Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 >Envelope-to: alvarez3@... >From: AndyCutler@... >Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:37:07 EDT >Subject: Re: Questions on urinary porphyrins test >alvarez3@... >X-Mailer: Thunderbird - Mac OS X sub 207 >X-Spam-Flag: NO >X-Virus: None found by Clam AV > >24 hour is fine. The issue is proper sample handling so as to not >destroy the analyte by exposing it to UV (sunlight, fluoresecent >lights) or air oxidation (shaking, agitation to mix it, pouring >samples into 24 hour collection bottle carelessly and creating a lot >of air bubbles). > >Andy >www.noamalgam.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 >Envelope-to: alvarez3@... >From: AndyCutler@... >Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:38:29 EDT >Subject: Re: Questions on urinary porphyrins test >alvarez3@... >X-Mailer: Thunderbird - Mac OS X sub 207 >X-Spam-Flag: NO >X-Virus: None found by Clam AV > > >In a message dated 9/23/06 2:53:48 PM, alvarez3@... writes: > > >>A third question. The pediatrician who wants to retest suggested that >>the elevation of porphyrins are not necessary linked to heavy metal >>toxicity. There are other options that need to be rule out first. >>What other problems could result in elevated porphyrins? > > >LIver disease such as mono, hepatitis, cancer, some genetic >disorders, other nonmetal toxicities, side effect of certain well >known medications. > > > >Andy >www.noamalgam.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 >Envelope-to: alvarez3@... >From: AndyCutler@... >Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:37:43 EDT >Subject: Re: Questions on urinary porphyrins test >alvarez3@... >X-Mailer: Thunderbird - Mac OS X sub 207 >X-Spam-Flag: NO >X-Virus: None found by Clam AV > > >In a message dated 9/23/06 2:53:48 PM, alvarez3@... writes: > > >>My understanding is that you >>recomend that any medication be stop for a week before testing. Is >>this correct? > > >Depends on the situation. I don't know that there is any interaction >and I do not recall ever making a recommendation. > > > >Andy >www.noamalgam.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 >Envelope-to: alvarez3@... >From: AndyCutler@... >Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:39:50 EDT >Subject: Re: Questions on urinary porphyrins test >alvarez3@... >X-Mailer: Thunderbird - Mac OS X sub 207 >X-Spam-Flag: NO >X-Virus: None found by Clam AV > > >In a message dated 9/23/06 2:53:48 PM, alvarez3@... writes: > > >>My last question regarding this test. The doctor who actually runs >>the test at the hospital was surprised that the pediatrician did not >>request feces and blood porphyrins, but she did not explain why. I >>was wondering if these other tests are necessary. > > >They are all thinking of looking for the genetic porphyrias, not >toxic or acquired porphyria. > >Depends on the situation but they seldom are. If blood is to be >drawn anyway you might as well check blood porphyrins, but don't get >him stuck just to do that. > > > >Andy >www.noamalgam.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 >Envelope-to: alvarez3@... >From: AndyCutler@... >Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:40:50 EDT >Subject: Re: Questions on urinary porphyrins test >alvarez3@... >X-Mailer: Thunderbird - Mac OS X sub 207 >X-Spam-Flag: NO >X-Virus: None found by Clam AV > >The most ineffective thing I see people do is " fight " with their >doctor about what is going on when the doc is trying to " prove " it >isn't something that is against his religion instead of help the sick person. > >Andy >www.noamalgam.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 >Envelope-to: alvarez3@... >From: AndyCutler@... >Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:41:50 EDT >Subject: Re: Questions on urinary porphyrins test >alvarez3@... >X-Mailer: Thunderbird - Mac OS X sub 207 >X-Spam-Flag: NO >X-Virus: None found by Clam AV > > >In a message dated 9/23/06 2:53:48 PM, alvarez3@... writes: > > >> Woods >>recommends the spot urine rather than a 24 hour collection. > > >Because he couldn't get any research subjects to participate in >trials where they had to collect a 24 hour sample, not for good >technical reasons. > > > >Andy >www.noamalgam.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2006 Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 The French Porphyrins test which is more extensive than the US one is morning urine only FWIW Mandi in UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.