Guest guest Posted October 16, 2006 Report Share Posted October 16, 2006 > > dear all, > > i heard that ascorbic acid is not the best form of vit c. those > extracted from fruit are much better instead. > > i would like to know which form is better. > > thx. > It should make no difference. See http://www.vitamincfoundation.org/NaturalC.pdf Don't waste money on the much more expensive Ester-C. If the acidity of ascorbic acid is not preferred, acorbates may be seleced. Many people use baking soda + ascorbic acid to make their own Sodium ascorbate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2006 Report Share Posted October 16, 2006 C is pretty much C. As long as you choose a supplement that is natural and does not have anything funny added to it. We use ascorbic acid, which works great. > > dear all, > > i heard that ascorbic acid is not the best form of vit c. those > extracted from fruit are much better instead. > > i would like to know which form is better. > > thx. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2006 Report Share Posted October 16, 2006 Ascorbic acid is not vitamin C contrary to popular opinion. Ascorbic acid is an isolate, a fraction, a distillate of naturally occurring vitamin C. In addition to ascorbic acid, vitamin C must include rutin, bioflavonoids, Factor K, Factor J, Factor P, Tyrosinase, Ascorbinogen, and other components. Please read the link below to understand why Vitamin C must come from a whole food source, otherwise it is useless. Roe http://thedoctorwithin.com/index_fr.php?page=articles/whole_food_vitamins.php ~ Roe v | The greatest gift one can give is the gift of health! v | U U U U U U ~ God is GOOD and Jesus is coming! ~ --------------------------------- All-new - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2006 Report Share Posted October 16, 2006 > > Ascorbic acid is not vitamin C It is according to the Merck Index. http://www.merck.com/mmhe/print/sec12/ch154/ch154l.html http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ascorbic%20acid >contrary to popular opinion. Ascorbic acid is an isolate, a fraction, a distillate of naturally occurring vitamin C. In addition to ascorbic acid, vitamin C must include rutin, bioflavonoids, Factor K, Factor J, Factor P, Tyrosinase, Ascorbinogen, and other components. Please read the link below to understand why Vitamin C must come from a whole food source, otherwise it is useless. Are you saying that ascorbic acid is not an an antioxidant? Try putting some pure ascorbic acid powder on an apple slice, and leave another apple slice open to the air. How come the one open to the air turns brown and the one with ascorbic acid doesn't? Sure, in whole foods ingredients come in whole packages with all sorts of useful things that interact and work together. When we supplement with ascorbic acid we are adding extra antioxidant power (and we need lots) and assuming that people are still eating whole foods too for all those extra components. J Roe > > http://thedoctorwithin.com/index_fr.php?page=articles/whole_food_vitamins.php > > > ~ Roe > > v | The greatest gift one can give is the gift of health! v | > > U U U U U U > > ~ God is GOOD and Jesus is coming! ~ > > > --------------------------------- > All-new - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2006 Report Share Posted October 17, 2006 The debate about whether ascorbic acid is vitamin C is made up by the purveyors of whole food supplements. Vitamin C and Ascorbic Acid are one and the same. But having said that is a whole food supplement with ascorbic acid, bioflavanoids and the other co-factors better? The answer is mostly yes except the cost goes up proportionally. The comment that " Vitamin C must come from a whole food source, otherwise it is useless " is blatantly wrong. Mark Schauss www.MarkSchauss.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of lindajaytee Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 10:27 PM Subject: [ ] Re: the best form of vitamin C > > Ascorbic acid is not vitamin C It is according to the Merck Index. http://www.merck. <http://www.merck.com/mmhe/print/sec12/ch154/ch154l.html> com/mmhe/print/sec12/ch154/ch154l.html http://dictionary. <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ascorbic%20acid> reference.com/browse/ascorbic%20acid >contrary to popular opinion. Ascorbic acid is an isolate, a fraction, a distillate of naturally occurring vitamin C. In addition to ascorbic acid, vitamin C must include rutin, bioflavonoids, Factor K, Factor J, Factor P, Tyrosinase, Ascorbinogen, and other components. Please read the link below to understand why Vitamin C must come from a whole food source, otherwise it is useless. Are you saying that ascorbic acid is not an an antioxidant? Try putting some pure ascorbic acid powder on an apple slice, and leave another apple slice open to the air. How come the one open to the air turns brown and the one with ascorbic acid doesn't? Sure, in whole foods ingredients come in whole packages with all sorts of useful things that interact and work together. When we supplement with ascorbic acid we are adding extra antioxidant power (and we need lots) and assuming that people are still eating whole foods too for all those extra components. J Roe > > http://thedoctorwit <http://thedoctorwithin.com/index_fr.php?page=articles/whole_food_vitamins.p hp> hin.com/index_fr.php?page=articles/whole_food_vitamins.php > > > ~ Roe > > v | The greatest gift one can give is the gift of health! v | > > U U U U U U > > ~ God is GOOD and Jesus is coming! ~ > > > --------------------------------- > All-new - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2006 Report Share Posted October 17, 2006 Are you saying that ascorbic acid is not an an antioxidant? No what I am saying is that ascorbic acid is NOT vitamin C. In order for you to understand this, one must understand Chemistry. In Chemistry there are many structures that are exactly the same, but can be different. One example that comes to mind is an isomer. ( FROM Wikipedia : In chemistry, isomers are molecules with the same chemical formula and often with the same kinds of bonds between atoms, but in which the atoms are arranged differently. That is to say, they have different structural formula. Many isomers share similar if not identical properties in most chemical contexts. ) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomer) Further, from Wikipedia Ascorbic acid is an organic acid with antioxidant properties. Its appearance is white to light yellow crystals or powder. It is water soluble. The L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid is commonly known as vitamin C. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid) Vitamin C is a weak acid, called ascorbic acid or a salt ascorbate. It is the L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid. The D-enantiomer shows no biological activity. Both are mirror image forms of the same chemical molecular structure (see optical isomers). As stated, Ascorbic acid has antioxidan properties. What I am saying is that one is wasting their money on pure ascorbic acid. Most of it is just passed through the body in our urine. It is not absorbed and it is not natural. One would be MUCH better off supplementing with a whole food antioxident and NOT ascorbic acid. I know our DAN! Doctor tried to get us to take an expensive powder of ascorbic acid, but I declined as I know too much chemistry to agree with that school of thought. Sorry, I don't mean to seem pedantic, but I think people REALLY need to be informed and research these supplements and " theories " before jumping into action. Because I have the background, I spend a lot of time researching things. The links that you have given are really an incorrect definition of Vitamin C, but suitable for the general public. And by NO means am I disputing that we all need lots of Vitamin C, but is should be naturally - NOT synthetic like ascorbic acid. Roe PS. Try the same experiement with apple slices and PURE lemon juice (squeezed from a lemon) and ascorbic acid powder...guess what the PURE lemon juice will not turn brown even longer than the ascorbic acid powdered apple. ~ Roe v | The greatest gift one can give is the gift of health! v | U U U U U U ~ God is GOOD and Jesus is coming! ~ --------------------------------- All-new - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2006 Report Share Posted October 17, 2006 Mark is absolutely right. The article posted on this board earlier was totally inaccurate and misleading. [ ] Re: the best form of vitamin C > > Ascorbic acid is not vitamin C It is according to the Merck Index. http://www.merck. <http://www.merck.com/mmhe/print/sec12/ch154/ch154l.html> com/mmhe/print/sec12/ch154/ch154l.html http://dictionary. <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ascorbic%20acid> reference.com/browse/ascorbic%20acid >contrary to popular opinion. Ascorbic acid is an isolate, a fraction, a distillate of naturally occurring vitamin C. In addition to ascorbic acid, vitamin C must include rutin, bioflavonoids, Factor K, Factor J, Factor P, Tyrosinase, Ascorbinogen, and other components. Please read the link below to understand why Vitamin C must come from a whole food source, otherwise it is useless. Are you saying that ascorbic acid is not an an antioxidant? Try putting some pure ascorbic acid powder on an apple slice, and leave another apple slice open to the air. How come the one open to the air turns brown and the one with ascorbic acid doesn't? Sure, in whole foods ingredients come in whole packages with all sorts of useful things that interact and work together. When we supplement with ascorbic acid we are adding extra antioxidant power (and we need lots) and assuming that people are still eating whole foods too for all those extra components. J Roe > > http://thedoctorwit <http://thedoctorwithin.com/index_fr.php?page=articles/whole_food_vitamins.p hp> hin.com/index_fr.php?page=articles/whole_food_vitamins.php > > > ~ Roe > > v | The greatest gift one can give is the gift of health! v | > > U U U U U U > > ~ God is GOOD and Jesus is coming! ~ > > > --------------------------------- > All-new - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2006 Report Share Posted October 17, 2006 Ascorbic acid is Vitamin C. What you are describing is Vitamin C with co-factors. None of the foods you mention have the same combination of bioflavanoids or other co-factors. So if say a lemon does not have any rutin in it does that mean it doesn't have any vitamin C? According to scientists, chemists and biochemists alike, when a food contains ascorbic acid it can be said to contain Vitamin C. There is no other definition available. If it does not contain any bioflavonoids but contains ascorbic acid it contains Vitamin C. If it only contains bioflavonoids but no ascorbic acid, it is not Vitamin C. Here are some links to further bolster my comments. http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=12420 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin If you look at that one you will see that the chemical name for Vitamin C is ascorbic acid. Vitamin A on the other hand can be a retinoid which includes retinol. C is different; it is and will always be synonymous with ascorbic acid. Mark Schauss www.MarkSchauss.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Roe Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:23 AM Subject: [ ] Re: the best form of vitamin C Are you saying that ascorbic acid is not an an antioxidant? No what I am saying is that ascorbic acid is NOT vitamin C. In order for you to understand this, one must understand Chemistry. In Chemistry there are many structures that are exactly the same, but can be different. One example that comes to mind is an isomer. ( FROM Wikipedia : In chemistry, isomers are molecules with the same chemical formula and often with the same kinds of bonds between atoms, but in which the atoms are arranged differently. That is to say, they have different structural formula. Many isomers share similar if not identical properties in most chemical contexts. ) (http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomer> .org/wiki/Isomer) Further, from Wikipedia Ascorbic acid is an organic acid with antioxidant properties. Its appearance is white to light yellow crystals or powder. It is water soluble. The L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid is commonly known as vitamin C. (http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> ..org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid) Vitamin C is a weak acid, called ascorbic acid or a salt ascorbate. It is the L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid. The D-enantiomer shows no biological activity. Both are mirror image forms of the same chemical molecular structure (see optical isomers). As stated, Ascorbic acid has antioxidan properties. What I am saying is that one is wasting their money on pure ascorbic acid. Most of it is just passed through the body in our urine. It is not absorbed and it is not natural. One would be MUCH better off supplementing with a whole food antioxident and NOT ascorbic acid. I know our DAN! Doctor tried to get us to take an expensive powder of ascorbic acid, but I declined as I know too much chemistry to agree with that school of thought. Sorry, I don't mean to seem pedantic, but I think people REALLY need to be informed and research these supplements and " theories " before jumping into action. Because I have the background, I spend a lot of time researching things. The links that you have given are really an incorrect definition of Vitamin C, but suitable for the general public. And by NO means am I disputing that we all need lots of Vitamin C, but is should be naturally - NOT synthetic like ascorbic acid. Roe PS. Try the same experiement with apple slices and PURE lemon juice (squeezed from a lemon) and ascorbic acid powder...guess what the PURE lemon juice will not turn brown even longer than the ascorbic acid powdered apple. ~ Roe v | The greatest gift one can give is the gift of health! v | U U U U U U ~ God is GOOD and Jesus is coming! ~ --------------------------------- All-new - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2006 Report Share Posted October 17, 2006 One can word it any way they want to, but the FACT remains that Vitamin C is NOT ascorbic acid! The L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid is commonly known as vitamin C. What does that mean? In chemistry <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry> , enantiomers are stereoisomers <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoisomer> that are mirror images <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_image> of each other. Much as a left and right hand <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality> are different but one is the mirror image of the other, enantiomers are stereoisomers whose molecules are nonsuperimposable mirror images of each other. Enantiomers have, when present in a symmetric environment, identical chemical and physical properties except for their ability to rotate plane <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plane_%28mathematics%29> -polarized light <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarized_light> by equal amounts but in opposite directions. Now you may be saying well that is the same thing! No it isn't there have been factual events when one chemical is non-toxic, but it's isomer is DEADLY. The FDA had problems with this in many drugs. You will notice that some companies will create an isomer to get around the patent issues and then in term patent their own isomer version. Unless you can prove it to me through Chemisty that Vit C is ascorbic acid, your arguments are nothing more than what politicians do to sway the public into believing false and inaccurate propaganda. I am not selling Vit C or ascorbic acid, I have nothing to gain from this, but I AM informing the public of the TRUE chemistry. Do your own research, look at the chemistry - NOT they hype. Do I need to further back up my statements as accurate? I can go into the molecular structure if needed.... Roe > > Ascorbic acid is Vitamin C. What you are describing is Vitamin C with > co-factors. None of the foods you mention have the same combination of > bioflavanoids or other co-factors. So if say a lemon does not have any > rutin in it does that mean it doesn't have any vitamin C? According to > scientists, chemists and biochemists alike, when a food contains ascorbic > acid it can be said to contain Vitamin C. There is no other definition > available. If it does not contain any bioflavonoids but contains ascorbic > acid it contains Vitamin C. If it only contains bioflavonoids but no > ascorbic acid, it is not Vitamin C. > > > > Here are some links to further bolster my comments. > > > > http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=12420 > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin > > If you look at that one you will see that the chemical name for Vitamin C is > ascorbic acid. Vitamin A on the other hand can be a retinoid which includes > retinol. C is different; it is and will always be synonymous with ascorbic > acid. > > > > Mark Schauss > > www.MarkSchauss.com > > > > _____ > > From: [mailto: ] > On Behalf Of Roe > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:23 AM > > Subject: [ ] Re: the best form of vitamin C > > > > Are you saying that ascorbic acid is not an an antioxidant? > > No what I am saying is that ascorbic acid is NOT vitamin C. In order for you > to understand this, one must understand Chemistry. In Chemistry there are > many structures that are exactly the same, but can be different. One example > that comes to mind is an isomer. ( FROM Wikipedia : In chemistry, isomers > are molecules with the same chemical formula and often with the same kinds > of bonds between atoms, but in which the atoms are arranged differently. > That is to say, they have different structural formula. Many isomers share > similar if not identical properties in most chemical contexts. ) > (http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomer> ..org/wiki/Isomer) > > Further, from Wikipedia Ascorbic acid is an organic acid with antioxidant > properties. Its appearance is white to light yellow crystals or powder. It > is water soluble. The L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid is commonly known as > vitamin C. (http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> > .org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid) > > Vitamin C is a weak acid, called ascorbic acid or a salt ascorbate. It is > the L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid. The D-enantiomer shows no biological > activity. Both are mirror image forms of the same chemical molecular > structure (see optical isomers). > > As stated, Ascorbic acid has antioxidan properties. What I am saying is that > one is wasting their money on pure ascorbic acid. Most of it is just passed > through the body in our urine. It is not absorbed and it is not natural. One > would be MUCH better off supplementing with a whole food antioxident and NOT > ascorbic acid. I know our DAN! Doctor tried to get us to take an expensive > powder of ascorbic acid, but I declined as I know too much chemistry to > agree with that school of thought. > > Sorry, I don't mean to seem pedantic, but I think people REALLY need to be > informed and research these supplements and " theories " before jumping into > action. Because I have the background, I spend a lot of time researching > things. > > The links that you have given are really an incorrect definition of Vitamin > C, but suitable for the general public. And by NO means am I disputing that > we all need lots of Vitamin C, but is should be naturally - NOT synthetic > like ascorbic acid. > > Roe > > PS. Try the same experiement with apple slices and PURE lemon juice > (squeezed from a lemon) and ascorbic acid powder...guess what the PURE lemon > juice will not turn brown even longer than the ascorbic acid powdered apple. > > > ~ Roe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2006 Report Share Posted October 17, 2006 Obviously nothing I can say, regardless of the scientific backup will sway your point of view. So everyone can make up their own mind from here. _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Roe Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:11 PM Subject: [ ] Re: the best form of vitamin C One can word it any way they want to, but the FACT remains that Vitamin C is NOT ascorbic acid! The L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid is commonly known as vitamin C. What does that mean? In chemistry <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry> ..org/wiki/Chemistry> , enantiomers are stereoisomers <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoisomer> .org/wiki/Stereoisomer> that are mirror images <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_image> .org/wiki/Mirror_image> of each other. Much as a left and right hand <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality> ..org/wiki/Chirality> are different but one is the mirror image of the other, enantiomers are stereoisomers whose molecules are nonsuperimposable mirror images of each other. Enantiomers have, when present in a symmetric environment, identical chemical and physical properties except for their ability to rotate plane <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plane_%28mathematics%29> ..org/wiki/Plane_%28mathematics%29> -polarized light <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarized_light> ..org/wiki/Polarized_light> by equal amounts but in opposite directions. Now you may be saying well that is the same thing! No it isn't there have been factual events when one chemical is non-toxic, but it's isomer is DEADLY. The FDA had problems with this in many drugs. You will notice that some companies will create an isomer to get around the patent issues and then in term patent their own isomer version. Unless you can prove it to me through Chemisty that Vit C is ascorbic acid, your arguments are nothing more than what politicians do to sway the public into believing false and inaccurate propaganda. I am not selling Vit C or ascorbic acid, I have nothing to gain from this, but I AM informing the public of the TRUE chemistry. Do your own research, look at the chemistry - NOT they hype. Do I need to further back up my statements as accurate? I can go into the molecular structure if needed.... Roe > > Ascorbic acid is Vitamin C. What you are describing is Vitamin C with > co-factors. None of the foods you mention have the same combination of > bioflavanoids or other co-factors. So if say a lemon does not have any > rutin in it does that mean it doesn't have any vitamin C? According to > scientists, chemists and biochemists alike, when a food contains ascorbic > acid it can be said to contain Vitamin C. There is no other definition > available. If it does not contain any bioflavonoids but contains ascorbic > acid it contains Vitamin C. If it only contains bioflavonoids but no > ascorbic acid, it is not Vitamin C. > > > > Here are some links to further bolster my comments. > > > > http://www.medterms <http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=12420> ..com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=12420 > > http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin> ..org/wiki/Vitamin > > If you look at that one you will see that the chemical name for Vitamin C is > ascorbic acid. Vitamin A on the other hand can be a retinoid which includes > retinol. C is different; it is and will always be synonymous with ascorbic > acid. > > > > Mark Schauss > > www.MarkSchauss.com > > > > _____ > > From: @ <mailto: %40> [mailto: @ <mailto: %40> ] > On Behalf Of Roe > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:23 AM > @ <mailto: %40> > Subject: [ ] Re: the best form of vitamin C > > > > Are you saying that ascorbic acid is not an an antioxidant? > > No what I am saying is that ascorbic acid is NOT vitamin C. In order for you > to understand this, one must understand Chemistry. In Chemistry there are > many structures that are exactly the same, but can be different. One example > that comes to mind is an isomer. ( FROM Wikipedia : In chemistry, isomers > are molecules with the same chemical formula and often with the same kinds > of bonds between atoms, but in which the atoms are arranged differently. > That is to say, they have different structural formula. Many isomers share > similar if not identical properties in most chemical contexts. ) > (http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomer> .org/wiki/Isomer> ..org/wiki/Isomer) > > Further, from Wikipedia Ascorbic acid is an organic acid with antioxidant > properties. Its appearance is white to light yellow crystals or powder. It > is water soluble. The L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid is commonly known as > vitamin C. (http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> ..org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> > .org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid) > > Vitamin C is a weak acid, called ascorbic acid or a salt ascorbate. It is > the L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid. The D-enantiomer shows no biological > activity. Both are mirror image forms of the same chemical molecular > structure (see optical isomers). > > As stated, Ascorbic acid has antioxidan properties. What I am saying is that > one is wasting their money on pure ascorbic acid. Most of it is just passed > through the body in our urine. It is not absorbed and it is not natural. One > would be MUCH better off supplementing with a whole food antioxident and NOT > ascorbic acid. I know our DAN! Doctor tried to get us to take an expensive > powder of ascorbic acid, but I declined as I know too much chemistry to > agree with that school of thought. > > Sorry, I don't mean to seem pedantic, but I think people REALLY need to be > informed and research these supplements and " theories " before jumping into > action. Because I have the background, I spend a lot of time researching > things. > > The links that you have given are really an incorrect definition of Vitamin > C, but suitable for the general public. And by NO means am I disputing that > we all need lots of Vitamin C, but is should be naturally - NOT synthetic > like ascorbic acid. > > Roe > > PS. Try the same experiement with apple slices and PURE lemon juice > (squeezed from a lemon) and ascorbic acid powder...guess what the PURE lemon > juice will not turn brown even longer than the ascorbic acid powdered apple. > > > ~ Roe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2006 Report Share Posted October 17, 2006 Er...so is my Vitamin C ascorbate (with buffered magnesium) by Biocare a good one then? then? > > > > Ascorbic acid is Vitamin C. What you are describing is Vitamin C with > > co-factors. None of the foods you mention have the same combination of > > bioflavanoids or other co-factors. So if say a lemon does not have any > > rutin in it does that mean it doesn't have any vitamin C? According to > > scientists, chemists and biochemists alike, when a food contains > ascorbic > > acid it can be said to contain Vitamin C. There is no other definition > > available. If it does not contain any bioflavonoids but contains > ascorbic > > acid it contains Vitamin C. If it only contains bioflavonoids but no > > ascorbic acid, it is not Vitamin C. > > > > > > > > Here are some links to further bolster my comments. > > > > > > > > http://www.medterms > <http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=12420> > .com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=12420 > > > > http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin> > .org/wiki/Vitamin > > > > If you look at that one you will see that the chemical name for > Vitamin C is > > ascorbic acid. Vitamin A on the other hand can be a retinoid which > includes > > retinol. C is different; it is and will always be synonymous with > ascorbic > > acid. > > > > > > > > Mark Schauss > > > > www.MarkSchauss.com > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > From: @ <mailto: %40> > > [mailto: @ <mailto: %40> > ] > > On Behalf Of Roe > > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:23 AM > > @ <mailto: %40> > > > Subject: [ ] Re: the best form of vitamin C > > > > > > > > Are you saying that ascorbic acid is not an an antioxidant? > > > > No what I am saying is that ascorbic acid is NOT vitamin C. In order > for you > > to understand this, one must understand Chemistry. In Chemistry there > are > > many structures that are exactly the same, but can be different. One > example > > that comes to mind is an isomer. ( FROM Wikipedia : In chemistry, > isomers > > are molecules with the same chemical formula and often with the same > kinds > > of bonds between atoms, but in which the atoms are arranged > differently. > > That is to say, they have different structural formula. Many isomers > share > > similar if not identical properties in most chemical contexts. ) > > (http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomer> .org/wiki/Isomer> > .org/wiki/Isomer) > > > > Further, from Wikipedia Ascorbic acid is an organic acid with > antioxidant > > properties. Its appearance is white to light yellow crystals or > powder. It > > is water soluble. The L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid is commonly known > as > > vitamin C. (http://en.wikipedia > <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> > .org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> > > .org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid) > > > > Vitamin C is a weak acid, called ascorbic acid or a salt ascorbate. It > is > > the L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid. The D-enantiomer shows no > biological > > activity. Both are mirror image forms of the same chemical molecular > > structure (see optical isomers). > > > > As stated, Ascorbic acid has antioxidan properties. What I am saying > is that > > one is wasting their money on pure ascorbic acid. Most of it is just > passed > > through the body in our urine. It is not absorbed and it is not > natural. One > > would be MUCH better off supplementing with a whole food antioxident > and NOT > > ascorbic acid. I know our DAN! Doctor tried to get us to take an > expensive > > powder of ascorbic acid, but I declined as I know too much chemistry > to > > agree with that school of thought. > > > > Sorry, I don't mean to seem pedantic, but I think people REALLY need > to be > > informed and research these supplements and " theories " before jumping > into > > action. Because I have the background, I spend a lot of time > researching > > things. > > > > The links that you have given are really an incorrect definition of > Vitamin > > C, but suitable for the general public. And by NO means am I disputing > that > > we all need lots of Vitamin C, but is should be naturally - NOT > synthetic > > like ascorbic acid. > > > > Roe > > > > PS. Try the same experiement with apple slices and PURE lemon juice > > (squeezed from a lemon) and ascorbic acid powder...guess what the PURE > lemon > > juice will not turn brown even longer than the ascorbic acid powdered > apple. > > > > > > ~ Roe > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2006 Report Share Posted October 17, 2006 Should be just fine. I actually like a buffered version as it's easier on the stomach than straight Vitamin C (aka ascorbic acid). _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of sue_lwsn Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:49 PM Subject: [ ] Re: the best form of vitamin C Er...so is my Vitamin C ascorbate (with buffered magnesium) by Biocare a good one then? then? > > > > Ascorbic acid is Vitamin C. What you are describing is Vitamin C with > > co-factors. None of the foods you mention have the same combination of > > bioflavanoids or other co-factors. So if say a lemon does not have any > > rutin in it does that mean it doesn't have any vitamin C? According to > > scientists, chemists and biochemists alike, when a food contains > ascorbic > > acid it can be said to contain Vitamin C. There is no other definition > > available. If it does not contain any bioflavonoids but contains > ascorbic > > acid it contains Vitamin C. If it only contains bioflavonoids but no > > ascorbic acid, it is not Vitamin C. > > > > > > > > Here are some links to further bolster my comments. > > > > > > > > http://www.medterms > <http://www.medterms <http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=12420> ..com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=12420> > .com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=12420 > > > > http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin> .org/wiki/Vitamin> > .org/wiki/Vitamin > > > > If you look at that one you will see that the chemical name for > Vitamin C is > > ascorbic acid. Vitamin A on the other hand can be a retinoid which > includes > > retinol. C is different; it is and will always be synonymous with > ascorbic > > acid. > > > > > > > > Mark Schauss > > > > www.MarkSchauss.com > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > From: @ <mailto: %40> > > [mailto: @ <mailto: %40> > ] > > On Behalf Of Roe > > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:23 AM > > @ <mailto: %40> > > > Subject: [ ] Re: the best form of vitamin C > > > > > > > > Are you saying that ascorbic acid is not an an antioxidant? > > > > No what I am saying is that ascorbic acid is NOT vitamin C. In order > for you > > to understand this, one must understand Chemistry. In Chemistry there > are > > many structures that are exactly the same, but can be different. One > example > > that comes to mind is an isomer. ( FROM Wikipedia : In chemistry, > isomers > > are molecules with the same chemical formula and often with the same > kinds > > of bonds between atoms, but in which the atoms are arranged > differently. > > That is to say, they have different structural formula. Many isomers > share > > similar if not identical properties in most chemical contexts. ) > > (http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia > <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomer> ..org/wiki/Isomer> .org/wiki/Isomer> > .org/wiki/Isomer) > > > > Further, from Wikipedia Ascorbic acid is an organic acid with > antioxidant > > properties. Its appearance is white to light yellow crystals or > powder. It > > is water soluble. The L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid is commonly known > as > > vitamin C. (http://en.wikipedia > <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> .org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> > .org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> > > .org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid) > > > > Vitamin C is a weak acid, called ascorbic acid or a salt ascorbate. It > is > > the L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid. The D-enantiomer shows no > biological > > activity. Both are mirror image forms of the same chemical molecular > > structure (see optical isomers). > > > > As stated, Ascorbic acid has antioxidan properties. What I am saying > is that > > one is wasting their money on pure ascorbic acid. Most of it is just > passed > > through the body in our urine. It is not absorbed and it is not > natural. One > > would be MUCH better off supplementing with a whole food antioxident > and NOT > > ascorbic acid. I know our DAN! Doctor tried to get us to take an > expensive > > powder of ascorbic acid, but I declined as I know too much chemistry > to > > agree with that school of thought. > > > > Sorry, I don't mean to seem pedantic, but I think people REALLY need > to be > > informed and research these supplements and " theories " before jumping > into > > action. Because I have the background, I spend a lot of time > researching > > things. > > > > The links that you have given are really an incorrect definition of > Vitamin > > C, but suitable for the general public. And by NO means am I disputing > that > > we all need lots of Vitamin C, but is should be naturally - NOT > synthetic > > like ascorbic acid. > > > > Roe > > > > PS. Try the same experiement with apple slices and PURE lemon juice > > (squeezed from a lemon) and ascorbic acid powder...guess what the PURE > lemon > > juice will not turn brown even longer than the ascorbic acid powdered > apple. > > > > > > ~ Roe > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2006 Report Share Posted October 17, 2006 Yes, is fine, Sue, as is plain ascorbic acid. [ ] Re: the best form of vitamin C > > > > > > > > Are you saying that ascorbic acid is not an an antioxidant? > > > > No what I am saying is that ascorbic acid is NOT vitamin C. In order > for you > > to understand this, one must understand Chemistry. In Chemistry there > are > > many structures that are exactly the same, but can be different. One > example > > that comes to mind is an isomer. ( FROM Wikipedia : In chemistry, > isomers > > are molecules with the same chemical formula and often with the same > kinds > > of bonds between atoms, but in which the atoms are arranged > differently. > > That is to say, they have different structural formula. Many isomers > share > > similar if not identical properties in most chemical contexts. ) > > (http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomer> .org/wiki/Isomer> > .org/wiki/Isomer) > > > > Further, from Wikipedia Ascorbic acid is an organic acid with > antioxidant > > properties. Its appearance is white to light yellow crystals or > powder. It > > is water soluble. The L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid is commonly known > as > > vitamin C. (http://en.wikipedia > <http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> > .org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid> > > .org/wiki/Ascorbic_acid) > > > > Vitamin C is a weak acid, called ascorbic acid or a salt ascorbate. It > is > > the L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid. The D-enantiomer shows no > biological > > activity. Both are mirror image forms of the same chemical molecular > > structure (see optical isomers). > > > > As stated, Ascorbic acid has antioxidan properties. What I am saying > is that > > one is wasting their money on pure ascorbic acid. Most of it is just > passed > > through the body in our urine. It is not absorbed and it is not > natural. One > > would be MUCH better off supplementing with a whole food antioxident > and NOT > > ascorbic acid. I know our DAN! Doctor tried to get us to take an > expensive > > powder of ascorbic acid, but I declined as I know too much chemistry > to > > agree with that school of thought. > > > > Sorry, I don't mean to seem pedantic, but I think people REALLY need > to be > > informed and research these supplements and " theories " before jumping > into > > action. Because I have the background, I spend a lot of time > researching > > things. > > > > The links that you have given are really an incorrect definition of > Vitamin > > C, but suitable for the general public. And by NO means am I disputing > that > > we all need lots of Vitamin C, but is should be naturally - NOT > synthetic > > like ascorbic acid. > > > > Roe > > > > PS. Try the same experiement with apple slices and PURE lemon juice > > (squeezed from a lemon) and ascorbic acid powder...guess what the PURE > lemon > > juice will not turn brown even longer than the ascorbic acid powdered > apple. > > > > > > ~ Roe > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.