALLY

TOXIC

> ELEMENTS

> element result ref range color

> ====================================================

> aluminum 3.9 < 8.0 green

> antimony 0.11 < 0.066 yellow

> arsenic 0.12 < 0.080 yellow

> beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

> bismuth 0.048 < 0.13 green

> cadmium 0.20 < 0.15 yellow

> lead 1.1 < 1.0 yellow

> mercury 2.2 < 0.40 red

> platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

> thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

> thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

> uranium 0.016 < 0.060 green

> nickel 0.14 < 0.40 green

> silver 0.08 < 0.20 green

> tin 0.42 < 0.30 yellow

> titanium 0.67 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic

representation:

> almost reach the end of red zone

> ========================================================

>

April 26, 2007

Wenwei,

Both of these tests meet the counting rules (4 or more in red).

Both have Na/Mg very high - means producing a lot of adrenaline.

Anything containing tyrosine or phenylalanine should be avoided.

Both have K/Ca high - this could indicate a thyroid problem.

Serum testing will tell you more.

I don't think you can conclude anything about the difference

in the toxics. Excretion of toxics in the hair varies. The hair

tests (both) say you have a heavy metal problem. You need to

chelate a lot to get rid of it.

--

> >

> > Hello, I got my son (4 y.o.) the second hair test

> result back after

> > 1.5 years on BioMed intervention. To my surprise, most of them

> are in

> > green zone now, except antimony and arsenic. Especialy, mercury was

> in

> > red zone in the first test, now it is in green zone. Also the total

> > toxic representation was almost reach the end of red zone, but now

> it

> > is just in the beginning of yellow zone. During BioMed, we do get

> high

> > mercury pull, even now I believe he is still dumping mercury. Just

> two

> > weeks ago, UTM shows mercury still in middle of yellow zone. What

> does

> > this really mean? Does this mean we are reaching the end of

> chelation?

> > I'm waiting for French lab testing to see how it is. I will be

> really

> > appreciated any comments. Thanks. Wenwei

> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> > Second Hair testing result on April 23 2007: POTENTIALLY

> TOXIC

> > ELEMENTS

> > element result ref range color

> > ====================================================

> > aluminum 3.6 < 8.0 green

> > antimony 0.073 < 0.066 yellow

> > arsenic 0.14 < 0.080 yellow

> > beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

> > bismuth 0.071 < 2.00 green

> > cadmium 0.097 < 0.15 green

> > lead 0.35 < 1.0 green

> > mercury 0.36 < 0.40 green

> > platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

> > thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

> > thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

> > uranium 0.008 < 0.060 green

> > nickel 0.07 < 0.40 green

> > silver 0.09 < 0.20 green

> > tin 0.17 < 0.30 green

> > titanium 0.58 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic

> representation:

> > just reach the start of yellow zone

> > ========================================================

> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> > First Hair testing result on November 15 2005 POTENTIALLY

> TOXIC

> > ELEMENTS

> > element result ref range color

> > ====================================================

> > aluminum 3.9 < 8.0 green

> > antimony 0.11 < 0.066 yellow

> > arsenic 0.12 < 0.080 yellow

> > beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

> > bismuth 0.048 < 0.13 green

> > cadmium 0.20 < 0.15 yellow

> > lead 1.1 < 1.0 yellow

> > mercury 2.2 < 0.40 red

> > platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

> > thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

> > thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

> > uranium 0.016 < 0.060 green

> > nickel 0.14 < 0.40 green

> > silver 0.08 < 0.20 green

> > tin 0.42 < 0.30 yellow

> > titanium 0.67 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic

> representation:

> > almost reach the end of red zone

> > ========================================================

> >

April 26, 2007

,

Thanks for your comments. I got pophyrin test result back, it shows

high elevated mercury as well.

Regarding Na/Mg & K/Ca are very high, what protocol make you saying

that? What to do for thyroid problem?

Thanks.

Wenwei

> > >

> > > Hello, I got my son (4 y.o.) the second hair test

> > result back after

> > > 1.5 years on BioMed intervention. To my surprise, most of

them

> > are in

> > > green zone now, except antimony and arsenic. Especialy, mercury

was

> > in

> > > red zone in the first test, now it is in green zone. Also the

total

> > > toxic representation was almost reach the end of red zone, but

now

> > it

> > > is just in the beginning of yellow zone. During BioMed, we do

get

> > high

> > > mercury pull, even now I believe he is still dumping mercury.

Just

> > two

> > > weeks ago, UTM shows mercury still in middle of yellow zone.

What

> > does

> > > this really mean? Does this mean we are reaching the end of

> > chelation?

> > > I'm waiting for French lab testing to see how it is. I will

be

> > really

> > > appreciated any comments. Thanks. Wenwei

> > >

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> > > Second Hair testing result on April 23 2007: POTENTIALLY

> > TOXIC

> > > ELEMENTS

> > > element result ref range color

> > > ====================================================

> > > aluminum 3.6 < 8.0 green

> > > antimony 0.073 < 0.066 yellow

> > > arsenic 0.14 < 0.080 yellow

> > > beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

> > > bismuth 0.071 < 2.00 green

> > > cadmium 0.097 < 0.15 green

> > > lead 0.35 < 1.0 green

> > > mercury 0.36 < 0.40 green

> > > platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

> > > thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

> > > thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

> > > uranium 0.008 < 0.060 green

> > > nickel 0.07 < 0.40 green

> > > silver 0.09 < 0.20 green

> > > tin 0.17 < 0.30 green

> > > titanium 0.58 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic

> > representation:

> > > just reach the start of yellow zone

> > > ========================================================

> > >

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> > > First Hair testing result on November 15 2005

POTENTIALLY

> > TOXIC

> > > ELEMENTS

> > > element result ref range color

> > > ====================================================

> > > aluminum 3.9 < 8.0 green

> > > antimony 0.11 < 0.066 yellow

> > > arsenic 0.12 < 0.080 yellow

> > > beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

> > > bismuth 0.048 < 0.13 green

> > > cadmium 0.20 < 0.15 yellow

> > > lead 1.1 < 1.0 yellow

> > > mercury 2.2 < 0.40 red

> > > platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

> > > thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

> > > thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

> > > uranium 0.016 < 0.060 green

> > > nickel 0.14 < 0.40 green

> > > silver 0.08 < 0.20 green

> > > tin 0.42 < 0.30 yellow

> > > titanium 0.67 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic

> > representation:

> > > almost reach the end of red zone

> > > ========================================================

> > >

April 27, 2007

The information on the Na/Mg and K/Ca ratios comes from

Andy Cutler's book:

http://www.noamalgam.com/hairtestbook.html

I think you also have an adrenal sign on both tests. This is the

pattern with very elevated sodium and potassium (Na and K) and

noticeably lower calcium and magnesium (Ca and Mg). This is also

discussed in Andy's book. Adrenal cortex extract can help - it can

reduce hyper behavior, irritability, etc. Lots of parents here have

used this and can offer input.

For thyroid, the hair test only suggests there is a problem, you

need blood tests to verify exactly the nature of the problem (hypo

or hyper, etc) and how to treat it. The tests needed are TSH, free

T3, free T4, and thyroid antibodies. Very important to ask for

those specific tests because most doctors do not test the frees.

Other parents here have done thyroid testing and treated with thyroid

hormones. They can advise you better than I can on the details of

testing and what to do as far as treatment. You can also find more

information by searching the archives.

--

> > > >

> > > > Hello, I got my son (4 y.o.) the second hair test

> > > result back after

> > > > 1.5 years on BioMed intervention. To my surprise, most of

> them

> > > are in

> > > > green zone now, except antimony and arsenic. Especialy, mercury

> was

> > > in

> > > > red zone in the first test, now it is in green zone. Also the

> total

> > > > toxic representation was almost reach the end of red zone, but

> now

> > > it

> > > > is just in the beginning of yellow zone. During BioMed, we do

> get

> > > high

> > > > mercury pull, even now I believe he is still dumping mercury.

> Just

> > > two

> > > > weeks ago, UTM shows mercury still in middle of yellow zone.

> What

> > > does

> > > > this really mean? Does this mean we are reaching the end of

> > > chelation?

> > > > I'm waiting for French lab testing to see how it is. I will

> be

> > > really

> > > > appreciated any comments. Thanks. Wenwei

> > > >

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> > > > Second Hair testing result on April 23 2007: POTENTIALLY

> > > TOXIC

> > > > ELEMENTS

> > > > element result ref range color

> > > > ====================================================

> > > > aluminum 3.6 < 8.0 green

> > > > antimony 0.073 < 0.066 yellow

> > > > arsenic 0.14 < 0.080 yellow

> > > > beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

> > > > bismuth 0.071 < 2.00 green

> > > > cadmium 0.097 < 0.15 green

> > > > lead 0.35 < 1.0 green

> > > > mercury 0.36 < 0.40 green

> > > > platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

> > > > thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

> > > > thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

> > > > uranium 0.008 < 0.060 green

> > > > nickel 0.07 < 0.40 green

> > > > silver 0.09 < 0.20 green

> > > > tin 0.17 < 0.30 green

> > > > titanium 0.58 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic

> > > representation:

> > > > just reach the start of yellow zone

> > > > ========================================================

> > > >

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> > > > First Hair testing result on November 15 2005

> POTENTIALLY

> > > TOXIC

> > > > ELEMENTS

> > > > element result ref range color

> > > > ====================================================

> > > > aluminum 3.9 < 8.0 green

> > > > antimony 0.11 < 0.066 yellow

> > > > arsenic 0.12 < 0.080 yellow

> > > > beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

> > > > bismuth 0.048 < 0.13 green

> > > > cadmium 0.20 < 0.15 yellow

> > > > lead 1.1 < 1.0 yellow

> > > > mercury 2.2 < 0.40 red

> > > > platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

> > > > thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

> > > > thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

> > > > uranium 0.016 < 0.060 green

> > > > nickel 0.14 < 0.40 green

> > > > silver 0.08 < 0.20 green

> > > > tin 0.42 < 0.30 yellow

> > > > titanium 0.67 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic

> > > representation:

> > > > almost reach the end of red zone

> > > > ========================================================

> > > >

April 27, 2007

> antimony 0.073 < 0.066 yellow

> arsenic 0.14 < 0.080 yellow

Consider removing sources of current exposures

http://www.danasview.net/metals.htm

Dana

April 27, 2007

Wenwei,

Are you chelating your son? If so, at what point did you run the

porphyrin test, i.e. how long after a chelation round?

Thanks,

Anne

> > > >

> > > > Hello, I got my son (4 y.o.) the second hair

test

> > > result back after

> > > > 1.5 years on BioMed intervention. To my surprise, most of

> them

> > > are in

> > > > green zone now, except antimony and arsenic. Especialy,

mercury

> was

> > > in

> > > > red zone in the first test, now it is in green zone. Also the

> total

> > > > toxic representation was almost reach the end of red zone,

but

> now

> > > it

> > > > is just in the beginning of yellow zone. During BioMed, we

do

> get

> > > high

> > > > mercury pull, even now I believe he is still dumping mercury.

> Just

> > > two

> > > > weeks ago, UTM shows mercury still in middle of yellow

zone.

> What

> > > does

> > > > this really mean? Does this mean we are reaching the end of

> > > chelation?

> > > > I'm waiting for French lab testing to see how it is. I will

> be

> > > really

> > > > appreciated any comments. Thanks. Wenwei

> > > >

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> > > > Second Hair testing result on April 23 2007:

POTENTIALLY

> > > TOXIC

> > > > ELEMENTS

> > > > element result ref range color

> > > > ====================================================

> > > > aluminum 3.6 < 8.0 green

> > > > antimony 0.073 < 0.066 yellow

> > > > arsenic 0.14 < 0.080 yellow

> > > > beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

> > > > bismuth 0.071 < 2.00 green

> > > > cadmium 0.097 < 0.15 green

> > > > lead 0.35 < 1.0 green

> > > > mercury 0.36 < 0.40 green

> > > > platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

> > > > thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

> > > > thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

> > > > uranium 0.008 < 0.060 green

> > > > nickel 0.07 < 0.40 green

> > > > silver 0.09 < 0.20 green

> > > > tin 0.17 < 0.30 green

> > > > titanium 0.58 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic

> > > representation:

> > > > just reach the start of yellow zone

> > > > ========================================================

> > > >

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> > > > First Hair testing result on November 15 2005

> POTENTIALLY

> > > TOXIC

> > > > ELEMENTS

> > > > element result ref range color

> > > > ====================================================

> > > > aluminum 3.9 < 8.0 green

> > > > antimony 0.11 < 0.066 yellow

> > > > arsenic 0.12 < 0.080 yellow

> > > > beryllium < 0.01 < 0.020 green

> > > > bismuth 0.048 < 0.13 green

> > > > cadmium 0.20 < 0.15 yellow

> > > > lead 1.1 < 1.0 yellow

> > > > mercury 2.2 < 0.40 red

> > > > platinum < 0.003 < 0.005 green

> > > > thallium 0.001 < 0.010 green

> > > > thorium 0.001 < 0.005 green

> > > > uranium 0.016 < 0.060 green

> > > > nickel 0.14 < 0.40 green

> > > > silver 0.08 < 0.20 green

> > > > tin 0.42 < 0.30 yellow

> > > > titanium 0.67 < 1.0 green Toatl Toxic

> > > representation:

> > > > almost reach the end of red zone

> > > > ========================================================

> > > >

April 27, 2007

,

Thanks very much again for your comments. I have the book, and only read the

counting rules section so far! I'm surely need do my homework now.

For Adrenal cortex extract, which brand would you recommend? (I'm always

cautious about the quality of supplements.)

Anyone has suggestion for me regarding thyroid testing? Is it done in standard

lab for special lab?

Thanks.

Wenwei

[ ] Re: Hair test result after 1.5 years on BioMed, what

does this mean?