Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 , > > Yes, TMG worked out to have twice as many x's as did DMG and TMG took her language from bare age minimum to two years above age level in about 5 days. I had just tested her language coincidentally the day before we started the TMG so thought that it would be fun to see the difference. That is reassuring that the book got this right. > > Also, Baker says that DMG with adequate folic acid can create formalydehyde???? At that time we could not use folinic acid or Folapro without having her be a weepy mess, so that and the hyperactivity made DMG a no go here. Do you mean withOUT here? I can't remember reading that particular part, but it certainly sounds scary. I'm going to go back and reread this. We've used folinic in the past, but never say anything at all and I had kind of decided to leave it in the not necessary pile. Thanks for this. We're doing a major rehaul on supps and any little bit of help is, well, very helpful :-) Anita > > > > > , > > I've been meaning to ask this for some time. Now that you have the > Pangborn book, would you say that the information in there regarding > whether to try DMG or TMG was accurate for your dgd? She's one of > the few kids I know who had a very noticeable bad reaction with DMG > and good one with TMG and I am very interested in knowing if that > particular information is accurate, at least in your case. > > If anyone else is familiar with the chart and how it applied to their > child I'd be very interested in hearing your experience. > > Thanks, > > Anita > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.