Re: hair results back

[Guest guest]

Joyce,

I was under the impression that this was a hair test by Doctor's Data called

Hair Elements. I'm not familiar with this kind of hair test. Without the

reference ranges for each item, it's hard to see what's normal and what's not.

What we're looking for is a specific pattern of abnormal levels/amounts of

specific items to see if it qualifies as derranged mineral transport. I can't

read this, but maybe someone else here can.

-------------- Original message --------------

From: " stemcellsugars3 " <joyce.beck@...>

Hi and everyone else out there;

The nutritional elements were as follows;calcium 40 inthe white range

on a purple and white chart,magnesium was 6.3,sodium was 60 ,potassium

3, copper 1.2, zinc 11, ohosphorus 9,iron0.8 ,manganese .216 chromium

0.04, selenium 0.08, boron, 0.20 cobalt,.001 , sulfer4496, and the

toxic elements were as followed uranium .0363, arsenic .006,

berylium,.0010,mercury 0.01 cadium .010 ,lead 0.10 aluminum 0.5 please

inform me if this is normal,. thank-you so much

joyce

[Guest guest]

You would need to tell us the brand test and give reference ranges.

Maybe even upload a copy of it if it's not from DDI.

>

> Hi and everyone else out there;

> The nutritional elements were as follows;calcium 40 inthe white

range

> on a purple and white chart,magnesium was 6.3,sodium was

60 ,potassium

> 3, copper 1.2, zinc 11, ohosphorus 9,iron0.8 ,manganese .216

chromium

> 0.04, selenium 0.08, boron, 0.20 cobalt,.001 , sulfer4496, and the

> toxic elements were as followed uranium .0363, arsenic .006,

> berylium,.0010,mercury 0.01 cadium .010 ,lead 0.10 aluminum 0.5

please

> inform me if this is normal,. thank-you so much

> joyce

>